<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/curroncol">
		<title>Current Oncology</title>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in Curr. Oncol. at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/curroncol</description>
		<link>https://www.mdpi.com/journal/curroncol</link>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/journal/curroncol"/>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:support@mdpi.com"/>
		<dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)</dc:rights>
						<prism:copyright>MDPI</prism:copyright>
		<prism:rightsAgent>support@mdpi.com</prism:rightsAgent>
		<image rdf:resource="https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo.png?13cf3b5bd783e021?1778678334"/>
				<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/287" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/286" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/285" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/284" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/283" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/282" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/281" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/280" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/279" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/278" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/277" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/276" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/275" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/274" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/273" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/272" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/271" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/270" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/269" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/268" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/267" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/266" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/265" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/264" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/263" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/262" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/261" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/260" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/259" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/258" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/257" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/256" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/255" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/254" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/253" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/252" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/251" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/250" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/248" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/249" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/247" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/246" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/245" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/244" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/243" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/242" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/241" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/240" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/239" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/238" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/237" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/236" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/235" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/234" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/233" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/232" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/231" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/230" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/229" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/228" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/227" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/226" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/225" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/224" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/223" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/222" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/221" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/220" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/219" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/218" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/217" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/216" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/215" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/214" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/213" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/212" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/211" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/210" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/209" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/208" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/207" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/206" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/205" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/204" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/203" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/202" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/199" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/200" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/201" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/197" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/198" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/196" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/195" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/194" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/193" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/192" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/190" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/191" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/189" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/188" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" />
	</channel>

        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/287">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 287: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Scoping Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/287</link>
	<description>Introduction: Lung cancer remains highly lethal. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) enables minimally invasive diagnosis and staging. Artificial intelligence (AI) improves image analysis and diagnostic accuracy, though current evidence is limited by retrospective, small, single center studies. Methods: A scoping review following Arksey&amp;amp;ndash;O&amp;amp;rsquo;Malley, Levac, and JBI frameworks, was reported as per PRISMA-ScR. Databases were searched for studies (2015&amp;amp;ndash;2026) on AI in EBUS. Two reviewers screened, extracted standardized data, and performed narrative synthesis grouped by algorithm type, application, and performance metrics. Results: A total of 26 studies were included. Of these, 73.1% (19/26) employed deep learning-based models, while 26.9% (7/26) used traditional or hybrid machine learning approaches. The most frequent clinical objective was diagnostic classification of malignancy (14/26; 53.8%), followed by segmentation or cytological analysis (5/26; 19.2%), anatomical navigation or lymph node station classification (3/26; 11.5%), and multimodal predictive or staging support models (4/26; 15.4%). Most studies were based on EBUS-derived images or videos (18/26; 69.2%), including both convex-probe and radial-probe applications. Studies were distributed among Convex Probe-EBUS for mediastinal staging, Radial Probe-EBUS for peripheral lesion assessment, and rapid on-site evaluation-based cytology analysis, reflecting diverse clinical contexts. Most models were developed using static images. Conclusions: AI applications in EBUS are predominantly based on deep learning and mainly focused on diagnostic classification, with growing but still limited exploration of segmentation, navigation, and multimodal approaches. The evidence reflects diverse clinical contexts and data sources, particularly image-based inputs, but remains unevenly distributed across applications.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 287: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Scoping Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/287">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050287</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jacobo Echeverri-Hoyos
		Jaime A. Echeverri-Franco
		Nicole Bonilla
		Gustavo Monsalve-Morales
		Eduardo Tuta-Quintero
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: Lung cancer remains highly lethal. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) enables minimally invasive diagnosis and staging. Artificial intelligence (AI) improves image analysis and diagnostic accuracy, though current evidence is limited by retrospective, small, single center studies. Methods: A scoping review following Arksey&amp;amp;ndash;O&amp;amp;rsquo;Malley, Levac, and JBI frameworks, was reported as per PRISMA-ScR. Databases were searched for studies (2015&amp;amp;ndash;2026) on AI in EBUS. Two reviewers screened, extracted standardized data, and performed narrative synthesis grouped by algorithm type, application, and performance metrics. Results: A total of 26 studies were included. Of these, 73.1% (19/26) employed deep learning-based models, while 26.9% (7/26) used traditional or hybrid machine learning approaches. The most frequent clinical objective was diagnostic classification of malignancy (14/26; 53.8%), followed by segmentation or cytological analysis (5/26; 19.2%), anatomical navigation or lymph node station classification (3/26; 11.5%), and multimodal predictive or staging support models (4/26; 15.4%). Most studies were based on EBUS-derived images or videos (18/26; 69.2%), including both convex-probe and radial-probe applications. Studies were distributed among Convex Probe-EBUS for mediastinal staging, Radial Probe-EBUS for peripheral lesion assessment, and rapid on-site evaluation-based cytology analysis, reflecting diverse clinical contexts. Most models were developed using static images. Conclusions: AI applications in EBUS are predominantly based on deep learning and mainly focused on diagnostic classification, with growing but still limited exploration of segmentation, navigation, and multimodal approaches. The evidence reflects diverse clinical contexts and data sources, particularly image-based inputs, but remains unevenly distributed across applications.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Scoping Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jacobo Echeverri-Hoyos</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jaime A. Echeverri-Franco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicole Bonilla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gustavo Monsalve-Morales</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eduardo Tuta-Quintero</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050287</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050287</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/287</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/286">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 286: Lenvatinib Combined with New FP Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Efficacy, Vascular Remodeling, and Implications for Immuno-Oncology&amp;ndash;Systemic Combination Therapy</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/286</link>
	<description>Background/Objectives: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) refractory or intolerant to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens represent a growing yet therapeutically underserved population with limited treatment options. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic underpinnings of lenvatinib combined with New FP hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP) in this challenging clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 14 consecutive patients with uHCC treated with LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP between April 2022 and March 2025. Tumor response was assessed by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Proper hepatic artery (PHA) diameter was serially measured on angiography as an exploratory assessment of vascular remodeling, and tumor vascularity was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a 4-point angiographic scoring system (Tumor Vascularity Score [TVS]). Results: The cohort comprised BCLC stage B/C (7/7), mALBI grade 1&amp;amp;ndash;2b, and 13 of 14 patients with prior ICI-containing therapy. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 85.7% and 100%, including two complete responses. Median overall survival was 22.8 months from LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP initiation (median follow-up: 15.1 months) and 36.2 months from first-line initiation; median intrahepatic progression-free survival was 10.4 months. A total of 11 of 14 patients (78.6%) transitioned to subsequent therapies, including four curative-intent conversions. PHA narrowing was observed in 10 of 13 evaluable patients (76.9%), with no clear association with hepatic function deterioration. TVS decreased in 10 of 12 evaluable patients (83.3%), with reduction observed in 90.0% of PR/CR cases. Conclusions: LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP achieved sustained intrahepatic tumor control and encouraging survival in aggressive uHCC, including ICI-refractory or -intolerant disease. The concordant reduction in PHA diameter and tumor vascularity score provides angiographic evidence of VEGFR inhibition-mediated vascular remodeling, offering mechanistic insight into the synergistic antitumor effects of this regimen and supporting LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP as a promising multimodal strategy within the evolving landscape of HCC treatment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 286: Lenvatinib Combined with New FP Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Efficacy, Vascular Remodeling, and Implications for Immuno-Oncology&amp;ndash;Systemic Combination Therapy</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/286">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050286</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Susumu Maruta
		Yohei Koshima
		Yuji Debari
		Chihei Sugihara
		Gou Takahata
		Ryo Tamura
		Tadashi Ohshima
		Yuji Ono
		Yuho Morita
		Tomoki Chiba
		Satoru Ishida
		Hideto Imai
		Keisuke Watanabe
		Ryo Chinzei
		Masanori Takahashi
		Yoshihiko Ooka
		</p>
	<p>Background/Objectives: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) refractory or intolerant to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens represent a growing yet therapeutically underserved population with limited treatment options. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic underpinnings of lenvatinib combined with New FP hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP) in this challenging clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 14 consecutive patients with uHCC treated with LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP between April 2022 and March 2025. Tumor response was assessed by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Proper hepatic artery (PHA) diameter was serially measured on angiography as an exploratory assessment of vascular remodeling, and tumor vascularity was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a 4-point angiographic scoring system (Tumor Vascularity Score [TVS]). Results: The cohort comprised BCLC stage B/C (7/7), mALBI grade 1&amp;amp;ndash;2b, and 13 of 14 patients with prior ICI-containing therapy. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 85.7% and 100%, including two complete responses. Median overall survival was 22.8 months from LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP initiation (median follow-up: 15.1 months) and 36.2 months from first-line initiation; median intrahepatic progression-free survival was 10.4 months. A total of 11 of 14 patients (78.6%) transitioned to subsequent therapies, including four curative-intent conversions. PHA narrowing was observed in 10 of 13 evaluable patients (76.9%), with no clear association with hepatic function deterioration. TVS decreased in 10 of 12 evaluable patients (83.3%), with reduction observed in 90.0% of PR/CR cases. Conclusions: LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP achieved sustained intrahepatic tumor control and encouraging survival in aggressive uHCC, including ICI-refractory or -intolerant disease. The concordant reduction in PHA diameter and tumor vascularity score provides angiographic evidence of VEGFR inhibition-mediated vascular remodeling, offering mechanistic insight into the synergistic antitumor effects of this regimen and supporting LEN&amp;amp;ndash;New FP as a promising multimodal strategy within the evolving landscape of HCC treatment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Lenvatinib Combined with New FP Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Efficacy, Vascular Remodeling, and Implications for Immuno-Oncology&amp;amp;ndash;Systemic Combination Therapy</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Susumu Maruta</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yohei Koshima</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuji Debari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chihei Sugihara</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gou Takahata</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ryo Tamura</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tadashi Ohshima</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuji Ono</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuho Morita</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tomoki Chiba</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Satoru Ishida</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hideto Imai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Keisuke Watanabe</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ryo Chinzei</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Masanori Takahashi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yoshihiko Ooka</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050286</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>286</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050286</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/286</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/285">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 285: Radioembolization Practice in North America Versus Europe: Results from a Global Survey</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/285</link>
	<description>Purpose: The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) conducted an international survey on the real-life application of transarterial radioembolization (TARE). This sub-analysis of the complete survey evaluates intercontinental disparities in TARE practices. Materials and Methods: A survey of 32 multiple-choice questions was distributed to CIRSE members between November and December 2022. The questions addressed steps of the TARE workflow, including treatment work-up, planning and dosimetry, intervention, follow-up and innovations. Responses were curated to remove duplicates and incomplete entries and categorised into continental groups. Analysis focused on variations between Europe and North America and impacting factors in the respective regions were identified. Data is presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Responses were obtained from 30 countries and 133 hospitals, including 87 European and 21 North American centres. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common indication, constituting 61% of treatments in North America and 51% in Europe. North America predominantly used 90Y glass microspheres, whereas Europe used 90Y resin. Procedural differences included the adoption of intra-procedural CT imaging, utilized by all North American sites, versus 89% of European sites. Outpatient treatments were favoured in North America (85%), while in Europe, most patients remained hospitalized for one night (51%). Both regions increasingly emphasized dosimetry-guided treatments, with personalized dosimetry planning in 71% and 84% of North American and European sites, respectively. Conclusions: This North America&amp;amp;ndash;Europe comparison highlights regional differences in radioembolization practice between the leading continents in procedure volume, based on results of the CIRSE TARE survey. Specific intercontinental differences identified in this survey included hospitalization, product utilization, and procedural techniques.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 285: Radioembolization Practice in North America Versus Europe: Results from a Global Survey</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/285">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050285</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Grace Keane
		Marnix G. E. H. Lam
		Arthur J. A. T. Braat
		Rutger C. G. Bruijnen
		Nathalie Kaufmann
		Hugo W. A. M. de Jong
		Riad Salem
		Maarten L. J. Smits
		</p>
	<p>Purpose: The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) conducted an international survey on the real-life application of transarterial radioembolization (TARE). This sub-analysis of the complete survey evaluates intercontinental disparities in TARE practices. Materials and Methods: A survey of 32 multiple-choice questions was distributed to CIRSE members between November and December 2022. The questions addressed steps of the TARE workflow, including treatment work-up, planning and dosimetry, intervention, follow-up and innovations. Responses were curated to remove duplicates and incomplete entries and categorised into continental groups. Analysis focused on variations between Europe and North America and impacting factors in the respective regions were identified. Data is presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Responses were obtained from 30 countries and 133 hospitals, including 87 European and 21 North American centres. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common indication, constituting 61% of treatments in North America and 51% in Europe. North America predominantly used 90Y glass microspheres, whereas Europe used 90Y resin. Procedural differences included the adoption of intra-procedural CT imaging, utilized by all North American sites, versus 89% of European sites. Outpatient treatments were favoured in North America (85%), while in Europe, most patients remained hospitalized for one night (51%). Both regions increasingly emphasized dosimetry-guided treatments, with personalized dosimetry planning in 71% and 84% of North American and European sites, respectively. Conclusions: This North America&amp;amp;ndash;Europe comparison highlights regional differences in radioembolization practice between the leading continents in procedure volume, based on results of the CIRSE TARE survey. Specific intercontinental differences identified in this survey included hospitalization, product utilization, and procedural techniques.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Radioembolization Practice in North America Versus Europe: Results from a Global Survey</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Grace Keane</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marnix G. E. H. Lam</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arthur J. A. T. Braat</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rutger C. G. Bruijnen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nathalie Kaufmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hugo W. A. M. de Jong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Riad Salem</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maarten L. J. Smits</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050285</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>285</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050285</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/285</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/284">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 284: Temporal Clustering of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia in HRT Users with Unscheduled Bleeding: A Retrospective NHS Cohort Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/284</link>
	<description>Background: Unscheduled bleeding in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) represents a common but poorly characterised clinical challenge. Whilst endometrial cancer affects approximately 9% of women with unexplained postmenopausal bleeding, existing evidence in HRT users is largely restricted to women under 60 years and short-duration regimens, leaving a critical evidence gap in contemporary all-age clinical practice. Whether the same investigative urgency is warranted for HRT users experiencing unscheduled bleeding as for women with unexplained postmenopausal haemorrhage remains unresolved. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic yield of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia amongst postmenopausal women presenting with unscheduled bleeding whilst on HRT, and to explore potential associations with HRT regimens and clinical risk factors. Methods: This retrospective observational study analysed 343 postmenopausal women presenting with unscheduled bleeding whilst on HRT at a single tertiary centre between September 2023 and February 2024. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial sampling according to institutional protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise outcomes, with exploratory analyses of potential risk factors. Given the symptomatic and selected nature of this cohort, all proportions represent the diagnostic yield within an investigated population rather than population-level incidence estimates. Results: Amongst 343 women (mean age 56.2 &amp;amp;plusmn; 7.4 years), nine cases (2.6%) of endometrial abnormalities were identified: four malignancies (1.2%), four endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (1.2%), and one complex atypical hyperplasia (0.3%). Only five cases (1.5%) required surgical intervention. All four endometrial cancers were Stage IA (FIGO 2009; three Grade 1, one Grade 2; no LVSI), corresponding to Stage IA2mNSMP under FIGO 2023. None required adjuvant therapy. Strikingly, 88.9% of all abnormal cases occurred within two years of HRT initiation, with no endometrial pathology identified amongst the 45 women using systemic HRT for more than five years&amp;amp;mdash;a temporal pattern not previously reported. Conclusions: In this retrospective all-age NHS cohort, the diagnostic yield of endometrial cancer was 1.2% in HRT users with unscheduled bleeding, with only 1.5% requiring surgical intervention. All cancers were early-stage (FIGO 2009 Stage IA; FIGO 2023 Stage IA2mNSMP) and required no adjuvant therapy. A previously unreported temporal clustering of pathology within the first two years of HRT initiation generates a hypothesis that early unscheduled bleeding may unmask pre-existing rather than HRT-induced endometrial abnormalities. These observations are hypothesis-generating and should not be interpreted as evidence of endometrial safety. These findings apply specifically to symptomatic women presenting for investigation and cannot be generalised to asymptomatic HRT users. Prospective validation in larger cohorts with baseline endometrial assessment is required before any clinical conclusions can be drawn. What This Study Adds: (1) A real-world cancer detection proportion of 1.2% in an all-age contemporary NHS cohort. (2) A previously undescribed temporal pattern with pathology clustering within two years of HRT initiation and no pathology in long-term users (n = 45), generating a testable hypothesis about pre-existing versus HRT-induced disease. (3) Dual FIGO 2009/2023 staging demonstrating that molecular classification added no treatment-discriminatory value in this early-detection context.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 284: Temporal Clustering of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia in HRT Users with Unscheduled Bleeding: A Retrospective NHS Cohort Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/284">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050284</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz
		Ahmed Mohamed
		Ayodele Olaleye
		Nesma Hesham
		Nazifa Tasnim
		Oluwafemi Ogundiran
		Lorna Sandison
		Hazem Sayed
		Anita Juliana
		</p>
	<p>Background: Unscheduled bleeding in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) represents a common but poorly characterised clinical challenge. Whilst endometrial cancer affects approximately 9% of women with unexplained postmenopausal bleeding, existing evidence in HRT users is largely restricted to women under 60 years and short-duration regimens, leaving a critical evidence gap in contemporary all-age clinical practice. Whether the same investigative urgency is warranted for HRT users experiencing unscheduled bleeding as for women with unexplained postmenopausal haemorrhage remains unresolved. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic yield of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia amongst postmenopausal women presenting with unscheduled bleeding whilst on HRT, and to explore potential associations with HRT regimens and clinical risk factors. Methods: This retrospective observational study analysed 343 postmenopausal women presenting with unscheduled bleeding whilst on HRT at a single tertiary centre between September 2023 and February 2024. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial sampling according to institutional protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise outcomes, with exploratory analyses of potential risk factors. Given the symptomatic and selected nature of this cohort, all proportions represent the diagnostic yield within an investigated population rather than population-level incidence estimates. Results: Amongst 343 women (mean age 56.2 &amp;amp;plusmn; 7.4 years), nine cases (2.6%) of endometrial abnormalities were identified: four malignancies (1.2%), four endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (1.2%), and one complex atypical hyperplasia (0.3%). Only five cases (1.5%) required surgical intervention. All four endometrial cancers were Stage IA (FIGO 2009; three Grade 1, one Grade 2; no LVSI), corresponding to Stage IA2mNSMP under FIGO 2023. None required adjuvant therapy. Strikingly, 88.9% of all abnormal cases occurred within two years of HRT initiation, with no endometrial pathology identified amongst the 45 women using systemic HRT for more than five years&amp;amp;mdash;a temporal pattern not previously reported. Conclusions: In this retrospective all-age NHS cohort, the diagnostic yield of endometrial cancer was 1.2% in HRT users with unscheduled bleeding, with only 1.5% requiring surgical intervention. All cancers were early-stage (FIGO 2009 Stage IA; FIGO 2023 Stage IA2mNSMP) and required no adjuvant therapy. A previously unreported temporal clustering of pathology within the first two years of HRT initiation generates a hypothesis that early unscheduled bleeding may unmask pre-existing rather than HRT-induced endometrial abnormalities. These observations are hypothesis-generating and should not be interpreted as evidence of endometrial safety. These findings apply specifically to symptomatic women presenting for investigation and cannot be generalised to asymptomatic HRT users. Prospective validation in larger cohorts with baseline endometrial assessment is required before any clinical conclusions can be drawn. What This Study Adds: (1) A real-world cancer detection proportion of 1.2% in an all-age contemporary NHS cohort. (2) A previously undescribed temporal pattern with pathology clustering within two years of HRT initiation and no pathology in long-term users (n = 45), generating a testable hypothesis about pre-existing versus HRT-induced disease. (3) Dual FIGO 2009/2023 staging demonstrating that molecular classification added no treatment-discriminatory value in this early-detection context.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Temporal Clustering of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia in HRT Users with Unscheduled Bleeding: A Retrospective NHS Cohort Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmed Mohamed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ayodele Olaleye</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nesma Hesham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nazifa Tasnim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Oluwafemi Ogundiran</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lorna Sandison</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hazem Sayed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anita Juliana</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050284</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050284</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/284</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/283">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 283: High-Grade Glioma Tumoral Cells in a Case of Postoperative, Recurrent Subdural Hematoma&amp;hellip; Where Did They Come From?</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/283</link>
	<description>Background: High-grade glioma (HGG), formerly known as Glioblastoma multiforme, can be complicated by hematomas, either at the initial presentation or after surgical removal. Rarely, postoperative bleeding can occur extra-axially, resulting in subdural hematomas (SDH) that might require surgical evacuation. Of note, little is known about the cellular composition of those hematomas. Observations: We present the case of a patient operated on for HGG who developed postoperative recurrent SDH that required multiple surgical evacuations. Histopathological analyses of the membranes comprising the SDH revealed the presence of HGG tumoral cells. Conclusions: Based on our observation, hematomas associated with HGG, either extra or intra-axial, should be suspected of being a sign of tumoral recurrence or spread and histopathological analyses might be considered as they could lead to further adaptation of the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s treatment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 283: High-Grade Glioma Tumoral Cells in a Case of Postoperative, Recurrent Subdural Hematoma&amp;hellip; Where Did They Come From?</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/283">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050283</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Paul E. Constanthin
		Arthur Durouchoux
		Gianpaolo Jannelli
		Mégane Le Quang
		Guillaume Chotard
		Julien Engelhardt
		</p>
	<p>Background: High-grade glioma (HGG), formerly known as Glioblastoma multiforme, can be complicated by hematomas, either at the initial presentation or after surgical removal. Rarely, postoperative bleeding can occur extra-axially, resulting in subdural hematomas (SDH) that might require surgical evacuation. Of note, little is known about the cellular composition of those hematomas. Observations: We present the case of a patient operated on for HGG who developed postoperative recurrent SDH that required multiple surgical evacuations. Histopathological analyses of the membranes comprising the SDH revealed the presence of HGG tumoral cells. Conclusions: Based on our observation, hematomas associated with HGG, either extra or intra-axial, should be suspected of being a sign of tumoral recurrence or spread and histopathological analyses might be considered as they could lead to further adaptation of the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s treatment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>High-Grade Glioma Tumoral Cells in a Case of Postoperative, Recurrent Subdural Hematoma&amp;amp;hellip; Where Did They Come From?</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Paul E. Constanthin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arthur Durouchoux</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gianpaolo Jannelli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mégane Le Quang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Guillaume Chotard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julien Engelhardt</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050283</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>283</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050283</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/283</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/282">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 282: Spontaneous Regression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases or Immune Restoration?</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/282</link>
	<description>Spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma is a rare and incompletely understood phenomenon. We report the case of a 61-year-old man with biopsy-proven pulmonary metastases from clear cell renal cell carcinoma who experienced durable tumor regression without receiving any systemic therapy. The patient underwent cryoablation of a symptomatic iliac bone metastasis and discontinued methotrexate, previously prescribed for inflammatory polyarthritis. Serial imaging demonstrated initial slow progression followed by significant shrinkage of pulmonary and mediastinal lesions, leading to a sustained partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. No disease progression has been observed after extended follow-up. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms may explain this observation: restoration of antitumor immunity following withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy, and a systemic immune response triggered by local tumor destruction (abscopal effect). Although such events are exceptional, this case highlights the potential interplay between immune modulation and local therapies in renal cell carcinoma. Further investigation is warranted to better understand these mechanisms and their potential therapeutic implications.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 282: Spontaneous Regression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases or Immune Restoration?</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/282">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050282</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Clara Vacheret
		Fabien Moinard-Butot
		Lucile Reberol
		Alexandre Ciccolini
		Roberto Luigi Cazzato
		Philippe Barthélémy
		</p>
	<p>Spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma is a rare and incompletely understood phenomenon. We report the case of a 61-year-old man with biopsy-proven pulmonary metastases from clear cell renal cell carcinoma who experienced durable tumor regression without receiving any systemic therapy. The patient underwent cryoablation of a symptomatic iliac bone metastasis and discontinued methotrexate, previously prescribed for inflammatory polyarthritis. Serial imaging demonstrated initial slow progression followed by significant shrinkage of pulmonary and mediastinal lesions, leading to a sustained partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. No disease progression has been observed after extended follow-up. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms may explain this observation: restoration of antitumor immunity following withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy, and a systemic immune response triggered by local tumor destruction (abscopal effect). Although such events are exceptional, this case highlights the potential interplay between immune modulation and local therapies in renal cell carcinoma. Further investigation is warranted to better understand these mechanisms and their potential therapeutic implications.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Spontaneous Regression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases or Immune Restoration?</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Clara Vacheret</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fabien Moinard-Butot</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lucile Reberol</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alexandre Ciccolini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Roberto Luigi Cazzato</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Philippe Barthélémy</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050282</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>282</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050282</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/282</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/281">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 281: Recording Medical Errors in Brain Tumor Surgery Can Facilitate Their Avoidance: Single Institution Comparative Cohort Analysis over 19 Years</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/281</link>
