Journal Description
Current Oncology
Current Oncology
is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that since 1994 represents a multidisciplinary medium for clinical oncologists to report and review progress in the management of this disease, and published monthly online by MDPI (from Volume 28, Issue 1 - 2021). The Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO), Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology (CAGPO), Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) and others are affiliated with Current Oncology and their members receive discounts on the article processing charges.
- Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
- High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, SCIE (Web of Science), PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC, Embase, and other databases.
- Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (Oncology)
- Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 22.8 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 2.6 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2025).
- Recognition of Reviewers: APC discount vouchers, optional signed peer review, and reviewer names published annually in the journal.
- Journal Clusters of Oncology: Cancers, Current Oncology, Onco and Targets.
Impact Factor:
3.4 (2024);
5-Year Impact Factor:
3.3 (2024)
Latest Articles
Machine Learning in Biomarker-Driven Precision Oncology: Automated Immunohistochemistry Scoring and Emerging Directions in Genitourinary Cancers
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010031 - 6 Jan 2026
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is essential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker assessment in oncology, but manual interpretation is limited by subjectivity and inter-observer variability. Machine learning (ML), a computational subset of AI that allows algorithms to recognise patterns and learn from annotated datasets to
[...] Read more.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is essential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker assessment in oncology, but manual interpretation is limited by subjectivity and inter-observer variability. Machine learning (ML), a computational subset of AI that allows algorithms to recognise patterns and learn from annotated datasets to make predictions or decisions, has led to advancements in digital pathology by supporting automated quantification of biomarker expression on whole-slide images (WSIs). This review evaluates the role of ML-assisted IHC scoring in the transition from validated biomarkers to the discovery of emerging prognostic and predictive IHC biomarkers for genitourinary (GU) tumours. Current applications include ML-based scoring of routinely used biomarkers such as ER/PR, HER2, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, PD-L1, and Ki-67, demonstrating improved consistency and scalability. Emerging studies in GU cancers show that algorithms can quantify markers including androgen receptor (AR), PTEN, cytokeratins, Uroplakin II, Nectin-4 and immune checkpoint proteins, with early evidence indicating associations between ML-derived metrics and clinical outcomes. Important limitations remain, including limited availability of training datasets, variability in staining protocols, and regulatory challenges. Overall, ML-assisted IHC scoring is a reproducible and evolving approach that may support biomarker discovery and enhance precision GU oncology.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Open AccessArticle
Improving Prognostic Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer Through a Combined Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index Score
by
Takuya Miura, Hisashi Kessoku, Masato Nagaoka, Yohei Morishita, Toshiki Kobayashi and Hiromi Kojima
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010030 - 5 Jan 2026
Abstract
This study evaluated whether a composite index combining the systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), the coSII–PNI score, enhances prognostic prediction in head and neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 166 patients who underwent curative surgery between 2015 and 2023. Patients
[...] Read more.
This study evaluated whether a composite index combining the systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), the coSII–PNI score, enhances prognostic prediction in head and neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 166 patients who underwent curative surgery between 2015 and 2023. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the coSII–PNI score (range, 0–2) derived from preoperative blood data. The optimal cutoff values for SII and PNI were 743 and 49, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between the SII and PNI (r = −0.386, p < 0.01). Patients with a high coSII–PNI score (low SII + high PNI) showed significantly better disease-free and overall survival than those with lower scores (both p < 0.01). The areas under the curve for predicting prognosis were 0.649 for SII, 0.717 for PNI, and 0.730 for the coSII–PNI score. These findings indicate that integrating systemic inflammation and nutritional status improves prognostic accuracy compared with either index alone. Therefore, the coSII–PNI score may serve as a simple, practical preoperative biomarker for risk stratification in patients with head and neck cancer.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Postoperative Survival Analysis of Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery with Liver Cirrhosis: A Propensity-Matched Study
by
Tsung-Jung Tsai, Kai-Jyun Syu, Xuan-Yuan Huang, Yu Shih Liu, Chang-Wei Chen, Yu-Yao Chang, Yen-Hang Wu and Tsung Chuang
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010029 - 5 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background: Liver cirrhosis increases perioperative risk in colorectal cancer surgery, yet data on long-term outcomes remain limited. In this study, we evaluated postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival in cirrhotic patients. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort, 53 cirrhotic patients undergoing elective colectomy or
[...] Read more.
