Skip to Content
  • 3.6
    Impact Factor
  • 6.1
    CiteScore
  • 23 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 3 days
    Acceptance to Publication

Current Oncology

Current Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that since 1994 represents a multidisciplinary medium for clinical oncologists to report and review progress in the management of this disease, and published monthly online by MDPI (from Volume 28, Issue 1 - 2021). The Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO), Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology (CAGPO), Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) and others are affiliated with Current Oncology and their members receive discounts on the article processing charges.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (5,760)

  • Review
  • Open Access

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains difficult to control. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have transformed the treatment of several extracranial cancers, but they have not consistently improved survival in GBM. This narrative review examines the main biological and translational barriers to antibody-based therapy. It also evaluates strategies to overcome them. We reviewed preclinical, translational, and clinical evidence on antibody delivery, target stability, the tumor microenvironment, target discovery, and emerging antibody formats. Heterogeneous blood–brain and blood–tumor barriers produce uneven intratumoral exposure, especially at infiltrative margins. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity promotes antigen loss and treatment escape. Lymphocyte dysfunction, myeloid dominance, and suppressive vascular and metabolic programs further limit immune activity. Receptor-mediated transcytosis and focused ultrasound may improve delivery. Single-cell and spatial profiling, surfaceome and endocytome proteomics, longitudinal sampling, and causal inference may improve target selection. Depending on their design, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) can deliver cytotoxic payloads, whereas bispecific constructs can enable immune redirection, dual-target recognition, or receptor-mediated transport. However, clinical benefit remains limited by construct design, target accessibility, regional exposure, toxicity, and inadequate biomarker selection. Successful translation requires modality-specific alignment of exposure at the relevant site of action, target requirements, immune dependence, molecular design, and safety. Biomarker-guided patient selection, spatial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic validation, and early evidence of clinical benefit are also essential.

Curr. Oncol.

14 October 2026

Major barriers to monoclonal antibody efficacy in glioblastoma. (a) The intact blood–brain barrier (BBB) and heterogeneously leaky blood–tumor barrier (BTB) produce low or patchy regional antibody exposure. The dashed arrow indicates restricted antibody entry across the intact BBB, whereas the solid arrow indicates relatively greater antibody entry through leaky regions of the BTB. (b) Target heterogeneity and treatment-associated antigen loss promote clonal selection and resistant recurrence. (c) The schematic depicts PD-L1 on a suppressive myeloid cell engaging PD-1 on a cytotoxic T cell, CD39/CD73-mediated conversion of extracellular ATP to immunosuppressive adenosine, and myeloid-derived TGF-β and IL-10 restraining T-cell activity. The illustrated cellular sources and marker patterns may vary among tumors. Abbreviations: BBB, blood–brain barrier; BTB, blood–tumor barrier; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; IL-10, interleukin-10; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.
  • Article
  • Open Access

(1) Background: the evaluation of app-based ePROs is increasingly being used in clinical trials with cancer patients while a medical effect for patients is a matter of controversy; (2) Methods: in the randomized (1:1) controlled PRO2 trial the effect of the mediduxTM app on the rate of “high-grade AEs” (HAEs, CTCAE severity ≥3) within patients receiving HER2-directed breast cancer treatment (arm A) was compared to a control-group that did not use the app (arm B); (3) Results: Among patients with observed (non-imputed) HAE data (n = 180 of N = 189 in the ITT population), the rates of documented HAEs were 21.51% in arm B and 17.24% in arm A. Logistic regression of HAE incidence in the full ITT population (N = 189), using reference-based multiple imputation for missing values, showed a positive tendency towards app use, but no significant difference (odds ratio arm (A/B): 0.797, 95% CI: 0.363, 1.752; p-value 0.569). Also, AE-related secondary endpoints “emergency consultations” (risk ratio arm (A/B): 0.842, 95% CI: 0.464, 1.522; p-value 0.570) and “hospitalizations” (risk ratio arm (A/B): 0.575, 95% CI: 0.237, 1.329; p-value 0.201) had no significant differences in negative binomial regression. (4) Conclusions: Although the effect on HAE rates was not statistically significant, intensive app use was observed and adverse events recorded by participants corresponded well with the known drug-side-effect-profiles. These exploratory findings suggest a potential supporting role of the app during out-patient cancer treatment, which needs confirmation in adequately powered studies.

Curr. Oncol.