	<description>Objectives: Error-tracking studies have become an invaluable tool for gaining deeper insights into the patterns, causes, and clinical consequences of errors. In this paper, we examine the long-term impact of analyzing errors at the level of an individual surgeon. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of an internally maintained prospective database from September 2013 to April 2019 (Group C). These variables were compared with two earlier cohorts: Group A (2000&amp;amp;ndash;2006) and Group B (2006&amp;amp;ndash;2013). The key endpoints assessed included error incidence, type, severity, preventability, and clinical impact. The study also investigated the potential seasonal variations in error incidence, considering the rotation of trainees. Results: A persistent decrease in the mean errors/case (across all types) since records began in 2000 was noted; (1.8 for study group C versus 1.9 and 2.4 for group B and group A respectively, p = 0.048). We observed a drop in error severity score (major errors of 17.5% versus 29.5% and 22.6% respectively, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.00001) and clinical impact (high impact in 0.4% versus 1.0% and 2.7% respectively, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.00001). Conclusions: Ongoing and systematic error tracking and analysis seem to have a lasting impact on reducing both the incidence and severity of errors. These positive outcomes are thought to reflect the establishment of a culture of safety, fostering transparency and constructive feedback within the broader surgical team.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 281: Recording Medical Errors in Brain Tumor Surgery Can Facilitate Their Avoidance: Single Institution Comparative Cohort Analysis over 19 Years</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/281">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050281</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mohammed J. Asha
		Patrick E. Steadman
		Ashkan Samienezhad
		Mark Bernstein
		</p>
	<p>Objectives: Error-tracking studies have become an invaluable tool for gaining deeper insights into the patterns, causes, and clinical consequences of errors. In this paper, we examine the long-term impact of analyzing errors at the level of an individual surgeon. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of an internally maintained prospective database from September 2013 to April 2019 (Group C). These variables were compared with two earlier cohorts: Group A (2000&amp;amp;ndash;2006) and Group B (2006&amp;amp;ndash;2013). The key endpoints assessed included error incidence, type, severity, preventability, and clinical impact. The study also investigated the potential seasonal variations in error incidence, considering the rotation of trainees. Results: A persistent decrease in the mean errors/case (across all types) since records began in 2000 was noted; (1.8 for study group C versus 1.9 and 2.4 for group B and group A respectively, p = 0.048). We observed a drop in error severity score (major errors of 17.5% versus 29.5% and 22.6% respectively, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.00001) and clinical impact (high impact in 0.4% versus 1.0% and 2.7% respectively, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.00001). Conclusions: Ongoing and systematic error tracking and analysis seem to have a lasting impact on reducing both the incidence and severity of errors. These positive outcomes are thought to reflect the establishment of a culture of safety, fostering transparency and constructive feedback within the broader surgical team.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Recording Medical Errors in Brain Tumor Surgery Can Facilitate Their Avoidance: Single Institution Comparative Cohort Analysis over 19 Years</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mohammed J. Asha</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Patrick E. Steadman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ashkan Samienezhad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mark Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050281</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050281</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/281</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/280">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 280: Prostate Cancer Biomarkers with a Focus on Galectin-3: Emerging Clinical and Therapeutic Implications</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/280</link>
	<description>Prostate cancer (PCa) management has evolved with biomarker-driven strategies, yet biological heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment limit their efficacy. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) has emerged as a central node in PCa pathobiology, influencing tumor survival, metastasis, and immune escape. This review comprehensively reviews Gal-3&amp;amp;rsquo;s dual role as a biomarker and a therapeutic target. We first delineate the limitations of the current diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in PCa, establishing the unmet need. We then elucidate the multifunctional biology of Gal-3, detailing its compartment-specific roles in anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and, notably, its function as a master regulator of immunosuppression. The interaction between Gal-3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is explored as a key regulatory interface. Furthermore, we catalog and analyze emerging Gal-3-targeted therapies, emphasizing their rationale for combination with immune checkpoint blockade to reverse therapeutic resistance. Finally, we outline a translational roadmap, advocating for standardized Gal-3 biomarker assays and biomarker-enriched clinical trials. Integrating Gal-3 into the PCa precision medicine toolkit offers a novel strategy to address heterogeneity and improve therapeutic durability.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 280: Prostate Cancer Biomarkers with a Focus on Galectin-3: Emerging Clinical and Therapeutic Implications</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/280">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050280</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hiba Narvel
		Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani
		Adnan Gulam Nabi
		Aman Goyal
		Rohan Garje
		Sanjay Srinivasan
		Hafiz Ahmed
		Deepak Kilari
		</p>
	<p>Prostate cancer (PCa) management has evolved with biomarker-driven strategies, yet biological heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment limit their efficacy. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) has emerged as a central node in PCa pathobiology, influencing tumor survival, metastasis, and immune escape. This review comprehensively reviews Gal-3&amp;amp;rsquo;s dual role as a biomarker and a therapeutic target. We first delineate the limitations of the current diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in PCa, establishing the unmet need. We then elucidate the multifunctional biology of Gal-3, detailing its compartment-specific roles in anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and, notably, its function as a master regulator of immunosuppression. The interaction between Gal-3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is explored as a key regulatory interface. Furthermore, we catalog and analyze emerging Gal-3-targeted therapies, emphasizing their rationale for combination with immune checkpoint blockade to reverse therapeutic resistance. Finally, we outline a translational roadmap, advocating for standardized Gal-3 biomarker assays and biomarker-enriched clinical trials. Integrating Gal-3 into the PCa precision medicine toolkit offers a novel strategy to address heterogeneity and improve therapeutic durability.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Prostate Cancer Biomarkers with a Focus on Galectin-3: Emerging Clinical and Therapeutic Implications</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hiba Narvel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adnan Gulam Nabi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aman Goyal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rohan Garje</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sanjay Srinivasan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hafiz Ahmed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Deepak Kilari</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050280</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050280</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/280</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/279">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 279: The Contemporary Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Radiation Oncology: A Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/279</link>
	<description>Purpose: Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are increasingly being explored as tools with potential applications in radiation oncology, with applications in education, patient care, and workflow optimization. This review evaluates the current landscape and future potential of immersive technologies in clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted via PubMed and Scopus (search date: January 2026) using a Boolean search strategy combining terms for virtual/augmented/mixed reality, radiotherapy, and education/anxiety/training; articles published between 2010 and 2026 were screened independently by two reviewers. An online survey assessed experience with and perceptions of VR among Canadian radiation oncologists. Semi-structured interviews with physicians, residents, therapists, physicists, and a staff psychologist at a large academic tertiary-care center in Canada explored qualitative insights into current use and attitudes toward immersive technologies. Results: VR and AR show utility across multiple domains. In education, platforms such as the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) enable therapists to practice in simulated treatment environments, while VR-based contouring tools reduce segmentation time by 41&amp;amp;ndash;58% and improve spatial understanding. For patient care, immersive VR interventions reduce pre-treatment anxiety by 26&amp;amp;ndash;56%, enhance understanding of procedures, and may decrease sedation in pediatric populations. AR-guided positioning systems demonstrate feasibility with acceptable accuracy, offering radiation-free setup verification. Survey findings revealed limited adoption (&amp;amp;gt;80% reported no use), though 40% believed VR could enhance patient education and 39% desired expanded integration over the next decade. Barriers included cost, limited institutional awareness, and lack of training infrastructure. Conclusions: VR and AR show early potential for improving education, reducing patient anxiety, and enhancing positioning accuracy in radiation oncology. Despite implementation barriers, ongoing trials and technological advances are gradually building the evidence needed to clarify the role of immersive technologies in clinical practice.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 279: The Contemporary Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Radiation Oncology: A Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/279">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050279</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Saad Mohssine
		Marie-Ève Pelland
		Stephane Bedwani
		David Roberge
		</p>
	<p>Purpose: Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are increasingly being explored as tools with potential applications in radiation oncology, with applications in education, patient care, and workflow optimization. This review evaluates the current landscape and future potential of immersive technologies in clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted via PubMed and Scopus (search date: January 2026) using a Boolean search strategy combining terms for virtual/augmented/mixed reality, radiotherapy, and education/anxiety/training; articles published between 2010 and 2026 were screened independently by two reviewers. An online survey assessed experience with and perceptions of VR among Canadian radiation oncologists. Semi-structured interviews with physicians, residents, therapists, physicists, and a staff psychologist at a large academic tertiary-care center in Canada explored qualitative insights into current use and attitudes toward immersive technologies. Results: VR and AR show utility across multiple domains. In education, platforms such as the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) enable therapists to practice in simulated treatment environments, while VR-based contouring tools reduce segmentation time by 41&amp;amp;ndash;58% and improve spatial understanding. For patient care, immersive VR interventions reduce pre-treatment anxiety by 26&amp;amp;ndash;56%, enhance understanding of procedures, and may decrease sedation in pediatric populations. AR-guided positioning systems demonstrate feasibility with acceptable accuracy, offering radiation-free setup verification. Survey findings revealed limited adoption (&amp;amp;gt;80% reported no use), though 40% believed VR could enhance patient education and 39% desired expanded integration over the next decade. Barriers included cost, limited institutional awareness, and lack of training infrastructure. Conclusions: VR and AR show early potential for improving education, reducing patient anxiety, and enhancing positioning accuracy in radiation oncology. Despite implementation barriers, ongoing trials and technological advances are gradually building the evidence needed to clarify the role of immersive technologies in clinical practice.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Contemporary Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Radiation Oncology: A Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Saad Mohssine</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marie-Ève Pelland</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephane Bedwani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David Roberge</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050279</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050279</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/279</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/278">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 278: Significant Correlation of Dynamic Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/278</link>
	<description>Background: Accurate identification of complete or near-complete responders after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is critical for selecting candidates for non-operative management in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While static inflammatory biomarkers have been widely investigated, the predictive value of dynamic changes in systemic inflammation during TNT remains unclear. This study evaluated whether changes in the Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) correlate with magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade (mrTRG) and regrowth risk. Methods: Seventy-three patients with LARC treated with TNT between 2018 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as complete/near-complete responders (C-NCRG; mrTRG1&amp;amp;ndash;2) or residual disease group (RDG; mrTRG3&amp;amp;ndash;5). The PIV was calculated as (platelet &amp;amp;times; monocyte &amp;amp;times; neutrophil)/lymphocyte at treatment initiation (first-PIV), three weeks after completion of chemotherapy (last-PIV), and at regrowth (Rg-PIV). Dynamic changes were defined as &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV (last-PIV minus first-PIV) and &amp;amp;Delta;Rg-PIV (Rg-PIV minus first-PIV). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified optimal cutoffs, and logistic regression assessed independent associations. Results: The baseline PIV did not differ between groups. Last-PIV and &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV were significantly lower in the C-NCRG compared with RDG (p = 0.006). A &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV cutoff of &amp;amp;minus;36.9 discriminated responders (AUC = 0.705; sensitivity 53.7%; specificity 84.4%) and remained independently associated with MRI response in multivariate analysis. In the non-operative management cohort, &amp;amp;Delta;Rg-PIV was significantly lower in patients without regrowth (p = 0.001), with a cutoff of &amp;amp;minus;77.72 (AUC = 0.794; sensitivity 88.9%; specificity 66.7%). Overall survival was superior in the C-NCRG (p = 0.01). Conclusions: A dynamic reduction in the PIV during TNT is significantly associated with favorable MRI response and lower regrowth risk in LARC. PIV dynamics may serve as a noninvasive complementary biomarker to support response assessment and stratification in organ-preservation strategies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-09</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 278: Significant Correlation of Dynamic Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/278">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050278</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sukran Celikarslan
		Duygu Karahacioglu
		Bengi Gurses
		Fatih Selcukbiricik
		Emre Balik
		Derya Salim Uymaz
		Ahmet Rencuzogullari
		Dursun Bugra
		Sahin Lacin
		Kerim Kaban
		Perran Fulden Yumuk
		Nil Molinas Mandel
		Ayse Armutlu
		Burcu Saka
		N. Volkan Adsay
		Metin Vural
		Merve Duman
		Caglayan Selenge Beduk Esen
		Nulifer Kilic Durankus
		Duygu Sezen
		Saliha Ezgi Oymak
		Yasemin Atagun
		Ugur Selek
		</p>
	<p>Background: Accurate identification of complete or near-complete responders after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is critical for selecting candidates for non-operative management in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While static inflammatory biomarkers have been widely investigated, the predictive value of dynamic changes in systemic inflammation during TNT remains unclear. This study evaluated whether changes in the Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) correlate with magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade (mrTRG) and regrowth risk. Methods: Seventy-three patients with LARC treated with TNT between 2018 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as complete/near-complete responders (C-NCRG; mrTRG1&amp;amp;ndash;2) or residual disease group (RDG; mrTRG3&amp;amp;ndash;5). The PIV was calculated as (platelet &amp;amp;times; monocyte &amp;amp;times; neutrophil)/lymphocyte at treatment initiation (first-PIV), three weeks after completion of chemotherapy (last-PIV), and at regrowth (Rg-PIV). Dynamic changes were defined as &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV (last-PIV minus first-PIV) and &amp;amp;Delta;Rg-PIV (Rg-PIV minus first-PIV). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified optimal cutoffs, and logistic regression assessed independent associations. Results: The baseline PIV did not differ between groups. Last-PIV and &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV were significantly lower in the C-NCRG compared with RDG (p = 0.006). A &amp;amp;Delta;-PIV cutoff of &amp;amp;minus;36.9 discriminated responders (AUC = 0.705; sensitivity 53.7%; specificity 84.4%) and remained independently associated with MRI response in multivariate analysis. In the non-operative management cohort, &amp;amp;Delta;Rg-PIV was significantly lower in patients without regrowth (p = 0.001), with a cutoff of &amp;amp;minus;77.72 (AUC = 0.794; sensitivity 88.9%; specificity 66.7%). Overall survival was superior in the C-NCRG (p = 0.01). Conclusions: A dynamic reduction in the PIV during TNT is significantly associated with favorable MRI response and lower regrowth risk in LARC. PIV dynamics may serve as a noninvasive complementary biomarker to support response assessment and stratification in organ-preservation strategies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Significant Correlation of Dynamic Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sukran Celikarslan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Duygu Karahacioglu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bengi Gurses</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatih Selcukbiricik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emre Balik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Derya Salim Uymaz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmet Rencuzogullari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dursun Bugra</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sahin Lacin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kerim Kaban</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Perran Fulden Yumuk</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nil Molinas Mandel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ayse Armutlu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Burcu Saka</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>N. Volkan Adsay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Metin Vural</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Merve Duman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Caglayan Selenge Beduk Esen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nulifer Kilic Durankus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Duygu Sezen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saliha Ezgi Oymak</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yasemin Atagun</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ugur Selek</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050278</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-09</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050278</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/278</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/277">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 277: Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Centre Real-World Evidence Analysis in the Immunotherapy Era</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/277</link>
	<description>Docetaxel has been a standard second-line or later (2L+) treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for more than two decades and remains recommended in current treatment algorithms. However, real-world outcomes in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are limited. This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with 2L+ docetaxel monotherapy between January 2011 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) from docetaxel initiation. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify predictors of OS. A total of 285 patients were analyzed. Median age was 62 years; 43% female, 75% ECOG performance status (PS) 0&amp;amp;ndash;1, and 65% adenocarcinoma. Molecular alterations included EGFR (20%) and KRAS (15%). PD-L1 status was available in 66% of patients. Median docetaxel exposure was three cycles, administered as 2L (48%), 3L (35%), or 4L+ (17%). Prior therapies included chemotherapy (96%), ICI (38%), targeted therapy (21%), and chemo-immunotherapy (10%). mOS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9&amp;amp;ndash;7.3). On multivariate analysis, KRAS alteration (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37&amp;amp;ndash;0.94; p = 0.026) and ECOG PS (1 vs. 0 HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.15&amp;amp;ndash;4.43; p = 0.018, &amp;amp;ge;2 vs. 0 HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.27&amp;amp;ndash;5.41; p = 0.0091) remained independent predictors of OS. Real-world OS with docetaxel is consistent with historical trial data, irrespective of prior ICI, targeted therapy, or chemo-immunotherapy. KRAS mutation and a favourable ECOG PS were associated with improved survival.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 277: Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Centre Real-World Evidence Analysis in the Immunotherapy Era</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/277">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050277</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Christopher F. Theriau
		Yuchen Li
		Deborah Akurang
		Sara M. Moore
		Rosalyn A. Juergens
		Natasha B. Leighl
		Paul Wheatley-Price
		</p>
	<p>Docetaxel has been a standard second-line or later (2L+) treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for more than two decades and remains recommended in current treatment algorithms. However, real-world outcomes in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are limited. This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with 2L+ docetaxel monotherapy between January 2011 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) from docetaxel initiation. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify predictors of OS. A total of 285 patients were analyzed. Median age was 62 years; 43% female, 75% ECOG performance status (PS) 0&amp;amp;ndash;1, and 65% adenocarcinoma. Molecular alterations included EGFR (20%) and KRAS (15%). PD-L1 status was available in 66% of patients. Median docetaxel exposure was three cycles, administered as 2L (48%), 3L (35%), or 4L+ (17%). Prior therapies included chemotherapy (96%), ICI (38%), targeted therapy (21%), and chemo-immunotherapy (10%). mOS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9&amp;amp;ndash;7.3). On multivariate analysis, KRAS alteration (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37&amp;amp;ndash;0.94; p = 0.026) and ECOG PS (1 vs. 0 HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.15&amp;amp;ndash;4.43; p = 0.018, &amp;amp;ge;2 vs. 0 HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.27&amp;amp;ndash;5.41; p = 0.0091) remained independent predictors of OS. Real-world OS with docetaxel is consistent with historical trial data, irrespective of prior ICI, targeted therapy, or chemo-immunotherapy. KRAS mutation and a favourable ECOG PS were associated with improved survival.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Centre Real-World Evidence Analysis in the Immunotherapy Era</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Christopher F. Theriau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuchen Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Deborah Akurang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sara M. Moore</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rosalyn A. Juergens</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Natasha B. Leighl</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Paul Wheatley-Price</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050277</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050277</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/277</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/276">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 276: Forecasting Trends in Androgen Deprivation Therapy Intensification for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort and Time-Series Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/276</link>
	<description>Treatment intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and/or docetaxel in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves survival for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), yet real-world uptake has historically been low. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of Ontario men aged &amp;amp;ge;66 years diagnosed with de novo mHSPC between 2014 and 2022 using linked administrative health data, defining treatment intensification as initiation of an ARPI and/or docetaxel with ADT within six months of diagnosis. Quarterly intensification rates were modeled using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) time-series methods with nonlinear trend specifications, and competing models were compared using information criteria, out-of-sample hold-out forecast accuracy, and long-horizon extrapolation behaviour to project uptake through 2030. Among 6099 men, 24% received treatment intensification, with quarterly intensification rates increasing from 3% in 2014 to 56% in 2022. A restricted cubic spline ARIMA model (ARIMA(1,0,1) + RCS3) was selected as the primary base-case forecast because it showed superior out-of-sample hold-out accuracy and more tempered long-horizon extrapolation. The cubic specification was retained as an upper-bound scenario, reflecting the possibility of continued aggressive momentum in treatment adoption. Both specifications captured a marked inflection after 2020 that temporally coincided with guideline updates and funding expansions. Near-term base-case projections (through 2026) suggest continued growth in intensification toward 80&amp;amp;ndash;85%, with the upper-bound scenario approaching saturation more quickly. Projections beyond 2026 are exploratory and presented for methodological completeness, given the eight-year horizon relative to a nine-year observation window and the widening prediction intervals at extended horizons. Despite substantial growth over time, treatment intensification remains incomplete in routine practice. These findings are temporally consistent with the impact of policy and funding changes on the adoption of evidence-based therapy and underscore the need for ongoing implementation efforts to address persistent clinical and system-level barriers to equitable access.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 276: Forecasting Trends in Androgen Deprivation Therapy Intensification for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort and Time-Series Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/276">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050276</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ealia Khosh Kish
		Erind Dvorani
		Refik Saskin
		Andrew S. Wilton
		Raj Satkunasivam
		Khatereh Aminoltejari
		Amanda Hird
		Kasey Berscheid
		Soumyajit Roy
		Scott C. Morgan
		Michael Ong
		Di Maria Jiang
		Geoffrey T. Gotto
		Bobby Shayegan
		Girish S. Kulkarni
		Rodney H. Breau
		Aly-Khan A. Lalani
		David-Dan Nguyen
		Christopher J. D. Wallis
		</p>
	<p>Treatment intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and/or docetaxel in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves survival for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), yet real-world uptake has historically been low. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of Ontario men aged &amp;amp;ge;66 years diagnosed with de novo mHSPC between 2014 and 2022 using linked administrative health data, defining treatment intensification as initiation of an ARPI and/or docetaxel with ADT within six months of diagnosis. Quarterly intensification rates were modeled using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) time-series methods with nonlinear trend specifications, and competing models were compared using information criteria, out-of-sample hold-out forecast accuracy, and long-horizon extrapolation behaviour to project uptake through 2030. Among 6099 men, 24% received treatment intensification, with quarterly intensification rates increasing from 3% in 2014 to 56% in 2022. A restricted cubic spline ARIMA model (ARIMA(1,0,1) + RCS3) was selected as the primary base-case forecast because it showed superior out-of-sample hold-out accuracy and more tempered long-horizon extrapolation. The cubic specification was retained as an upper-bound scenario, reflecting the possibility of continued aggressive momentum in treatment adoption. Both specifications captured a marked inflection after 2020 that temporally coincided with guideline updates and funding expansions. Near-term base-case projections (through 2026) suggest continued growth in intensification toward 80&amp;amp;ndash;85%, with the upper-bound scenario approaching saturation more quickly. Projections beyond 2026 are exploratory and presented for methodological completeness, given the eight-year horizon relative to a nine-year observation window and the widening prediction intervals at extended horizons. Despite substantial growth over time, treatment intensification remains incomplete in routine practice. These findings are temporally consistent with the impact of policy and funding changes on the adoption of evidence-based therapy and underscore the need for ongoing implementation efforts to address persistent clinical and system-level barriers to equitable access.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Forecasting Trends in Androgen Deprivation Therapy Intensification for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort and Time-Series Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ealia Khosh Kish</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Erind Dvorani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Refik Saskin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrew S. Wilton</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Raj Satkunasivam</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Khatereh Aminoltejari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amanda Hird</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kasey Berscheid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Soumyajit Roy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Scott C. Morgan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Michael Ong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Di Maria Jiang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Geoffrey T. Gotto</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bobby Shayegan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Girish S. Kulkarni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rodney H. Breau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aly-Khan A. Lalani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David-Dan Nguyen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christopher J. D. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050276</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050276</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/276</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/275">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 275: Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/275</link>
	<description>Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its multimodal treatment substantially impair speech, swallowing, breathing, appearance, and psychosocial well-being. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improve symptom monitoring and quality of life in oncology, yet their integration into routine HNC care remains inconsistent. This study assessed patterns of PROM use, perceived value, and barriers to implementation among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in HNC care. Methods: A 30-item cross-sectional survey was distributed to HCPs treating HNC patients between June 2024 and April 2025. The questionnaire explored PROM use in clinical practice and trials, perceived relevance across care phases, and implementation barriers. Respondents were classified as non-users, occasional users, or regular users. Data were analyzed descriptively with comparisons between groups. Results: Among 133 respondents, 33.8% were non-users, 29.3% occasional users, and 36.8% regular users of PROMs. Users reported inviting half of patients to complete PROMs, predominantly via paper-based questionnaires (67.8%). PROMs were mainly applied during active treatment and early follow-up to monitor symptoms, overall health, and emotional well-being, and were less frequently used to guide treatment decisions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HNC-specific tools were most commonly reported. Compared with users, non-users more often cited lack of time, limited training in interpreting PROM data, insufficient institutional support, resource constraints, and lack of appropriate instruments (all p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). PROM use in clinical trials was associated with routine use (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Although PROMs are widely valued in HNC care, their integration into clinical decision-making remains limited. Addressing organizational, educational, and digital barriers is essential to support sustainable implementation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 275: Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/275">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050275</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Tatiana Dragan
		Niclas Hubel
		Jens Lehmann
		Katherine J. Taylor
		Renée Bultijnck
		Tihana Gašpert
		Luigi Lorini
		Vincent Bourbonne
		Arnaud Beddok
		Bartłomiej Tomasik
		Daan Nevens
		Stefano Cavalieri
		Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez
		Esmée Lauren Looman
		Iyizoba-Ebozue Zsuzsanna
		Fatjona Kraja
		Emma Lidington
		Csongor György Lengyel
		Marc Oliva
		Gerardo Petruzzi
		Ana Varges Gomes
		Maria Pilar Solis Hernandez
		Sophie Veldhuijzen van Zanten
		Jesus Brenes Castro
		Francesca Caparrotti
		Giuseppe Fanetti
		Yannick G. Eller
		Chiara Gottardi
		Laurelie R. Wishart
		Petr Szturz
		</p>
	<p>Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its multimodal treatment substantially impair speech, swallowing, breathing, appearance, and psychosocial well-being. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improve symptom monitoring and quality of life in oncology, yet their integration into routine HNC care remains inconsistent. This study assessed patterns of PROM use, perceived value, and barriers to implementation among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in HNC care. Methods: A 30-item cross-sectional survey was distributed to HCPs treating HNC patients between June 2024 and April 2025. The questionnaire explored PROM use in clinical practice and trials, perceived relevance across care phases, and implementation barriers. Respondents were classified as non-users, occasional users, or regular users. Data were analyzed descriptively with comparisons between groups. Results: Among 133 respondents, 33.8% were non-users, 29.3% occasional users, and 36.8% regular users of PROMs. Users reported inviting half of patients to complete PROMs, predominantly via paper-based questionnaires (67.8%). PROMs were mainly applied during active treatment and early follow-up to monitor symptoms, overall health, and emotional well-being, and were less frequently used to guide treatment decisions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HNC-specific tools were most commonly reported. Compared with users, non-users more often cited lack of time, limited training in interpreting PROM data, insufficient institutional support, resource constraints, and lack of appropriate instruments (all p &amp;amp;lt; 0.05). PROM use in clinical trials was associated with routine use (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Although PROMs are widely valued in HNC care, their integration into clinical decision-making remains limited. Addressing organizational, educational, and digital barriers is essential to support sustainable implementation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Tatiana Dragan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Niclas Hubel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jens Lehmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Katherine J. Taylor</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Renée Bultijnck</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tihana Gašpert</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luigi Lorini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vincent Bourbonne</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arnaud Beddok</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bartłomiej Tomasik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Daan Nevens</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stefano Cavalieri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Esmée Lauren Looman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iyizoba-Ebozue Zsuzsanna</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatjona Kraja</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emma Lidington</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Csongor György Lengyel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marc Oliva</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gerardo Petruzzi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ana Varges Gomes</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria Pilar Solis Hernandez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sophie Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jesus Brenes Castro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Francesca Caparrotti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giuseppe Fanetti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yannick G. Eller</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chiara Gottardi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laurelie R. Wishart</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Petr Szturz</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050275</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050275</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/275</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/274">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 274: A Consensus Approach to the Incorporation of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in a Treatment Algorithm for Stage I&amp;ndash;III Resectable Rectal Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/274</link>