Background: Liver cirrhosis increases perioperative risk in colorectal cancer surgery, yet data on long-term outcomes remain limited. In this study, we evaluated postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival in cirrhotic patients. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort, 53 cirrhotic patients undergoing elective colectomy or proctectomy (2011–2022) were propensity score-matched 1:1 with non-cirrhotic controls. Perioperative variables, complications, and survival were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed for right hemicolectomy and non-right hemicolectomy procedures. Kaplan–Meier and logistic regression analyses were implemented to assess outcomes and risk factors. Results: Cirrhotic patients had higher preoperative MELD-Na scores and lower albumin and hemoglobin levels. They experienced greater blood loss, longer operative times, more ICU admissions, and higher rates of major complications (18.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). Mortality was higher at in-hospital (7.5% vs. 0%), 3-month (9.4% vs. 0%), and 60-month (66% vs. 28.3%) intervals, and these patients’ overall survival was shorter (70.7 vs. 116.8 months, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that the adverse impact of cirrhosis persisted for both right hemicolectomy and non-right hemicolectomy procedures, with significantly worse long-term survival in cirrhotic patients. Postoperative complications after right hemicolectomy did not differ significantly between groups. Among cirrhotic patients, Child–Turcotte–Pugh class B predicted worse survival than class A (40.1 vs. 84.8 months, p = 0.006). Preoperative hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) independently predicted long-term mortality (HR = 3.93). Conclusions: Elective colorectal surgery in patients with cirrhosis is associated with increased perioperative complications and significantly reduced long-term survival. However, postoperative outcomes after right hemicolectomy in cirrhotic patients were comparable to those of non-cirrhotic patients, despite their persistently poorer long-term survival. Optimization of nutritional status and careful preoperative assessment of hepatic reserve are essential to improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Advances in the Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessCase Report
Multiple Endocrinology Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Related to Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Two Cases of TNBC Patients: Case Reports and Literature Review
by
Khashayar Yazdanpanah Ardakani, Gaia Passarella, Andrea Gerardo Antonio Lania, Thoma Dario Clementi, Alessandro Fanti, Francesca Fulvia Pepe, Serena Capici and Marina Elena Cazzaniga
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010028 - 4 Jan 2026
Abstract
Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, showed promising results in the treatment of different types of solid tumors and generally an improvement in overall survival and patients’ outcome. However, as a drug that targets the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor response, it simultaneously
[...] Read more.
Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, showed promising results in the treatment of different types of solid tumors and generally an improvement in overall survival and patients’ outcome. However, as a drug that targets the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor response, it simultaneously increases the risk of autoimmune reactions, producing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These irAEs might involve any body organ, and in some cases may lead to treatment discontinuation. In this article, we discuss two cases of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, who developed irAEs during the course of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, highlighting the mechanism of the reactions, possible clinical manifestations, and potential management.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessSystematic Review
Olanzapine Plus Triple Antiemetic Therapy for the Prevention of Platinum-Based Delayed-Phase Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis
by
Wenlin Gong, Hongxin Qie, Yuxiang Xu, Peiyuan Wang, Jinglin Gao and Mingxia Wang
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010027 - 4 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common treatment-related side effect that has a detrimental effect on the quality of life of patients with cancer and may lead to dose reductions or discontinuation of chemotherapy. This meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy
[...] Read more.
Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common treatment-related side effect that has a detrimental effect on the quality of life of patients with cancer and may lead to dose reductions or discontinuation of chemotherapy. This meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy and safety of olanzapine plus triple antiemetic therapy for prevention of delayed-phase platinum-based CINV. Methods: Electronic databases (five English databases: (I) PubMed, (II) ScienceDirect, (III) The Cochrane Library, (IV) Scopus, and (V) EMBASE, and two Chinese databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Database) were searched for trials that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine plus triple antiemetic in preventing platinum-based CINV. Efficacy was no nausea, complete control, and complete response (CR) rates in the acute, delayed, and overall phases after chemotherapy. Data were analyzed using the random effects model and fixed effects model. Results: A total of 18 trials involving 3110 patients were identified, including 9 controlled trials and 9 single-arm trials. The meta-analysis of nine studies, which showed significant heterogeneity (p = 0.002, I2 = 67%), demonstrated that the olanzapine (OLN) group had a significantly higher rate of delayed CR compared to the control group (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.57–3.46, p < 0.00001). Compared with the Without OLN group, the With OLN group had a significant overall CR (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.80–2.63, p < 0.00001, heterogeneity: p < 0.00001, I2 = 69%), and a significant acute CR (OR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.45–3.58, p < 0.00001, heterogeneity: p = 0.04, I2 = 51%). The meta-analysis revealed that the With OLN group could significantly increase the risk of dry mouth compared to the Without OLN group (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.73–3.91). In terms of insomnia, the odds ratio for the With OLN group was significantly lower than that for the Without OLN group (OR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.89). Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis provide robust evidence that adding olanzapine to standard triple therapy significantly improves the prevention of platinum-based delayed-phase CINV, a setting where current antiemetic regimens often prove suboptimal. However, it also increases the risk of certain adverse events, especially dry mouth. Clinical decisions should be made based on a thorough assessment of the therapeutic benefits and safety risks.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Palliative and Supportive Care)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Evolving Practices in Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Impact of the 2015 ATA Guidelines
