Education Sciences

This article reports on a comparative case study that examined the ground rules used to facilitate a dialogic space in two discrete and diverse research studies: Year 5 & 6 children learning to code with ScratchMaths as part of their mathematics programmes, and crop farmers in rural east Africa developing their practice through various communications. The intention was to see if there were common actions or principles important for the establishment of ground rules in dialogic spaces in general. Understanding the nature of dialogic space has become increasingly important in many areas of education. STEM subjects, particularly when integrated, frequently involve collaborative interaction, and utilise a dialogical approach. Some initial aspects of ground rules were collaboratively identified, with both studies then independently analysed to identify emerging themes related to these ground rules. Several key elements emerged: developing the processes for interaction and communication; developing trust between participants; developing respectful dialogue; teacher roles; and facilitating collaborative work and the co-construction of meaning. The comparative case study suggested that these were important for other education work when establishing dialogic space.

Teachers’ language assessment literacy (LAL) encompasses the knowledge and competencies required to design and implement assessment practices that support learning. Although prior research has documented general trends in LAL development, less is known about how individual teachers, particularly student teachers, interpret, appropriate, and negotiate formative assessment (FA) task design within the context of initial teacher education (ITE). Adopting an in-depth qualitative case study approach, this study examines how a single student teacher in a Chinese initial teacher education developed her cognition and classroom practice related to FA tasks across a teaching methodology course and a practicum. Drawing on thematic analysis of semi-structure interviews, lesson plans, classroom observations, stimulated recall interviews, and reflective journals, the study traces developmental changes and the contextual factors shaping the student teacher’s LAL in relation to FA tasks. Findings show that the sustained engagement with FA task design supported more sophisticated understandings of FA, including (1) an increased recognition of the pedagogical necessity of incorporating authentic FA tasks into lesson planning, (2) a growing aspiration to implement FA-oriented instruction that promotes higher-order thinking, (3) an enhanced awareness of the empowering role of FA tasks in fostering students’ self-regulated learning, and (4) a more nuanced understanding of the challenges inherent in implementing FA practices. Meanwhile, the case illustrates how pre-existing assessment conceptions, school culture norms, and limited targeted mentoring can constrain LAL development in relation to FA. By providing a fine-grained account of developmental processes, this study offers insights into how ITE can mediate student teachers’ engagement with FA task design. The findings have implications for teacher education programs in other similar educational contexts, particularly regarding the integration of FA task design into assessment courses and the provision of sustained, context-sensitive support during teaching practicum.

Never before has the role of the federal government in underwriting U.S. higher education been more visible than in the early months of the second Trump Administration. The Administration’s aggressive anti-DEI and anti-science attacks have exposed the reliance within higher education, especially among research institutions, on federal grantmaking infrastructure. In this paper, we use the (e)quality politics framework to analyze the Trump Administration’s attack on federal grantmaking infrastructure as well as the response and/or resistance from targeted institutions and concerned advocates. Bringing this theoretical model into conversation with present-day empirics allows us to not only parse the underlying, racialized ideology of these political moves but to surface political and practical insights for organized resistance.