	<description>Advances in surgical techniques, radiographic imaging capabilities, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have led to improved outcomes for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Treatment strategies have correspondingly evolved, as seen with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and organ preservation approaches. TNT is a treatment strategy for primary, non-metastatic, resectable mismatch repair proficient rectal cancer where the intent is to administer all appropriate adjuvant therapy in the preoperative phase, including both systemic therapy and chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy. In this setting, TNT is increasingly administered for the purposes of maximizing tumour response to facilitate resection, improving treatment compliance, thus increasing the likelihood of a complete response to allow for organ preservation and for the possibility of improving survival. While several recent randomized controlled trials have described the role of TNT in the contemporary treatment of rectal cancer, there is significant heterogeneity in sequencing of treatments, dosing, allowance for non-operative management, and the potential for over-treatment. Our objective here was to incorporate current evidence to develop a consensus-based institutional treatment algorithm to be used in the ambulatory and multidisciplinary team setting for the treatment of stage I&amp;amp;ndash;III rectal cancer.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 274: A Consensus Approach to the Incorporation of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in a Treatment Algorithm for Stage I&amp;ndash;III Resectable Rectal Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/274">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050274</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sami A. Chadi
		Karineh Kazazian
		Paul Savage
		Christine Brezden-Masley
		Ron Burkes
		Eric Chen
		Anand Govindarajan
		Ali Hosni
		Raymond Jang
		Erin Kennedy
		John Kim
		Jelena Lukovic
		Aruz Mesci
		Catherine O’Brien
		Fayez Quereshy
		Abdulazeez Salawu
		Peter K. Stotland
		Carol J. Swallow
		</p>
	<p>Advances in surgical techniques, radiographic imaging capabilities, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have led to improved outcomes for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Treatment strategies have correspondingly evolved, as seen with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and organ preservation approaches. TNT is a treatment strategy for primary, non-metastatic, resectable mismatch repair proficient rectal cancer where the intent is to administer all appropriate adjuvant therapy in the preoperative phase, including both systemic therapy and chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy. In this setting, TNT is increasingly administered for the purposes of maximizing tumour response to facilitate resection, improving treatment compliance, thus increasing the likelihood of a complete response to allow for organ preservation and for the possibility of improving survival. While several recent randomized controlled trials have described the role of TNT in the contemporary treatment of rectal cancer, there is significant heterogeneity in sequencing of treatments, dosing, allowance for non-operative management, and the potential for over-treatment. Our objective here was to incorporate current evidence to develop a consensus-based institutional treatment algorithm to be used in the ambulatory and multidisciplinary team setting for the treatment of stage I&amp;amp;ndash;III rectal cancer.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Consensus Approach to the Incorporation of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in a Treatment Algorithm for Stage I&amp;amp;ndash;III Resectable Rectal Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sami A. Chadi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Karineh Kazazian</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Paul Savage</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christine Brezden-Masley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ron Burkes</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eric Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anand Govindarajan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ali Hosni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Raymond Jang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Erin Kennedy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>John Kim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jelena Lukovic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aruz Mesci</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Catherine O’Brien</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fayez Quereshy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdulazeez Salawu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Peter K. Stotland</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carol J. Swallow</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050274</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050274</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/274</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/273">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 273: Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/273</link>
	<description>Background: Eyelid malignancies require accurate intraoperative margin control to achieve complete tumor excision while preserving the functional and aesthetic integrity of the periocular region. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is widely regarded as the reference standard for margin-controlled excision, whereas frozen section&amp;amp;ndash;controlled excision (FSC) represents a reliable and widely used alternative in oculoplastic practice. In parallel, several emerging imaging technologies are being investigated to improve real-time tumor detection and surgical precision. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to summarize current evidence on intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. The review focused on established surgical techniques, including MMS and FSC, as well as emerging imaging modalities such as fluorescence confocal microscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. Results: MMS provides complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment and remains the benchmark for high-risk, recurrent, and poorly defined periocular tumors, particularly basal cell carcinoma. FSC offers favorable oncologic outcomes, allows immediate reconstruction, and remains an effective option when MMS is not available. Emerging imaging modalities have shown promising diagnostic performance for tumor detection, presurgical mapping, and intraoperative support, particularly in basal cell carcinoma, although evidence in periocular tumors remains limited for most techniques. AI-assisted approaches have also demonstrated high accuracy in the interpretation of frozen sections and optical imaging data, suggesting potential to improve workflow efficiency and diagnostic consistency. Conclusions: MMS and FSC remain the current standards for intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. Emerging imaging technologies and AI-based tools may further enhance surgical precision and tissue preservation, but most remain investigational in the periocular setting. Further prospective studies are needed to validate their clinical utility, define standardized workflows, and clarify their role alongside established histopathologic techniques.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 273: Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/273">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050273</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Michele Nardella
		Anna Argentesi
		Claudia Pirro
		Claudia Quaranta Leoni
		Francesco M. Quaranta Leoni
		</p>
	<p>Background: Eyelid malignancies require accurate intraoperative margin control to achieve complete tumor excision while preserving the functional and aesthetic integrity of the periocular region. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is widely regarded as the reference standard for margin-controlled excision, whereas frozen section&amp;amp;ndash;controlled excision (FSC) represents a reliable and widely used alternative in oculoplastic practice. In parallel, several emerging imaging technologies are being investigated to improve real-time tumor detection and surgical precision. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to summarize current evidence on intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. The review focused on established surgical techniques, including MMS and FSC, as well as emerging imaging modalities such as fluorescence confocal microscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. Results: MMS provides complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment and remains the benchmark for high-risk, recurrent, and poorly defined periocular tumors, particularly basal cell carcinoma. FSC offers favorable oncologic outcomes, allows immediate reconstruction, and remains an effective option when MMS is not available. Emerging imaging modalities have shown promising diagnostic performance for tumor detection, presurgical mapping, and intraoperative support, particularly in basal cell carcinoma, although evidence in periocular tumors remains limited for most techniques. AI-assisted approaches have also demonstrated high accuracy in the interpretation of frozen sections and optical imaging data, suggesting potential to improve workflow efficiency and diagnostic consistency. Conclusions: MMS and FSC remain the current standards for intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. Emerging imaging technologies and AI-based tools may further enhance surgical precision and tissue preservation, but most remain investigational in the periocular setting. Further prospective studies are needed to validate their clinical utility, define standardized workflows, and clarify their role alongside established histopathologic techniques.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Michele Nardella</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anna Argentesi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Claudia Pirro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Claudia Quaranta Leoni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Francesco M. Quaranta Leoni</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050273</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050273</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/273</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/272">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 272: Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based App for Adverse Effect Management in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Oral Targeted Therapy or Chemotherapy: Findings from a Pilot Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/272</link>
	<description>This pilot study (NCT05743686) evaluated the feasibility of a web-based application enabling patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving oral therapy to self-report and manage treatment-related adverse effects (AEs). Patients were enrolled between January and August 2023. Historical controls were used for comparison. Participants used the web-app to self-report AEs daily for 13 weeks, completed the PRO-CTCAE weekly, and completed a questionnaire assessing psychosocial precursor factors associated with treatment adherence. Some patients and healthcare professionals participated in semi-structured interviews. The study included 28 participants and 185 historical controls. Compared with controls, participants had fewer interactions with hospital pharmacists (0 [0&amp;amp;ndash;1] vs. 0 [0&amp;amp;ndash;7], p = 0.04), with no significant differences in the number of visits, hospitalizations, or modifications to treatment. Concordance between AEs reported via the web-app and PRO-CTCAE was 66.2%. No statistically significant changes were observed in psychosocial precursor factors of treatment adherence following the intervention (all p &amp;amp;gt; 0.05). The qualitative data underscored the generally positive reception of the web-based application among both patients and healthcare professionals. In conclusion, in this small mixed-methods pilot study, monitoring oral cancer therapy-related adverse effects using the web-app was feasible and acceptable, and was associated with a lower frequency of telephone contacts with hospital pharmacists compared with historical usual care. These preliminary findings are exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger, prospectively designed studies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 272: Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based App for Adverse Effect Management in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Oral Targeted Therapy or Chemotherapy: Findings from a Pilot Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/272">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050272</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Julie Lemieux
		Isabelle Côté
		Martine Lemay
		Sophie Lauzier
		Philippe Després
		Christine Desbiens
		Catherine Doyle
		Brigitte Poirier
		Amel Baghdadli
		Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta
		Hermann Nabi
		</p>
	<p>This pilot study (NCT05743686) evaluated the feasibility of a web-based application enabling patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving oral therapy to self-report and manage treatment-related adverse effects (AEs). Patients were enrolled between January and August 2023. Historical controls were used for comparison. Participants used the web-app to self-report AEs daily for 13 weeks, completed the PRO-CTCAE weekly, and completed a questionnaire assessing psychosocial precursor factors associated with treatment adherence. Some patients and healthcare professionals participated in semi-structured interviews. The study included 28 participants and 185 historical controls. Compared with controls, participants had fewer interactions with hospital pharmacists (0 [0&amp;amp;ndash;1] vs. 0 [0&amp;amp;ndash;7], p = 0.04), with no significant differences in the number of visits, hospitalizations, or modifications to treatment. Concordance between AEs reported via the web-app and PRO-CTCAE was 66.2%. No statistically significant changes were observed in psychosocial precursor factors of treatment adherence following the intervention (all p &amp;amp;gt; 0.05). The qualitative data underscored the generally positive reception of the web-based application among both patients and healthcare professionals. In conclusion, in this small mixed-methods pilot study, monitoring oral cancer therapy-related adverse effects using the web-app was feasible and acceptable, and was associated with a lower frequency of telephone contacts with hospital pharmacists compared with historical usual care. These preliminary findings are exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger, prospectively designed studies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based App for Adverse Effect Management in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Oral Targeted Therapy or Chemotherapy: Findings from a Pilot Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Julie Lemieux</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Isabelle Côté</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Martine Lemay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sophie Lauzier</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Philippe Després</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christine Desbiens</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Catherine Doyle</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Brigitte Poirier</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amel Baghdadli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hermann Nabi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050272</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050272</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/272</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/271">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 271: Durable Response to Selpercatinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring a Novel TIMM23B::RET Fusion: A Case Report</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/271</link>
	<description>RET fusions are rare but actionable oncogenic drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), occurring in a small molecular subset with limited clinical evidence for selective RET inhibition. We report a 77-year-old woman with mCRC harboring a rare TIMM23B::RET fusion who achieved durable benefit from selpercatinib after progression on capecitabine. Molecular profiling showed RAS/BRAF wild-type, microsatellite-stable disease with a TIMM23B::RET fusion. Selpercatinib induced a marked decline in tumor markers and a sustained partial response on serial imaging. Treatment was complicated by grade 3 hepatotoxicity, requiring temporary interruption and dose reduction to 80 mg twice daily. Despite this, disease control was maintained without further grade &amp;amp;ge; 3 toxicity. At the time of writing, the patient remains on treatment with progression-free survival exceeding 14 months. To our knowledge, this is among the first detailed reports of mCRC harboring a TIMM23B::RET fusion with documented clinical benefit from selpercatinib. This case highlights the value of comprehensive genomic profiling and individualized toxicity management in rare molecular subsets of mCRC.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 271: Durable Response to Selpercatinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring a Novel TIMM23B::RET Fusion: A Case Report</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/271">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050271</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ziyan Tong
		Mengyuan Yang
		Shanshan Weng
		Ying Yuan
		</p>
	<p>RET fusions are rare but actionable oncogenic drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), occurring in a small molecular subset with limited clinical evidence for selective RET inhibition. We report a 77-year-old woman with mCRC harboring a rare TIMM23B::RET fusion who achieved durable benefit from selpercatinib after progression on capecitabine. Molecular profiling showed RAS/BRAF wild-type, microsatellite-stable disease with a TIMM23B::RET fusion. Selpercatinib induced a marked decline in tumor markers and a sustained partial response on serial imaging. Treatment was complicated by grade 3 hepatotoxicity, requiring temporary interruption and dose reduction to 80 mg twice daily. Despite this, disease control was maintained without further grade &amp;amp;ge; 3 toxicity. At the time of writing, the patient remains on treatment with progression-free survival exceeding 14 months. To our knowledge, this is among the first detailed reports of mCRC harboring a TIMM23B::RET fusion with documented clinical benefit from selpercatinib. This case highlights the value of comprehensive genomic profiling and individualized toxicity management in rare molecular subsets of mCRC.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Durable Response to Selpercatinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring a Novel TIMM23B::RET Fusion: A Case Report</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ziyan Tong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mengyuan Yang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shanshan Weng</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ying Yuan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050271</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050271</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/271</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/270">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 270: Sexuality in Adult Cancer Patients Living with Enterostomy or Urostomy: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/270</link>
	<description>Cancer patients with an enterostomy or urostomy face significant physical and psychological challenges that impact their sexuality and quality of life. Despite its importance, this topic is often overlooked in clinical settings. This study explores the lived experiences of these patients regarding their sexual health. Using a descriptive phenomenological approach, researchers performed face-to-face interviews with 33 adult cancer patients living with enterostomy or urostomy at Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Italy. Data were analyzed according to Giorgi&amp;amp;rsquo;s method to identify core themes. Four primary themes emerged: the emotional weight of surgery, fear of rejection or disgust, the influence of partner reactions on intimacy, and the struggle to find professional guidance. Participants reported reduced desire and altered body image, though many utilized coping strategies like personal resilience and partner support. Stoma surgery profoundly affects sexuality, yet professional support remains inadequate. The study highlights a critical need for multidisciplinary care and proactive communication. Integrating sexual health into routine oncological practice is essential for providing person-centred care and improving overall quality of life.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 270: Sexuality in Adult Cancer Patients Living with Enterostomy or Urostomy: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/270">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050270</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Nicolò Panattoni
		Giulia Manzon
		Alessia Campoli
		Valentina Anselmi
		Francesca Laurenza
		Chiara Giammaria
		Aurora De Leo
		Alessandro Spano
		Fabrizio Petrone
		Emanuele Di Simone
		Laura Iacorossi
		</p>
	<p>Cancer patients with an enterostomy or urostomy face significant physical and psychological challenges that impact their sexuality and quality of life. Despite its importance, this topic is often overlooked in clinical settings. This study explores the lived experiences of these patients regarding their sexual health. Using a descriptive phenomenological approach, researchers performed face-to-face interviews with 33 adult cancer patients living with enterostomy or urostomy at Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Italy. Data were analyzed according to Giorgi&amp;amp;rsquo;s method to identify core themes. Four primary themes emerged: the emotional weight of surgery, fear of rejection or disgust, the influence of partner reactions on intimacy, and the struggle to find professional guidance. Participants reported reduced desire and altered body image, though many utilized coping strategies like personal resilience and partner support. Stoma surgery profoundly affects sexuality, yet professional support remains inadequate. The study highlights a critical need for multidisciplinary care and proactive communication. Integrating sexual health into routine oncological practice is essential for providing person-centred care and improving overall quality of life.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Sexuality in Adult Cancer Patients Living with Enterostomy or Urostomy: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Nicolò Panattoni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giulia Manzon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alessia Campoli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Valentina Anselmi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Francesca Laurenza</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chiara Giammaria</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aurora De Leo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alessandro Spano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fabrizio Petrone</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emanuele Di Simone</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laura Iacorossi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050270</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>270</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050270</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/270</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/269">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 269: Propeller Flaps in Extremity Sarcoma Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Reconstructive Outcomes and Oncologic Considerations</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/269</link>
	<description>Extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection often results in complex defects requiring reconstruction to preserve function and support multidisciplinary treatment. Propeller flaps have emerged as a local alternative to free flaps in selected cases, but their role in sarcoma reconstruction remains incompletely defined. This systematic review aimed to assess the current evidence on the indications, reconstructive outcomes, and oncologic reporting of propeller flaps in extremity sarcoma reconstruction. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Studies reporting perforator-based propeller flaps after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection were included. Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of study design, patient populations, and outcome reporting. Nineteen studies were included. Across the published literature, 656 patients were described overall, including 185 propeller flaps used after sarcoma resection. Most reconstructions involved the lower extremity, accounting for more than 95% of reported cases. Flap survival was generally high; among studies providing extractable numerical data, complete flap survival was 92.7% (115/124), total flap loss was 3.8% (2/52), and partial necrosis occurred in 9.6% (5/52) of flaps. Venous congestion was the most frequently reported complication. Oncologic outcomes were inconsistently reported, and comparative recurrence-related data were very limited. Available data suggest that propeller flaps can provide reliable coverage with acceptable complication rates in selected cases. Oncologic outcomes were sparsely and inconsistently reported, and the current literature does not show a clear signal of increased local recurrence; however, the available evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding oncologic safety or equivalence compared with other reconstructive strategies. These findings support consideration of propeller flaps as a complementary reconstructive option in carefully selected patients, although higher-quality studies with standardized oncologic outcomes are needed.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 269: Propeller Flaps in Extremity Sarcoma Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Reconstructive Outcomes and Oncologic Considerations</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/269">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050269</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sara Matarazzo
		Beatrice Corsini
		Claudia Lauricella
		Elisa Bascialla
		Luigi Valdatta
		Ferruccio Paganini
		</p>
	<p>Extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection often results in complex defects requiring reconstruction to preserve function and support multidisciplinary treatment. Propeller flaps have emerged as a local alternative to free flaps in selected cases, but their role in sarcoma reconstruction remains incompletely defined. This systematic review aimed to assess the current evidence on the indications, reconstructive outcomes, and oncologic reporting of propeller flaps in extremity sarcoma reconstruction. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Studies reporting perforator-based propeller flaps after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection were included. Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of study design, patient populations, and outcome reporting. Nineteen studies were included. Across the published literature, 656 patients were described overall, including 185 propeller flaps used after sarcoma resection. Most reconstructions involved the lower extremity, accounting for more than 95% of reported cases. Flap survival was generally high; among studies providing extractable numerical data, complete flap survival was 92.7% (115/124), total flap loss was 3.8% (2/52), and partial necrosis occurred in 9.6% (5/52) of flaps. Venous congestion was the most frequently reported complication. Oncologic outcomes were inconsistently reported, and comparative recurrence-related data were very limited. Available data suggest that propeller flaps can provide reliable coverage with acceptable complication rates in selected cases. Oncologic outcomes were sparsely and inconsistently reported, and the current literature does not show a clear signal of increased local recurrence; however, the available evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding oncologic safety or equivalence compared with other reconstructive strategies. These findings support consideration of propeller flaps as a complementary reconstructive option in carefully selected patients, although higher-quality studies with standardized oncologic outcomes are needed.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Propeller Flaps in Extremity Sarcoma Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Reconstructive Outcomes and Oncologic Considerations</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sara Matarazzo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Beatrice Corsini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Claudia Lauricella</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elisa Bascialla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luigi Valdatta</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ferruccio Paganini</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050269</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050269</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/269</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/268">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 268: Overlapping Toxicities of Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib: A Case of Capillary Leak Syndrome with Severe Erythroblastosis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/268</link>
	<description>Combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) improve outcomes in advanced melanoma, especially in heavily pretreated patients, but introduce complex, overlapping toxicities. Although immune-related adverse events and TKI-specific toxicities are well characterized individually, their concurrent presentation is uncommon and can obscure diagnosis. Capillary leak syndrome (CLS), a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of ICIs, further complicates recognition due to nonspecific features and variable onset. A 43-year-old woman with metastatic BRAF wild-type melanoma, in complete metabolic response on lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, presented with generalized edema, hypotension, thrombocytopenia, and marked erythroblastosis. Extensive evaluation, including bone marrow analysis, excluded malignancy, infection, and autoimmune disease, but revealed multilineage dysplasia with pronounced erythroid stress. Imaging confirmed sustained remission with pleural effusions and ascites. Dual toxicity was suspected: lenvatinib-related hematologic toxicity and pembrolizumab-associated CLS. Both agents were discontinued, and corticosteroids followed by IVIG for steroid-refractory edema led to gradual recovery. This case underscores the diagnostic challenge of overlapping ICI&amp;amp;ndash;TKI toxicities. Mechanistically, VEGF pathway inhibition may disrupt marrow endothelial integrity and hematopoietic homeostasis, promoting cytopenias and erythroid precursor release, while immune activation drives cytokine-mediated endothelial dysfunction and vascular hyperpermeability. Early recognition and prompt immunomodulatory management are critical to improving outcomes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 268: Overlapping Toxicities of Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib: A Case of Capillary Leak Syndrome with Severe Erythroblastosis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/268">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050268</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Aikaterini Gkoufa
		Iraklis Patsialos
		Christos Stafylidis
		Amalia Anastasopoulou
		Dimitra Adamou
		Helen Gogas
		Panagiotis T. Diamantopoulos
		</p>
	<p>Combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) improve outcomes in advanced melanoma, especially in heavily pretreated patients, but introduce complex, overlapping toxicities. Although immune-related adverse events and TKI-specific toxicities are well characterized individually, their concurrent presentation is uncommon and can obscure diagnosis. Capillary leak syndrome (CLS), a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of ICIs, further complicates recognition due to nonspecific features and variable onset. A 43-year-old woman with metastatic BRAF wild-type melanoma, in complete metabolic response on lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, presented with generalized edema, hypotension, thrombocytopenia, and marked erythroblastosis. Extensive evaluation, including bone marrow analysis, excluded malignancy, infection, and autoimmune disease, but revealed multilineage dysplasia with pronounced erythroid stress. Imaging confirmed sustained remission with pleural effusions and ascites. Dual toxicity was suspected: lenvatinib-related hematologic toxicity and pembrolizumab-associated CLS. Both agents were discontinued, and corticosteroids followed by IVIG for steroid-refractory edema led to gradual recovery. This case underscores the diagnostic challenge of overlapping ICI&amp;amp;ndash;TKI toxicities. Mechanistically, VEGF pathway inhibition may disrupt marrow endothelial integrity and hematopoietic homeostasis, promoting cytopenias and erythroid precursor release, while immune activation drives cytokine-mediated endothelial dysfunction and vascular hyperpermeability. Early recognition and prompt immunomodulatory management are critical to improving outcomes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Overlapping Toxicities of Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib: A Case of Capillary Leak Syndrome with Severe Erythroblastosis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Aikaterini Gkoufa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iraklis Patsialos</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christos Stafylidis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amalia Anastasopoulou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dimitra Adamou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Helen Gogas</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Panagiotis T. Diamantopoulos</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050268</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050268</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/268</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/267">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 267: Clinical Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Metastatic Non-Squamous NSCLC Treated with First-Line Pembrolizumab&amp;ndash;Chemotherapy: A Real-World Study from Serbia</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/267</link>
	<description>Background: Pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed&amp;amp;ndash;platinum chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1&amp;amp;ndash;49%. Real-world data on treatment outcomes and the prognostic relevance of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in this population remain limited, particularly in Eastern Europe. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center real-world study including patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS of 1&amp;amp;ndash;49% treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed&amp;amp;ndash;platinum chemotherapy between June 2024 and May 2025. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors associated with PFS, including baseline clinical characteristics and organ-specific irAEs graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 7.03 months (95% CI, 4.81&amp;amp;ndash;9.26). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 52 patients (48.6%), with thyroid (21.5%) and skin (13.1%) irAEs being the most frequent. The majority of irAEs were grade 1&amp;amp;ndash;2, while grade 3&amp;amp;ndash;4 events were rare (4.7%) and limited to hepatic toxicity and pneumonitis, all leading to treatment discontinuation. In multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status 2 was independently associated with inferior PFS (HR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74&amp;amp;ndash;5.48; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Conversely, the occurrence of thyroid irAEs (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17&amp;amp;ndash;0.78; p = 0.009) and skin irAEs (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10&amp;amp;ndash;0.79; p = 0.016) was independently associated with prolonged PFS, whereas pulmonary, hepatic, and gastrointestinal irAEs were not. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab&amp;amp;ndash;chemotherapy, clinical outcomes were consistent with prior real-world experience. These findings suggest that low-grade, manageable immune toxicities may serve as pragmatic on-treatment markers of benefit. However, given the retrospective design, limited sample size, and the absence of time-dependent analyses, these associations should be interpreted with caution and considered hypothesis-generating rather than causal.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 267: Clinical Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Metastatic Non-Squamous NSCLC Treated with First-Line Pembrolizumab&amp;ndash;Chemotherapy: A Real-World Study from Serbia</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/267">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050267</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Zlatan Bojić
		Filip Marković
		Milica Kontić
		</p>
	<p>Background: Pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed&amp;amp;ndash;platinum chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1&amp;amp;ndash;49%. Real-world data on treatment outcomes and the prognostic relevance of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in this population remain limited, particularly in Eastern Europe. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center real-world study including patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS of 1&amp;amp;ndash;49% treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed&amp;amp;ndash;platinum chemotherapy between June 2024 and May 2025. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors associated with PFS, including baseline clinical characteristics and organ-specific irAEs graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 7.03 months (95% CI, 4.81&amp;amp;ndash;9.26). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 52 patients (48.6%), with thyroid (21.5%) and skin (13.1%) irAEs being the most frequent. The majority of irAEs were grade 1&amp;amp;ndash;2, while grade 3&amp;amp;ndash;4 events were rare (4.7%) and limited to hepatic toxicity and pneumonitis, all leading to treatment discontinuation. In multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status 2 was independently associated with inferior PFS (HR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74&amp;amp;ndash;5.48; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Conversely, the occurrence of thyroid irAEs (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17&amp;amp;ndash;0.78; p = 0.009) and skin irAEs (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10&amp;amp;ndash;0.79; p = 0.016) was independently associated with prolonged PFS, whereas pulmonary, hepatic, and gastrointestinal irAEs were not. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab&amp;amp;ndash;chemotherapy, clinical outcomes were consistent with prior real-world experience. These findings suggest that low-grade, manageable immune toxicities may serve as pragmatic on-treatment markers of benefit. However, given the retrospective design, limited sample size, and the absence of time-dependent analyses, these associations should be interpreted with caution and considered hypothesis-generating rather than causal.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Clinical Outcomes and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Metastatic Non-Squamous NSCLC Treated with First-Line Pembrolizumab&amp;amp;ndash;Chemotherapy: A Real-World Study from Serbia</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Zlatan Bojić</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Filip Marković</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Milica Kontić</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050267</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050267</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/267</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/266">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 266: Quality of Life and Healthcare Experiences of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/266</link>
	<description>Anal cancer is a rare and under-researched malignancy, leading to limited understanding of patients&amp;amp;rsquo; experiences and potentially insufficiently tailored care. This study explored the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and healthcare interactions of people with anal cancer. Patients with confirmed diagnosis took part in semi-structured interviews, supplemented by two European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) HRQoL questionnaires. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and organized into themes. Twenty-one patients (71% female; mean age of 62 years) from five countries were included. HRQoL challenges were identified across four phases: illness onset, diagnosis, treatment, and life beyond treatment. Key themes included misdiagnosis, not being taken seriously, and emotional and social disruptions. Additional themes involved stigma, embarrassment, strain on loved ones, and healthcare experiences. Defecation problems were especially burdensome, beginning at onset, intensifying during treatment, and persisting as a chronic issue affecting well-being. Patients described coping strategies and sometimes reframed their experiences positively, expressing gratitude for support received. Questionnaire findings aligned with patients&amp;amp;rsquo; reports of prominent physical symptoms. Anal cancer remains highly stigmatized, creating complex physical, emotional, and social challenges. Individualized care and extended psychosocial and practical support beyond treatment are essential to improve HRQoL and dignity in survivorship.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 266: Quality of Life and Healthcare Experiences of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/266">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050266</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Andreia F. Moura