14 October 2026

Consort diagram. Patients randomized into arm A received the medidux™-app, Patients in arm B constituted the control group, who did not receive the app. ITT: Intention-to-treat; SoC: Standard of Care; PD: Protocol Deviation; AE: Adverse Event; Dec. Phys.: Decision of Physician; Consentw.: Consent withdrawn; PP: Per Protocol. * There were actually 9 PDs that would have led to the exclusion of a patient from the PP population, but 1 patient was already excluded, because she did not complete the 12-week treatment.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Background: Limited data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of photon re-irradiation with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in children with recurrent or second primary CNS tumors. Materials and methods: In this retrospective single-institution study, 23 patients < 21 years who underwent photon re-irradiation with WBRT (n = 9) or CSI (n = 14) for CNS tumors between 2013 and 2026 were included. Clinical and treatment characteristics were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: In our cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 8.5 years (range: 0.2–19.7 years), and medulloblastoma was the most common histology (30%). Median time to the first relapse after initial irradiation was 12.0 months (range: 0.9–92.5 months). Median re-irradiation dose to the whole brain or craniospinal axis was 24.0 Gy (range: 20.0–36.0 Gy). For 15 patients who received involved field boosts, median total dose was 30.6 Gy (range: 20.0–54.0 Gy). With median follow-up after re-RT of 12.2 months (range: 1.0–106.8), 12-month PFS and OS were 24.2% and 67.0%, respectively. Four patients who received curative-intent re-CSI remain alive with median follow-up of 20.4 months (range: 5.8–106.8). The crude rate of grade >2 CNS toxicity was 8.7%. Of 10 patients with new neurologic symptoms before re-irradiation, 7 (70%) had symptomatic improvement after treatment. Conclusions: Photon re-irradiation with WBRT or CSI was feasible and achieved disease control in a subset of patients and meaningful symptom palliation with acceptable acute toxicity. Careful attention to cumulative dose constraints is essential, and longer follow-up is needed to assess durability and late effects.

Curr. Oncol.

14 October 2026

(A) Progression-free survival and (B) overall survival following re-irradiation with WBRT or CSI in the entire cohort; (C) progression-free survival and (D) overall survival stratified by re-WBRT versus re-CSI (log-rank p-values shown).
  • Article
  • Open Access

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but may be associated with pneumonitis. We retrospectively studied adults with mRCC who began first- or second-line ICI therapy at the University of Virginia Medical Center between 2015 and 2023. Potential cases underwent multidisciplinary clinical review, and two thoracic radiologists independently reviewed available computed tomography scans. Among 146 ICI-treated patients, 13 developed pneumonitis (8.9%; 95% CI 4.8–14.7%). Incidence did not differ significantly by treatment line or ICI regimen. Incidence was higher with prior chest radiation than without (31.8% vs. 4.8%; unadjusted odds ratio 9.2, 95% CI 2.7–31.0; Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p = 0.005). Five cases (38%) were grade 3–4 at diagnosis, and seven (54%) reached grade ≥ 3. Nine patients (69%) received high-dose systemic corticosteroids. Eleven patients (85%) improved or resolved with initial management; two, both with grade 1–2 pneumonitis at diagnosis, worsened and died (grade 5). Five patients underwent ICI rechallenge after clinical recovery, without recurrent pneumonitis. In this exploratory cohort, pneumonitis was sometimes fatal despite a low grade at presentation. The association with prior chest radiation is hypothesis-generating and warrants evaluation in larger studies with detailed radiation and confounder data.

Curr. Oncol.

14 October 2026

Incidence of pneumonitis by clinical characteristics. Points show incidence and horizontal lines show exact 95% confidence intervals; the vertical line marks the overall incidence of 8.9% (13/146). Rates were similar between first-line (11/117; 9.4%) and second-line (2/29; 6.9%) therapy. Pneumonitis occurred in 10.8% of patients receiving ICI/ICI, 10.0% with ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and 4.7% with ICI monotherapy. Pneumonitis incidence was higher among patients with prior chest radiation than among those without (31.8% vs. 4.8%; adjusted p = 0.005); this univariate, exploratory association does not account for radiation dose, field, timing, or thoracic tumor burden. Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p values across seven comparisons are shown for each characteristic; the treatment-era comparison (†) was added post hoc and is unadjusted. ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Featured Articles of Last Quarter

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

Evolution of Treatments of Prostate Cancer
Reprint

Evolution of Treatments of Prostate Cancer

From Biology to Current Advanced Technologies
Editors: Fernando Munoz
Recent Advances in Anticancer Strategies
Reprint

Recent Advances in Anticancer Strategies

Editors: Hassan Bousbaa, Zhiwei Hu
XFacebookLinkedIn
Curr. Oncol. - ISSN 1718-7729