Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • 3.6
    Impact Factor
  • 6.1
    CiteScore
  • 23 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 3 days
    Acceptance to Publication

Current Oncology

Current Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that since 1994 represents a multidisciplinary medium for clinical oncologists to report and review progress in the management of this disease, and published monthly online by MDPI (from Volume 28, Issue 1 - 2021). The Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO), Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology (CAGPO), Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) and others are affiliated with Current Oncology and their members receive discounts on the article processing charges.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (5,850)

  • Review
  • Open Access

Reconstructive surgical oncology has traditionally been assessed through clinician-reported endpoints such as flap survival and complications, which describe technical success but poorly capture the symptoms, function, appearance, and well-being that matter to patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify that perspective, but administering a validated questionnaire is not equivalent to performing a valid assessment. This critical review compares PROM measurement in four deliberately selected settings against five explicit criteria: content validity, measurement properties, interpretability, quality of application, and evidence on intervention effects. On this basis, we propose a gradient of measurement maturity. Breast reconstruction has the most developed instrument and reference data, although its threshold of important difference is distribution-based and its comparative evidence observational. In cancer-related lymphedema, patient-reported improvement after lymphatic surgery has been reported without corresponding volume reduction, but the randomized evidence is open-label and exposed to expectancy and to changes in compression; sham-controlled results are awaited. Head and neck and extremity reconstruction have validated instruments but lack agreed constructs and appropriate thresholds. We discuss cross-cutting problems, including feasibility and equity, and propose setting-specific minimum measurement sets. The gradient is a hypothesis generated by a non-systematic review, to be tested in systematic appraisals and consensus studies.

Curr. Oncol.

15 November 2026

Conceptual framework for patient-centered outcome assessment in reconstructive surgical oncology. Technical and patient-reported outcomes are related but non-equivalent constructs that together define a patient-centered reconstructive outcome. When the aim is to assess change attributable to reconstruction, valid longitudinal measurement requires a defined sequence: a validated, construct-specific instrument administered at a preoperative baseline, through prespecified follow-up, to domain-level analysis interpreted against a threshold of the appropriate type (a between-group difference for group comparisons, a within-patient threshold for responder analyses).
  • Review
  • Open Access

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often recruits an arterial blood supply from parasitized extra-hepatic vessels. Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization can be delivered directly through these vessels as an alternative to embolizing them to redistribute flow. This comprehensive review describes the feasibility, safety, and reported tumor response of that approach. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched to June 2026, and outcomes were summarized descriptively. We included five retrospective cohorts (109 reported participants) and six case reports. All five cohorts were at serious risk of bias. The studies reported delivery through the inferior phrenic, cystic, adrenal, internal mammary, and superior mesenteric arteries. Delivery through the extra-hepatic artery was completed in every treated patient. In the four cohorts reporting tumor response, the objective response ranged from 68% to 100% and complete response from 21.1% to 76.5%, with wide confidence intervals, but nearly all patients also received hepatic-artery Y-90, so response cannot be attributed to the extra-hepatic route alone. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 5.0% and 7.0% of patients in the two cohorts reporting it, and no radioembolization-induced liver disease was reported. No study compared direct delivery with flow redistribution, so the evidence supports feasibility and preliminary safety in selected patients rather than efficacy, and comparative studies with standardized dosimetry and reporting may be helpful.

Curr. Oncol.

14 November 2026

  • Article
  • Open Access

Insomnia is prevalent during breast cancer and exacerbates other common symptoms such as fatigue, distress, and pain, which in turn worsen sleep. This symptom burden is disproportionate for women receiving treatment in rural areas. Nite2Day is a mindfulness-based, behavioral insomnia and symptom management intervention previously applied in hematologic cancer. We adapted and pilot-tested Nite2Day in patients with breast cancer in rural areas. Patient (N = 8) and clinician (N = 6) interviews informed adaptation. A single-arm pilot (N = 15) evaluated feasibility (accrual, attrition, adherence), acceptability, and changes to patient-reported outcomes (insomnia symptoms, fatigue, distress, pain, pre-sleep arousal, mindfulness, symptom management self-efficacy) from baseline to post-intervention. Participants were enthusiastic about mindfulness and behavioral skills to address symptoms. Qualitative feedback guided protocol changes (e.g., mindfulness definitions, telephone and evening sessions). Nite2Day was feasible. The accrual target was met in 6 months, and all participants completed the intervention and post-treatment assessments. Acceptability of Nite2Day was strong (M = 30.53/32). Pre-post change for all patient-reported outcomes was in the expected direction. These feasibility and acceptability data provide support for next-step pilot testing using a randomized design. This research could extend access to an evidence-based behavioral intervention targeting concurrent insomnia, fatigue, distress, and pain symptoms reported by patients in rural cancer care settings.

Curr. Oncol.

12 November 2026

  • Article
  • Open Access

Sexual dysfunction is a frequent but often under-recognised consequence of cancer and its treatment in women, with potential implications for quality of life and survivorship care. This cross-sectional study evaluated sexual dysfunction, health-related quality of life, and sexual healthcare experiences in 246 women with a history of breast and/or gynaecological cancer. Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index and health-related quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Female Sexual Function Index scores were ≤26.55 in 89.0% of participants, with a mean total score of 14.9 ± 8.94. Lubrication and orgasm were the most impaired domains. In the primary analysis, better physical functioning and lower insomnia were independently associated with better sexual function. In sensitivity analyzes, the insomnia association persisted, while physical functioning estimates were smaller and their confidence intervals included zero: no statistically significant independent associations were detected for age or menopausal status, although these findings require cautious interpretation given the subgroup imbalance. A healthcare professional initiated a discussion about sexuality in 46/246 participants (18.7%). These findings highlight the high prevalence and multidimensional nature of sexual dysfunction after cancer and support more systematic assessment, individualized management, and integration of sexual health into survivorship care.

Curr. Oncol.

12 November 2026

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
Curr. Oncol. - ISSN 1718-7729