		Catarina S. Padilla
		Samuel M. Vorbach
		Emily I. Holthuis
		Baukelien van Triest
		Cristiane D. Bergerot
		Vassilios Vassiliou
		Emir Celik
		Kübra Akkaya
		Irfan Cicin
		Winette T. A. van der Graaf
		Olga Husson
		Samantha C. Sodergren
		</p>
	<p>Anal cancer is a rare and under-researched malignancy, leading to limited understanding of patients&amp;amp;rsquo; experiences and potentially insufficiently tailored care. This study explored the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and healthcare interactions of people with anal cancer. Patients with confirmed diagnosis took part in semi-structured interviews, supplemented by two European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) HRQoL questionnaires. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and organized into themes. Twenty-one patients (71% female; mean age of 62 years) from five countries were included. HRQoL challenges were identified across four phases: illness onset, diagnosis, treatment, and life beyond treatment. Key themes included misdiagnosis, not being taken seriously, and emotional and social disruptions. Additional themes involved stigma, embarrassment, strain on loved ones, and healthcare experiences. Defecation problems were especially burdensome, beginning at onset, intensifying during treatment, and persisting as a chronic issue affecting well-being. Patients described coping strategies and sometimes reframed their experiences positively, expressing gratitude for support received. Questionnaire findings aligned with patients&amp;amp;rsquo; reports of prominent physical symptoms. Anal cancer remains highly stigmatized, creating complex physical, emotional, and social challenges. Individualized care and extended psychosocial and practical support beyond treatment are essential to improve HRQoL and dignity in survivorship.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Quality of Life and Healthcare Experiences of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Andreia F. Moura</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Catarina S. Padilla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Samuel M. Vorbach</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emily I. Holthuis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Baukelien van Triest</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Cristiane D. Bergerot</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vassilios Vassiliou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emir Celik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kübra Akkaya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Irfan Cicin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Winette T. A. van der Graaf</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olga Husson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Samantha C. Sodergren</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050266</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050266</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/266</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/265">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 265: Association of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) with Therapy Response and Clinical Outcomes in HPV-Related Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Report</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/265</link>
	<description>Background: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a critical modulator of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). Its clinical significance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains controversial because of HPV-dependent tumor biology and the limitations of single-timepoint biomarker assessments. This preliminary study evaluates whether dynamic changes in circulating MIF (&amp;amp;Delta;MIF) in an HPV-stratified longitudinal cohort reflect disease severity and treatment response. Methods: Ninety-six serial serum samples were analyzed from 27 HNSCC patients (22 HPV-positive, 5 HPV-negative) from diagnosis through therapy and follow-up. Serum MIF and anti-HPV16 E7 IgG were quantified by ELISA, and &amp;amp;Delta;MIF was defined as the change in MIF concentration between consecutive visits. Results: Baseline MIF did not correlate with clinical stage in the total cohort (p = 0.63). However, 56% of HPV-positive patients exhibited a positive correlation between elevated MIF and advanced stage. Following chemoradiotherapy, the HPV-negative group showed a consistent and significant decline in MIF (mean &amp;amp;Delta;MIF = &amp;amp;minus;1.23, p = 0.031), corresponding with no evidence of disease (NED). In contrast, the HPV-positive group showed heterogeneous trajectories (mean &amp;amp;Delta;MIF = +0.21, p = 0.94), with several patients demonstrating paradoxical declines in MIF during active disease or relapse, followed by recovery upon reaching NED. In select cases, MIF dynamics were closely synchronized with anti-E7 IgG levels. Conclusions: Serum MIF dynamics are strongly dependent on HPV status. While MIF serves as a reliable therapy-monitoring marker in HPV-negative HNSCC, it may play a complex and paradoxical immunomodulatory role in HPV-positive disease. These preliminary findings support the need for larger prospective, HPV-stratified trials.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 265: Association of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) with Therapy Response and Clinical Outcomes in HPV-Related Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Report</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/265">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050265</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Janki Naidugari
		Shruti Wadhwa
		Benjamin Xie
		Sarah Taheri
		Indraneel Kulkarni
		Luke Johnson
		Heehwa G. Son
		John Strickley
		Shadmehr Demehri
		Joongho J. Joh
		Robert Mitchell
		Rebecca Redman
		</p>
	<p>Background: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a critical modulator of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). Its clinical significance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains controversial because of HPV-dependent tumor biology and the limitations of single-timepoint biomarker assessments. This preliminary study evaluates whether dynamic changes in circulating MIF (&amp;amp;Delta;MIF) in an HPV-stratified longitudinal cohort reflect disease severity and treatment response. Methods: Ninety-six serial serum samples were analyzed from 27 HNSCC patients (22 HPV-positive, 5 HPV-negative) from diagnosis through therapy and follow-up. Serum MIF and anti-HPV16 E7 IgG were quantified by ELISA, and &amp;amp;Delta;MIF was defined as the change in MIF concentration between consecutive visits. Results: Baseline MIF did not correlate with clinical stage in the total cohort (p = 0.63). However, 56% of HPV-positive patients exhibited a positive correlation between elevated MIF and advanced stage. Following chemoradiotherapy, the HPV-negative group showed a consistent and significant decline in MIF (mean &amp;amp;Delta;MIF = &amp;amp;minus;1.23, p = 0.031), corresponding with no evidence of disease (NED). In contrast, the HPV-positive group showed heterogeneous trajectories (mean &amp;amp;Delta;MIF = +0.21, p = 0.94), with several patients demonstrating paradoxical declines in MIF during active disease or relapse, followed by recovery upon reaching NED. In select cases, MIF dynamics were closely synchronized with anti-E7 IgG levels. Conclusions: Serum MIF dynamics are strongly dependent on HPV status. While MIF serves as a reliable therapy-monitoring marker in HPV-negative HNSCC, it may play a complex and paradoxical immunomodulatory role in HPV-positive disease. These preliminary findings support the need for larger prospective, HPV-stratified trials.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Association of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) with Therapy Response and Clinical Outcomes in HPV-Related Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Report</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Janki Naidugari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shruti Wadhwa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Benjamin Xie</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sarah Taheri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Indraneel Kulkarni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luke Johnson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Heehwa G. Son</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>John Strickley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shadmehr Demehri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joongho J. Joh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Robert Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rebecca Redman</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050265</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050265</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/265</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/264">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 264: Retinoblastoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/264</link>
	<description>Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignancy of childhood and is most often driven by loss of the RB1 tumor suppressor gene. While current treatments achieve high survival rates, they are frequently associated with significant morbidity, highlighting the need for more precise, biology-driven therapeutic methods. Increasing evidence suggests that retinoblastoma progression is not dictated by neoplastic cells alone, but rather by complex interactions within the tumor microenvironment, including stromal and immune components. In this review, we examine the cellular and molecular landscape of retinoblastoma with a particular focus on the immune microenvironment, including the spatial distribution and functional roles of innate and adaptive immune cells, as well as immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. We discuss how tumor- and treatment-induced immune suppression shapes disease progression and therapeutic response, and how chemotherapy alters immune infiltration and checkpoint expression. Finally, we explore emerging immunotherapeutic and cell-based approaches, emphasizing the potential for combination therapies that integrate immune modulation to improve outcomes and reduce long-term toxicity in retinoblastoma.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 264: Retinoblastoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/264">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050264</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ashwinaa M. Vaithianathan
		George Zanazzi
		</p>
	<p>Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignancy of childhood and is most often driven by loss of the RB1 tumor suppressor gene. While current treatments achieve high survival rates, they are frequently associated with significant morbidity, highlighting the need for more precise, biology-driven therapeutic methods. Increasing evidence suggests that retinoblastoma progression is not dictated by neoplastic cells alone, but rather by complex interactions within the tumor microenvironment, including stromal and immune components. In this review, we examine the cellular and molecular landscape of retinoblastoma with a particular focus on the immune microenvironment, including the spatial distribution and functional roles of innate and adaptive immune cells, as well as immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. We discuss how tumor- and treatment-induced immune suppression shapes disease progression and therapeutic response, and how chemotherapy alters immune infiltration and checkpoint expression. Finally, we explore emerging immunotherapeutic and cell-based approaches, emphasizing the potential for combination therapies that integrate immune modulation to improve outcomes and reduce long-term toxicity in retinoblastoma.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Retinoblastoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ashwinaa M. Vaithianathan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>George Zanazzi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050264</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050264</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/264</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/263">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 263: Educational Needs Regarding Mental Health of Professionals Working with Young Adults with Cancer: A European Survey</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/263</link>
	<description>Worldwide, an increase in cancer diagnosis has been identified, especially in people under 50 years and in young adults (YAs, age group 18&amp;amp;ndash;39 years) [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 263: Educational Needs Regarding Mental Health of Professionals Working with Young Adults with Cancer: A European Survey</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/263">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050263</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sid Morsink
		Leonieke W. Kranenburg
		Johanna Berg
		Evangeli Bista
		Saintuya Dashondog
		Siret Kivistik
		Mari Lahti
		Carmen Monge-Montero
		Joaquim Oliveira Lopes
		Evanthia Sakellari
		Duygu Sezgin
		Margarida Rodrigues Tomás
		Merle Varik
		Wendy H. Oldenmenger
		</p>
	<p>Worldwide, an increase in cancer diagnosis has been identified, especially in people under 50 years and in young adults (YAs, age group 18&amp;amp;ndash;39 years) [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Educational Needs Regarding Mental Health of Professionals Working with Young Adults with Cancer: A European Survey</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sid Morsink</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Leonieke W. Kranenburg</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Johanna Berg</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Evangeli Bista</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saintuya Dashondog</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Siret Kivistik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mari Lahti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carmen Monge-Montero</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joaquim Oliveira Lopes</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Evanthia Sakellari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Duygu Sezgin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Margarida Rodrigues Tomás</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Merle Varik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wendy H. Oldenmenger</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050263</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050263</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/263</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/262">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 262: Greek Physicians&amp;rsquo; Skills and Factors Affecting Breaking Bad News to Cancer Patients</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/262</link>
	<description>Background/Objectives: Breaking bad news is crucial for patient-centered care. This study aimed to assess physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; skills and investigate the possible factors affecting their ability to communicate bad news. Methods: This web-based cross-sectional survey of 633 Greek physicians included demographic and other breaking bad news related questions to evaluate their skills and practices in breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Results: Most physicians defined bad news (91.5%) and frequently used both verbal and non-verbal communication (82.6%). About three-quarters rated their ability to communicate bad news as good to very good (75%) and about half (50.4%) disclosed bad news in a private and comfortable setting. Emotional responses, like sadness (53.4%) and compassion (49.6%), were common, while fears mainly focused on diminishing patients&amp;amp;rsquo; hope (60.8%) or managing patients&amp;amp;rsquo; reactions (53.9%). Female physicians showed higher anxiety (15.9% vs. 4.3%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005) and sadness (53.4% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.018) and lower self-perceived competence (p = 0.001) compared to males. Specialists and physicians with formal training demonstrated greater competence (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005) and were more likely to choose private and comfortable settings (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005). Multivariable logistic regression identified increased age (OR = 1.03; p = 0.018), male sex (OR = 1.63; p = 0.015), formal training in breaking bad news (OR = 9.34; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005), residence outside Athens (OR = 2.27; p = 0.002), working in oncology (OR = 1.90; p = 0.043), and employment in private hospitals (OR = 1.81; p = 0.014) as statistically significant predictors of good to very good ability to communicate bad news to cancer patients. Conclusions: These findings highlight the value of structured training, targeted practice and institutional support in fostering physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; communication skills and boosting patient-centered care.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 262: Greek Physicians&amp;rsquo; Skills and Factors Affecting Breaking Bad News to Cancer Patients</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/262">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050262</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Georgios Goumas
		Theodoros I. Dardavesis
		Konstantinos Syrigos
		Nikolaos Syrigos
		Dimitra S. Mouliou
		Effie Simou
		</p>
	<p>Background/Objectives: Breaking bad news is crucial for patient-centered care. This study aimed to assess physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; skills and investigate the possible factors affecting their ability to communicate bad news. Methods: This web-based cross-sectional survey of 633 Greek physicians included demographic and other breaking bad news related questions to evaluate their skills and practices in breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Results: Most physicians defined bad news (91.5%) and frequently used both verbal and non-verbal communication (82.6%). About three-quarters rated their ability to communicate bad news as good to very good (75%) and about half (50.4%) disclosed bad news in a private and comfortable setting. Emotional responses, like sadness (53.4%) and compassion (49.6%), were common, while fears mainly focused on diminishing patients&amp;amp;rsquo; hope (60.8%) or managing patients&amp;amp;rsquo; reactions (53.9%). Female physicians showed higher anxiety (15.9% vs. 4.3%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005) and sadness (53.4% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.018) and lower self-perceived competence (p = 0.001) compared to males. Specialists and physicians with formal training demonstrated greater competence (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005) and were more likely to choose private and comfortable settings (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005). Multivariable logistic regression identified increased age (OR = 1.03; p = 0.018), male sex (OR = 1.63; p = 0.015), formal training in breaking bad news (OR = 9.34; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0005), residence outside Athens (OR = 2.27; p = 0.002), working in oncology (OR = 1.90; p = 0.043), and employment in private hospitals (OR = 1.81; p = 0.014) as statistically significant predictors of good to very good ability to communicate bad news to cancer patients. Conclusions: These findings highlight the value of structured training, targeted practice and institutional support in fostering physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; communication skills and boosting patient-centered care.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Greek Physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; Skills and Factors Affecting Breaking Bad News to Cancer Patients</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Georgios Goumas</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Theodoros I. Dardavesis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Konstantinos Syrigos</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nikolaos Syrigos</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dimitra S. Mouliou</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Effie Simou</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050262</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050262</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/262</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/261">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 261: Assessment of Risks and Outcomes of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome/Veno-Occlusive Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Including Potentially Undiagnosed Cases&amp;mdash;A Multicenter Canadian Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/261</link>
	<description>Background and Methods: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a severe complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). Given the increased use of allo-SCT and variability of SOS/VOD incidence in published reports, cases of allo-SCT from two major transplant centers in Ontario, Canada (2019&amp;amp;ndash;2021), were reviewed to identify risk factors prognostic for SOS/VOD onset and to assess outcomes. Results: This study included 536 allo-SCT cases, with a mean age of 53.4 years [min&amp;amp;ndash;max: 17&amp;amp;ndash;76], including 322 male recipients and 214 female recipients. There were 17 SOS/VOD cases diagnosed during the first 100 days, representing 3% of allo-SCT cases, with a median age of 48 years [18&amp;amp;ndash;72] and equally distributed between genders. All cases were classical SOS/VOD, with onset prior to day 21 [1&amp;amp;ndash;20]. These cases were graded as one mild, six moderate, six severe, and four very severe cases. The mild case of SOS/VOD recovered after treatment with diuretics. In respect to the 16 cases graded as &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD, the average inpatient stay was 56 days [24&amp;amp;ndash;178], and eight patients were in the ICU for an average of 6 days [0&amp;amp;ndash;42], with a median of zero days. Five of the sixteen &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD patients died within 100 days [9&amp;amp;ndash;59]&amp;amp;mdash;four from SOS/VOD. After day +100, five remained alive, and six died between days 125 and 419. Treatments for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD included diuretics [n = 15], steroids [n = 3], and defibrotide [n = 9]. The nine patients treated with defibrotide were graded as moderate [n = 2], severe [n = 4], and very severe [n = 3]. Three of the nine patients treated with defibrotide died before day 100, and the other six survived beyond day 100. None of the six surviving patients died from SOS/VOD. Univariable regression analysis identified a higher baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 4.2 &amp;amp;times; 109/L compared to 2.6 &amp;amp;times; 109/L [p = 0.035] and lower baseline platelet count of 104 &amp;amp;times; 109/L compared to 140 &amp;amp;times; 109/L [p = 0.034] in SOS/VOD and non-SOS/VOD cases, respectively, as independent risks for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD. Treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin was also identified as a risk factor for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD (p = 0.016). The absence of late-onset SOS/VOD in the cohort of 536 patients prompted a retrospective analysis of the data to identify potentially missed cases. Seven cases were identified as meeting the diagnostic criteria for SOS/VOD: four classical and three late-onset. One case would have been graded as severe, and the remaining six would have been graded as very severe. Six patients were reported to have died between days 11 and 107, with four deaths before day 100. The clinical diagnoses of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for SOS/VOD included infection (n = 3), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (n = 3), and pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 1). The inclusion of potentially missed cases in the analysis again suggested a lower baseline platelet count (p = 0.002) and prior treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin (p = 0.003) as potential risk factors for SOS/VOD. The baseline ANC was lower in this combined cohort but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.089) as it did in the confirmed SOS/VOD cohort (p = 0.035). Additional clinical features that were identified as statistically significant for the onset of SOS/VOD (potential and confirmed cases) included a lower Karnofsky Performance Status (p = 0.01), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.012), lower baseline hemoglobin (p = 0.017), and higher baseline serum ferritin (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The incidence of classical SOS/VOD in this cohort was consistent with recent published reports and carried a high fatality rate. A higher ANC, lower platelet count at the start of the preparative regimen, and prior treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin were identified as potential risk factors for diagnosed SOS/VOD. Hospital and intensive care unit stays were longer in SOS/VOD patients. There were no cases of late-onset VOD diagnosed within the first 100 days of allo-SCT transplant, which is inconsistent with recently reported incidence rates. Potentially missed cases of SOS/VOD were identified, suggesting that this disease may be under-diagnosed and underscoring the need for ongoing education and resources to allow for early intervention.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 261: Assessment of Risks and Outcomes of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome/Veno-Occlusive Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Including Potentially Undiagnosed Cases&amp;mdash;A Multicenter Canadian Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/261">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050261</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Emily Trus
		Alexander Ruzic
		Ram Vasudevan Nampoothiri
		Gregory R. Pond
		Vinita Dhir
		Andrew Poskus
		Louise Bordeleau
		Michael Trus
		</p>
	<p>Background and Methods: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a severe complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). Given the increased use of allo-SCT and variability of SOS/VOD incidence in published reports, cases of allo-SCT from two major transplant centers in Ontario, Canada (2019&amp;amp;ndash;2021), were reviewed to identify risk factors prognostic for SOS/VOD onset and to assess outcomes. Results: This study included 536 allo-SCT cases, with a mean age of 53.4 years [min&amp;amp;ndash;max: 17&amp;amp;ndash;76], including 322 male recipients and 214 female recipients. There were 17 SOS/VOD cases diagnosed during the first 100 days, representing 3% of allo-SCT cases, with a median age of 48 years [18&amp;amp;ndash;72] and equally distributed between genders. All cases were classical SOS/VOD, with onset prior to day 21 [1&amp;amp;ndash;20]. These cases were graded as one mild, six moderate, six severe, and four very severe cases. The mild case of SOS/VOD recovered after treatment with diuretics. In respect to the 16 cases graded as &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD, the average inpatient stay was 56 days [24&amp;amp;ndash;178], and eight patients were in the ICU for an average of 6 days [0&amp;amp;ndash;42], with a median of zero days. Five of the sixteen &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD patients died within 100 days [9&amp;amp;ndash;59]&amp;amp;mdash;four from SOS/VOD. After day +100, five remained alive, and six died between days 125 and 419. Treatments for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD included diuretics [n = 15], steroids [n = 3], and defibrotide [n = 9]. The nine patients treated with defibrotide were graded as moderate [n = 2], severe [n = 4], and very severe [n = 3]. Three of the nine patients treated with defibrotide died before day 100, and the other six survived beyond day 100. None of the six surviving patients died from SOS/VOD. Univariable regression analysis identified a higher baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 4.2 &amp;amp;times; 109/L compared to 2.6 &amp;amp;times; 109/L [p = 0.035] and lower baseline platelet count of 104 &amp;amp;times; 109/L compared to 140 &amp;amp;times; 109/L [p = 0.034] in SOS/VOD and non-SOS/VOD cases, respectively, as independent risks for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD. Treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin was also identified as a risk factor for &amp;amp;ge;moderate SOS/VOD (p = 0.016). The absence of late-onset SOS/VOD in the cohort of 536 patients prompted a retrospective analysis of the data to identify potentially missed cases. Seven cases were identified as meeting the diagnostic criteria for SOS/VOD: four classical and three late-onset. One case would have been graded as severe, and the remaining six would have been graded as very severe. Six patients were reported to have died between days 11 and 107, with four deaths before day 100. The clinical diagnoses of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for SOS/VOD included infection (n = 3), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (n = 3), and pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 1). The inclusion of potentially missed cases in the analysis again suggested a lower baseline platelet count (p = 0.002) and prior treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin (p = 0.003) as potential risk factors for SOS/VOD. The baseline ANC was lower in this combined cohort but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.089) as it did in the confirmed SOS/VOD cohort (p = 0.035). Additional clinical features that were identified as statistically significant for the onset of SOS/VOD (potential and confirmed cases) included a lower Karnofsky Performance Status (p = 0.01), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.012), lower baseline hemoglobin (p = 0.017), and higher baseline serum ferritin (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The incidence of classical SOS/VOD in this cohort was consistent with recent published reports and carried a high fatality rate. A higher ANC, lower platelet count at the start of the preparative regimen, and prior treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin were identified as potential risk factors for diagnosed SOS/VOD. Hospital and intensive care unit stays were longer in SOS/VOD patients. There were no cases of late-onset VOD diagnosed within the first 100 days of allo-SCT transplant, which is inconsistent with recently reported incidence rates. Potentially missed cases of SOS/VOD were identified, suggesting that this disease may be under-diagnosed and underscoring the need for ongoing education and resources to allow for early intervention.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Assessment of Risks and Outcomes of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome/Veno-Occlusive Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Including Potentially Undiagnosed Cases&amp;amp;mdash;A Multicenter Canadian Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Emily Trus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Ruzic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ram Vasudevan Nampoothiri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gregory R. Pond</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vinita Dhir</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Poskus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Louise Bordeleau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Michael Trus</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050261</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050261</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/261</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/260">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 260: Maintenance Liposomal Doxorubicin Following Induction Doxorubicin in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Observational Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/260</link>
	<description>Maintenance chemotherapy prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in several malignancies, but its role in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unclear. Conventional doxorubicin is limited by cumulative toxicities. Liposomal doxorubicin may allow prolonged therapy. We evaluated outcomes of patients treated with maintenance liposomal doxorubicin following induction doxorubicin. This was a single-center retrospective study using the Quebec Sarcoma Registry from 2015 to 2025. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed STS and received doxorubicin-based induction therapy. Those achieving disease control were treated with maintenance liposomal doxorubicin. Clinical variables, adverse events, and outcomes were collected, and PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method. Twenty-four patients were included (median age 61 years; 62.5% male), with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma as the most frequent histologies. The median induction exposure was six cycles, and maintenance treatment was administered for a median of five cycles. Median PFS was 11.4 months, and median maintenance PFS was 6.1 months. Infusion reactions and hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. Median OS was 60.2 months. Maintenance liposomal doxorubicin was feasible, well-tolerated, and associated with encouraging disease control in selected patients, supporting further prospective evaluation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 260: Maintenance Liposomal Doxorubicin Following Induction Doxorubicin in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Observational Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/260">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050260</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Alexandre Da Silva Faco
		Mohammad Amin Salehi
		Mohammad Hassan Hodroj
		Kaveh Mozafari-Lorestani
		Feras A. Moria
		Jonathan Noujaim
		Ramy R. Saleh
		</p>
	<p>Maintenance chemotherapy prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in several malignancies, but its role in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unclear. Conventional doxorubicin is limited by cumulative toxicities. Liposomal doxorubicin may allow prolonged therapy. We evaluated outcomes of patients treated with maintenance liposomal doxorubicin following induction doxorubicin. This was a single-center retrospective study using the Quebec Sarcoma Registry from 2015 to 2025. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed STS and received doxorubicin-based induction therapy. Those achieving disease control were treated with maintenance liposomal doxorubicin. Clinical variables, adverse events, and outcomes were collected, and PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method. Twenty-four patients were included (median age 61 years; 62.5% male), with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma as the most frequent histologies. The median induction exposure was six cycles, and maintenance treatment was administered for a median of five cycles. Median PFS was 11.4 months, and median maintenance PFS was 6.1 months. Infusion reactions and hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. Median OS was 60.2 months. Maintenance liposomal doxorubicin was feasible, well-tolerated, and associated with encouraging disease control in selected patients, supporting further prospective evaluation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Maintenance Liposomal Doxorubicin Following Induction Doxorubicin in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Observational Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Alexandre Da Silva Faco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammad Amin Salehi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammad Hassan Hodroj</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kaveh Mozafari-Lorestani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Feras A. Moria</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Noujaim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ramy R. Saleh</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050260</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050260</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/260</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/259">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 259: Global Disparities and Trends in Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/259</link>
	<description>We evaluated global radiotherapy practices in the management of early-stage (AJCC/UICC 8th edition stages I-II) glottic cancer (ESGC). A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in March 2025 across centers worldwide. Data was collected on clinical practices, including staging, CT simulation, target volumes delineation, organs-at-risk contouring, radiotherapy techniques, dose and fractionation schedules, treatment delivery techniques, and image guidance practices. A total of 181 responses were received, primarily from Asia (41.4%) and Europe (24.3%). Most respondents were from non-academic public centers (44.2%), with multidisciplinary team involvement reported by 84.5%. Head and neck CT scan was the most used staging modality (80.1%). Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy was the most common planning technique (82.9%). Hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules predominated for T1 (84%) and T2 (72.4%) disease. T1a was typically treated with whole-larynx target volume (72.4%). Use of ipsilateral involved vocal cord irradiation varied by geographical region (p = 0.015), being most common in North America (44.8%) and Europe (38.6%). Accelerated fractionation for T2 also differed significantly (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), with the highest use reported in North America (41.4%). Daily Cone-Beam Computed Tomography was acquired by (58.2%). In total, 70% of respondents expressed interest in the results of a future phase III randomized trial comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy to conventional radiotherapy. Significant global variations in radiotherapy practices for ESGC were observed, likely reflecting disparities in access and differences in institutional protocols. The development and implementation of standardized, evidence-based global guidelines are essential to harmonize care, minimize toxicity, and improve outcomes for patients with ESGC.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 259: Global Disparities and Trends in Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/259">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050259</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Issa Mohamad
		Shatha Abu Taha
		Ahmad Bushehri
		Bassem Youssef
		Enis Ozyar
		Ibrahim Alotain
		Ibrahim Abu-Gheida
		Mohammed Aldehaim
		Carlton Johnny
		Layth Mula-Hussain
		Majed Alghamdi
		Mohamed Shelan
		Mohammed Al Dohan
		Nadeem Pervez
		Olgun Elicin
		Saad Alrashidi
		Wael El-Sheshtawy
		Shoukri Temraz
		Zineb Dahbi
		Ahmed Abbasi
		Abdulrahman Sumaida
		Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
		Khawla Ammar
		Akram Al-Ibraheem
		Ali Hosni
		</p>