by
Benard Gjeloshi, Leonardo Rossi, Carlo Enrico Ambrosini, Chiara Becucci, Piermarco Papini, Andrea De Palma, Luigi De Napoli, Marco Puccini and Gabriele Materazzi
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010026 - 2 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The extent of initial surgical resection for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains debated. Traditionally, total thyroidectomy (TT) has been the standard approach, although the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines endorsed a more conservative strategy. The real-world adoption of these
[...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The extent of initial surgical resection for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains debated. Traditionally, total thyroidectomy (TT) has been the standard approach, although the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines endorsed a more conservative strategy. The real-world adoption of these recommendations, however, is unclear. This study evaluated changes in the surgical management of low-risk PTC in a high-volume center following the implementation of the ATA guidelines and analyzed the impact on postoperative outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 1644 patients who underwent surgery for localized low-risk PTC < 4 cm between 2014 and 2023. Temporal trends in the initial surgical procedure (TT vs. thyroid lobectomy [TL]) were analyzed overall and by tumor size and patient demographics. The need for completion thyroidectomy after TL and postoperative outcomes were also assessed. Results: The use of TL increased from 0% in 2014 to 59.4% in 2023 (p < 0.001). For microcarcinomas, TL rose from 17.5% in 2016 to 78% in 2023, with similar but less pronounced trends for 1–2 cm tumors. TT remained predominant for nodules > 2 cm. The completion thyroidectomy rate declined from 32% in 2016 to 4% in 2022. Patients undergoing TT experienced higher rates of postoperative complications (12.4% vs. 3.0%), particularly transient hypoparathyroidism (8.9% vs. 0%), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (1.8% vs. 0%), as well as longer operative time and hospital stay (all p < 0.001). The incidence of hypoparathyroidism decreased over time as TL use increased. Conclusions: Adoption of the 2015 ATA guidelines has progressively increased the use of TL in the management of low-risk PTC. This shift in surgical practice is associated with a reduction in the overall postoperative complication burden at the population level, largely driven by decreased hypoparathyroidism. Although guideline uptake has been gradual, current trends suggest increasing acceptance of less aggressive surgical strategies in routine clinical practice.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Thyroid Cancer Management)
►▼
Show Figures

Graphical abstract
Open AccessReview
Reawakening Differentiation Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review of ATRA-Based Combination Strategies
by
Shinichiro Takahashi
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010025 - 2 Jan 2026
Abstract
(1) Background: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has transformed the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) by inducing terminal myeloid differentiation. However, its efficacy in non-APL acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is limited. Exploring combination strategies that enhance ATRA-induced differentiation may broaden its therapeutic potential.
[...] Read more.
(1) Background: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has transformed the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) by inducing terminal myeloid differentiation. However, its efficacy in non-APL acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is limited. Exploring combination strategies that enhance ATRA-induced differentiation may broaden its therapeutic potential. (2) Methods: A literature search of PubMed using the keywords “ATRA,” “myeloid,” and “differentiation inducer or enhancer” identified more than 500 published papers as of November 2025. Pre-clinical and clinical studies were reviewed, with a focus on mechanisms, combination partners, and translational relevance. (3) Results: Clinical evidence confirms that ATRA combined with arsenic trioxide or epigenetic modulators achieves high remission rates in APL and selected AML subtypes. Pre-clinical studies show synergistic differentiation effects when ATRA is combined with CDK and kinase inhibitors, nucleotide synthesis inhibitors, DNA-damaging agents, Bcl-2/MDM2 inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, cytokines, glycosylation modifiers, natural products, and antibiotic-derived compounds. Mechanistically, these combinations modulate key signaling pathways (MAPK, Akt, JAK/STAT), stabilize RARα, remodel chromatin, and perturb nucleotide metabolism. Although translation to non-APL AML remains limited, these findings provide a rational basis for future clinical trials. (4) ATRA-based combination therapies represent a promising strategy to extend differentiation therapy beyond APL. This review, authored solely by the investigator, highlights molecular targets and potential enhancers warranting further clinical evaluation in AML.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Is Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy a Safe and Effective Strategy for Cervical Cancer?—A Review of Current Evidence
by
Hui Xiao, Fuxin Guo, Zhenyu Wang, Kangjia Pei, Shuhua Wei, Ang Qu, Junjie Wang and Ping Jiang
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010024 - 1 Jan 2026
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite advancements in HPV vaccination and screening. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a critical role in managing CC, but conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) is limited by long treatment
[...] Read more.
