Soil aeration is a widely used field method to remove subsurface methane (CH
4) following natural gas (NG) pipeline leaks, reducing safety risks and enabling site recovery. However, conventional aeration practices often rely on generalized guidance and do not explicitly account for
[...] Read more.
Soil aeration is a widely used field method to remove subsurface methane (CH
4) following natural gas (NG) pipeline leaks, reducing safety risks and enabling site recovery. However, conventional aeration practices often rely on generalized guidance and do not explicitly account for site-specific soil conditions, resulting in inefficient CH
4 removal and prolonged cleanup times. This study investigated the influence of soil properties and aeration system design on CH
4 removal using controlled field-scale experiments and a validated multiphase transport model. Six field-scale aeration experiments and 39 numerical simulations were conducted across representative soil types, soil moisture conditions, vacuum pressures, and bar hole configurations. Results show that CH
4 removal occurs in two distinct stages: an initial advection-dominated removal phase followed by a slower diffusion-controlled phase. More than 50% of the residual CH
4 mass was removed within the first 10 min of aeration in permeable soils, while greater than 90% removal was achieved within 30 min under favorable conditions. Increasing vacuum pressure improved CH
4 removal by approximately 15 percentage points after 60 min and increased the effective radius of influence of individual bar holes. Soil permeability exerted a primary control on performance, with high-permeability soils exhibiting substantially faster CH
4 removal and larger treatment zones than lower-permeability soils. Bar hole configuration was equally important; properly spaced bar holes improved plume coverage and removal efficiency, whereas excessive overlap reduced aeration effectiveness through airflow interference. Overall, the results demonstrate that CH
4 removal during NG soil aeration is governed by coupled interactions among soil properties, moisture conditions, vacuum pressure, and bar hole deployment. Incorporating these factors into aeration system design can improve removal efficiency, reduce aeration duration, and provide utilities with a quantitative basis for safer and more effective NG leak mitigation.
Full article