Testimonials

I am pleased to share my positive experience with the manuscript submission and peer-review process at MDPI Technologies. The editorial team demonstrated an exceptionally high level of professionalism and efficiency throughout the entire process, from initial submission to final publication. The workflow was well-structured, transparent, and supported by clear and timely communication at every stage. The reviewers provided thorough, constructive, and valuable feedback, which significantly enhanced the scientific quality of our manuscript. I would confidently recommend this journal to researchers seeking a transparent, efficient, and high-quality publication process.

Article in Technologies: Integration of Road Data Collected Using LSB Audio Steganography

Less

Our experience with the ‘Technologies’ journal’s peer review process has been very smooth and efficient. The reviewers provided constructive feedback that significantly improved the quality of our manuscript, and the editorial team was supportive and responsive at every stage. We truly appreciate the clarity and professionalism maintained throughout the process. We would be pleased to publish with this journal again in the future and will also suggest it to our colleagues.

Article in Technologies: Physiological Artifact Suppression in EEG Signals Using an Efficient Multi-Scale Depth-Wise Separable Convolution and Variational Attention Deep Learning Model for Improved Neurological Health Signal Quality

Less

I sincerely appreciate the support of the MDPI Technologies Editorial Office during the process of publishing an article in the Special Issues of Technologies (MDPI). Quick and clear communication made the experience positive and efficient. I also thank the reviewers for their constructive suggestions for improving the quality of the manuscript, making it clearer, more complete and more precise. Thank you for your commitment to high publishing standards. It was a pleasure to work with such a professional editorial team! I highly recommend this journal to researchers in this field.

Article in Technologies: Analysis of Concentrated Solar Power Potential in the Photovoltaic Competitive Landscape

Less

Our experience with Technologies was very positive from start to finish. The peer-review process was constructive and thorough, and the reviewers’ observations helped us significantly strengthen the manuscript. We especially appreciated the clear communication and prompt support provided by the editorial team throughout the different stages of revision and production. The process was efficient, transparent, and handled with great professionalism. We highly recommend this MDPI journal to colleagues seeking a rigorous and well-managed publication experience.

Article in Technologies: Unsupervised Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Hydropower Systems via Time Series Clustering and Autoencoders

Less

The peer review process at MDPI journals, particularly in Technologies, Water, and Energies, the ones to I recently sent scientific papers, has consistently demonstrated rigor, transparency, and efficiency. As both an author and reviewer, I have witnessed how this system strengthens the scientific record and fosters meaningful supports.
Manuscripts undergo thorough evaluation by experts with diverse technical backgrounds. In Technologies, reviewers ensure that innovation is substantiated by methodological soundness. In Water, the focus is on practical applicability and sustainability of solutions. In Energies, reviewers emphasize both technical robustness and societal impact, ensuring that contributions advance the global energy transition. MDPI’s open peer review option promotes accountability, while the structured review reports provide authors with clear, actionable guidance. Feedback is not limited to identifying weaknesses; it often highlights opportunities for improvement, strengthening the clarity, reproducibility, and relevance of the work.
The editorial workflow is remarkably efficient, balancing speed with depth. Authors benefit from timely decisions without compromising the integrity of the review. This is particularly valuable in fast-evolving fields such as water management, renewable energy systems and digital water technologies, where rapid dissemination of validated knowledge is essential. By bridging engineering, environmental sciences, and social dimensions, MDPI journals encourage reviewers to consider broader impacts. This interdisciplinary lens ensures that published research is not only technically sound but also aligned with societal needs and policy frameworks. Serving as a reviewer is intellectually rewarding. It allows one to engage with cutting-edge research, contribute to the advancement of knowledge, and uphold the standards of scientific communication. The process embodies the collaborative spirit of academia, with recognitions for next submissions, where critical evaluation and constructive dialogue drive progress.
What I can say more, is the peer review in MDPI journals such as Technologies, Water, and Energies is a cornerstone of scientific integrity. It combines rigor, transparency, and efficiency, ensuring recognition for reviewers and authors, where published work is both technically robust and socially relevant. Participating in this process is not only a professional duty but also a privilege that strengthens the collective pursuit of knowledge.

Article in Technologies: Energy Storage Systems in Micro-Grid of Hybrid Renewable Energy Solutions

Less

Publishing in Technologies was an excellent experience. The review process was highly professional, constructive, and remarkably thorough, providing valuable insights that significantly improved the quality of our paper. The reviewers’ comments were detailed and thoughtful, demonstrating deep technical understanding. The editorial team handled the entire process efficiently and with great professionalism. Overall, I found Technologies to uphold a very high standard of peer review and author support.

Article in Technologies: Hardware Design of DRAM Memory Prefetching Engine for General-Purpose GPUs

Less

Our experience with Limnological Review was extremely positive. The entire submission and peer-review process was handled with care and efficiency. We greatly valued the detailed and insightful feedback provided by the reviewers, which helped us enhance the clarity and scientific quality of our work. Throughout the process, the editorial staff were professional, responsive, and supportive, always maintaining clear and courteous communication, and I greatly appreciated it. We highly recommend this MDPI journal for publication.