Cervical cancer (CC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite advancements in HPV vaccination and screening. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a critical role in managing CC, but conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) is limited by long treatment durations, which reduce patient adherence, increase the risk of treatment interruptions, and impair healthcare access in LMICs. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) may offer a promising alternative, delivering higher doses per fraction with fewer total fractions, thus shortening treatment duration and alleviating the burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Early clinical data suggest that MHRT achieve acceptable short- to medium-term tumor control with manageable toxicity. However, the small sample sizes and limited follow-up in published studies preclude definitive conclusions about long-term efficacy and safety. This review synthesizes the existing clinical evidence to outline the potential benefits and inherent limitations of MHRT in CC management and highlight the need for future large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials with rigorous quality assurance protocols. These findings also have implications for the potential implementation of MHRT in LMICs.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecologic Oncology)
Open AccessArticle
Impacts of Self-Esteem and Self-Perceived Burden on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Does Age Matter?
by
Lei Dou, Li Liu, Zhichen Liu, Yajing Wang, Hui Guo, Yiqun Xiao, Meizhu Pan, Yuli Song, Hui Wu and Yi Zhang
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010023 - 1 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer, the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, is characterized by a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study examined the mediating role of self-perceived burden (SPB) in the impact of self-esteem on HRQoL and whether age moderated the associations among
[...] Read more.
Background: Ovarian cancer, the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, is characterized by a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study examined the mediating role of self-perceived burden (SPB) in the impact of self-esteem on HRQoL and whether age moderated the associations among ovarian cancer patients. Methods: 203 patients effectively completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and SPB scale, respectively. For the FACT-G, physical (PWB), social/family (SFWB), emotional (EWB), and functional well-being (FWB) were scored separately. Results: Significant mediation of SPB in the impacts of self-esteem on PWB (a × b = 0.074, 95% CI: 0.018, 0.153), EWB (a × b = 0.048, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.125), and FWB (a × b = 0.056, 95% CI: 0.009, 0.114) were revealed. Age positively moderated the impact of self-esteem on SPB (β = 0.159, p < 0.05), and the associations of SPB with PWB (β = 0.173, p < 0.05) and EWB (β = 0.240, p < 0.01), indicating a moderated mediation. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients’ self-esteem could improve the PWB, EWB, and FWB domains of HRQoL by reducing SPB. Age could attenuate SPB’s mediation in the impacts of self-esteem on PWB and EWB, indicating stronger impacts in younger patients. Clinical programs integrating components that strengthen self-esteem and reduce SPB may be particularly beneficial for younger women with ovarian cancer.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Psychosocial Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Psychosocial Barriers and Social Perceptions in Oncology Patients with Tracheostomy: Case–Control Study
by
Tomasz Jurys, Milena Orzażewska, Karolina Klimek, Eliza Działach, Jarosław Markowski and Mateusz Grajek
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010022 - 31 Dec 2025
Abstract
Patients with respiratory tract malignancies who undergo tracheostomy often experience profound psychosocial challenges related to visible anatomical changes and altered communication. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychosocial barriers and perceived social acceptance in patients living with a tracheostomy, compared with
[...] Read more.
Patients with respiratory tract malignancies who undergo tracheostomy often experience profound psychosocial challenges related to visible anatomical changes and altered communication. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychosocial barriers and perceived social acceptance in patients living with a tracheostomy, compared with patients treated for similar cancers without requiring a tracheostomy. A matched case–control study with frequency matching at the group level was conducted including 150 patients with permanent tracheostomies and 150 matched controls treated with organ-preserving approaches. Groups were frequency-matched at the group level based on age, sex, primary tumor site, and disease stage at diagnosis. Participants completed a study-specific questionnaire assessing social withdrawal, self-consciousness, and perceived reactions of others using a five-point Likert scale. A composite Psychosocial Barrier Score was calculated, and subgroup analyses examined differences according to gender and age. Patients with tracheostomies demonstrated significantly higher psychosocial burden than controls, with markedly elevated composite scores and higher endorsement of stigma-related items. Female and younger patients within the tracheostomy group reported the greatest psychosocial difficulties, including increased social avoidance and reduced confidence in public settings. In contrast, gender- and age-related differences were minimal in the control group. These findings indicate that tracheostomy is strongly associated with heightened psychosocial barriers and perceived social stigma, particularly among younger and female patients. Integrating targeted psychosocial support into routine post-treatment care may be essential to improve social reintegration and quality of life in this population.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Psychosocial Oncology)
Open AccessArticle
A Novel Approach to Reducing Chemoresistance in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Effect of Itraconazole—A Single-Institution Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
by
Ahmed E. S. Besheir, Sahar M. El-Hagar, Hesham A. Tawfik and Tarek M. Mostafa
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010021 - 31 Dec 2025
Abstract
Background: The five-year survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer remains less than 50%, secondary to chemotherapy resistance. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effects of itraconazole as a supplementary treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin on malignancy response and in preventing the
[...] Read more.