	<p>We evaluated global radiotherapy practices in the management of early-stage (AJCC/UICC 8th edition stages I-II) glottic cancer (ESGC). A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in March 2025 across centers worldwide. Data was collected on clinical practices, including staging, CT simulation, target volumes delineation, organs-at-risk contouring, radiotherapy techniques, dose and fractionation schedules, treatment delivery techniques, and image guidance practices. A total of 181 responses were received, primarily from Asia (41.4%) and Europe (24.3%). Most respondents were from non-academic public centers (44.2%), with multidisciplinary team involvement reported by 84.5%. Head and neck CT scan was the most used staging modality (80.1%). Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy was the most common planning technique (82.9%). Hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules predominated for T1 (84%) and T2 (72.4%) disease. T1a was typically treated with whole-larynx target volume (72.4%). Use of ipsilateral involved vocal cord irradiation varied by geographical region (p = 0.015), being most common in North America (44.8%) and Europe (38.6%). Accelerated fractionation for T2 also differed significantly (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), with the highest use reported in North America (41.4%). Daily Cone-Beam Computed Tomography was acquired by (58.2%). In total, 70% of respondents expressed interest in the results of a future phase III randomized trial comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy to conventional radiotherapy. Significant global variations in radiotherapy practices for ESGC were observed, likely reflecting disparities in access and differences in institutional protocols. The development and implementation of standardized, evidence-based global guidelines are essential to harmonize care, minimize toxicity, and improve outcomes for patients with ESGC.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Global Disparities and Trends in Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Issa Mohamad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shatha Abu Taha</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmad Bushehri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bassem Youssef</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Enis Ozyar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ibrahim Alotain</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ibrahim Abu-Gheida</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammed Aldehaim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carlton Johnny</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Layth Mula-Hussain</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Majed Alghamdi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohamed Shelan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammed Al Dohan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nadeem Pervez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olgun Elicin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saad Alrashidi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wael El-Sheshtawy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shoukri Temraz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zineb Dahbi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmed Abbasi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdulrahman Sumaida</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hikmat Abdel-Razeq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Khawla Ammar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Akram Al-Ibraheem</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ali Hosni</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050259</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050259</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/259</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/258">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 258: Overcoming Acquired MET-Driven Resistance to First-Line Lorlatinib: Successful Combination of Lorlatinib and Envafolimab in an ALK-Positive NSCLC Patient with Ultra-High PD-L1 Expression</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/258</link>
	<description>Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a well-established oncogenic driver alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly lorlatinib, have significantly improved the prognosis of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Although high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (&amp;amp;ge;50%) is generally associated with favorable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PD-L1 has not been shown to reliably predict ICI benefit in ALK-rearranged disease, and optimal management after ALK TKI resistance remains challenging. Herein, we report a case of an elderly patient with ALK-rearrangement and exceptionally high PD-L1 expression (TPS &amp;amp;ge; 95%) NSCLC who experienced disease progression following first-line lorlatinib with genetically confirmed MET amplification. The patient subsequently received an exploratory combination of continued lorlatinib plus envafolimab and achieved partial response (PR) with manageable tolerability after 4 months, highlighting a potential sequential strategy that may warrant further investigation in select ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibiting both bypass pathway activation and exceptionally high PD-L1 expression.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 258: Overcoming Acquired MET-Driven Resistance to First-Line Lorlatinib: Successful Combination of Lorlatinib and Envafolimab in an ALK-Positive NSCLC Patient with Ultra-High PD-L1 Expression</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/258">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050258</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lu Ding
		Reyizha Nuersulitan
		Jingjing Wang
		Hanxiao Chen
		Minglei Zhuo
		</p>
	<p>Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a well-established oncogenic driver alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly lorlatinib, have significantly improved the prognosis of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Although high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (&amp;amp;ge;50%) is generally associated with favorable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PD-L1 has not been shown to reliably predict ICI benefit in ALK-rearranged disease, and optimal management after ALK TKI resistance remains challenging. Herein, we report a case of an elderly patient with ALK-rearrangement and exceptionally high PD-L1 expression (TPS &amp;amp;ge; 95%) NSCLC who experienced disease progression following first-line lorlatinib with genetically confirmed MET amplification. The patient subsequently received an exploratory combination of continued lorlatinib plus envafolimab and achieved partial response (PR) with manageable tolerability after 4 months, highlighting a potential sequential strategy that may warrant further investigation in select ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibiting both bypass pathway activation and exceptionally high PD-L1 expression.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Overcoming Acquired MET-Driven Resistance to First-Line Lorlatinib: Successful Combination of Lorlatinib and Envafolimab in an ALK-Positive NSCLC Patient with Ultra-High PD-L1 Expression</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lu Ding</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Reyizha Nuersulitan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jingjing Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hanxiao Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Minglei Zhuo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050258</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>258</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050258</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/258</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/257">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 257: Reasons for Indoor and Outdoor Tanning: Starting Points for Skin Cancer Prevention Based on a Nationwide Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/257</link>
	<description>Background: Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major risk factor for skin cancer. Nevertheless, many people tan in the sun and in tanning beds. The aim of this study was to explore the reasons behind these behaviors and to investigate whether the reasons for tanning in the sun and in tanning beds differ. Methods: We used data from a nationwide survey study conducted in Germany, which included n = 4156 individuals aged 16 to 65 years. We assessed different reasons for outdoor and indoor tanning, as well as sociodemographic characteristics, skin type, and tanning behaviors. Results: While both outdoor and indoor tanners frequently reported relaxation, as well as feeling of light and warmth as reasons, outdoor tanners placed a greater emphasis on increasing vitamin D levels and health benefits. In contrast, indoor tanners were more focused on enhancing attractiveness and pre-tanning for holidays. Individuals who sought a tan more frequently&amp;amp;mdash;whether through indoor or outdoor tanning&amp;amp;mdash;were more likely to agree with the various reasons provided, compared to those who tanned less often. In addition, we found associations with sex, age, immigrant background, education, occupation, and skin type. Conclusions: There were differences as well as similarities in the reasons for indoor and outdoor tanning. This indicates that overarching prevention strategies could be effective. Additionally, targeted measures specifically for indoor and outdoor tanning could also be beneficial in raising awareness about the risks of UV radiation and, in the long term, reducing the incidence of skin cancer.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 257: Reasons for Indoor and Outdoor Tanning: Starting Points for Skin Cancer Prevention Based on a Nationwide Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/257">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050257</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Katharina Diehl
		Lisa Voß
		Eckhard W. Breitbart
		Inga-Marie Hübner
		Tatiana Görig
		</p>
	<p>Background: Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major risk factor for skin cancer. Nevertheless, many people tan in the sun and in tanning beds. The aim of this study was to explore the reasons behind these behaviors and to investigate whether the reasons for tanning in the sun and in tanning beds differ. Methods: We used data from a nationwide survey study conducted in Germany, which included n = 4156 individuals aged 16 to 65 years. We assessed different reasons for outdoor and indoor tanning, as well as sociodemographic characteristics, skin type, and tanning behaviors. Results: While both outdoor and indoor tanners frequently reported relaxation, as well as feeling of light and warmth as reasons, outdoor tanners placed a greater emphasis on increasing vitamin D levels and health benefits. In contrast, indoor tanners were more focused on enhancing attractiveness and pre-tanning for holidays. Individuals who sought a tan more frequently&amp;amp;mdash;whether through indoor or outdoor tanning&amp;amp;mdash;were more likely to agree with the various reasons provided, compared to those who tanned less often. In addition, we found associations with sex, age, immigrant background, education, occupation, and skin type. Conclusions: There were differences as well as similarities in the reasons for indoor and outdoor tanning. This indicates that overarching prevention strategies could be effective. Additionally, targeted measures specifically for indoor and outdoor tanning could also be beneficial in raising awareness about the risks of UV radiation and, in the long term, reducing the incidence of skin cancer.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reasons for Indoor and Outdoor Tanning: Starting Points for Skin Cancer Prevention Based on a Nationwide Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Katharina Diehl</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lisa Voß</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eckhard W. Breitbart</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Inga-Marie Hübner</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tatiana Görig</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050257</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050257</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/257</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/256">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 256: Mutational Landscape and Treatment Response in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/256</link>
	<description>Objectives: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy often diagnosed at the extensive stage (ES-SCLC). While chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has emerged as a first-line option, SCLC&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;ldquo;cold&amp;amp;rdquo; immune profile limits broad efficacy. This study evaluates the real-world clinical efficacy of CIT versus chemotherapy (CT) alone and analyzes the association between gene mutation characteristics and clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with ES-SCLC treated at a single center between January 2020 and January 2024. Patients were categorized by first-line treatment (CIT vs. CT). Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate treatment response. Genomic profiling was integrated for a subset of patients to identify associations between mutation signatures and clinicopathological factors. Results: Of the 115 patients (67.6%) who received CIT and 55 (32.4%) who received CT, the CIT group achieved a significantly higher objective response rate (76.5% vs. 56.4%). Median progression-free survival was numerically but not significantly longer in the CIT group (6.0 vs. 5.8 months). Adrenal metastasis was identified as an independent adverse prognostic factor. Genomic analysis revealed site-specific correlations: MYC mutations with pleural metastasis, NTRK3 with brain metastasis, ALK with adrenal metastasis, and NTRK1 with intrapulmonary metastasis. Additionally, smokers showed higher mutation frequencies in SMAD4 and PIK3CA. Conclusions: CIT significantly improves initial response rates in ES-SCLC compared to CT alone. Baseline adrenal metastasis serves as a poor prognostic indicator. Distinct genomic mutation signatures are associated with clinical characteristics, suggesting potential pathways for personalized treatment strategies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 256: Mutational Landscape and Treatment Response in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/256">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050256</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Meizeng Li
		Lianying Guo
		Ruiying Zhao
		Shengnan Chen
		Shengji Ma
		Chan Xiang
		Yuchen Han
		</p>
	<p>Objectives: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy often diagnosed at the extensive stage (ES-SCLC). While chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has emerged as a first-line option, SCLC&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;ldquo;cold&amp;amp;rdquo; immune profile limits broad efficacy. This study evaluates the real-world clinical efficacy of CIT versus chemotherapy (CT) alone and analyzes the association between gene mutation characteristics and clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with ES-SCLC treated at a single center between January 2020 and January 2024. Patients were categorized by first-line treatment (CIT vs. CT). Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate treatment response. Genomic profiling was integrated for a subset of patients to identify associations between mutation signatures and clinicopathological factors. Results: Of the 115 patients (67.6%) who received CIT and 55 (32.4%) who received CT, the CIT group achieved a significantly higher objective response rate (76.5% vs. 56.4%). Median progression-free survival was numerically but not significantly longer in the CIT group (6.0 vs. 5.8 months). Adrenal metastasis was identified as an independent adverse prognostic factor. Genomic analysis revealed site-specific correlations: MYC mutations with pleural metastasis, NTRK3 with brain metastasis, ALK with adrenal metastasis, and NTRK1 with intrapulmonary metastasis. Additionally, smokers showed higher mutation frequencies in SMAD4 and PIK3CA. Conclusions: CIT significantly improves initial response rates in ES-SCLC compared to CT alone. Baseline adrenal metastasis serves as a poor prognostic indicator. Distinct genomic mutation signatures are associated with clinical characteristics, suggesting potential pathways for personalized treatment strategies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Mutational Landscape and Treatment Response in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Meizeng Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lianying Guo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ruiying Zhao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shengnan Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shengji Ma</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chan Xiang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuchen Han</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050256</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050256</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/256</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/255">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 255: Phased Traumatic Stress Responses Among Caregivers of Children and Adults Recently Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia: A Grounded Theory Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/255</link>
	<description>A diagnosis of acute leukemia (AL) represents a sudden, life-threatening event that places family caregivers (FCs) at high risk for traumatic stress. While traumatic stress symptoms have been documented among FCs later in the cancer trajectory, little is known about how these responses unfold during the immediate peri-diagnostic period, when acute stress disorder (ASD) may emerge, and early intervention could be most impactful. We conducted a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach to examine early traumatic stress responses among FCs of adults and children with newly diagnosed AL. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 caregivers within the first six months of diagnosis as part of two clinical trials at major cancer centres in Toronto, Canada, and were analyzed iteratively using constant comparative methods. Caregivers described a coherent trajectory of traumatic stress responses across three phases. The anticipatory phase was characterized by prolonged uncertainty, helplessness, and mounting fear during diagnostic investigations. The acute phase, beginning at diagnosis, involved an abrupt shift toward emotional numbing, deliberate avoidance of catastrophic thoughts, and a narrowed focus on immediate tasks, often described as operating on &amp;amp;ldquo;autopilot.&amp;amp;rdquo; In the post-acute phase, as patients stabilized and discharge approached, caregivers reported increased emotional access, including grief, anger, and recognition of their own trauma, alongside emerging concerns about long-term caregiving and life disruption. These findings suggest that FCs of individuals with newly diagnosed AL exhibit a phased pattern of traumatic stress responses, marked by an early, adaptive dissociative coping response followed by delayed emotional processing, underscoring the importance of phase-sensitive psychosocial care in oncology.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 255: Phased Traumatic Stress Responses Among Caregivers of Children and Adults Recently Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia: A Grounded Theory Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/255">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050255</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Carmine Malfitano
		Stephanie M. Nanos
		Luigi Grassi
		Rosangela Caruso
		Gary Rodin
		</p>
	<p>A diagnosis of acute leukemia (AL) represents a sudden, life-threatening event that places family caregivers (FCs) at high risk for traumatic stress. While traumatic stress symptoms have been documented among FCs later in the cancer trajectory, little is known about how these responses unfold during the immediate peri-diagnostic period, when acute stress disorder (ASD) may emerge, and early intervention could be most impactful. We conducted a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach to examine early traumatic stress responses among FCs of adults and children with newly diagnosed AL. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 caregivers within the first six months of diagnosis as part of two clinical trials at major cancer centres in Toronto, Canada, and were analyzed iteratively using constant comparative methods. Caregivers described a coherent trajectory of traumatic stress responses across three phases. The anticipatory phase was characterized by prolonged uncertainty, helplessness, and mounting fear during diagnostic investigations. The acute phase, beginning at diagnosis, involved an abrupt shift toward emotional numbing, deliberate avoidance of catastrophic thoughts, and a narrowed focus on immediate tasks, often described as operating on &amp;amp;ldquo;autopilot.&amp;amp;rdquo; In the post-acute phase, as patients stabilized and discharge approached, caregivers reported increased emotional access, including grief, anger, and recognition of their own trauma, alongside emerging concerns about long-term caregiving and life disruption. These findings suggest that FCs of individuals with newly diagnosed AL exhibit a phased pattern of traumatic stress responses, marked by an early, adaptive dissociative coping response followed by delayed emotional processing, underscoring the importance of phase-sensitive psychosocial care in oncology.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Phased Traumatic Stress Responses Among Caregivers of Children and Adults Recently Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia: A Grounded Theory Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Carmine Malfitano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephanie M. Nanos</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luigi Grassi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rosangela Caruso</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gary Rodin</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050255</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050255</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/255</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/254">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 254: Imaging Features and Clinical Outcomes of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study and Literature Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/254</link>
	<description>Background: Ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) is an under-recognized complication after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our goal was to estimate the incidence, timing, clinical presentation, and management of IC after drug-eluting bead TACE. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort of consecutive drug-eluting bead TACE procedures (1 January 2020&amp;amp;ndash;31 December 2023) with imaging follow-up to 31 December 2024 was conducted. IC was defined radiologically as bile duct dilatation without mechanical obstruction, biloma formation, biliary strictures, or ischemic cholecystitis occurring after TACE. The primary outcome was the incidence of IC. Secondary outcomes included clinical presentation, need for hospitalization, and management. Results: Among 106 patients, 14 developed IC (13.2%). Imaging abnormalities were detected a mean of 3.1 months after TACE. Six patients (42.9%) were asymptomatic. Among symptomatic patients, the most common manifestations were abdominal pain (n = 6) and fever (n = 4). Five patients required hospitalization, including 2 with infected bilomas requiring antibiotics and/or drainage. Subsequent HCC therapy was feasible in most cases; no deaths were directly attributed to IC. Conclusions: IC after TACE is not rare and is frequently asymptomatic, often detected incidentally on routine CT follow-up. Systematic biochemical monitoring and selective MRCP could improve detection, particularly when TACE sessions are closely spaced.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 254: Imaging Features and Clinical Outcomes of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study and Literature Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/254">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050254</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Saša Štupar
		Peter Popović
		Rok Dežman
		Jure Uršič
		Martin Zaplotnik
		Miha Štabuc
		Sanjo Finderle
		Alojz Šmid
		</p>
	<p>Background: Ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) is an under-recognized complication after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our goal was to estimate the incidence, timing, clinical presentation, and management of IC after drug-eluting bead TACE. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort of consecutive drug-eluting bead TACE procedures (1 January 2020&amp;amp;ndash;31 December 2023) with imaging follow-up to 31 December 2024 was conducted. IC was defined radiologically as bile duct dilatation without mechanical obstruction, biloma formation, biliary strictures, or ischemic cholecystitis occurring after TACE. The primary outcome was the incidence of IC. Secondary outcomes included clinical presentation, need for hospitalization, and management. Results: Among 106 patients, 14 developed IC (13.2%). Imaging abnormalities were detected a mean of 3.1 months after TACE. Six patients (42.9%) were asymptomatic. Among symptomatic patients, the most common manifestations were abdominal pain (n = 6) and fever (n = 4). Five patients required hospitalization, including 2 with infected bilomas requiring antibiotics and/or drainage. Subsequent HCC therapy was feasible in most cases; no deaths were directly attributed to IC. Conclusions: IC after TACE is not rare and is frequently asymptomatic, often detected incidentally on routine CT follow-up. Systematic biochemical monitoring and selective MRCP could improve detection, particularly when TACE sessions are closely spaced.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Imaging Features and Clinical Outcomes of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study and Literature Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Saša Štupar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Peter Popović</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rok Dežman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jure Uršič</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Martin Zaplotnik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miha Štabuc</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sanjo Finderle</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alojz Šmid</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050254</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050254</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/254</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/253">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 253: Perceptions and Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Regarding Sexuality in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/253</link>
	<description>Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of human well-being, yet it is often disrupted in women diagnosed with cervical cancer. Although healthcare providers play a crucial role in supporting patients&amp;amp;rsquo; sexual health, the topic remains largely unaddressed in oncology settings. This study aimed to explore how healthcare providers perceive and respond to sexual health concerns among women with cervical cancer. A qualitative approach was conducted between August and November 2024 at Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Indonesia. Eighteen healthcare workers experienced in cancer care were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke&amp;amp;rsquo;s six-phase framework with Nvivo 12 Plus software. The analysis revealed three main themes: (1) diverse perceptions of sexuality; (2) unmet sexual health needs; and (3) challenges to address sexual health. This study highlights that healthcare providers acknowledge the importance of addressing sexuality in cancer care but face numerous challenges that hinder open discussions in Indonesia. Integrating sexual health into routine oncology care and enhancing provider training are essential steps toward delivering more holistic and patient-centered care. These findings can improve sexual health care in cancer patients.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 253: Perceptions and Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Regarding Sexuality in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/253">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050253</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ida Ayu Md Vera Susiladewi
		Yati Afiyanti
		Allenidekania Allenidekania
		Margaret Fitch
		</p>
	<p>Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of human well-being, yet it is often disrupted in women diagnosed with cervical cancer. Although healthcare providers play a crucial role in supporting patients&amp;amp;rsquo; sexual health, the topic remains largely unaddressed in oncology settings. This study aimed to explore how healthcare providers perceive and respond to sexual health concerns among women with cervical cancer. A qualitative approach was conducted between August and November 2024 at Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Indonesia. Eighteen healthcare workers experienced in cancer care were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke&amp;amp;rsquo;s six-phase framework with Nvivo 12 Plus software. The analysis revealed three main themes: (1) diverse perceptions of sexuality; (2) unmet sexual health needs; and (3) challenges to address sexual health. This study highlights that healthcare providers acknowledge the importance of addressing sexuality in cancer care but face numerous challenges that hinder open discussions in Indonesia. Integrating sexual health into routine oncology care and enhancing provider training are essential steps toward delivering more holistic and patient-centered care. These findings can improve sexual health care in cancer patients.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Perceptions and Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Regarding Sexuality in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ida Ayu Md Vera Susiladewi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yati Afiyanti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Allenidekania Allenidekania</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Margaret Fitch</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050253</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050253</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/253</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/252">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 252: The Implementation of a Caregiver Distress Screening Initiative in a Pediatric Oncology Healthcare Setting: A Quality Improvement Project</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/252</link>
	<description>Background: Parents of children with cancer often experience significant stressors that can heighten distress and impact overall well-being. Despite recommendations supporting distress screening for adult and pediatric patients with cancer, systematic assessment of parent or caregiver distress in pediatric oncology settings remains limited. This Quality Improvement initiative aimed to implement routine distress screening for adult caregivers of pediatric patients with brain and solid tumors at our institution. Methods: Using the 18-item CancerSupportSource&amp;amp;trade;-Caregiver (CSS-CG) instrument, our social work team invited eligible caregivers to complete monthly electronic distress screeners while their child was receiving treatment. Automated reports with tailored psychoeducational resources were sent to caregivers upon completion, and social workers received alerts when participants scored at-risk for anxiety, depression, or financial strain. The feasibility of the CSS-CG implementation was assessed via caregiver enrollment and completion rates, and clinician acceptability was evaluated through a post-implementation survey. Results: Of 122 eligible patients, 64 of their caregivers enrolled in the CSS-CG screening platform (52.45%), and 44 (36.06%) completed at least one screener. Of the 44 caregivers who completed the CSS-CG assessment, 59.09% (n = 26) screened positive at least once for risk of anxiety, 54.54% (n = 24) for risk of financial strain, and 59.09% (n = 26) for risk of depression. Among participating social workers, 83% reported that the screener improved their clinical practice, making their sessions more focused and helpful. They also noted that it improved their ability to identify a caregiver&amp;amp;rsquo;s overall needs. Conclusions: Implementing caregiver distress screening positively impacted social work practice at our institution. Despite variable caregiver enrollment and a few implementation challenges, the findings support the importance and potential benefit of screening for caregiver distress in a pediatric oncology setting.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 252: The Implementation of a Caregiver Distress Screening Initiative in a Pediatric Oncology Healthcare Setting: A Quality Improvement Project</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/252">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050252</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Clayton Culp
		Christen Long
		Angelique Ribieras
		Erica H. Sirrine
		</p>
	<p>Background: Parents of children with cancer often experience significant stressors that can heighten distress and impact overall well-being. Despite recommendations supporting distress screening for adult and pediatric patients with cancer, systematic assessment of parent or caregiver distress in pediatric oncology settings remains limited. This Quality Improvement initiative aimed to implement routine distress screening for adult caregivers of pediatric patients with brain and solid tumors at our institution. Methods: Using the 18-item CancerSupportSource&amp;amp;trade;-Caregiver (CSS-CG) instrument, our social work team invited eligible caregivers to complete monthly electronic distress screeners while their child was receiving treatment. Automated reports with tailored psychoeducational resources were sent to caregivers upon completion, and social workers received alerts when participants scored at-risk for anxiety, depression, or financial strain. The feasibility of the CSS-CG implementation was assessed via caregiver enrollment and completion rates, and clinician acceptability was evaluated through a post-implementation survey. Results: Of 122 eligible patients, 64 of their caregivers enrolled in the CSS-CG screening platform (52.45%), and 44 (36.06%) completed at least one screener. Of the 44 caregivers who completed the CSS-CG assessment, 59.09% (n = 26) screened positive at least once for risk of anxiety, 54.54% (n = 24) for risk of financial strain, and 59.09% (n = 26) for risk of depression. Among participating social workers, 83% reported that the screener improved their clinical practice, making their sessions more focused and helpful. They also noted that it improved their ability to identify a caregiver&amp;amp;rsquo;s overall needs. Conclusions: Implementing caregiver distress screening positively impacted social work practice at our institution. Despite variable caregiver enrollment and a few implementation challenges, the findings support the importance and potential benefit of screening for caregiver distress in a pediatric oncology setting.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Implementation of a Caregiver Distress Screening Initiative in a Pediatric Oncology Healthcare Setting: A Quality Improvement Project</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Clayton Culp</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christen Long</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Angelique Ribieras</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Erica H. Sirrine</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050252</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050252</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/252</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/251">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 251: Treatment Selection Based on Dominant Tumor Biology in Endometrial Carcinoma with Choriocarcinomatous Differentiation: A Case-Based Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/251</link>
	<description>Endometrial carcinoma (EC) with choriocarcinomatous differentiation is an exceptionally rare malignancy for which standardized postoperative treatment strategies are lacking. Herein, we describe two postmenopausal patients with endometrioid carcinoma containing a choriocarcinomatous component. One patient had an EC-dominant tumor with low and rapidly normalized postoperative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels and received paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The other patient had a choriocarcinomatous-dominant tumor with markedly elevated postoperative serum hCG levels and was treated with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN)-oriented chemotherapy using etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D/cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA/CO). Both patients remain disease-free. A review of representative published cases revealed two competing treatment paradigms, EC-oriented and GTN-oriented, applied inconsistently and without unified selection criteria. On the basis of integrated clinicopathological assessment, we propose that postoperative treatment consideration should be guided primarily by dominant tumor biology, rather than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage alone. Tumors with a dominant choriocarcinomatous component accompanied by elevated postoperative serum hCG levels may benefit from GTN-oriented chemotherapy, whereas EC-dominant tumors with low or normalized hCG levels may benefit from EC-oriented regimens. Reassessment of dominant tumor biology using postoperative pathological findings and serum hCG dynamics may provide a pragmatic, decision-support framework for adjuvant treatment consideration in this rare and clinically challenging entity.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 251: Treatment Selection Based on Dominant Tumor Biology in Endometrial Carcinoma with Choriocarcinomatous Differentiation: A Case-Based Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/251">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050251</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Norihito Kamo
		Shigenori Furukawa
		Asami Kato
		Keisuke Yoshida
		Chikako Okabe
		Hideki Miura
		Tetsu Sato
		Hiroshi Suzuki
		Shu Soeda
		Keiya Fujimori
		</p>
	<p>Endometrial carcinoma (EC) with choriocarcinomatous differentiation is an exceptionally rare malignancy for which standardized postoperative treatment strategies are lacking. Herein, we describe two postmenopausal patients with endometrioid carcinoma containing a choriocarcinomatous component. One patient had an EC-dominant tumor with low and rapidly normalized postoperative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels and received paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The other patient had a choriocarcinomatous-dominant tumor with markedly elevated postoperative serum hCG levels and was treated with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN)-oriented chemotherapy using etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D/cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA/CO). Both patients remain disease-free. A review of representative published cases revealed two competing treatment paradigms, EC-oriented and GTN-oriented, applied inconsistently and without unified selection criteria. On the basis of integrated clinicopathological assessment, we propose that postoperative treatment consideration should be guided primarily by dominant tumor biology, rather than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage alone. Tumors with a dominant choriocarcinomatous component accompanied by elevated postoperative serum hCG levels may benefit from GTN-oriented chemotherapy, whereas EC-dominant tumors with low or normalized hCG levels may benefit from EC-oriented regimens. Reassessment of dominant tumor biology using postoperative pathological findings and serum hCG dynamics may provide a pragmatic, decision-support framework for adjuvant treatment consideration in this rare and clinically challenging entity.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Treatment Selection Based on Dominant Tumor Biology in Endometrial Carcinoma with Choriocarcinomatous Differentiation: A Case-Based Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Norihito Kamo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shigenori Furukawa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Asami Kato</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Keisuke Yoshida</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chikako Okabe</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hideki Miura</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tetsu Sato</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hiroshi Suzuki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shu Soeda</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Keiya Fujimori</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050251</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050251</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/251</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/250">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 250: Perineural Spread and Base of Skull Involvement in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma&amp;mdash;A Critical Review from an Endemic Region</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/250</link>
	<description>Perineural spread (PNS) from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) to the skull base is increasingly recognised as a route of cancer spread. Management historically involved definitive radiotherapy to treat PNS at the skull base. In the endemic region with modern magnetic resonance neurogram (MRN) and skull base surgical expertise, the outcome has improved over the years. With the advent of immunotherapy, the outcome may be maintained while preserving critical organs in the head and neck region. We conducted a critical review of the literature to establish the treatment outcomes and pattern of failure as practice evolved. Furthermore, we described our skull base surgical and radiotherapy management guideline and outlined the emerging paradigm shift in the immunotherapy era.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 250: Perineural Spread and Base of Skull Involvement in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma&amp;mdash;A Critical Review from an Endemic Region</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/250">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050250</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Charles Y. Lin
