- Article
24 Pages
Urban renewal has become an important policy approach for advancing sustainable urban development. However, systematic evidence remains limited on how local urban renewal policies differ in their design under a common national policy agenda. This study examines comprehensive urban renewal policy documents from 19 cities (districts) included in China’s first batch of national urban renewal pilots. Drawing on a Topics–Objectives–Instruments (TOI) framework, it combines Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, structured content coding, percentile-based scoring, TOI index construction, and cluster analysis to compare policy design across cities. The analysis identifies six shared policy topics and reveals substantial cross-city variation in the relative articulation of policy topics, objectives, and instruments. Based on 23 coded indicators, the TOI index further demonstrates marked differences in the breadth and intensity of policy articulation. Cluster analysis identifies four exploratory policy design configurations: Multidimensional Comprehensive, Demand-Incentive, Environmental-Regulation, and Supply-Support. These configurations differ primarily in the relative emphasis placed on policy topics, objectives, and demand-side, supply-side, and environmental instruments. Robustness tests show high stability under alternative scoring, weighting, indicator, and sample specifications; document-length standardization produces moderate changes in exact city rankings, while the overall cross-city pattern remains stable. Overall, the findings demonstrate that cities operating within a common national urban renewal agenda exhibit both shared thematic foundations and differentiated patterns of emphasis across policy objectives and instruments. By translating local policy texts into comparable configurations of topics, objectives, and instruments, the TOI framework provides a systematic basis for identifying variation in local urban renewal policy design.
Sustainability
11 October 2026