Background: The five-year survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer remains less than 50%, secondary to chemotherapy resistance. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effects of itraconazole as a supplementary treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin on malignancy response and in preventing the initial development of chemoresistance in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Method: This randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study involved 60 chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced epithelial ovarian malignancy who were randomized into two arms; the placebo and itraconazole groups. The placebo group received six chemotherapy cycles and four inactive capsules, while the itraconazole group received six chemotherapy cycles and 400 mg oral itraconazole for five days per cycle. Results: Following completion of six chemotherapy cycles and when contrasted with the control arm, the itraconazole arm demonstrated statistically significant improvements in tumor response. The objective response rate was 80% in the itraconazole group compared with 47% in the placebo group (p = 0.015), while the disease control rate was 100% versus 80%, respectively (p = 0.023). The median progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time point at which 50% of patients experienced disease progression or death, was 13.5 months for the overall study population. PFS was evaluated as a fixed-time endpoint at 18 months following completion of chemotherapy for the overall study population. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the itraconazole group, with 70% of patients remaining progression-free compared with 26.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.001). Also, the itraconazole group produced significant declines in the serum levels of CA-125 (p = 0.005) and p-glycoprotein (p = 0.042) with significant elevation in VEGFR-2 (p = 0.006) as compared to the control group. Itraconazole was safe and its use was associated with a significant improvement in the quality of life (QOL). Conclusions: Itraconazole could represent a promising add-on therapy to enhance tumor response to chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecologic Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Graphical abstract
Open AccessReview
A Canadian Perspective on Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by
Saqib Raza Khan, Enxhi Kotrri, Daniel Breadner, Vijayananda Kundapur and Mita Manna
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010020 - 30 Dec 2025
Abstract
The management strategies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have changed over the last few years. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and conventional chemotherapy, patients with resectable NSCLC remained at high risk of future recurrence. Clinical trials have demonstrated improvements in response
[...] Read more.
The management strategies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have changed over the last few years. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and conventional chemotherapy, patients with resectable NSCLC remained at high risk of future recurrence. Clinical trials have demonstrated improvements in response rates, pathological outcomes, and survival with the perioperative approach. Considering the findings of these landmark trials, there is a pressing need to contextualize and incorporate these global developments into the national practice framework. This review outlines key developments from recent clinical trials, with a focus on perioperative strategies in early-stage operable NSCLC from a Canadian perspective. We discuss the integration of checkpoint inhibitors in the perioperative setting for patients without actionable genomic alterations, adjuvant targeted therapies for EGFR and ALK mutant disease, and emerging tools such as ctDNA based minimal residual disease monitoring. The article also addresses the practical challenges of implementing these advances within the Canadian healthcare system, including systemic therapy approvals, barriers, and importance of multidisciplinary care to guide clinicians in optimizing patient outcomes.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgery in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Combination Cancer Therapy and Reference Models for Assessing Drug Synergy in Glioblastoma
by
Semyon A. Sinyavskiy, Nelly S. Chmelyuk, Daria Yu. Travnikova, Vsevolod V. Belousov and Tatiana O. Abakumova
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010019 - 29 Dec 2025
Abstract
Glioblastoma is currently an incurable disease despite the development of a wide variety of therapeutic approaches, from surgical methods to immunotherapy. In current clinical practice, treatment typically involves a combination of existing methods, often comprising three stages: tumor resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Modern
[...] Read more.
Glioblastoma is currently an incurable disease despite the development of a wide variety of therapeutic approaches, from surgical methods to immunotherapy. In current clinical practice, treatment typically involves a combination of existing methods, often comprising three stages: tumor resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Modern research offers improved chemotherapy strategies, as well as combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy. However, the efficacy of these therapies is profoundly influenced by factors such as tumor and peritumoral heterogeneity, alongside complex molecular signaling pathways. Optimizing glioma treatment requires a rigorous mechanistic understanding of individual approaches and their synergistic effects. This review comprehensively details current glioblastoma therapeutic strategies and critically evaluates key reference models for assessing combination therapy efficacy and their inherent limitations. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms and models will refine the investigation of observed therapeutic effects and accelerate the translation of promising in vitro approaches to effective clinical management of malignant gliomas.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuro-Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Lessons from a National Liquid Biopsy Program to Provide Cancer Testing and Treatment for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
by
Anna Lapuk, Benjamin L. S. Furman, Pedro Feijao, Ebru Baran, Sonal Brahmbhatt, Betty Chan, Ka Mun Nip, Adrian Kense, Brenda Murphy, Ruth Miller, Vincent Funari, Alicja Parker, Melissa K. McConechy, Shaqil Kassam, Arif A. Awan, Bryan Lo, Daniel Breadner, Barry D. Stein and David G. Huntsman
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010018 - 29 Dec 2025
Abstract
Personalized cancer treatment depends on the accurate and timely detection of the patient tumor variants. LBx enables minimally invasive tumor mutation profiling. We report results of a pan-Canadian LBx program for patients with advanced solid tumors. Plasma samples were tested at Imagia Canexia
[...] Read more.