Article in Limnological Review: Effect of Surrounding Detritus on Phragmites australis Litter Decomposition: Evidence from Laboratory Aquatic Microcosms

Less

Publishing our article in Limnological Review was a highly satisfying experience. The peer-review process, managed by the editorial staff and handled by expert reviewers, was rigorous, efficient and enriching. We received detailed, constructive comments that significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the professionalism, friendliness and timely communication from both the editorial team and the editor throughout every stage. The swift handling and high-quality editorial service reflect the excellent standards of Limnological Review and MDPI. We would confidently recommend this journal to authors seeking a transparent, accessible and scientifically rigorous publication.

Article in Limnological Review: A New Machine Learning Algorithm to Simulate the Outlet Flow in a Reservoir, Based on a Water Balance Model

Less

Our first experience publishing with Gels was a very pleasant one. The review process has been quite fast, with the reviewers providing useful comments and feedback that significantly improved our manuscript. We are also very grateful for the swift and kind support from the Editorial Office during the revision process. We hope to publish in Gels in the future and will strongly suggest it to our colleagues.

Article in Gels: Gelatin/Cerium-Doped Bioactive Glass Composites for Enhancing Cellular Functions of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hBMSCs)

Less

"I highly recommend publishing in Limnological Review, because I was very impressed with the handling of my manuscript by the Editorial Team at Limnological Review. I deeply appreciate the assistance and cooperation from the Editorial Staff. They were very kind and helpful. The reviewers' valuable comments were very useful and greatly improved my manuscript."

Article in Limnological Review: Annual and Seasonal Trends in Density, Biomass, and Secondary Production of Chironomid Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Middle Reaches of the Shinano River, Japan, 2015–2019

Less

The process for publishing our article in Gels was very constructive. The reviewers contributed comments that improved the submitted article. In addition, we consider that the time between submission and publication was very fast. We thank the reviewers and editors for their excellent performance.

Article in Gels: Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach

Less

Publishing with Gels has been a truly satisfying experience. From the very beginning, the editorial team was incredibly responsive, supportive, and patient in addressing every one of my queries. Their clear communication and timely updates made the entire peer-review and publication process smooth and stress-free. I was particularly impressed by how professionally they handled each step, guiding me with genuine care and clarity; the process felt personal, not mechanical. I highly recommend Gels to fellow researchers seeking not just the high-quality publication of their work, but a collaborative and respectful editorial experience.

Article in Gels: Development and Optimization of Kunzea ericoides Nanoemulgel Using a Quality by Design Approach for Transdermal Anti-Inflammatory Therapy

Less

The turnaround time of MDPI journals is good, and the editorial team are very prompt in dealing with inquiries related to the submitted manuscript. The quality of feedback from peer reviewers is also great. As a whole, my team has had a good experience with MDPI journals.

Article in Energies: Strengthening Power Systems for Net Zero: A Review of the Role of Synchronous Condensers and Emerging Challenges

Less

The overall experience was excellent. The reviewing and editing services were both responsive and highly supportive, contributing to a smooth publication process. Highly recommend.

Article in Energies: Review and Evaluation of Multi-Agent Control Applications for Energy Management in Buildings

Less

Reliable and honest editors. Cooperativeness in the manuscript revision process. Understanding and flexibility in communication. High scientific level and rigor. It promotes original and valuable results and their critical analysis. Good guidance in the process of revising the manuscript and high standards of editing and presentation.

Article in Energies: A Comprehensive Review of Multi-Use Platforms for Renewable Energy and Aquaculture Integration

Less

In the last decade it is my reference publisher, where I have published most of my research works, and I have not had the slightest problem, in any sense.

Article in Energies: Internal Combustion Engines and Carbon-Neutral Fuels: A Perspective on Emission Neutrality in the European Union

Less

I have been working with MDPI for some time, and I think I can give an objective opinion about this publisher. The publishing process is simple and based on clear criteria. The publisher ensures the highest standards in terms of the review process and evaluation of submitted manuscripts. New features and tools are constantly being developed to limit unethical behavior in science. For me, cooperation with MDPI is an honor and a great pleasure.

Article in Energies: Municipal Solid Waste as a Renewable Energy Source: Advances in Thermochemical Conversion Technologies and Environmental Impacts

Less

I had a positive experience publishing with MDPI! The submission process was streamlined and efficient, with clear guidance at each stage. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, which made the peer review process smooth and constructive. I appreciated the transparency and speed of the review process, as it allowed me to quickly address feedback and finalize my paper. Overall, MDPI’s focus on open access and rapid publication is fantastic, and I’d gladly work with them again for future projects!

Article in Energies: The Role of Lightweight AI Models in Supporting a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy: A Systematic Review

Less

I encourage any academic who has not published with MDPI before to try the process at least once. In terms of leadtime, responsiveness, and the right balance of power between authors, reviewers, and editors, publishing with MDPI is truly a refreshing experience.

Article in Energies: From Aggregate Production Planning to Aggregate Energy Industrial Consumption Plans

Less

Excellent following-up and helpful process on publication of a scientific article.

Article in Energies: Simulation of a Continuous Pyrolysis Reactor for a Heat Self-Sufficient Process and Liquid Fuel Production

Less