		Rahul Ladwa
		Ryan Sommerville
		</p>
	<p>Perineural spread (PNS) from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) to the skull base is increasingly recognised as a route of cancer spread. Management historically involved definitive radiotherapy to treat PNS at the skull base. In the endemic region with modern magnetic resonance neurogram (MRN) and skull base surgical expertise, the outcome has improved over the years. With the advent of immunotherapy, the outcome may be maintained while preserving critical organs in the head and neck region. We conducted a critical review of the literature to establish the treatment outcomes and pattern of failure as practice evolved. Furthermore, we described our skull base surgical and radiotherapy management guideline and outlined the emerging paradigm shift in the immunotherapy era.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Perineural Spread and Base of Skull Involvement in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma&amp;amp;mdash;A Critical Review from an Endemic Region</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Charles Y. Lin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rahul Ladwa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Sommerville</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050250</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050250</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/250</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/248">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 248: Reply to Venkataraman, J.; Mokbel, K. Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on &amp;ldquo;Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89&amp;rdquo;</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/248</link>
	<description>We thank Venkataraman and Mokbel [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 248: Reply to Venkataraman, J.; Mokbel, K. Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on &amp;ldquo;Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89&amp;rdquo;</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/248">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050248</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Netchanok Sae-sim
		Norasate Samarnthai
		Warapan Numprasit
		</p>
	<p>We thank Venkataraman and Mokbel [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reply to Venkataraman, J.; Mokbel, K. Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on &amp;amp;ldquo;Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89&amp;amp;rdquo;</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Netchanok Sae-sim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Norasate Samarnthai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Warapan Numprasit</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050248</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Reply</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050248</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/248</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/249">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 249: High-Risk Cytogenetic Multiple Myeloma Remains a Therapeutic Challenge: A 15-Year Real-World Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/249</link>
	<description>Background: High-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma (HRMM) confers inferior outcomes despite significant therapeutic advances. Real-world data characterizing contemporary treatment patterns across lines of therapy in this population are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 205 patients with HRMM diagnosed between January 2009 and January 2024. High-risk cytogenetics were defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) criteria as the presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and/or gain/amplification of 1q21. Treatment regimens were categorized by the number of agents (doublet, triplet, quadruplet), mechanism of action (proteasome inhibitor [PI]-based, immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]-based, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based), and specific regimen composition. Treatment patterns were analyzed across three treatment eras and stratified by age (&amp;amp;lt;70 vs. &amp;amp;ge;70 years). Results: The cohort included 205 patients (median age, 62 years [interquartile range [IQR], 54&amp;amp;ndash;68 years]; 78.5% aged &amp;amp;lt;70 years). Double-hit and triple-hit cytogenetics were present in 60.0% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. For first-line induction, triplet therapy predominated (81.0%, n = 166), followed by quadruplet (8.8%, n = 18), doublet (5.9%, n = 12), and multi-agent chemotherapy (2.9%, n = 6). By mechanism of action, PI + IMiD combinations were the most common (63.4%, n = 130), followed by PI-based (19.0%, n = 39), anti-CD38-based (10.2%, n = 21), and IMiD-based (2.9%, n = 6) regimens. Era-stratified analysis revealed a significant increase in quadruplet utilization from 3.2% in Era 1 (2009&amp;amp;ndash;2015) to 20.3% in Era 3 (2020&amp;amp;ndash;2024), with anti-CD38-containing frontline regimens administered to 26.6% of patients in the contemporary era (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Second-line induction was required in 50 patients (24.4%), with anti-CD38-based triplets comprising the most common approach (30.0%). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 75.1% of patients overall, with significantly higher utilization in those aged &amp;amp;lt;70 years (83.9% vs. 43.2%). Maintenance therapy was administered to 71.7% of patients (n = 147), with IMiD-based regimens predominating (53.1%), followed by PI + IMiD combinations (27.9%) and anti-CD38-containing regimens (10.2%). Despite intensive therapy, 69.4% of patients on maintenance experienced disease relapse, with higher rates observed in younger patients (74.8% vs. 41.7%). Conclusions: In this real-world HRMM cohort, the PI + IMiD triplet regimen remained the predominant induction approach, with a significant shift toward quadruplet and anti-CD38-containing regimens in the contemporary era. However, substantial relapse rates during maintenance underscore the continued unmet need in HRMM and support the early integration of novel therapeutic strategies, including quadruplet induction and BCMA-directed agents, in this population.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 249: High-Risk Cytogenetic Multiple Myeloma Remains a Therapeutic Challenge: A 15-Year Real-World Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/249">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050249</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Carmel Awadallah
		Anas Zayad
		Shebli Atrash
		Anita Mazloom
		Omar Alkharabsheh
		Prerna Mewawalla
		Mansi R. Shah
		Forat Lutfi
		Zahra Mahmoudjafari
		Muhammad Umair Mushtaq
		Jeries Kort
		Alma Habib
		Al-Ola Abdallah
		</p>
	<p>Background: High-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma (HRMM) confers inferior outcomes despite significant therapeutic advances. Real-world data characterizing contemporary treatment patterns across lines of therapy in this population are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 205 patients with HRMM diagnosed between January 2009 and January 2024. High-risk cytogenetics were defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) criteria as the presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and/or gain/amplification of 1q21. Treatment regimens were categorized by the number of agents (doublet, triplet, quadruplet), mechanism of action (proteasome inhibitor [PI]-based, immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]-based, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based), and specific regimen composition. Treatment patterns were analyzed across three treatment eras and stratified by age (&amp;amp;lt;70 vs. &amp;amp;ge;70 years). Results: The cohort included 205 patients (median age, 62 years [interquartile range [IQR], 54&amp;amp;ndash;68 years]; 78.5% aged &amp;amp;lt;70 years). Double-hit and triple-hit cytogenetics were present in 60.0% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. For first-line induction, triplet therapy predominated (81.0%, n = 166), followed by quadruplet (8.8%, n = 18), doublet (5.9%, n = 12), and multi-agent chemotherapy (2.9%, n = 6). By mechanism of action, PI + IMiD combinations were the most common (63.4%, n = 130), followed by PI-based (19.0%, n = 39), anti-CD38-based (10.2%, n = 21), and IMiD-based (2.9%, n = 6) regimens. Era-stratified analysis revealed a significant increase in quadruplet utilization from 3.2% in Era 1 (2009&amp;amp;ndash;2015) to 20.3% in Era 3 (2020&amp;amp;ndash;2024), with anti-CD38-containing frontline regimens administered to 26.6% of patients in the contemporary era (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Second-line induction was required in 50 patients (24.4%), with anti-CD38-based triplets comprising the most common approach (30.0%). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 75.1% of patients overall, with significantly higher utilization in those aged &amp;amp;lt;70 years (83.9% vs. 43.2%). Maintenance therapy was administered to 71.7% of patients (n = 147), with IMiD-based regimens predominating (53.1%), followed by PI + IMiD combinations (27.9%) and anti-CD38-containing regimens (10.2%). Despite intensive therapy, 69.4% of patients on maintenance experienced disease relapse, with higher rates observed in younger patients (74.8% vs. 41.7%). Conclusions: In this real-world HRMM cohort, the PI + IMiD triplet regimen remained the predominant induction approach, with a significant shift toward quadruplet and anti-CD38-containing regimens in the contemporary era. However, substantial relapse rates during maintenance underscore the continued unmet need in HRMM and support the early integration of novel therapeutic strategies, including quadruplet induction and BCMA-directed agents, in this population.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>High-Risk Cytogenetic Multiple Myeloma Remains a Therapeutic Challenge: A 15-Year Real-World Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Carmel Awadallah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anas Zayad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shebli Atrash</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anita Mazloom</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar Alkharabsheh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Prerna Mewawalla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mansi R. Shah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Forat Lutfi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zahra Mahmoudjafari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Muhammad Umair Mushtaq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeries Kort</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alma Habib</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Al-Ola Abdallah</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050249</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050249</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/249</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/247">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 247: Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients with 1&amp;ndash;2 Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Multicenter Real-World Cohort Study in a Chinese Population</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/247</link>
	<description>The optimal management of patients with limited sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer, particularly regarding whether to perform additional axillary surgery, continues to be an area of clinical uncertainty in routine practice. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate adherence to ACOSOG Z0011 criteria and the oncological safety of omitting ALND in a Chinese population. We included 462 women with clinical stage T1&amp;amp;ndash;2N0 breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and were found to have 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 positive SLNs between January 2013 and December 2021. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Patients underwent either sentinel lymph node biopsy alone (SLNB; n = 274, 59.3%) or SLNB followed by ALND (n = 188, 40.7%). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to balance baseline characteristics, yielding 152 matched pairs. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. No significant difference in DFS was observed between the SLNB alone and SLNB + ALND groups in either the overall cohort or the matched cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that the type of axillary surgery was not independently associated with DFS in patients with 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 positive SLNs treated with breast-conserving surgery. Logistic regression analysis indicated that surgeons were more likely to perform ALND in patients with a higher SLN tumor burden; compared with micrometastasis, macrometastasis in 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 SLNs and a sentinel lymph node metastasis ratio greater than one-third were significantly associated with the selection of ALND. These findings suggest that omission of ALND was not associated with a statistically significant difference in DFS and provide real-world evidence supporting the applicability of Z0011-based axillary management in the Chinese population; however, given the observational design and potential for residual confounding, these results should be interpreted with caution.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-27</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 247: Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients with 1&amp;ndash;2 Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Multicenter Real-World Cohort Study in a Chinese Population</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/247">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050247</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Chengye Hong
		Jianhui Chen
		Yongwu Chen
		Liangqiang Li
		Xianqiang Du
		Debo Chen
		Weibin Lian
		</p>
	<p>The optimal management of patients with limited sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer, particularly regarding whether to perform additional axillary surgery, continues to be an area of clinical uncertainty in routine practice. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate adherence to ACOSOG Z0011 criteria and the oncological safety of omitting ALND in a Chinese population. We included 462 women with clinical stage T1&amp;amp;ndash;2N0 breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and were found to have 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 positive SLNs between January 2013 and December 2021. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Patients underwent either sentinel lymph node biopsy alone (SLNB; n = 274, 59.3%) or SLNB followed by ALND (n = 188, 40.7%). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to balance baseline characteristics, yielding 152 matched pairs. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. No significant difference in DFS was observed between the SLNB alone and SLNB + ALND groups in either the overall cohort or the matched cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that the type of axillary surgery was not independently associated with DFS in patients with 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 positive SLNs treated with breast-conserving surgery. Logistic regression analysis indicated that surgeons were more likely to perform ALND in patients with a higher SLN tumor burden; compared with micrometastasis, macrometastasis in 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 SLNs and a sentinel lymph node metastasis ratio greater than one-third were significantly associated with the selection of ALND. These findings suggest that omission of ALND was not associated with a statistically significant difference in DFS and provide real-world evidence supporting the applicability of Z0011-based axillary management in the Chinese population; however, given the observational design and potential for residual confounding, these results should be interpreted with caution.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients with 1&amp;amp;ndash;2 Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Multicenter Real-World Cohort Study in a Chinese Population</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Chengye Hong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jianhui Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yongwu Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Liangqiang Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xianqiang Du</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Debo Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Weibin Lian</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050247</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050247</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/247</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/246">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 246: Outcomes of Double-Hit and Single High-Risk Cytogenetic Newly Diagnosed Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/246</link>
	<description>Introduction: High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) is primarily defined by adverse cytogenetic abnormalities that are associated with inferior outcomes despite contemporary treatment with novel induction agents and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). While the accumulation of high-risk lesions has been proposed to further stratify prognosis, the relative impact of single-hit versus double-hit HRMM on post-transplant outcomes in real-world clinical practice remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of transplant-eligible adults with HRMM undergoing upfront ASCT between 2009 and 2024 at three U.S. academic centers. Patients were categorized as single-hit HRMM or double-hit HRMM based on the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups using standard statistical methods. Results: A total of 154 patients were included, of whom 63 had SH-HRMM, and 91 had DH-HRMM. Following induction therapy, overall response rates (ORR) were high and comparable between groups. After ASCT, ORR was significantly higher in SH-HRMM compared with DH-HRMM (97% vs. 82%, p = 0.006), although depth of response did not differ significantly. With a median follow-up of 150 months, median OS was 103 months in SH-HRMM and 94 months in DH-HRMM (p = 0.40). Median PFS was 36 months and 31 months, respectively (p = 0.20). Restricted mean survival time analyses similarly demonstrated no significant differences in OS or PFS between groups. Although ORR differed, depth of response and long-term survival did not. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of transplant-treated HRMM, single-hit disease was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving post-ASCT response; however, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between single-hit and double-hit HRMM. These findings suggest that cytogenetic hit burden alone may be insufficient to predict post-transplant survival, highlighting the need for refined risk stratification incorporating additional biological and response-based markers.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-26</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 246: Outcomes of Double-Hit and Single High-Risk Cytogenetic Newly Diagnosed Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/246">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050246</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Raeef Rahman
		Anas Zayad
		Carmel Awadallah
		Beining Wang
		Jianzheng Wu
		Aroog Khaliq
		Prerna Mewawalla
		Shebli Atrash
		Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam
		Joseph McGuirk
		Zahra Mahmoudjafari
		Muhammad Umair Mushtaq
		Al-Ola Abdallah
		Nausheen Ahmed
		Jordan Snyder
		Anita Mazloom
		Omar Alkharabsheh
		Mansi R. Shah
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) is primarily defined by adverse cytogenetic abnormalities that are associated with inferior outcomes despite contemporary treatment with novel induction agents and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). While the accumulation of high-risk lesions has been proposed to further stratify prognosis, the relative impact of single-hit versus double-hit HRMM on post-transplant outcomes in real-world clinical practice remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of transplant-eligible adults with HRMM undergoing upfront ASCT between 2009 and 2024 at three U.S. academic centers. Patients were categorized as single-hit HRMM or double-hit HRMM based on the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups using standard statistical methods. Results: A total of 154 patients were included, of whom 63 had SH-HRMM, and 91 had DH-HRMM. Following induction therapy, overall response rates (ORR) were high and comparable between groups. After ASCT, ORR was significantly higher in SH-HRMM compared with DH-HRMM (97% vs. 82%, p = 0.006), although depth of response did not differ significantly. With a median follow-up of 150 months, median OS was 103 months in SH-HRMM and 94 months in DH-HRMM (p = 0.40). Median PFS was 36 months and 31 months, respectively (p = 0.20). Restricted mean survival time analyses similarly demonstrated no significant differences in OS or PFS between groups. Although ORR differed, depth of response and long-term survival did not. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of transplant-treated HRMM, single-hit disease was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving post-ASCT response; however, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between single-hit and double-hit HRMM. These findings suggest that cytogenetic hit burden alone may be insufficient to predict post-transplant survival, highlighting the need for refined risk stratification incorporating additional biological and response-based markers.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Outcomes of Double-Hit and Single High-Risk Cytogenetic Newly Diagnosed Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Raeef Rahman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anas Zayad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carmel Awadallah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Beining Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jianzheng Wu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aroog Khaliq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Prerna Mewawalla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shebli Atrash</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joseph McGuirk</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zahra Mahmoudjafari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Muhammad Umair Mushtaq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Al-Ola Abdallah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nausheen Ahmed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jordan Snyder</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anita Mazloom</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar Alkharabsheh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mansi R. Shah</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050246</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-26</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050246</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/246</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/245">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 245: Will We Need a Novel Heuristic in Resectable Lung Cancer?: A Narrative Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/245</link>
	<description>Introduction: The management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer has long relied on a relatively limited set of determinants, primarily anatomical resectability and pathological stage. Although these parameters remain central to therapeutic planning, accumulating clinical and translational evidence indicates that they do not fully explain variability in outcomes observed after lung cancer surgery. The primary aim of this review is to evaluate whether current evidence supports the need for a novel heuristic framework in resectable NSCLC. Secondary aims are to examine how host-related, clinical, and data-driven factors contribute to prognosis and treatment selection beyond conventional staging systems. Methods: This review integrates evidence from clinical studies, national registries, and translational analyses to examine how these dimensions contribute to prognosis and treatment selection. Results: Over the past two decades, advances in surgical techniques, perioperative management, systemic therapies, and large-scale clinical databases have revealed additional determinants of prognosis beyond tumor burden, including physiological reserve, nutritional condition, systemic inflammatory state, comorbidities, and socioeconomic environment. Developments in multimodal strategies and minimally invasive surgery have reshaped the therapeutic landscape. Data-driven approaches have identified clinically meaningful subgroups not captured by conventional staging systems. Conclusions: A heuristic framework integrating tumor biology, patient characteristics, and treatment context may better reflect the complexity of contemporary thoracic oncology practice.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-25</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 245: Will We Need a Novel Heuristic in Resectable Lung Cancer?: A Narrative Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/245">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050245</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lorenzo Gherzi
		Marco Alifano
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: The management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer has long relied on a relatively limited set of determinants, primarily anatomical resectability and pathological stage. Although these parameters remain central to therapeutic planning, accumulating clinical and translational evidence indicates that they do not fully explain variability in outcomes observed after lung cancer surgery. The primary aim of this review is to evaluate whether current evidence supports the need for a novel heuristic framework in resectable NSCLC. Secondary aims are to examine how host-related, clinical, and data-driven factors contribute to prognosis and treatment selection beyond conventional staging systems. Methods: This review integrates evidence from clinical studies, national registries, and translational analyses to examine how these dimensions contribute to prognosis and treatment selection. Results: Over the past two decades, advances in surgical techniques, perioperative management, systemic therapies, and large-scale clinical databases have revealed additional determinants of prognosis beyond tumor burden, including physiological reserve, nutritional condition, systemic inflammatory state, comorbidities, and socioeconomic environment. Developments in multimodal strategies and minimally invasive surgery have reshaped the therapeutic landscape. Data-driven approaches have identified clinically meaningful subgroups not captured by conventional staging systems. Conclusions: A heuristic framework integrating tumor biology, patient characteristics, and treatment context may better reflect the complexity of contemporary thoracic oncology practice.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Will We Need a Novel Heuristic in Resectable Lung Cancer?: A Narrative Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lorenzo Gherzi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marco Alifano</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050245</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-25</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050245</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/245</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/244">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 244: A Case of Primary EGFR T790M Mutation in Treatment-Na&amp;iuml;ve Advanced NSCLC: Clinical and Molecular Implications</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/244</link>
	<description>Background: De novo (pretreatment) EGFR T790M mutation is a rare molecular finding in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has historically been associated with primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Evidence guiding optimal first-line management in this subgroup, particularly in elderly patients, remains limited. Case Presentation: We report a case of an elderly patient with treatment-na&amp;amp;iuml;ve advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring a concurrent EGFR exon 19 deletion and de novo EGFR T790M mutation. Given the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s age, significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and absence of rapidly progressive disease, a multidisciplinary tumor board recommended first-line osimertinib monotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, with rapid improvement in performance status and no clinically significant adverse events. Serial contrast-enhanced CT restaging demonstrated RECIST 1.1&amp;amp;ndash;defined stable disease, without development of new visceral, nodal, cerebral, or osseous metastases. The patient remains on continuous osimertinib therapy with durable disease control at the time of manuscript preparation. Conclusion: Primary EGFR T790M&amp;amp;ndash;positive NSCLC can achieve durable disease control with first-line osimertinib, even in advanced age. While combination strategies with chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes in selected patients, treatment decisions in elderly individuals must carefully balance efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life. Chronological age alone should not discourage active targeted treatment when guided by molecular profiling and comprehensive clinical assessment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 244: A Case of Primary EGFR T790M Mutation in Treatment-Na&amp;iuml;ve Advanced NSCLC: Clinical and Molecular Implications</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/244">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050244</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		George Dimitrov
		Elitsa Kraevska
		Vladislav Nankov
		Victoria Hlebarova
		Savelina Popovska
		</p>
	<p>Background: De novo (pretreatment) EGFR T790M mutation is a rare molecular finding in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has historically been associated with primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Evidence guiding optimal first-line management in this subgroup, particularly in elderly patients, remains limited. Case Presentation: We report a case of an elderly patient with treatment-na&amp;amp;iuml;ve advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring a concurrent EGFR exon 19 deletion and de novo EGFR T790M mutation. Given the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s age, significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and absence of rapidly progressive disease, a multidisciplinary tumor board recommended first-line osimertinib monotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, with rapid improvement in performance status and no clinically significant adverse events. Serial contrast-enhanced CT restaging demonstrated RECIST 1.1&amp;amp;ndash;defined stable disease, without development of new visceral, nodal, cerebral, or osseous metastases. The patient remains on continuous osimertinib therapy with durable disease control at the time of manuscript preparation. Conclusion: Primary EGFR T790M&amp;amp;ndash;positive NSCLC can achieve durable disease control with first-line osimertinib, even in advanced age. While combination strategies with chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes in selected patients, treatment decisions in elderly individuals must carefully balance efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life. Chronological age alone should not discourage active targeted treatment when guided by molecular profiling and comprehensive clinical assessment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Case of Primary EGFR T790M Mutation in Treatment-Na&amp;amp;iuml;ve Advanced NSCLC: Clinical and Molecular Implications</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>George Dimitrov</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elitsa Kraevska</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vladislav Nankov</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Victoria Hlebarova</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Savelina Popovska</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050244</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050244</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/244</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/243">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 243: Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Setting 2025</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/243</link>
	<description>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been associated with a poorer prognosis than other subtypes, due to its more aggressive behaviour. Since 2020, significant advances in locoregional and systemic therapy have improved outcomes for patients with TNBC, but the implementation of these treatments remains inconsistent across Canada. There is, therefore, a critical need for evidence-informed, consensus-driven guidance to support the integration of new therapies into practice. Research Excellence, Active Leadership Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance (REAL Alliance), a pan-Canadian group of breast cancer specialists and Breast Cancer Canada, a patient advocacy organization, convened to develop national clinical consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer. Through a selective literature review and modified Delphi process of national experts in the fields of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology and pharmacy, REAL Alliance developed national consensus recommendations for the management of TNBC. The result is a set of 23 recommendations: four overall general recommendations, 11 in early-stage TNBC, and eight in metastatic TNBC. These recommendations are intended for oncology healthcare professionals, and are intended to guide evidence-informed, consistent care across Canada.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 243: Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Setting 2025</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/243">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050243</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Christine Simmons
		Omar F. Khan
		Christine Brezden-Masley
		David W. Cescon
		Anil Abraham Joy
		Nathalie LeVasseur
		Katarzyna J. Jerzak
		Karen A. Gelmon
		Sandeep Sehdev
		Stephen Chia
		Marc Webster
		Scott Edwards
		Aalok Kumar
		Jeffrey Q. Cao
		Jean-François Boileau
		Kara Laing
		Nathaniel Bouganim
		Mita Manna
		on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada
		</p>
	<p>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been associated with a poorer prognosis than other subtypes, due to its more aggressive behaviour. Since 2020, significant advances in locoregional and systemic therapy have improved outcomes for patients with TNBC, but the implementation of these treatments remains inconsistent across Canada. There is, therefore, a critical need for evidence-informed, consensus-driven guidance to support the integration of new therapies into practice. Research Excellence, Active Leadership Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance (REAL Alliance), a pan-Canadian group of breast cancer specialists and Breast Cancer Canada, a patient advocacy organization, convened to develop national clinical consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer. Through a selective literature review and modified Delphi process of national experts in the fields of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology and pharmacy, REAL Alliance developed national consensus recommendations for the management of TNBC. The result is a set of 23 recommendations: four overall general recommendations, 11 in early-stage TNBC, and eight in metastatic TNBC. These recommendations are intended for oncology healthcare professionals, and are intended to guide evidence-informed, consistent care across Canada.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Setting 2025</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Christine Simmons</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar F. Khan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christine Brezden-Masley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David W. Cescon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anil Abraham Joy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nathalie LeVasseur</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Katarzyna J. Jerzak</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Karen A. Gelmon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sandeep Sehdev</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Chia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marc Webster</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Scott Edwards</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aalok Kumar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeffrey Q. Cao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jean-François Boileau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kara Laing</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nathaniel Bouganim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mita Manna</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050243</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Guidelines</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050243</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/243</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/242">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 242: Prehabilitation for Patients with Brain Tumours: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/242</link>
	<description>Patients following brain tumour resection experience significant disability, yet rehabilitation is not typically delivered prior to adjuvant treatment such as radiation or chemotherapy. This study aims to characterize the medical and functional profiles, and function outcomes of patients with brain tumour admitted over the past four years to a pilot inpatient prehabilitation programme following brain tumour resection but prior to adjuvant therapy, and to compare these findings with those of patients in a standard acquired brain injury rehabilitation programme. We retrospectively reviewed the charts from a randomly selected sample of 58 prehabilitation inpatients and 112 patients with acquired brain injuries at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute between March 2020 and December 2024. Data abstracted included demographics, medical and functional profiles, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, and discharge parameters. Compared with acquired brain injury subjects, prehabilitation subjects had significantly less physical (47% vs. 86%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001) but more communication (46% vs. 20%, p = 0.0005) impairments, though with similar mean FIM change (22.5 vs. 26.0, p = 0.082) and FIM efficiency (1.1 vs. 1.0, p = 0.78). While not reaching significance, they also experienced more mood issues during rehabilitation (30% vs. 18%, p = 0.075). These findings support that prehabilitation after brain tumour surgery but before adjuvant therapy is clinically effective within existing ABI rehabilitation programmes. However, prehabilitation programmes may benefit from staffing models that emphasize communication supports and mental health expertise.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-24</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 242: Prehabilitation for Patients with Brain Tumours: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/242">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050242</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kevin Y. Sun
		Derek S. Tsang
		Laura K. Langer
		Alejandro S. Moreno
		Amy E. Yeung
		Alan K. H. Tam
		Mark Bayley
		Meiqi Guo
		</p>
