Agriculture 2026, 16(11), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252 (registering DOI) - 5 Jun 2026
Abstract
Accurate estimation of crop yield from remote sensing remains challenging due to the crop-specific nature of yield drivers and the difficulty of interpreting spectral indicators across agronomic systems. While many studies prioritise predictive accuracy through complex models, fewer explicitly examine the stability and
[...] Read more.
Accurate estimation of crop yield from remote sensing remains challenging due to the crop-specific nature of yield drivers and the difficulty of interpreting spectral indicators across agronomic systems. While many studies prioritise predictive accuracy through complex models, fewer explicitly examine the stability and physiological relevance of individual spectral and phenological indicators under controlled analytical conditions. This study investigates yield–spectral relationships in wheat and cotton using a unified Sentinel-2 indicator framework applied across multiple growing seasons in a Mediterranean agricultural environment. A consistent set of spectral and thermal indicators was derived from two phenologically targeted Sentinel-2 acquisitions per season and analysed using correlation analysis, univariate regression, constrained multivariate modelling, and recurrence analysis within an identical workflow for both crops. Distinct crop-specific patterns were observed. Wheat yield was most strongly associated with water-sensitive and canopy-related indicators, with NDWI-based metrics reaching Pearson correlations up to r = 0.85 and multivariate models explaining a substantial proportion of yield variability (up to R2 ≈ 0.70) under controlled analytical conditions. In contrast, cotton yield variability was dominated by thermal accumulation, with growing degree day indicators showing correlations up to |r| = 0.59 and multivariate performance reaching R2 = 0.74. Recurrence analysis indicated consistent recurrence of these indicator families across analytical stages under the examined conditions. Overall, the results indicate that parsimonious, physiologically interpretable indicator combinations can account for a meaningful proportion of yield variability without reliance on highly complex or high-dimensional modelling approaches, supporting crop-aware indicator selection for precision agriculture applications.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote and Proximal Sensing for Arable Crops Monitoring and Yield Assessment)
