Skip to Content

Current Oncology

Current Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that since 1994 represents a multidisciplinary medium for clinical oncologists to report and review progress in the management of this disease, and published monthly online by MDPI (from Volume 28, Issue 1 - 2021). 
The Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO), Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology (CAGPO), Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) and others are affiliated with Current Oncology and their members receive discounts on the article processing charges.
Indexed in PubMed | Quartile Ranking JCR - Q2 (Oncology)

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (5,292)

Scientific Meetings in Medical Oncology: Are We Facing a Time- and Resource-Consuming Plethora?

  • Vittorio Gebbia,
  • Dario Piazza and
  • Maria Rosaria Valerio
  • + 4 authors

Background: In recent years, the rapid advances in molecular biology and cancer pathophysiology, and the rapid availability of new therapeutic agents, have led to an exponential increase in the number of medical oncology conferences. This plethora may partly result from excessive duplication, undertaken without scientific or updating aims, under pressure from sponsors or other motivations unrelated to scientific advancement. The quality of meetings is therefore to be analyzed. Methods: A panel of medical oncologists, psychologists, and health-related data managers reviewed the characteristics of 99 out of 125 medical oncology conferences. The meetings were assessed for quality using a 0–5 score based on five parameters: attendees-to-speaker ratio, speaker quality, adequate time allocated for discussion, availability of feedback, and fairness of speeches. Results: The panelists identified 25 of 99 scientific events (25%; 95% CI 17–35%) at the 75th percentile and classified them as high-tier meetings, with a total score of 4–5. There were 5 national conferences, 6 regional conferences, and 14 local conferences. Forty-five meetings (56%; 95%Cl 35–56%) reached a score of 0–2 and twenty-nine (29%; 95%Cl 21–39%) a score of 3, and all were considered low tiers. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002709) in favor of high-titer national conferences. Conclusions: Although this paper has several limitations, the results indicate that many conferences were of moderate to poor quality, with a significant prevalence of low-tier events at regional and local levels and a higher concentration of low-tier events within this group. Scientific societies should implement adequate countermeasures.

5 March 2026

Schematic representation of the reasons behind participation in conferences. Depending on the distinct patterns of professional experience, reasons range from the need for continuing medical education and translation into clinical practice to opportunities for publication and networking.

Despite the increasing popularity of upfront decompressive surgery, there are still patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) and expected longer-term survival receiving irradiation alone. In these patients, local progression-free survival (LPFS) may be improved with doses beyond the commonly applied regimen of 10 × 3.0 Gy. A prospective phase 2 trial (RAMSES-01) investigated the benefit of two regimens, 15 × 2.633 and 18 × 2.333 Gy, compared with a 10 × 3.0 Gy (historical control). Patients in the phase 2 cohort had significantly better local progression-free survival (LPFS) after 1 year. Since recurrent MSCC-related motor weakness is a serious situation, it must be avoided as long as possible. In this respect, it is important to know whether the superiority of 15 × 2.633 and 18 × 2.333 Gy found in the RAMSES-01 trial still exists after 2 or 3 years. This led to the current study. In the phase 2 group, 2- and 3-year LPFS rates were 93.1% and 93.1%, respectively, and survival rates were 54.2% and 36.1%, respectively. According to propensity-adjusted Cox regression analyses, radiotherapy regimens in the phase 2 cohort resulted in significantly better LPFS at 2 (p = 0.017) and 3 (p = 0.013) years. In contrast, survival was not significantly different (p = 0.251 and p = 0.288, respectively). Radiation myelopathy and pathologic vertebral fractures were not observed in any group. Given the limitations of this study, irradiation 15 × 2.633 or 18 × 2.333 Gy may be an alternative option for patients with MSCC and longer expected survival treated with irradiation alone.

4 March 2026

Estimated local progression-free survival (LPFS) after propensity score adjustment (censored at two years).

KRAS-targeted therapy has opened new doors in the world of oncology, and many trials are underway for KRAS specific treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Outlining the current state of KRAS therapy and the remaining research gaps pertaining to these deadly cancers is crucial for the development of future therapeutics. In this review, we focus on the relationship between KRAS and GI malignancies. Current therapies are discussed with an in-depth exploration of the KRAS gene and how it connects to pancreatic, colorectal and other GI malignancies. Promising clinical trials and future therapies are highlighted while discussing the molecular biology behind them. Specifically, trials focusing on upcoming KRAS on and off inhibitors in development as well as variant focused inhibitors targeting the more common mutations G12D and G12V. We discuss exciting new pan/multi KRAS inhibitors that have been successful in pre-clinical trials. More unique therapeutic options include KRAS T cell therapies, vaccines, and combination strategies with immunotherapy. Furthermore, we address the difficulties with KRAS therapy, and the potential future directions needed to overcome them. An in-depth current literature review was done along with a review of the active clinical trials for KRAS-targeted therapeutics involving GI malignancies.

3 March 2026

This figure depicts the KRAS On/Off Inhibitor mechanism. The KRAS pathway is triggered by growth factors binding to receptor tyrosine kinases (represented as the blue and red cell surface receptors) which facilitates dimerization, phosphorylation and GDP release with GTP loading leading to KRAS-GDP inactive (light purple) vs. KRAS-GTP active (dark purple) states. KRAS off and on inhibitors block different steps of this cycle by either locking KRAS in its inactive state preventing GTP loading (off) or preventing GTP unloading as well as preventing interaction with downstream proteins (on). Both of these mechanisms prevent signal translocation to the nucleus (arrow leading to STOP sign) thus halting the cancer cell growth, proliferation and survival. Created in BioRender. Frisch, A. (2025) https://BioRender.com/el3m0co (URL accessed on 30 July 2025).

Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA), a rare vascular tumor in adolescent males, involves dysregulated angiogenesis and hormonal interplay. Key molecular drivers include HIF-1α, VEGF, bFGF, and β-catenin, promoting tumor growth via pathways like Wnt/β-catenin and Ras signaling. Androgens and estrogen modulate progression, though mechanisms remain debated. Targeted therapies reduce tumor proliferation and vascularity in preclinical studies, yet clinical translation is hindered by drug resistance and inconsistent biomarker expression. Hormonal and MMP-targeted approaches also show potential but require validation. This review consolidates JNA’s molecular landscape, emphasizing the need for personalized strategies, biomarker refinement, and combination therapies to improve therapeutic outcomes for this challenging tumor.

3 March 2026

Clinical characteristics of JNA. JNA is commonly found in the pterygopalatine fossa, and the tumor typically has a lobulated appearance, usually causing nasal obstruction and rhinorrhagia.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

Evolution of Treatments of Prostate Cancer
Reprint

Evolution of Treatments of Prostate Cancer

From Biology to Current Advanced Technologies
Editors: Fernando Munoz
Recent Advances in Anticancer Strategies
Reprint

Recent Advances in Anticancer Strategies

Editors: Hassan Bousbaa, Zhiwei Hu
XFacebookLinkedIn
Curr. Oncol. - ISSN 1718-7729