-
Applied System Innovation
AI-Supported Objection Management in Public Participation: Concept, Prototype and Evaluation in the Context of Infrastructure Projects -
Catalysts
Cobalt Oxides and Co-Al Mixed Oxides as Thermo-, Photo- and Electrocatalytic Materials: Properties and Perspectives of Industrial Applications -
Sports
Do Long-Haul Travels and Jet Lag Affect Athletes' Physiological, Humoral and Performance Outcomes? -
AI
Epistemic Agency in the Age of LLMs -
Geosciences
The Changing Concept of Habitability on Earth, the Solar System, and Beyond
people of Brazil) is reanalysed in order to compare and contrast three kinds of probability
mass functions (PMFs): (i) quantitative response to a discrete range of counts; (ii) the [...] Read more.
people of Brazil) is reanalysed in order to compare and contrast three kinds of probability
mass functions (PMFs): (i) quantitative response to a discrete range of counts; (ii) the classic
Poisson distribution of miscounts; and (iii) psychometric (Rasch) distributions of counting
task difficulty and person counting ability. This reanalysis highlights how best to handle
PMFs which provide a means of defining—for discrete and qualitative data—the basic
metrics, viz. location and dispersion, of metrology—quality-assured measurement, as
increasingly required since the turn of the millennium in topical and challenging qualityassurance
applications, amongst others, in the human sciences and in Artificial Intelligence.
PMF-based metrics, useful in ’clinical’ and other applications where meaning and value
are sought, complement the traditionally dominating role played by the corresponding
probability density functions (PDF) in ’analytical’, quantitative and continuous Metrology
in Physics. New insights are provided when benchmarking the Rasch Poisson Counts
Model, which has received less attention in modern metrology, against full psychometric
Rasch modelling. Full article
Open Access Journals
-
Sustainability
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.1 -
Applied Sciences
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.9 -
IJMS
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.6 -
JCM
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.3 -
Sensors
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.0 -
Electronics
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.9 -
Materials
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.7 -
Energies
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.9 -
Mathematics
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.3 -
Buildings
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Molecules
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.1 -
Foods
IMPACT
FACTOR
6.0 -
Healthcare
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Remote Sensing
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.3 -
Diagnostics
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.8 -
Nutrients
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.8 -
Cancers
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.8 -
Processes
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Plants
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.7 -
Animals
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.2 -
Polymers
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.8 -
Water
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.5 -
Biomedicines
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.5 -
Land
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.5 -
Agriculture
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.5 -
Microorganisms
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.7 -
Medicina
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.9 -
Behavioral Sciences
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.2 -
JMSE
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.2 -
Cells
IMPACT
FACTOR
6.0 -
Life
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.9 -
Agronomy
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.1 -
Symmetry
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.2 -
Biology
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.3 -
Education Sciences
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.5 -
Biomolecules
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.6 -
Pharmaceuticals
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.7 -
Systems
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.8 -
Antioxidants
IMPACT
FACTOR
8.2 -
Nanomaterials
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.8 -
Pharmaceutics
IMPACT
FACTOR
6.9 -
IJERPH
-
Genes
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.1 -
Horticulturae
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Coatings
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Children
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.6 -
Religions
IMPACT
FACTOR
0.6 -
Micromachines
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.5 -
Machines
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.0 -
Bioengineering
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.4 -
Entropy
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.1 -
Metals
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.1 -
Forests
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.1 -
Minerals
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.7 -
Brain Sciences
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.4 -
Information
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.3 -
Insects
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.0 -
Pathogens
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.8 -
CIMB
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.1 -
Catalysts
IMPACT
FACTOR
4.5 -
Veterinary Sciences
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.7 -
Photonics
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.1 -
Antibiotics
IMPACT
FACTOR
5.5 -
Atmosphere
IMPACT
FACTOR
2.6 -
Viruses
IMPACT
FACTOR
3.8











