Healthcare

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) has become a foundational component of modern healthcare globally. In Saudi Arabia, the understanding and application of EBP by respiratory therapists (RTs) remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess RTs’ behaviors, attitudes, awareness, knowledge, and barriers related to EBP. Methods: A previously validated online questionnaire was distributed to RTs across Saudi Arabia between February and July 2025. The survey collected sociodemographic data and included 14 items assessing behaviors, attitudes, awareness, knowledge, prior formal EBP training, and perceived barriers to EBP implementation. Results: A total of 301 RTs participated, with 290 completing the survey. Most participants (75.2%) held a bachelor’s degree. Overall, respondents demonstrated positive attitudes toward EBP, with more than 60% agreeing that understanding research methods is essential to respiratory therapy practice. The most frequently used resources for clinical decision-making were personal experience (67.3%), expert opinion (65.5%), and national or international guidelines (65.5%). Awareness of core EBP concepts was moderate; approximately 30% of participants reported a good understanding of terms such as “systematic review,” “quality of evidence,” and “risk of bias.” Several barriers to EBP implementation were identified, most commonly limited access to resources (25.2%), insufficient research knowledge and skills (23.8%), and lack of interest (21.0%). Conclusions: RTs in Saudi Arabia generally support EBP principles and use evidence-based resources in clinical decision-making. However, gaps in training, access to resources, and research competency limit full EBP implementation. Targeted strategies, including integrating mandatory EBP education, expanding professional development, and enhancing access to research resources, are recommended.

Background: As populations rapidly age, care robots have been proposed as a promising solution, supporting independent living and alleviating care burdens. However, acceptance of care robots among older adults remains limited. This study examined the relative contributions of demographic, health-related, digital competence, and technology-related psychological factors to care robot acceptance among older adults in South Korea. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 506 community-dwelling older adults. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to identify predictors of care robot acceptance, sequentially entering demographic characteristics, health-related factors, digital competence, and technology-related psychological variables. Results: Demographic and health-related factors were initially associated with care robot acceptance, but their effects diminished after accounting for digital competence and psychological variables. In the final model, technology-related psychological factors—particularly technology use self-efficacy and technology enthusiasm—were the strongest predictors of acceptance, while most demographic and health variables became non-significant, with the exception of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Conclusions: These findings indicate that psychological readiness and confidence in technology use outweigh demographic or health characteristics in shaping older adults’ acceptance of care robots. Interventions and design strategies that enhance self-efficacy, foster positive engagement, and support functional independence may be critical for promoting the effective and sustainable adoption of care robots in aging societies.

Healthcare systems worldwide are burdened significantly due to glaucoma, which is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. A total of 76 million are currently affected, and it is estimated that by the year 2040, 112 million will be affected by glaucoma. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a recent innovation that plays a key role in glaucoma management. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of MIGS devices and procedures and their use in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: A comprehensive electronic search of the PubMed database was conducted, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIGS devices and techniques with cataract surgery or other glaucoma procedures that had been published by 1 May 2025 were included. Results: Thirty RCTs were included in the systematic review. Studies show that MIGSs are as safe and effective as other procedures, including phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy, at lowering IOP. Conclusions: Short-term trials indicate that MIGSs are a safe and effective treatment option for primary open-angle glaucoma. MIGS procedures lead to favorable outcomes, including decreases in mean IOP and medication use, compared with other glaucoma procedures or standalone phacoemulsification. Independent long-term follow-up studies are needed further to elucidate the efficacy and long-term safety of MIGS.