- Article
Regulation of mRNA 3′ poly(A) tail length plays a central role in post-transcriptional gene regulation by controlling mRNA stability and translational efficiency. Although cytoplasmic polyadenylation has been extensively studied in oocytes and neurons, the mechanisms that mediate post-transcriptional poly(A) tail extension in somatic cells remain incompletely understood. Here, we identify Ataxin-2L as a factor that promotes post-transcriptional poly(A) tail extension and translational activation. Using MS2 tethering assays, we found that recruitment of Ataxin-2L to a reporter mRNA increased mRNA abundance, protein output, and translation efficiency. Northern blot analysis showed that Ataxin-2L promoted poly(A) tail extension even when deadenylation was inhibited by catalytically inactive Caf1 and Pan2 mutants. A transcriptional turn-on assay further demonstrated an increase in poly(A) tail length after transcriptional induction, supporting a role for Ataxin-2L in post-transcriptional polyadenylation. Efficient poly(A) tail extension required the PAM2-mediated interaction with PABPC1 and was reduced by deletion of amino acids 671–842. Ataxin-2L also associated with the cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase PAPD4/TENT2, and this association remained detectable after deletion of amino acids 671–842. In addition, depletion of Ataxin-2L shortened the poly(A) tail of endogenous NUFIP2 and CUX1 mRNAs. Together, these findings establish Ataxin-2L as a mediator of cytoplasmic poly(A) tail extension and support a broader role for RNA-binding proteins in post-transcriptional polyadenylation in somatic cells.
13 November 2026




















![Bodies and minds self-assemble from single cells as a process of alignment and autopoiesis. (A) Most complex biological forms begin as one cell—a fertilized oocyte, commonly thought to be well-described by the laws of physics and chemistry. (B) A gradual, slow process of developmental morphogenesis results in the final form of the organism, which may have complex structure and a mind which may not believe it is a “machine”. Our transformation from a chemical soup into an active embodied mind is continuous but heterogeneous: (C) while we commonly think of ourselves as a unified intelligence with a “centralized” brain, the fact is that even the pineal gland, of which there is only one in the brain, is made of cells (C′) and those cells in turn are made of myriad other active components (C″)—we are a collective intelligence at all scales. (D) The creation of an “individual” out of an excitable medium such as an embryonic blastoderm with hundreds of thousands of cells is a dynamic process that is not hardwired: scratches made in that blastoderm would result in independent self-organization in each island, resulting in multiple embryos forming. This reveals the potentiality for some non-pre-determined number of minds to arise out of the same substrate. Images in (A,B,D) courtesy of Jeremy Guay of Peregrine Creative, used previously in [29]. Image (B) used with permission from [30]. Image in (C′) courtesy of Jose Calvo, Science Photo Library. Image in (C″) courtesy of Evan Ingersoll and Gaël McGill. Image (D) used with permission from [31].](https://mdpi-res.com/philosophies/philosophies-11-00161/article_deploy/html/images/philosophies-11-00161-g001-550.jpg)