Personalized cancer treatment depends on the accurate and timely detection of the patient tumor variants. LBx enables minimally invasive tumor mutation profiling. We report results of a pan-Canadian LBx program for patients with advanced solid tumors. Plasma samples were tested at Imagia Canexia Health accredited laboratory using the clinically validated Follow It 38-gene panel. A proprietary platform was used to identify clinically relevant variants in the circulating tumor DNA and report results following accepted international guidelines on clinical significance. A total of 4229 eligible patients submitted samples for LBx testing, and reports for 97% of them were delivered within ~8 days. More than 80% of Canadian oncologists from >150 institutions across 12 provinces (11% from rural centers) participated in the project. The patient cohort consisted mostly of advanced or metastatic lung, breast, and colon cancers. ctDNA mutations were detected in >50% of cases, and clinical trials were recommended for 76% of all participants. Health economics modeling analysis found that Follow It® in combination with tissue biopsy was cost-saving and resulted in an additional 0.1138 QALYs gained relative to tissue biopsy alone. The successful pan-Canadian implementation of a cost-effective, robust LBx testing program demonstrated its sustained demand and feasibility, and its potential economic and health benefits.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology Biomarkers)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Shifting Survival Horizons in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Conditional Survival Perspective
by
Aydan Farzaliyeva, Huseyin Akilli, Ozden Altundag, Esra Kuscu and Nejat Ozgul
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010017 - 29 Dec 2025
Abstract
Advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is defined by biological heterogeneity and poor outcomes, and traditional survival metrics fail to reflect the evolving nature of prognosis as patients survive longer. This study aimed to evaluate conditional survival (CS) in advanced EOC using both overall
[...] Read more.
Advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is defined by biological heterogeneity and poor outcomes, and traditional survival metrics fail to reflect the evolving nature of prognosis as patients survive longer. This study aimed to evaluate conditional survival (CS) in advanced EOC using both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) metrics to provide a dynamic understanding of long-term outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 808 patients with FIGO stage III–IV EOC who underwent surgery at Baskent University Ankara Hospital between 2004 and 2024. CS estimates were calculated for additional 1- and 5-year intervals among patients who had already survived 6 months, 1, 3, or 5 years after surgery. Median OS and PFS were 4.37 and 1.70 years, respectively. Peritoneal dissemination and platinum resistance were independent predictors of poor survival. Approximately 11% of patients achieved survival beyond ten years. The 1-year CS-OS increased from 87% at 6 months to 95% at 5 years, while the 5-year CS-OS rose from 49% to 66%; corresponding CS-PFS values increased from 89% to 95% and from 44% to 62%. Conditional survival analysis underscores that prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer is not static but continually improves with time survived and sustained disease control. These insights redefine long-term outcomes and provide a modern foundation for individualized patient counseling and survivorship planning.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecologic Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Graphical abstract
Open AccessArticle
Emerging Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in Argentina and Brazil: Insights from the TOTEMM Study in the Private Healthcare Sector
by
Vania Hungria, Angelo Maiolino, Roberto Jose Pessoa de Magalhães, Filho, Marcelo Pitombeira de Lacerda, Guillermina Remaggi, Paula Scibona, Cristian Seehaus, Erika Brulc, Nadia Savoy, Dorotea Fantl, Claudia Soares, Gabriela Abreu, Juliana Queiroz, Graziela Bernardino, Straus Tanaka, Mariano Carrizo, Ventura A. Simonovich, Tais Bertoldo Teixeira Fernandes and Bhumika Aggarwal
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010016 - 29 Dec 2025
Abstract
As treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) evolve, there is a need for real-world insights into treatment patterns and outcomes. The treatment practices and clinical outcomes in patients with MM (TOTEMM) was a database study (2018–2024) of newly
[...] Read more.
As treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) evolve, there is a need for real-world insights into treatment patterns and outcomes. The treatment practices and clinical outcomes in patients with MM (TOTEMM) was a database study (2018–2024) of newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with MM in Argentina (TOTEMM-A) and Brazil (TOTEMM-B) in a private healthcare setting. In TOTEMM-A (n = 72) and TOTEMM-B (n = 892), 37 and 92 different drug regimens were reported, respectively. In each country, treatment duration reduced across lines of therapy (LOT) (TOTEMM-A: range, 6.2–3.4 months; TOTEMM-B: range, 4.4–3.5 months); attrition rates increased across LOT (TOTEMM-A: range, 52.8–86.1%; TOTEMM-B: range, 41.9–88.0%); triplet regimens (mainly bortezomib based) were used most frequently in first-line (1L); >75% relapsed within 12 months, regardless of the drug prescribed; over 90% of relapses occurred between 1L and second-line, and up to half of patients were rechallenged with the same drug; >65% of patients experienced disease progression after 1L; and the 1- to 5-year adjusted cumulative risk of progression or death increased across LOT (TOTEMM-A: range, 47.1–88.5%; TOTEMM-B: range, 40.4–91.7%). The rapid and marked progression underscores the urgent need for novel treatments and regimens.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessConference Report
The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report
by
Christine Brezden-Masley, Katarzyna J. Jerzak, Nancy A. Nixon, Anne Koch, Amanda Roberts, Jean-François Boileau, May Lynn Quan, MJ DeCoteau and Tulin D. Cil
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010015 - 27 Dec 2025
Abstract
The 2025 Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium (CBCS) brought together patients, clinicians and researchers from across Canada to discuss advances shaping personalized breast cancer care. Key updates in systemic therapy highlighted expanding treatment options, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, oral SERDs, PI3K/AKT-targeted therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates
[...] Read more.
The 2025 Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium (CBCS) brought together patients, clinicians and researchers from across Canada to discuss advances shaping personalized breast cancer care. Key updates in systemic therapy highlighted expanding treatment options, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, oral SERDs, PI3K/AKT-targeted therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates across early and metastatic settings. Radiation oncology sessions emphasized treatment de-escalation, featuring evidence for ultra-hypofractionation, selective omission of nodal irradiation, and stereotactic strategies to manage oligoprogression. Surgical presentations focused on reducing morbidity through tailored axillary management and emerging techniques to prevent lymphedema. Advances in the management of central nervous system metastases underscored the growing synergy between stereotactic radiotherapy and CNS-active systemic therapies. Informed by patient testimony and advocacy perspectives, experts reflected on persistent gaps in diagnosis, access, and survivorship that shape priorities for future improvements. Together, these insights outline key directions that help to refine clinical practice and guide future research.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
►▼
Show Figures

Graphical abstract
Open AccessArticle
Low HALP Score Predicts Prolonged Hospitalization in Solid Tumor Patients with Febrile Neutropenia
by
Salih Karatlı and Doğan Yazılıtaş
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010014 - 27 Dec 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious chemotherapy-related complication in patients with solid tumors. Identifying simple and accessible biomarkers that can predict prolonged hospitalization may support early risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective study included 169 adults hospitalized with FN between
[...] Read more.
Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious chemotherapy-related complication in patients with solid tumors. Identifying simple and accessible biomarkers that can predict prolonged hospitalization may support early risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective study included 169 adults hospitalized with FN between January 2023 and January 2025. Immunonutritional indices, including the Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP) score, the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), as well as the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) score were calculated. HALP and PNI were categorized using ROC-derived cut-offs based on the Youden Index. Prolonged hospital stay was defined as a binary variable based on the cohort median (>9 days). Spearman correlation, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of prolonged hospitalization. Results: HALP showed a significant negative correlation with hospitalization duration (r = −0.469; p < 0.001), as did serum albumin (r = −0.184; p = 0.017) and PNI (r = −0.273; p < 0.001). CAR (p = 0.617) and neutrophil count (p = 0.955) demonstrated no correlation. In univariate logistic regression, low HALP (p < 0.001), low PNI (p = 0.001), intermediate CISNE (p = 0.002), high CISNE (p < 0.001), microbiological culture positivity (p < 0.001), and sex (p = 0.015) were significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization. Age, comorbidity status, metastatic stage, and CAR were not significant. In the multivariate model, low HALP (p < 0.001), intermediate CISNE (p = 0.007), high CISNE (p < 0.001), and culture positivity (p < 0.001) remained independent predictors. PNI (p = 0.400) and sex (p = 0.176) did not retain significance. Conclusions: A Low HALP score, higher CISNE risk categories, and microbiological culture positivity independently predicted prolonged hospitalization in FN. HALP, as a simple and inexpensive immunonutritional marker, may enhance early FN risk assessment when used alongside validated clinical tools such as CISNE or MASCC.
Full article

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Prognostic Value of the PET/CT-Derived Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Combined with the Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Hepatectomy
by
Tianyi Zhou and Chaoliu Dai
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010013 - 25 Dec 2025
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate ability of a novel scoring system that combines fluorodeoxyglucose-uptake parameters and systemic inflammatory response indicators to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy at our hospital in 2014–2022.
[...] Read more.
