Testimonials
What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
This paper was our first publication in the Multimodal Technologies and Interaction journal. It was a pleasure to manage the process with our associated editor, who was very active and
[...] Read more.
This paper was our first publication in the Multimodal Technologies and Interaction journal. It was a pleasure to manage the process with our associated editor, who was very active and communicative from the first steps of the submission process until our paper became available. The publication process was fluent and transparent.
Article in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction:
Multimodal Approach of Improving Spatial Abilities
Less
It is a pleasure to share our experience with the peer review and publication process of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. The editors demonstrated exceptional professionalism and provided clear, timely,
[...] Read more.
It is a pleasure to share our experience with the peer review and publication process of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. The editors demonstrated exceptional professionalism and provided clear, timely, and supportive communication throughout every stage of the process. The reviewers offered rigorous and relevant suggestions that helped us to improve the scientific article.
Finally, the review process was efficient and fast, reflecting the journal's commitment to quality and author support. The collaboration of the editorial team and their dedication to ensuring the quality of the published work are worth mentioning.
Publishing in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction has been a positive experience, and I would highly recommend this scientific journal to researchers looking for a professional, rigorous, and author-centred publishing platform.
Thank you for this opportunity to reflect on and share our positive experience.
Article in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction:
Science Mapping of AI as an Educational Tool Exploring Digital Inequalities: A Sociological Perspective
Less
The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review,
[...] Read more.
The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, and publishers must find a way to properly value it. My experience in this regard with MDPI publications is very positive.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team
[...] Read more.
My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team is responsive and supportive. This facilitates a smooth and rewarding review experience, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of
[...] Read more.
The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of MDPI.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for
[...] Read more.
There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for major revisions, which was very good; it provides deadlines similar to other journals for minor revisions. After acceptance, it was published online within 3 to 5 days, which is quite amazing.
Article in Energies:
The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model
Less
Publishing in Antioxidants has been a very positive experience. The editors were professional and helpful, and the reviewers were knowledgeable. In addition, the whole process was smooth and rapid, resulting
[...] Read more.
Publishing in Antioxidants has been a very positive experience. The editors were professional and helpful, and the reviewers were knowledgeable. In addition, the whole process was smooth and rapid, resulting in a noticeable improvement to the paper. I would recommend this journal to anyone considering publishing in this area.
Article in Antioxidants:
Oxidative Stress in Genetic Cataract Formation
Less
The publishing in Algorithms was really joyful, mostly because of editing assistance. All of the mismatches with the Journal format in draft versions of my paper were clearly highlighted, which
[...] Read more.
The publishing in Algorithms was really joyful, mostly because of editing assistance. All of the mismatches with the Journal format in draft versions of my paper were clearly highlighted, which made a correcting process smooth and fast. Also all of the reviews of the paper were thoughtful and allowed me to improve its quality.
Article in Algorithms:
Not So Robust after All: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks to Unseen Adversarial Attacks
Less
I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They
[...] Read more.
I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They care that the review is appropriate, fast, and reliable. They recognise its importance and demonstrate it.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.
[...] Read more.
I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were
[...] Read more.
I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were handled promptly and professionally, and this greatly contributed to a very satisfactory publishing experience for us as the authors. I highly recommend the journal to any authors wishing to publish open access.
Article in Energies:
Demand-Side Management as a Network Planning Tool: Review of Drivers, Benefits and Opportunities for South Africa
Less
The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow.
[...] Read more.
I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional
[...] Read more.
I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional team. In addition, there is a very good and stimulating system of vouchers and bonuses. For this reason, I no longer use other publishers for magazine publications. Very fast manuscript processing and review process. Maximum service and support from the technical team.
Article in Energies:
Short-Term Hydro-Thermal-Solar Scheduling with CCGT Based on Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm
Less
Publishing our research with Algorithms was a rewarding experience. The peer-review process was quick and thorough, providing us with constructive feedback that significantly improved our paper. We are grateful to
[...] Read more.
Publishing our research with Algorithms was a rewarding experience. The peer-review process was quick and thorough, providing us with constructive feedback that significantly improved our paper. We are grateful to the reviewers and the editorial team for their professionalism and support. We greatly appreciate the clear and efficient handling of our publication.
Article in Algorithms:
Advancing Pulmonary Nodule Diagnosis by Integrating Engineered and Deep Features Extracted from CT Scans
Less
Publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been an excellent experience. The review process offered us valuable and insightful feedback, allowing us to significantly improve the quality of our
[...] Read more.
Publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been an excellent experience. The review process offered us valuable and insightful feedback, allowing us to significantly improve the quality of our paper. The editorial team was responsive and provided all necessary information, while the proofreading and publishing process was managed efficiently and supportively. Based on this positive experience, I highly recommend Algorithms to any colleague seeking a journal that offers a rigorous and constructive publishing journey.
Article in Algorithms:
Numbers Do Not Lie: A Bibliometric Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Fake News Research
Less
My experience of publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been exceptional, starting from the review process through which we have received a series of constructive and insightful feedback
[...] Read more.
My experience of publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been exceptional, starting from the review process through which we have received a series of constructive and insightful feedback - which has significantly improved the quality of our paper; continuing with the editorial team - which has responded prompt and clear to our needs; and ending with the proofreading and publishing process - which has been done in a supportive and efficient manner. Given this positive experience with the journal, I highly recommend Algorithms to any colleague seeking a constructive yet rigorous publishing experience.
Article in Algorithms:
Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Agent-Based Modeling Applications: A Bibliometric Study
Less
Displaying testimonial 1-20 on page 1 of 66.