	<p>Patients following brain tumour resection experience significant disability, yet rehabilitation is not typically delivered prior to adjuvant treatment such as radiation or chemotherapy. This study aims to characterize the medical and functional profiles, and function outcomes of patients with brain tumour admitted over the past four years to a pilot inpatient prehabilitation programme following brain tumour resection but prior to adjuvant therapy, and to compare these findings with those of patients in a standard acquired brain injury rehabilitation programme. We retrospectively reviewed the charts from a randomly selected sample of 58 prehabilitation inpatients and 112 patients with acquired brain injuries at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute between March 2020 and December 2024. Data abstracted included demographics, medical and functional profiles, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, and discharge parameters. Compared with acquired brain injury subjects, prehabilitation subjects had significantly less physical (47% vs. 86%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001) but more communication (46% vs. 20%, p = 0.0005) impairments, though with similar mean FIM change (22.5 vs. 26.0, p = 0.082) and FIM efficiency (1.1 vs. 1.0, p = 0.78). While not reaching significance, they also experienced more mood issues during rehabilitation (30% vs. 18%, p = 0.075). These findings support that prehabilitation after brain tumour surgery but before adjuvant therapy is clinically effective within existing ABI rehabilitation programmes. However, prehabilitation programmes may benefit from staffing models that emphasize communication supports and mental health expertise.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Prehabilitation for Patients with Brain Tumours: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kevin Y. Sun</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Derek S. Tsang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laura K. Langer</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alejandro S. Moreno</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amy E. Yeung</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alan K. H. Tam</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mark Bayley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Meiqi Guo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050242</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-24</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050242</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/242</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/241">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 241: STK11 as an Emerging Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/241</link>
	<description>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment; however, durable responses occur in only a subset of patients, underscoring the need for robust predictive biomarkers. Serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) is an emerging biomarker that portends poor prognosis and predicts therapeutic resistance. Loss of STK11 disrupts AMPK signaling, leading to unchecked mTOR activation, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, and epithelial&amp;amp;ndash;mesenchymal transition, fostering tumor progression and immune evasion. STK11 mutations frequently co-occur with KRAS and KEAP1 alterations, exhibit low PD-L1 expression, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that leads to the development of PD-1/PD-L1 resistance. Clinical studies consistently demonstrate inferior outcomes with ICIs in STK11-mutant NSCLC, particularly in the presence of KRAS and KEAP1 co-mutations. Dual checkpoint inhibition combining PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade shows promise in overcoming resistance, results remain inconsistent, and prospective trials are ongoing. Beyond immunotherapy, STK11 mutations confer poor outcomes across targeted therapies, including KRAS G12C inhibitors, with KEAP1 co-mutation serving as a strong negative predictor of efficacy. In this review we present an overview of STK11 function and its role in tumor biology, highlight the prognostic and predictive potential of STK11 mutations in the context of NSCLC treatment and summarize the emerging treatment strategies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 241: STK11 as an Emerging Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/241">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050241</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Amit A. Kulkarni
		Adam Rock
		Matthew Lee
		Amanda Reyes
		Manish R. Patel
		Robert A. Kratzke
		Ravi Salgia
		</p>
	<p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment; however, durable responses occur in only a subset of patients, underscoring the need for robust predictive biomarkers. Serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) is an emerging biomarker that portends poor prognosis and predicts therapeutic resistance. Loss of STK11 disrupts AMPK signaling, leading to unchecked mTOR activation, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, and epithelial&amp;amp;ndash;mesenchymal transition, fostering tumor progression and immune evasion. STK11 mutations frequently co-occur with KRAS and KEAP1 alterations, exhibit low PD-L1 expression, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that leads to the development of PD-1/PD-L1 resistance. Clinical studies consistently demonstrate inferior outcomes with ICIs in STK11-mutant NSCLC, particularly in the presence of KRAS and KEAP1 co-mutations. Dual checkpoint inhibition combining PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade shows promise in overcoming resistance, results remain inconsistent, and prospective trials are ongoing. Beyond immunotherapy, STK11 mutations confer poor outcomes across targeted therapies, including KRAS G12C inhibitors, with KEAP1 co-mutation serving as a strong negative predictor of efficacy. In this review we present an overview of STK11 function and its role in tumor biology, highlight the prognostic and predictive potential of STK11 mutations in the context of NSCLC treatment and summarize the emerging treatment strategies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>STK11 as an Emerging Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Amit A. Kulkarni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adam Rock</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Matthew Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amanda Reyes</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Manish R. Patel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Robert A. Kratzke</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ravi Salgia</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050241</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050241</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/241</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/240">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 240: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Incidence and Clinical Risk Factors</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/240</link>
	<description>It is well-known that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to uncommon but potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Early recognition, identification, and treatment are crucial with regard to decreasing toxicity from ICIs. However, there is a discrepancy in the incidence rates between the clinical trials and postmarketing studies. Several postmarketing studies have developed early detection methods and identified new risk factors in developing CIP. Thus, in this narrative review, we aim to review these incidence rates, early detection methods, and clinical risk factors for CIP in NSCLC patients, which could help to improve CIP diagnosis and management for enhanced NSCLC care. Major clinical trials and postmarketing studies of CIP incidence, early detection methods, and risk factors in NSCLC were reviewed. A wide array of potential risk factors has been implicated in the development of CIP in NSCLC, such as having preexisting interstitial lung disease, receiving PD-1 inhibitors, receiving combination ICI therapy instead of ICI monotherapy, lower pretreatment hemoglobin and albumin levels, increased baseline plasma IL-8 levels, and impaired baseline pulmonary function.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 240: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Incidence and Clinical Risk Factors</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/240">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050240</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Olexiy Aseyev
		Liliia Zrielykh
		Minghan Shi
		Katherine Filipovic
		Claire Seymour
		Rabail Siddiqui
		Birubi Biman
		</p>
	<p>It is well-known that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to uncommon but potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Early recognition, identification, and treatment are crucial with regard to decreasing toxicity from ICIs. However, there is a discrepancy in the incidence rates between the clinical trials and postmarketing studies. Several postmarketing studies have developed early detection methods and identified new risk factors in developing CIP. Thus, in this narrative review, we aim to review these incidence rates, early detection methods, and clinical risk factors for CIP in NSCLC patients, which could help to improve CIP diagnosis and management for enhanced NSCLC care. Major clinical trials and postmarketing studies of CIP incidence, early detection methods, and risk factors in NSCLC were reviewed. A wide array of potential risk factors has been implicated in the development of CIP in NSCLC, such as having preexisting interstitial lung disease, receiving PD-1 inhibitors, receiving combination ICI therapy instead of ICI monotherapy, lower pretreatment hemoglobin and albumin levels, increased baseline plasma IL-8 levels, and impaired baseline pulmonary function.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Incidence and Clinical Risk Factors</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Olexiy Aseyev</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Liliia Zrielykh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Minghan Shi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Katherine Filipovic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Claire Seymour</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rabail Siddiqui</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Birubi Biman</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050240</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050240</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/240</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/239">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 239: Sequencing Immunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Frail Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/239</link>
	<description>(1) Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy and immunotherapy (IT) are possible treatment options for HNSCC patients unsuitable for standard curative treatment, yet no high-level evidence supports their combined use. We aim to report on the clinical outcome of a single-center cohort of HNSCC patients treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT) regimen in combination with IT alone or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IT). (2) Methods: We enrolled a cohort of elderly and frail HNSCC patients unsuitable for standard curative treatment, deemed candidates to undergo hypoRT in a sequential strategy (time interval &amp;amp;lt; 6 months), followed or preceded by IT alone (hypoRT_IT) or CT-IT. We selected our sample using the Geriatric 8 (G8) score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). (3) Results: At a median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 5&amp;amp;ndash;20), the median locoregional control (LRC) was 12 months (95% CI 7.0&amp;amp;ndash;17.1) with a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 63%. For the hypoRT-IT group, the median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI 0&amp;amp;ndash;24). No grade (G) 4&amp;amp;ndash;5 in-field acute side effects were observed, while one case of G3 oral mucositis and two cases of G3 radiation dermatitis were reported. (4) Conclusions: A sequential combination of checkpoint inhibitors and hypoRT may provide clinical benefit with acceptable toxicity in frail and elderly patients with advanced HNSCC unfit for standard therapy.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 239: Sequencing Immunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Frail Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/239">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050239</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Beatrice Bettazzi
		Viola Salvestrini
		Marco Banini
		Olga Ruggieri
		Annarita Palomba
		Ilaria Camilla Galli
		Lorenzo Livi
		Pierluigi Bonomo
		Carlotta Becherini
		</p>
	<p>(1) Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy and immunotherapy (IT) are possible treatment options for HNSCC patients unsuitable for standard curative treatment, yet no high-level evidence supports their combined use. We aim to report on the clinical outcome of a single-center cohort of HNSCC patients treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT) regimen in combination with IT alone or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IT). (2) Methods: We enrolled a cohort of elderly and frail HNSCC patients unsuitable for standard curative treatment, deemed candidates to undergo hypoRT in a sequential strategy (time interval &amp;amp;lt; 6 months), followed or preceded by IT alone (hypoRT_IT) or CT-IT. We selected our sample using the Geriatric 8 (G8) score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). (3) Results: At a median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 5&amp;amp;ndash;20), the median locoregional control (LRC) was 12 months (95% CI 7.0&amp;amp;ndash;17.1) with a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 63%. For the hypoRT-IT group, the median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI 0&amp;amp;ndash;24). No grade (G) 4&amp;amp;ndash;5 in-field acute side effects were observed, while one case of G3 oral mucositis and two cases of G3 radiation dermatitis were reported. (4) Conclusions: A sequential combination of checkpoint inhibitors and hypoRT may provide clinical benefit with acceptable toxicity in frail and elderly patients with advanced HNSCC unfit for standard therapy.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Sequencing Immunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Frail Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Beatrice Bettazzi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Viola Salvestrini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marco Banini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olga Ruggieri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Annarita Palomba</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ilaria Camilla Galli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lorenzo Livi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pierluigi Bonomo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carlotta Becherini</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050239</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050239</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/239</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/238">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 238: Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Carmustine Wafer Implantation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Impact on Survival and Key Prognostic Factors</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/238</link>
	<description>Objective: The implantation of biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers is a treatment option for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG), but its efficacy is debated. We evaluated its impact on overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) considering recurrence timing after first-line treatment. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence following initial diagnosis (pre- and post-WHO classification 2016) between 2007 and 2022. All patients received standard first-line therapy, including maximal safe resection, radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, and adjuvant temozolomide. Recurrent GBM treatment involves resection, with or without adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Patients who received carmustine wafer implantation (CWI) during resection were compared to those without wafer placement. Recurrences were classified by timing relative to first-line therapy: (1) post-radiochemotherapy, pre-adjuvant temozolomide; (2) during adjuvant temozolomide; (3) during prolonged temozolomide; (4) &amp;amp;gt;1 month after completion of all therapy. Primary endpoints were OS and SAR, with prognostic factors analyzed. Results: A total of 176 patients were enrolled, with 59.7% (105/176) receiving CWI. Recurrence treatment included surgery without adjuvant therapy in 23.3% (41/176) of cases (26.7% of CWI+ and 18.3% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), adjuvant chemotherapy in 39.8% (70/176) (41% of CWI+ and 38% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), radiotherapy in 7.4% (13/176) (7.6% of CWI+ and 7% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), and combined radiochemotherapy in 29.5% (52/176) (24.8% of CWI+ and 36.6% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;). No significant differences were found between groups in age (p = 0.684), residual tumor volume after initial (p = 0.988) or recurrence surgery (p = 0.356), MGMT status (p = 0.766) and KPS post 1st-line-therapy (p = 0.833). Median OS was 20 months [range 18&amp;amp;ndash;24] for CWI+ and 22 months [range 20&amp;amp;ndash;27] for CWI&amp;amp;minus; (p = 0.487). The median SAR was 10 months [range 8&amp;amp;ndash;12] for CWI+ and 12 months [range 10&amp;amp;ndash;13] for CWI&amp;amp;minus; (p = 0.252). Later recurrence (type 4) significantly correlated with prolonged OS (HR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04&amp;amp;ndash;0.66, p = 0.011). Age (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), MGMT methylation (p = 0.017), and smaller residual tumor volume post-recurrence surgery (p = 0.008) were also associated with longer survival. Conclusions: CWI did not significantly improve OS or SAR in recurrent GBM patients. However, younger age, MGMT methylation, smaller residual tumor volume, and later recurrence were linked to better survival outcomes, underscoring their prognostic importance.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 238: Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Carmustine Wafer Implantation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Impact on Survival and Key Prognostic Factors</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/238">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050238</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Naomi Houedjissin
		Franziska Staub-Bartelt
		Michael Sabel
		Julia Steinmann
		Hannah Fischer
		Marion Rapp
		</p>
	<p>Objective: The implantation of biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers is a treatment option for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG), but its efficacy is debated. We evaluated its impact on overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) considering recurrence timing after first-line treatment. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence following initial diagnosis (pre- and post-WHO classification 2016) between 2007 and 2022. All patients received standard first-line therapy, including maximal safe resection, radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, and adjuvant temozolomide. Recurrent GBM treatment involves resection, with or without adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Patients who received carmustine wafer implantation (CWI) during resection were compared to those without wafer placement. Recurrences were classified by timing relative to first-line therapy: (1) post-radiochemotherapy, pre-adjuvant temozolomide; (2) during adjuvant temozolomide; (3) during prolonged temozolomide; (4) &amp;amp;gt;1 month after completion of all therapy. Primary endpoints were OS and SAR, with prognostic factors analyzed. Results: A total of 176 patients were enrolled, with 59.7% (105/176) receiving CWI. Recurrence treatment included surgery without adjuvant therapy in 23.3% (41/176) of cases (26.7% of CWI+ and 18.3% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), adjuvant chemotherapy in 39.8% (70/176) (41% of CWI+ and 38% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), radiotherapy in 7.4% (13/176) (7.6% of CWI+ and 7% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;), and combined radiochemotherapy in 29.5% (52/176) (24.8% of CWI+ and 36.6% of CWI&amp;amp;minus;). No significant differences were found between groups in age (p = 0.684), residual tumor volume after initial (p = 0.988) or recurrence surgery (p = 0.356), MGMT status (p = 0.766) and KPS post 1st-line-therapy (p = 0.833). Median OS was 20 months [range 18&amp;amp;ndash;24] for CWI+ and 22 months [range 20&amp;amp;ndash;27] for CWI&amp;amp;minus; (p = 0.487). The median SAR was 10 months [range 8&amp;amp;ndash;12] for CWI+ and 12 months [range 10&amp;amp;ndash;13] for CWI&amp;amp;minus; (p = 0.252). Later recurrence (type 4) significantly correlated with prolonged OS (HR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04&amp;amp;ndash;0.66, p = 0.011). Age (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), MGMT methylation (p = 0.017), and smaller residual tumor volume post-recurrence surgery (p = 0.008) were also associated with longer survival. Conclusions: CWI did not significantly improve OS or SAR in recurrent GBM patients. However, younger age, MGMT methylation, smaller residual tumor volume, and later recurrence were linked to better survival outcomes, underscoring their prognostic importance.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Carmustine Wafer Implantation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Impact on Survival and Key Prognostic Factors</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Naomi Houedjissin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Franziska Staub-Bartelt</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Michael Sabel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julia Steinmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hannah Fischer</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marion Rapp</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050238</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050238</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/238</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/237">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 237: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Meningioma: A Single-Center Study at the Indonesian National Cancer Center Dharmais Hospital (2019&amp;ndash;2025)</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/237</link>
	<description>Background: Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults, and survival outcomes are influenced by histopathological grade, tumor characteristics, and treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and identify prognostic factors in patients with meningioma treated at a national referral cancer center in Indonesia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital, including adult patients with histopathologically confirmed intracranial meningioma who underwent surgical resection between January 2019 and 17 August 2025. Overall survival was calculated from the date of histopathological diagnosis to death or last follow-up and analyzed using Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 114 patients were included (mean age 48.1 &amp;amp;plusmn; 10.5 years; 86.8% female), with most tumors classified as WHO Grade I (64.0%) and located at the skull base (57.0%). Subtotal resection was more common (67.5%), and 71.9% did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. During follow-up, 14.0% of patients died, with cumulative overall survival rates of 95.6% at 6 months and 86.0% at 96 months. On multivariate analysis, only WHO tumor grade remained an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.199; 95% CI 1.161&amp;amp;ndash;4.167; p = 0.016), with higher grades associated with worse survival. Extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy were not significantly associated with overall survival after adjustment. Conclusions: In this Indonesian tertiary referral cohort, WHO tumor grade emerged as the only independent predictor of overall survival, underscoring its important prognostic role in meningioma; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to incomplete clinical data and relatively short follow-up duration. The high proportion of complex cases, including skull base tumors, reflects referral patterns and may also influence treatment outcomes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 237: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Meningioma: A Single-Center Study at the Indonesian National Cancer Center Dharmais Hospital (2019&amp;ndash;2025)</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/237">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050237</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Rini Andriani
		Sylvanie Ratna Permatasari
		Ansi Rinjani
		Mohammad Firdaus
		Arwinder Singh
		Oskar Ady Widarta
		 Rosalina
		Achmad Fachri
		Farilaila Rayhani
		Nikrial Dewin
		Aldithya Fakhri
		</p>
	<p>Background: Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults, and survival outcomes are influenced by histopathological grade, tumor characteristics, and treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and identify prognostic factors in patients with meningioma treated at a national referral cancer center in Indonesia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital, including adult patients with histopathologically confirmed intracranial meningioma who underwent surgical resection between January 2019 and 17 August 2025. Overall survival was calculated from the date of histopathological diagnosis to death or last follow-up and analyzed using Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 114 patients were included (mean age 48.1 &amp;amp;plusmn; 10.5 years; 86.8% female), with most tumors classified as WHO Grade I (64.0%) and located at the skull base (57.0%). Subtotal resection was more common (67.5%), and 71.9% did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. During follow-up, 14.0% of patients died, with cumulative overall survival rates of 95.6% at 6 months and 86.0% at 96 months. On multivariate analysis, only WHO tumor grade remained an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.199; 95% CI 1.161&amp;amp;ndash;4.167; p = 0.016), with higher grades associated with worse survival. Extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy were not significantly associated with overall survival after adjustment. Conclusions: In this Indonesian tertiary referral cohort, WHO tumor grade emerged as the only independent predictor of overall survival, underscoring its important prognostic role in meningioma; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to incomplete clinical data and relatively short follow-up duration. The high proportion of complex cases, including skull base tumors, reflects referral patterns and may also influence treatment outcomes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Meningioma: A Single-Center Study at the Indonesian National Cancer Center Dharmais Hospital (2019&amp;amp;ndash;2025)</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Rini Andriani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sylvanie Ratna Permatasari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ansi Rinjani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammad Firdaus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arwinder Singh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Oskar Ady Widarta</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator> Rosalina</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Achmad Fachri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Farilaila Rayhani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nikrial Dewin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aldithya Fakhri</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33050237</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>5</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33050237</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/5/237</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/236">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 236: Real-World Treatment Pathways of Adult Patients with Glioblastoma and Other CNS Tumors: A Population-Based Registry Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/236</link>
	<description>Background: Population-level evidence on delivery of neuro-oncology care is essential for evaluating access, equity, and quality of treatment pathways. However, real-world data describing how patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, especially with glioblastoma, are managed across healthcare systems remain limited. This study aimed to characterize treatment pathways using linked registry and administrative data within a regional care network. Methods: All adult CNS tumors diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Veneto Cancer Registry. Tumor grading was derived using a validated text-mining algorithm, and surgical, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments were captured through linkage with regional healthcare utilization databases. Patterns of care were evaluated by tumor subtype, grade, and diagnostic pathway. Results: Among 1634 histologically confirmed tumors, glioblastoma represented the largest group. Surgical intervention was widely implemented, with high resection rates in glioblastoma and meningioma. Combined chemoradiotherapy constituted the primary adjuvant approach for glioblastoma and high-grade diffuse gliomas, whereas management of lower-grade tumors showed greater variability. Approximately one-third of patients received no oncologic therapy, primarily associated with older age or diagnostic uncertainty. Analysis of recurrent glioblastoma showed heterogeneous systemic treatment use, reflecting evolving therapeutic practice. Conclusions: Linking population-based registry and administrative data provides actionable insight into real-world delivery of neuro-oncology care, in particular for glioblastoma patients. This approach enables monitoring of treatment variability, identification of potential access gaps, and evaluation of system-level performance, supporting data-driven planning of multidisciplinary services and future quality improvement initiatives.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 236: Real-World Treatment Pathways of Adult Patients with Glioblastoma and Other CNS Tumors: A Population-Based Registry Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/236">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040236</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Eliana Ferroni
		Alessandra Andreotti
		Stefano Guzzinati
		Susanna Baracco
		Maddalena Baracco
		Emanuela Bovo
		Eva Carpin
		Antonella Dal Cin
		Alessandra Greco
		Anna Rita Fiore
		Laura Memo
		Daniele Monetti
		Silvia Rizzato
		Jessica Elisabeth Stocco
		Carmen Stocco
		Sara Zamberlan
		Marta Maccari
		Alberto Bosio
		Luca Denaro
		Giampietro Pinna
		Sara Lonardi
		Giuseppe Lombardi
		Manuel Zorzi
		</p>
	<p>Background: Population-level evidence on delivery of neuro-oncology care is essential for evaluating access, equity, and quality of treatment pathways. However, real-world data describing how patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, especially with glioblastoma, are managed across healthcare systems remain limited. This study aimed to characterize treatment pathways using linked registry and administrative data within a regional care network. Methods: All adult CNS tumors diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Veneto Cancer Registry. Tumor grading was derived using a validated text-mining algorithm, and surgical, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments were captured through linkage with regional healthcare utilization databases. Patterns of care were evaluated by tumor subtype, grade, and diagnostic pathway. Results: Among 1634 histologically confirmed tumors, glioblastoma represented the largest group. Surgical intervention was widely implemented, with high resection rates in glioblastoma and meningioma. Combined chemoradiotherapy constituted the primary adjuvant approach for glioblastoma and high-grade diffuse gliomas, whereas management of lower-grade tumors showed greater variability. Approximately one-third of patients received no oncologic therapy, primarily associated with older age or diagnostic uncertainty. Analysis of recurrent glioblastoma showed heterogeneous systemic treatment use, reflecting evolving therapeutic practice. Conclusions: Linking population-based registry and administrative data provides actionable insight into real-world delivery of neuro-oncology care, in particular for glioblastoma patients. This approach enables monitoring of treatment variability, identification of potential access gaps, and evaluation of system-level performance, supporting data-driven planning of multidisciplinary services and future quality improvement initiatives.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Real-World Treatment Pathways of Adult Patients with Glioblastoma and Other CNS Tumors: A Population-Based Registry Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Eliana Ferroni</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alessandra Andreotti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stefano Guzzinati</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Susanna Baracco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maddalena Baracco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emanuela Bovo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eva Carpin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Antonella Dal Cin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alessandra Greco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anna Rita Fiore</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laura Memo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Daniele Monetti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Silvia Rizzato</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jessica Elisabeth Stocco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Carmen Stocco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sara Zamberlan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marta Maccari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alberto Bosio</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luca Denaro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giampietro Pinna</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sara Lonardi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giuseppe Lombardi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Manuel Zorzi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040236</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040236</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/236</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/235">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 235: A Rare Case of Descending Colon Metastasis Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Left Ureteral Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/235</link>
	<description>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, accounting for only 5&amp;amp;ndash;10% of all urothelial carcinomas (UCs). Lung, bone, liver, and distant lymph nodes are common sites of metastasis, while gastrointestinal metastasis is extremely rare. We present a case of a 63-year-old female who developed a descending colon lesion 19 months after left radical nephroureterectomy for high-grade ureteral UC. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), colonoscopy, and biopsy, which excluded primary colorectal malignancy. First-line therapy consisted of six 21-day cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, followed by two cycles of tislelizumab maintenance immunotherapy. Restaging with contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated disease progression. Despite switching to second-line nab-paclitaxel, the patient rapidly deteriorated from tumor cachexia and ultimately succumbed to septic shock secondary to severe pulmonary infection. This represents the first reported case of descending colon metastasis from primary ureteral UC. It highlights the colon as a potential metastatic site where biopsy is essential for definitive diagnosis. Notably, although the patient initially responded to platinum-based therapy, the subsequent rapid progression underscores the need for vigilant monitoring and timely adjustment of therapeutic strategies in managing such high-risk presentations.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 235: A Rare Case of Descending Colon Metastasis Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Left Ureteral Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/235">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040235</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Huaiwen Zhang
		Heyang Liu
		Yousong Luo
		Peizhe Li
		Lianjun Yang
		Jing Shi
		Junyao Duan
		Yongji Yan
		</p>
	<p>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, accounting for only 5&amp;amp;ndash;10% of all urothelial carcinomas (UCs). Lung, bone, liver, and distant lymph nodes are common sites of metastasis, while gastrointestinal metastasis is extremely rare. We present a case of a 63-year-old female who developed a descending colon lesion 19 months after left radical nephroureterectomy for high-grade ureteral UC. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), colonoscopy, and biopsy, which excluded primary colorectal malignancy. First-line therapy consisted of six 21-day cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, followed by two cycles of tislelizumab maintenance immunotherapy. Restaging with contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated disease progression. Despite switching to second-line nab-paclitaxel, the patient rapidly deteriorated from tumor cachexia and ultimately succumbed to septic shock secondary to severe pulmonary infection. This represents the first reported case of descending colon metastasis from primary ureteral UC. It highlights the colon as a potential metastatic site where biopsy is essential for definitive diagnosis. Notably, although the patient initially responded to platinum-based therapy, the subsequent rapid progression underscores the need for vigilant monitoring and timely adjustment of therapeutic strategies in managing such high-risk presentations.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Rare Case of Descending Colon Metastasis Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Left Ureteral Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Huaiwen Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Heyang Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yousong Luo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Peizhe Li</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lianjun Yang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jing Shi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Junyao Duan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yongji Yan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040235</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040235</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/235</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/234">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 234: Gender Differences in Palliative Care Experience and Quality Perceptions Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Nursing Practice</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/234</link>
	<description>Gender shapes healthcare experiences, yet its influence on palliative care (PC) in Middle Eastern contexts remains under-researched. Understanding how male and female patients differently experience PC is essential for delivering gender-sensitive nursing care. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 cancer patients recruited from healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. PC quality perceptions were measured using the Palliative Care Experience and Quality Questionnaire (PCEQQ), assessing communication, symptom management, emotional support, and overall quality. Independent-samples t-tests compared mean scores between male (n = 99) and female (n = 101) participants. Chi-square tests and logistic regression examined gender differences in access and associated factors. Female patients reported significantly higher overall satisfaction (M = 4.12 vs. M = 3.85, p = 0.008) and communication quality (M = 4.10 vs. M = 3.65, p = 0.002) compared to males. Females also demonstrated greater PC awareness (69.3% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.008) and access rates (64.4% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.013). Emotional support ratings approached significance, favoring females (p = 0.052), while symptom management showed no significant gender differences. These findings suggest that gender significantly shapes the PC experience in Saudi Arabia, with the most robust disparity appearing in provider, patient communication. Nurses should adopt gender-sensitive strategies to bridge the engagement gap for male patients, who may face cultural barriers to accessing supportive care.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 234: Gender Differences in Palliative Care Experience and Quality Perceptions Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Nursing Practice</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/234">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040234</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Muteb Aljuhani
		Hanadi Dakhilallah
		Rayhanah R. Almutairi
		Asrar S. Almutairi
		Waleed M. Alshehri
		Thurayya Eid
		Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah
		</p>