Background: We aimed to evaluate ability of a novel scoring system that combines fluorodeoxyglucose-uptake parameters and systemic inflammatory response indicators to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy at our hospital in 2014–2022. The tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) was adopted as a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) standardized uptake value (SUV)-related indicator and calculated as the ratio of the SUVmax of tumor tissue to the SUVmean of normal liver tissue. The patients’ immune microenvironment reflected the NLR. Postoperative overall survival (OS)- and disease-free survival (DFS)-related independent prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included. TLR, NLR, and alpha-fetoprotein levels were independently associated with OS and DFS. The OS and DFS in the zero-point group were significantly longer than those in the one- and two-point groups. Time-dependent ROC curve analyses revealed area under the curve values of 0.830 and 0.752 for 5-year OS and DFS, respectively, for the scoring system, outperforming single evaluation indices. Conclusions: The proposed scoring system, which incorporates both TLR and NLR, simultaneously reflects metabolic tumor characteristics and the host’s immune microenvironment, enabling more accurate patients with early to intermediate-stage HCC undergoing hepatectomy classification and better prognostic evaluation.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Management of Patients with Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Patient Concerns Inventory for Arabic Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Validation
by
Abdullah M. Alsoghier, Bader A. Alwhaibi, Abdullah F. Alnuwaybit, Simon N. Rogers and Saif A. Aljabab
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010012 - 24 Dec 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments often lead to significant post-treatment side effects that affect patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to translate and validate the post-treatment Patient Concerns Inventory for head and neck (PCI-HN) into Arabic among HNC survivors. Methods:
[...] Read more.
Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments often lead to significant post-treatment side effects that affect patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to translate and validate the post-treatment Patient Concerns Inventory for head and neck (PCI-HN) into Arabic among HNC survivors. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design, where PCI-HN was translated and assessed for content and face validity by clinical experts and patients, respectively. Revisions to multiple items related to ‘social and religious welfare’. Patients’ responses were then analysed to assess internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability (Cohen’s Kappa). Results: Thirty-eight participants (19 males, 19 females, mean age 50.68 ± 16.13 years) were included. The Arabic PCI-HN demonstrated good overall internal consistency (α = 0.723) but fair test–retest agreement (κ = 0.22), likely reflecting dynamic changes in HNC post-treatment experiences. Conclusion: The Ar-PCI-HN can be a helpful instrument for capturing distinct aspects of the survivorship experience among Arabic-speaking HNC survivors. Determining the clinical interpretability and ability to detect changes over time requires further multi-centre and multi-country clinical studies. This would be necessary to ensure its integration into routine outpatient consultations for Arabic-speaking patients in Arab countries and globally.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient-Reported Outcomes Including Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Current Oncology Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal Browser-
arrow_forward_ios
Forthcoming issue
arrow_forward_ios Current issue - Volumes not published by MDPI
Highly Accessed Articles
Latest Books
E-Mail Alert
News
Topics
Topic in
Cancers, IJMS, Pharmaceuticals, Pharmaceutics, Sci. Pharm., Current Oncology, Molecules
Recent Advances in Anticancer Strategies, 2nd Edition
Topic Editors: Hassan Bousbaa, Zhiwei HuDeadline: 31 March 2026
Topic in
Brain Sciences, Cancers, JCM, Neurology International, Diagnostics, Therapeutics, Current Oncology
Innovations in Brain Tumor Surgery: Techniques and Outcomes
Topic Editors: Maria Caffo, Teresa SommaDeadline: 30 June 2026
Topic in
Cancers, Current Oncology, JCM, Medicina, Onco
Cancer Biology and Radiation Therapy: 2nd Edition
Topic Editors: Chang Ming Charlie Ma, Ka Yu Tse, Ming-Yii Huang, Mukund SeshadriDeadline: 25 July 2026
Topic in
Cancers, Diagnostics, Gastrointestinal Disorders, JCM, Current Oncology
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: From Laboratory to Clinical Studies, 2nd Edition
Topic Editors: Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Diamantis I. TsilimigrasDeadline: 20 August 2026
Conferences
Special Issues
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Surgical Advances in the Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers
Guest Editor: Boris Luis Gala-LópezDeadline: 15 January 2026
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Estrogen-Receptor Low Positive (ER-Low) Breast Cancer: A New (or Old?) World to Discover
Guest Editors: Eleonora Lai, Gavino FaaDeadline: 15 January 2026
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Patient-Reported Outcomes Including Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials
Guest Editor: Caroline HammDeadline: 31 January 2026
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Advances in Multiparametric MRI and Artificial Intelligence for Bladder Cancer: From Diagnosis to Personalized Treatment Strategies
Guest Editor: Thierry BoellaardDeadline: 31 January 2026
Topical Collections
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
New Insights into Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Collection Editor: Sazan Rasul
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
New Insights into Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Collection Editors: Filippo Pesapane, Matteo Suter
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series in "Exercise and Cancer Management"
Collection Editors: Linda Denehy, Ravi Mehrotra, Nicole Culos-Reed
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series: Contemporary Perioperative Concepts in Cancer Surgery
Collection Editors: Vijaya Gottumukkala, Jörg Kleeff


