In flooded soils, the concentrations of exchangeable Mn
2+ and, especially, Fe
2+ can be high and must be considered when determining the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil under flooded conditions. However, these reduced forms of Mn and Fe are oxidized and precipitated during the extraction process used in traditional CEC methods. This procedure underestimates the exchangeable portion of these cations and, consequently, the CEC value of the flooded soil. We introduce a pH-gradient-based model to predict ECEC and exchangeable Fe
2+ in flooded soils, circumventing oxidation artifacts inherent in conventional methods. The objective of this study is to propose an alternative to estimate the exchangeable Fe
2+ and the effective CEC (ECEC) of flooded soils. To achieve this goal, 21 surface samples (0–20 cm) of soil from rice fields were collected and distributed in the cultivation regions of southern Brazil. The soils were flooded for 50 days. The soil solution was collected on the first day and after 50 days of flooding and pH, Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe and Mn were determined. In these samples, exchangeable cations (K, Na, Ca, Mg, Mn, Al and H + Al) were determined to calculate ECEC and CEC at pH 7 of unflooded soil and after 50 days of flooding. There was a wide range of variation in the exchangeable cation contents among the soil samples. The K contents ranged from 0.12 to 0.54 cmol
c kg
−1, the Na contents from 0.00 to 1.18 cmol
c kg
−1, the Ca contents from 0.48 to 37.31 cmol
c kg
−1, the Mg contents from 0.10 to 15.53 cmol
c kg
−1, the Mn contents from 0.01 to 0.36 cmol
c kg
−1, the Al contents from 0.10 to 1.74 cmol
c kg
−1 and the H + Al contents from 2.01 to 8.42 cmol
c kg
−1. The results were used to develop models to predict ECEC and exchangeable Fe content after 50 days of flooding. Estimating the ECEC after flooding using the pH gradient before and after flooding yielded values closer to CEC pH 7.0, correcting for the possible underestimation of the ECEC during flooding. The amount of exchangeable Fe estimated was higher than the exchangeable Fe determined, correcting the possible underestimation of these quantities determined during flooding. It is concluded that the estimations of ECEC after flooding through the equation
, where
pHsol.before is pre-flooding soil pH,
pHsol.after is after flooding pH,
ECECafter is effective CEC after flooding and the exchangeable Fe
2+ after flooding through the equation
where
Feexc.after.estimated is estimated exchangeable Fe
2+ after flooding corrected the problem of underestimating the values of these variables by analytical methods, demonstrating its viability for use in flood-prone soils.
Full article