- Systematic Review
24 Pages
Background: Human milk-derived fortifiers (HumBMF) are an alternative to bovine protein-based fortifiers (BovBMF) for preterm infants, but their comparative effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. We evaluated the effects of HumBMF versus BovBMF in preterm or very low birth weight infants. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing use of HumBMF versus BovBMF to fortify human milk were identified through four databases and three trial registries (to 11 May 2026). At least two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Fixed-effect meta-analyses and GRADE assessments were performed. Prespecified analyses separated trials comparing fortifier type alone, in which any mother’s own milk (MOM) shortfall was supplemented with donor human milk (DHM) in both arms; and dual-intervention trials, in which MOM shortfall was also randomised to DHM in the HumBMF arm or preterm formula in the BovBMF arm. Results: Nine RCTs were included. In trials comparing fortifier type alone, there was no evidence that HumBMF reduced mortality (RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.29–1.23), low-certainty) or necrotising enterocolitis (NEC; RR 0.83 (0.39–1.78), very low-certainty). In dual-intervention trials, where MOM shortfall was supplemented with DHM rather than formula, NEC was lower (RR 0.45 (0.20–0.99), moderate-certainty). Conclusions: Current evidence does not demonstrate clinical advantages of HumBMF over BovBMF when added to the same human milk diet. Reductions in NEC occurred only where DHM also replaced preterm formula and cannot be attributed to fortifier type alone. Future research should distinguish the independent effects of fortifier composition from those of an exclusive human milk feeding strategy.
Nutrients
7 October 2026




![Bodies and minds self-assemble from single cells as a process of alignment and autopoiesis. (A) Most complex biological forms begin as one cell—a fertilized oocyte, commonly thought to be well-described by the laws of physics and chemistry. (B) A gradual, slow process of developmental morphogenesis results in the final form of the organism, which may have complex structure and a mind which may not believe it is a “machine”. Our transformation from a chemical soup into an active embodied mind is continuous but heterogeneous: (C) while we commonly think of ourselves as a unified intelligence with a “centralized” brain, the fact is that even the pineal gland, of which there is only one in the brain, is made of cells (C′) and those cells in turn are made of myriad other active components (C″)—we are a collective intelligence at all scales. (D) The creation of an “individual” out of an excitable medium such as an embryonic blastoderm with hundreds of thousands of cells is a dynamic process that is not hardwired: scratches made in that blastoderm would result in independent self-organization in each island, resulting in multiple embryos forming. This reveals the potentiality for some non-pre-determined number of minds to arise out of the same substrate. Images in (A,B,D) courtesy of Jeremy Guay of Peregrine Creative, used previously in [29]. Image (B) used with permission from [30]. Image in (C′) courtesy of Jose Calvo, Science Photo Library. Image in (C″) courtesy of Evan Ingersoll and Gaël McGill. Image (D) used with permission from [31].](https://mdpi-res.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=470%2Cheight=317/https://mdpi-res.com/philosophies/philosophies-11-00161/article_deploy/html/images/philosophies-11-00161-g001-550.jpg)



