Healthcare

Background/Objectives: Diabetes distress is a significant, often unaddressed, aspect of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS) is a key assessment tool, but no validated Arabic version exists for Saudi Arabia’s large T1D population. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Arabic T1-DDS to enable accurate assessment of diabetes-specific distress in Saudi adults with T1D. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Saudi adults with self-reported T1D. The T1-DDS underwent forward-backward translation, expert panel review, and cognitive debriefing. Participants completed an online survey containing the 28-item Arabic T1-DDS, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Psychometric evaluation included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), and convergent validity. A multivariable generalized linear model identified predictors of distress. Results: The analysis included 837 participants (73.8% female, mean age 27.22 ± 7.8 years). The Arabic T1-DDS demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.934). EFA/CFA supported a robust four-factor structure, confirming model fit (χ²/df = 1.313, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.019). The mean overall distress score was 2.74 (SD = 1.05), with 72.4% reporting moderate-to-high distress. Distress correlated moderately with depression (r = 0.58) and anxiety (r = 0.52). Multivariable analysis identified higher PHQ-9 (RR = 1.178) and GAD-7 scores (RR = 1.063) as significant predictors of elevated distress, while insulin pump use was protective (RR = 0.938). Conclusions: The Arabic T1-DDS is a valid and reliable tool for Saudi adults with T1D. Its use revealed a high prevalence of diabetes distress, strongly linked to psychological symptoms and mitigated by insulin pump therapy. Integrating this scale into routine clinical care can facilitate timely psychosocial support, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Since October 2019, Lebanon has faced continuous sociopolitical and economic instability. Clinical psychologists have played a central role in responding to rising mental health needs, yet little is known about their own psychological well-being. Methods: This study examined mental health outcomes among 157 certified psychologists (clinical and educational psychologists) working in Lebanon. A cross-sectional study was conducted with psychologists aged 30–53 years across all Lebanese governorates, who were recruited through snowball and word-of-mouth sampling. Participants completed validated measures of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (LAS-10), perceived stress (PSS-10), subjective well-being (WHO-5), eating attitudes (EAT-26), and self-esteem (A-SISE). Results: Results showed that 44% of participants reported at least mild depressive symptoms, 14% met criteria for anxiety, and 57% experienced moderate to high perceived stress, while most showed no risk for eating disorders. Bivariate and multivariate analyses identified self-esteem as a predictive factor, negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress, and positively associated with subjective well-being. Additional risk factors included younger age, being unmarried, not having children, prior psychological history, health problems, lower income, and working as an educational rather than clinical psychologist. Conclusions: These findings highlight aspects of vulnerability among psychologists and underline the need for targeted interventions for at-risk groups. Strengthening self-esteem may contribute to enhancing clinicians’ mental health. However, these conclusions should be interpreted in light of several limitations, including the small sample size, the non-probability and gender-skewed nature of the sample, partly due to the relatively limited number of practicing psychologists in Lebanon.

Introduction: Stroke is a severe neurological condition associated with high rates of mortality and disability. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze the efficacy of early mobilization (EM) on the quality of life and the dependency levels in stroke patients. Additionally, the impact on anxiety and depression, the occurrence of adverse effects, and length of hospital stay were assessed. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The search was restricted to randomized controlled trials published within the last 10 years that included EM as an intervention in the experimental group. The Cochrane tools were used to assess risk of bias, and the PEDro scale was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Nine studies were included in this review. Findings indicated that EM performed within 24–48 h post-stroke reduces dependency levels; however, no significant improvement in quality of life was observed. Evidence regarding anxiety and depression was inconclusive, and no significant differences were reported between groups concerning adverse events or reduction in hospital stay duration. Conclusions: This review demonstrates that EM is beneficial for reducing dependency after stroke, but there is no evidence of a significant improvement in quality of life. Further research is needed to establish clear protocols and appropriate intervention doses.