Cancers

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer with rapid progression and a high relapse rate, highlighting the urgent need for effective treatments. While recent advances in drug therapies and combination regimens have improved outcomes, relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML still shows low response rates, poor prognosis, and limited survival. The lack of effective immunotherapies further complicates the management of R/R AML. The bone marrow tumor microenvironment (TME) poses a significant barrier, requiring multifaceted, combined therapeutic strategies for clinical success. This TME creates an immunosuppressive and metabolically challenging environment that limits the expansion, persistence, cytotoxicity, and survival of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Unlike CD19 in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), AML lacks a truly leukemia-specific antigen. Although clinical trials are ongoing, no CAR-T therapies have received FDA approval for AML. This paper explores the reasons behind these ongoing challenges.

Peritoneal metastases represent one of the most dreadful manifestations of gastric cancer and continue to drive poor outcomes despite significant advances in systemic therapy. Accurate staging—beginning with laparoscopy—remains essential for avoiding non-beneficial surgery and ensuring appropriate allocation to systemic or locoregional treatment pathways. Although modern systemic agents, including immunotherapy and targeted therapies, have transformed the broader management of metastatic disease, their impact in the peritoneal compartment remains limited, reflecting its unique biological and pharmacokinetic constraints. Locoregional approaches such as CRS–HIPEC, PIPAC, and NIPS have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium and have shown encouraging signals in selected populations. Recent randomized studies, including ESTOK01 and PERISCOPE II, emphasize the importance of careful patient selection, technical standardization, and optimal sequencing, while ongoing trials—such as PREVENT, GASTRICHIP, and CONVERGENCE—seek to refine the integration of systemic and intraperitoneal strategies. Yet the field continues to advance without the benefit of validated predictive biomarkers capable of guiding therapeutic decisions. This limitation constrains clinical progress and underscores the need for a stronger translational framework. Future improvement in the management of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases will depend on the identification of robust biological predictors of response, enabling more rational patient selection and the development of truly personalized multimodal approaches.

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial, multi-organ syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, anorexia, and progressive depletion of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Despite its high prevalence among patients with advanced malignancies, effective therapeutic options remain limited. Recent studies have elucidated the molecular underpinnings of CC and the therapeutic potential of natural herbs, highlighting the involvement of central nervous system regulation, adipose tissue, immune responses, gut microbiota, skeletal muscle, and disruptions in anabolic–catabolic signaling pathways such as mTOR, UPS, NF-κB, and STAT3. Persistent inflammation induces E3 ubiquitin ligases (Atrogin-1/MuRF-1) through cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-α, thereby impairing muscle homeostasis, while suppression of anabolic cascades such as IGF-1/mTOR further aggravates muscle atrophy. The limited efficacy and adverse effects of synthetic agents like megestrol acetate underscore the value of herbal therapies as safer adjunctive strategies. Botanicals such as Coicis Semen, Scutellaria baicalensis, and Astragalus demonstrate anti-inflammatory and muscle-preserving activities by modulating NF-κB, IL-6, and oxidative stress signaling. Numerous investigations indicate that these herbs downregulate MuRF-1 and Atrogin-1 expression, enhance appetite, and attenuate muscle loss, though they exhibit minimal influence on tumor suppression. While promising, current evidence remains largely preclinical and mechanistic validation is incomplete. This review consolidates contemporary insights into CC pathogenesis and the bioactivity of herbal interventions, highlighting the need for translational research to bridge preclinical findings with clinical applicability.