	<p>Gender shapes healthcare experiences, yet its influence on palliative care (PC) in Middle Eastern contexts remains under-researched. Understanding how male and female patients differently experience PC is essential for delivering gender-sensitive nursing care. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 cancer patients recruited from healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. PC quality perceptions were measured using the Palliative Care Experience and Quality Questionnaire (PCEQQ), assessing communication, symptom management, emotional support, and overall quality. Independent-samples t-tests compared mean scores between male (n = 99) and female (n = 101) participants. Chi-square tests and logistic regression examined gender differences in access and associated factors. Female patients reported significantly higher overall satisfaction (M = 4.12 vs. M = 3.85, p = 0.008) and communication quality (M = 4.10 vs. M = 3.65, p = 0.002) compared to males. Females also demonstrated greater PC awareness (69.3% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.008) and access rates (64.4% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.013). Emotional support ratings approached significance, favoring females (p = 0.052), while symptom management showed no significant gender differences. These findings suggest that gender significantly shapes the PC experience in Saudi Arabia, with the most robust disparity appearing in provider, patient communication. Nurses should adopt gender-sensitive strategies to bridge the engagement gap for male patients, who may face cultural barriers to accessing supportive care.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Gender Differences in Palliative Care Experience and Quality Perceptions Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Nursing Practice</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Muteb Aljuhani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hanadi Dakhilallah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rayhanah R. Almutairi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Asrar S. Almutairi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Waleed M. Alshehri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thurayya Eid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040234</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040234</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/234</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/233">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 233: The Protective Role of Emotional Intelligence Against Occupational Burnout in Oncology Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Saudi Arabian Hospitals</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/233</link>
	<description>Oncology nursing is one of healthcare&amp;amp;rsquo;s most emotionally demanding specialties, characterized by sustained exposure to patient suffering and mortality. While global burnout rates reach 40&amp;amp;ndash;60%, emotional intelligence (EI) is a potential protective resource that remains underexamined in Middle Eastern contexts. Despite growing global evidence, little is known about these relationships in Middle Eastern healthcare systems, where cultural norms and workforce structures may shape emotional processes differently. This study examined whether EI was significantly associated with lower burnout across personal, work-related, and client-related dimensions among oncology nurses in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study enrolled 172 oncology nurses from three tertiary hospitals in Riyadh. Participants completed validated Arabic versions of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Hierarchical regression analyses examined predictive relationships while controlling for age and experience. Results: EI demonstrated significant inverse correlations with personal (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.41), work-related (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.38), and client-related burnout (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.33, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). In hierarchical models, EI emerged as a significant predictor of lower scores across all dimensions, explaining 11&amp;amp;ndash;17% of unique variance beyond demographic factors. The strongest association was with personal burnout. Causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional design. Conclusion: EI functions as a significant protective factor against burnout. Healthcare organizations should integrate EI development into professional training to strengthen workforce resilience and sustain care quality.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 233: The Protective Role of Emotional Intelligence Against Occupational Burnout in Oncology Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Saudi Arabian Hospitals</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/233">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040233</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah
		Bandar S. Alharbi
		Faihan F. Alshaibany
		Norah M. Alyahya
		Thurayya Eid
		Albandari Almutairi
		</p>
	<p>Oncology nursing is one of healthcare&amp;amp;rsquo;s most emotionally demanding specialties, characterized by sustained exposure to patient suffering and mortality. While global burnout rates reach 40&amp;amp;ndash;60%, emotional intelligence (EI) is a potential protective resource that remains underexamined in Middle Eastern contexts. Despite growing global evidence, little is known about these relationships in Middle Eastern healthcare systems, where cultural norms and workforce structures may shape emotional processes differently. This study examined whether EI was significantly associated with lower burnout across personal, work-related, and client-related dimensions among oncology nurses in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study enrolled 172 oncology nurses from three tertiary hospitals in Riyadh. Participants completed validated Arabic versions of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Hierarchical regression analyses examined predictive relationships while controlling for age and experience. Results: EI demonstrated significant inverse correlations with personal (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.41), work-related (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.38), and client-related burnout (r = &amp;amp;minus;0.33, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). In hierarchical models, EI emerged as a significant predictor of lower scores across all dimensions, explaining 11&amp;amp;ndash;17% of unique variance beyond demographic factors. The strongest association was with personal burnout. Causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional design. Conclusion: EI functions as a significant protective factor against burnout. Healthcare organizations should integrate EI development into professional training to strengthen workforce resilience and sustain care quality.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Protective Role of Emotional Intelligence Against Occupational Burnout in Oncology Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Saudi Arabian Hospitals</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bandar S. Alharbi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Faihan F. Alshaibany</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Norah M. Alyahya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thurayya Eid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Albandari Almutairi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040233</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040233</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/233</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/232">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 232: The Mediating Role of Team Resilience at Work Between Teamwork Practice Environment, Team Functioning and Cohesion in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/232</link>
	<description>Oncology teams operate in highly demanding clinical environments marked by recurrent acute and chronic stressors that can impair optimal quality of care. Although the practice environment is known to influence team processes, the specific contribution of team resilience at work to team effectiveness remains insufficiently delineated in oncology. This cross-sectional study investigated whether team resilience at work mediates the associations between the teamwork practice environment and two core indicators of team effectiveness: team functioning and team cohesion. A total of 189 oncology team members in Qu&amp;amp;eacute;bec (Canada) completed an e-questionnaire between February 2022 and June 2023. Structural equation modeling was conducted to assess an evidence-informed mediation model. The tested model revealed acceptable fit. Findings showed significant indirect effects consistent with a mediating role of team resilience at work in the relationships between the teamwork practice environment and team functioning and team cohesion. Some dimensions&amp;amp;mdash;resourcefulness, alignment, efforts to understand problems, wellness awareness and being proud to work in the team&amp;amp;mdash;loaded strongly on the resilience concept. These results highlight the relevance of reinforcing team resilience capacities to sustain high-quality care in oncology settings. Interventions aiming to enhance team effectiveness may benefit from explicitly integrating strategies designed to strengthen resilience-related dimensions within oncology teams.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 232: The Mediating Role of Team Resilience at Work Between Teamwork Practice Environment, Team Functioning and Cohesion in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/232">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040232</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Dominique Tremblay
		Djamal Berbiche
		Susan Usher
		Marie-José Durand
		Kelley Kilpatrick
		Marjolaine Landry
		Sylvie Lessard
		Thomas G. Poder
		Catherine Prady
		Mathieu Roy
		Nassera Touati
		Annie Turcotte
		</p>
	<p>Oncology teams operate in highly demanding clinical environments marked by recurrent acute and chronic stressors that can impair optimal quality of care. Although the practice environment is known to influence team processes, the specific contribution of team resilience at work to team effectiveness remains insufficiently delineated in oncology. This cross-sectional study investigated whether team resilience at work mediates the associations between the teamwork practice environment and two core indicators of team effectiveness: team functioning and team cohesion. A total of 189 oncology team members in Qu&amp;amp;eacute;bec (Canada) completed an e-questionnaire between February 2022 and June 2023. Structural equation modeling was conducted to assess an evidence-informed mediation model. The tested model revealed acceptable fit. Findings showed significant indirect effects consistent with a mediating role of team resilience at work in the relationships between the teamwork practice environment and team functioning and team cohesion. Some dimensions&amp;amp;mdash;resourcefulness, alignment, efforts to understand problems, wellness awareness and being proud to work in the team&amp;amp;mdash;loaded strongly on the resilience concept. These results highlight the relevance of reinforcing team resilience capacities to sustain high-quality care in oncology settings. Interventions aiming to enhance team effectiveness may benefit from explicitly integrating strategies designed to strengthen resilience-related dimensions within oncology teams.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Mediating Role of Team Resilience at Work Between Teamwork Practice Environment, Team Functioning and Cohesion in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Dominique Tremblay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Djamal Berbiche</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Susan Usher</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marie-José Durand</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kelley Kilpatrick</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marjolaine Landry</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sylvie Lessard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thomas G. Poder</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Catherine Prady</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Roy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nassera Touati</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Annie Turcotte</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040232</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040232</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/232</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/231">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 231: Outcome Measures to Assess the Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Scoping Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/231</link>
	<description>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapy that can affect functioning and quality of life. Currently, duloxetine is the only recommended agent to treat painful CIPN; however, no effective pharmacological treatments have been approved for the prevention or cure of CIPN, highlighting the need to understand non-pharmacological strategies such as exercise. Given significant heterogeneity in the CIPN outcome measures chosen across studies, this scoping review aimed to identify the outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions as a potential countermeasure for CIPN. Following the Arksey and O&amp;amp;rsquo;Malley framework refined by Levac and colleagues, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four databases were searched, and 20 studies were included in the review. Data were abstracted on study characteristics, cancer and chemotherapy factors, exercise prescription, outcome measures, and CIPN-related findings. Outcome measures varied widely across studies, encompassing various patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures. The most common patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures were the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, vibration sensation, and maximal isometric strength, respectively. No study satisfied the components of the core outcome measure set proposed by Park and colleagues, limiting cross-study comparisons. These findings underscore the need for standardized CIPN outcome measures in future exercise studies to strengthen evidence synthesis and inform clinical practice.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-20</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 231: Outcome Measures to Assess the Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Scoping Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/231">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040231</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Trei R. Lindstrom
		Joanna F. Parkinson
		Kerry S. Courneya
		Margaret L. McNeely
		</p>
	<p>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapy that can affect functioning and quality of life. Currently, duloxetine is the only recommended agent to treat painful CIPN; however, no effective pharmacological treatments have been approved for the prevention or cure of CIPN, highlighting the need to understand non-pharmacological strategies such as exercise. Given significant heterogeneity in the CIPN outcome measures chosen across studies, this scoping review aimed to identify the outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions as a potential countermeasure for CIPN. Following the Arksey and O&amp;amp;rsquo;Malley framework refined by Levac and colleagues, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four databases were searched, and 20 studies were included in the review. Data were abstracted on study characteristics, cancer and chemotherapy factors, exercise prescription, outcome measures, and CIPN-related findings. Outcome measures varied widely across studies, encompassing various patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures. The most common patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures were the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, vibration sensation, and maximal isometric strength, respectively. No study satisfied the components of the core outcome measure set proposed by Park and colleagues, limiting cross-study comparisons. These findings underscore the need for standardized CIPN outcome measures in future exercise studies to strengthen evidence synthesis and inform clinical practice.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Outcome Measures to Assess the Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Scoping Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Trei R. Lindstrom</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joanna F. Parkinson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kerry S. Courneya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Margaret L. McNeely</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040231</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-20</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040231</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/231</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/230">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 230: Performance of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Objective Optimization in Cancer Survivors</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/230</link>
	<description>Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of non-cancer death among cancer survivors, attributable to cardiotoxic therapies and cardiovascular risk factors. General population risk prediction tools, including ASCVD (Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), Framingham&amp;amp;rsquo;s Score, and PREVENT (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTS), lack cancer-specific variables. We evaluated whether these models, even after statistical optimization, could predict cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors. Methods: Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001&amp;amp;ndash;2018, linked with National Death Index (NDI) mortality data, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 634 and 429 cancer survivors, respectively, across model-specific cohorts free of baseline cardiovascular disease. Discrimination was assessed for ASCVD, Framingham Score, and PREVENT using standardized thresholds of 7.5% and 20%, as well as Youden-optimized cutoffs. Area under the curve (AUC) comparisons were performed using the DeLong non-parametric method. Results: Standard thresholds showed suboptimal discrimination across all models (AUCs: ASCVD 0.56, Framingham 0.53, PREVENT 0.64). In contrast, Youden-optimized AUCs (ASCVD: 0.68; PREVENT: 0.71; all p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001, DeLong test). Optimization increased the &amp;amp;ldquo;low-risk&amp;amp;rdquo; group&amp;amp;rsquo;s mortality rate from 2.8% to 4.1% (RR = 1.47), suggesting improved statistical fit came at the cost of overestimating the risk. Optimized thresholds outperformed conventional cutoffs, underscoring the necessity for recalibrated, cohort-specific risk stratification in cancer survivors. Conclusions: Standard risk scores have inadequate discrimination for cardiovascular mortality prediction in cancer survivors. Threshold recalibration improves statistical metrics but does not resolve the structural failure of these models to account for cardiotoxic exposure. Development of cardio-oncology-specific risk models incorporating oncologic exposures is therefore warranted.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-19</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 230: Performance of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Objective Optimization in Cancer Survivors</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/230">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040230</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Harsh A. Patel
		Saifullah Syed
		Pranathi Tella
		Harshith Thyagaturu
		Brijesh Patel
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of non-cancer death among cancer survivors, attributable to cardiotoxic therapies and cardiovascular risk factors. General population risk prediction tools, including ASCVD (Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), Framingham&amp;amp;rsquo;s Score, and PREVENT (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTS), lack cancer-specific variables. We evaluated whether these models, even after statistical optimization, could predict cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors. Methods: Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001&amp;amp;ndash;2018, linked with National Death Index (NDI) mortality data, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 634 and 429 cancer survivors, respectively, across model-specific cohorts free of baseline cardiovascular disease. Discrimination was assessed for ASCVD, Framingham Score, and PREVENT using standardized thresholds of 7.5% and 20%, as well as Youden-optimized cutoffs. Area under the curve (AUC) comparisons were performed using the DeLong non-parametric method. Results: Standard thresholds showed suboptimal discrimination across all models (AUCs: ASCVD 0.56, Framingham 0.53, PREVENT 0.64). In contrast, Youden-optimized AUCs (ASCVD: 0.68; PREVENT: 0.71; all p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001, DeLong test). Optimization increased the &amp;amp;ldquo;low-risk&amp;amp;rdquo; group&amp;amp;rsquo;s mortality rate from 2.8% to 4.1% (RR = 1.47), suggesting improved statistical fit came at the cost of overestimating the risk. Optimized thresholds outperformed conventional cutoffs, underscoring the necessity for recalibrated, cohort-specific risk stratification in cancer survivors. Conclusions: Standard risk scores have inadequate discrimination for cardiovascular mortality prediction in cancer survivors. Threshold recalibration improves statistical metrics but does not resolve the structural failure of these models to account for cardiotoxic exposure. Development of cardio-oncology-specific risk models incorporating oncologic exposures is therefore warranted.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Performance of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Objective Optimization in Cancer Survivors</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Harsh A. Patel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saifullah Syed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pranathi Tella</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Harshith Thyagaturu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Brijesh Patel</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040230</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-19</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-19</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040230</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/230</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/229">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 229: Breaking Bad News: The Perspective and Experience of Women with Gynecological Cancer (Results of the NOGGO-Expression XX Survey)</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/229</link>
	<description>Background: Effective communication improves patient satisfaction and reduces stress for both patients and physicians. Surveys consistently highlight the importance of strong communication skills among physicians, especially in oncologic settings. Yet, communication training is neither ubiquitous nor standardized in medical studies or residency, and physicians report that this task represents a burden for them. Given the limited data addressing the observations and expectations of patients with gynecologic malignancies when receiving bad news, this survey aimed to assess their perspective on this topic. Methods: We examined throughout an anonymous questionnaire how patients with gynecological and breast cancer experienced the delivery of bad news. Data were collected in Germany from July 2024 to September 2025. The questionnaire was available online and in paper form in four languages (German, English, Turkish, Arabic), with the purpose of recording culture-specific data. Results: A total of 249 patients completed the survey. Regarding the overall need for improvement in delivering bad news, 222 women (94.5%) declared that improvement was necessary, with 92 (39.1%) of them indicating that substantial improvement was required. While 67.9% of patients were content with the physician&amp;amp;rsquo;s professional competence, 30.5% stated a lack of empathy, and 32.9% stated insufficient time for conversation. When comparing satisfied and dissatisfied patients, significant differences were observed across several aspects, such as consultation length, nonverbal communication, calmness of the setting, stress level after the conversation, and the offer to bring a trusted person or arrange a follow-up conversation. Conclusions: This patient survey highlights a persistent gap between patients&amp;amp;rsquo; expectations and physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; performance when it comes to delivering bad news. The findings underline the urgent need for the implementation of systematic training programs and structured communication protocols in gynecologic oncology.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-18</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 229: Breaking Bad News: The Perspective and Experience of Women with Gynecological Cancer (Results of the NOGGO-Expression XX Survey)</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/229">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040229</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ela Igde
		Gülten Oskay-Özcelik
		Jekaterina Vasiljeva
		Murat Karaman
		Susanne Fechner
		Adak Pirmorady Sehouli
		Jalid Sehouli
		</p>
	<p>Background: Effective communication improves patient satisfaction and reduces stress for both patients and physicians. Surveys consistently highlight the importance of strong communication skills among physicians, especially in oncologic settings. Yet, communication training is neither ubiquitous nor standardized in medical studies or residency, and physicians report that this task represents a burden for them. Given the limited data addressing the observations and expectations of patients with gynecologic malignancies when receiving bad news, this survey aimed to assess their perspective on this topic. Methods: We examined throughout an anonymous questionnaire how patients with gynecological and breast cancer experienced the delivery of bad news. Data were collected in Germany from July 2024 to September 2025. The questionnaire was available online and in paper form in four languages (German, English, Turkish, Arabic), with the purpose of recording culture-specific data. Results: A total of 249 patients completed the survey. Regarding the overall need for improvement in delivering bad news, 222 women (94.5%) declared that improvement was necessary, with 92 (39.1%) of them indicating that substantial improvement was required. While 67.9% of patients were content with the physician&amp;amp;rsquo;s professional competence, 30.5% stated a lack of empathy, and 32.9% stated insufficient time for conversation. When comparing satisfied and dissatisfied patients, significant differences were observed across several aspects, such as consultation length, nonverbal communication, calmness of the setting, stress level after the conversation, and the offer to bring a trusted person or arrange a follow-up conversation. Conclusions: This patient survey highlights a persistent gap between patients&amp;amp;rsquo; expectations and physicians&amp;amp;rsquo; performance when it comes to delivering bad news. The findings underline the urgent need for the implementation of systematic training programs and structured communication protocols in gynecologic oncology.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Breaking Bad News: The Perspective and Experience of Women with Gynecological Cancer (Results of the NOGGO-Expression XX Survey)</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ela Igde</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gülten Oskay-Özcelik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jekaterina Vasiljeva</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Murat Karaman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Susanne Fechner</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adak Pirmorady Sehouli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jalid Sehouli</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040229</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-18</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040229</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/229</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/228">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 228: Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2025</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/228</link>
	<description>The Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference convened annually and was held in Fredericton, New Brunswick, from 18 to 20 September 2025. Attendees included experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, and general practitioners in oncology (GPO) from across the eastern Canadian provinces who are engaged in the care and management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The consensus statement resulting from this meeting addresses several key topics, including the management of early-stage gastroesophageal junction cancer, recent developments in molecular biomarkers and colorectal cancer treatments, secondary prevention strategies for colorectal cancer, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 228: Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2025</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/228">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040228</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Arwa Ahmed
		Stéphanie L. Mercier
		Ravi Ramjeesingh
		Robert Thompson
		Donald James Bastin
		Silvana Spadafora
		Thais Baccili Cury Megid
		Vladimir Djedovic
		Amandeep S. Taggar
		Conrad Falkson
		Abdul Rehman Farooq
		Gordon Emil Locke
		Stacie Connors
		Hao Yu Wang
		Mustapha Tehfe
		Francine Aubin
		Setareh Samimi
		James Michael
		Holly Campbell
		Eve St-Hilaire
		Suneil Khanna
		Mohammed Saud Ali Al Darai
		Pierre Whitlock
		Angela Hyde
		Luisa Galvis
		Marie-Philippe Saltiel
		Adrian Bailey
		Doha Itani
		Rakesh Goel
		Wadima Aldarmaki
		Shivani Dadwal
		Rachel Goodwin
		Timothy R. Asmis
		</p>
	<p>The Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference convened annually and was held in Fredericton, New Brunswick, from 18 to 20 September 2025. Attendees included experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, and general practitioners in oncology (GPO) from across the eastern Canadian provinces who are engaged in the care and management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The consensus statement resulting from this meeting addresses several key topics, including the management of early-stage gastroesophageal junction cancer, recent developments in molecular biomarkers and colorectal cancer treatments, secondary prevention strategies for colorectal cancer, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2025</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Arwa Ahmed</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stéphanie L. Mercier</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ravi Ramjeesingh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Robert Thompson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Donald James Bastin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Silvana Spadafora</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thais Baccili Cury Megid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vladimir Djedovic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amandeep S. Taggar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Conrad Falkson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdul Rehman Farooq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gordon Emil Locke</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stacie Connors</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hao Yu Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mustapha Tehfe</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Francine Aubin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Setareh Samimi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>James Michael</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Holly Campbell</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eve St-Hilaire</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Suneil Khanna</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammed Saud Ali Al Darai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pierre Whitlock</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Angela Hyde</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luisa Galvis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marie-Philippe Saltiel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adrian Bailey</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Doha Itani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rakesh Goel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wadima Aldarmaki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shivani Dadwal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rachel Goodwin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Timothy R. Asmis</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040228</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Conference Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040228</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/228</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/227">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 227: Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/227</link>
	<description>Objectives: To evaluate the association between European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scores and treatment recommendations from European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in curative and metastatic breast cancer (BC), and to assess inter-guideline concordance. Methods: We conducted a comparative review of 47 systemic BC therapies with published ESMO-MCBS scores (accessed 30 June 2025). Guideline recommendations from ESMO, NCCN, and ASCO were extracted from the most recent versions and harmonized into ordinal tiers. Associations between MCBS scores and recommendation categories were evaluated using Fisher&amp;amp;rsquo;s exact test and Spearman&amp;amp;rsquo;s rank correlation in the palliative setting. Curative therapies were analyzed descriptively due to limited variability. Results: Among 38 palliative therapies, 40% achieved high clinical benefit (MCBS 4&amp;amp;ndash;5). A significant association was observed between MCBS scores and NCCN recommendations (p = 0.003; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.48), with 62% of NCCN Category 1 therapies demonstrating high benefit versus 13% in other categories. No significant associations were observed with ASCO (p = 0.101; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.18) or ESMO guideline recommendations (p = 0.073; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.19). Inter-guideline concordance was strongest between ASCO and ESMO (p = 0.033; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.48). In the curative setting (n = 9), most therapies received an MCBS grade A and top-tier guideline endorsement. Conclusions: Alignment between ESMO-MCBS and guideline recommendations is moderate and framework-dependent, strongest with NCCN in metastatic BC. Discordance primarily reflects differences between magnitude-of-benefit thresholds and evidence-certainty frameworks. ESMO-MCBS may serve as a complementary tool to enhance value-based clinical and policy decision-making.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 227: Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/227">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040227</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Bushra Salman
		Intissar Yehia
		Hadil Al Sharqi
		Roula Al Shidi
		Miaad A. Al Dhahri
		Saba Al Ghefeili
		Meriem Makhloufi
		Adil Al Ajmi
		Suhaila Al Farsi
		Zayana Al Kiyumi
		Zaid Riyadh Raouf Al Ishaq
		Omar Abdelhakim Ayaad
		Khalid Al Baimani
		</p>
	<p>Objectives: To evaluate the association between European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scores and treatment recommendations from European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in curative and metastatic breast cancer (BC), and to assess inter-guideline concordance. Methods: We conducted a comparative review of 47 systemic BC therapies with published ESMO-MCBS scores (accessed 30 June 2025). Guideline recommendations from ESMO, NCCN, and ASCO were extracted from the most recent versions and harmonized into ordinal tiers. Associations between MCBS scores and recommendation categories were evaluated using Fisher&amp;amp;rsquo;s exact test and Spearman&amp;amp;rsquo;s rank correlation in the palliative setting. Curative therapies were analyzed descriptively due to limited variability. Results: Among 38 palliative therapies, 40% achieved high clinical benefit (MCBS 4&amp;amp;ndash;5). A significant association was observed between MCBS scores and NCCN recommendations (p = 0.003; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.48), with 62% of NCCN Category 1 therapies demonstrating high benefit versus 13% in other categories. No significant associations were observed with ASCO (p = 0.101; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.18) or ESMO guideline recommendations (p = 0.073; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.19). Inter-guideline concordance was strongest between ASCO and ESMO (p = 0.033; &amp;amp;rho; = 0.48). In the curative setting (n = 9), most therapies received an MCBS grade A and top-tier guideline endorsement. Conclusions: Alignment between ESMO-MCBS and guideline recommendations is moderate and framework-dependent, strongest with NCCN in metastatic BC. Discordance primarily reflects differences between magnitude-of-benefit thresholds and evidence-certainty frameworks. ESMO-MCBS may serve as a complementary tool to enhance value-based clinical and policy decision-making.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Bushra Salman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Intissar Yehia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hadil Al Sharqi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Roula Al Shidi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miaad A. Al Dhahri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saba Al Ghefeili</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Meriem Makhloufi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adil Al Ajmi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Suhaila Al Farsi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zayana Al Kiyumi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zaid Riyadh Raouf Al Ishaq</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar Abdelhakim Ayaad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Khalid Al Baimani</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040227</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040227</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/227</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/226">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 226: Combining External Beam Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/226</link>
	<description>The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has driven progress in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment outcomes and enabled opportunities for combining therapeutic modalities. Growing evidence substantiates the utility of radiotherapy, particularly at ablative doses, in the management of HCC. Given the potential for radiotherapy to induce an immunostimulatory environment and potentiate immune checkpoint inhibitor activity, the expanding HCC treatment landscape compels exploration of the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This review highlights recent advances in the treatment of HCC using radiotherapy and immunotherapy in combination. Radiation can potentiate an anti-tumor response and tumor microenvironment permissive to immunotherapy. Results from randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies consistently show that combinations of radiotherapy and immunotherapy improved the treatment outcomes of unresectable or advanced HCC&amp;amp;mdash;especially HCC with macrovascular invasion. Active research to further improve treatment efficacy and reduce side effects is exemplified by more than 20 ongoing clinical trials combining external beam radiotherapy and immunotherapy to treat HCC. Ongoing research aims at prolonging survival and downstaging advanced or unresectable HCC.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 226: Combining External Beam Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/226">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040226</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Connie Le
		Aswin G. Abraham
		Keith Tankel
		Nawaid Usmani
		Kurian Joseph
		Diane Severin
		Fatimah AlFaraj
		Laura A. Dawson
		</p>
	<p>The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has driven progress in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment outcomes and enabled opportunities for combining therapeutic modalities. Growing evidence substantiates the utility of radiotherapy, particularly at ablative doses, in the management of HCC. Given the potential for radiotherapy to induce an immunostimulatory environment and potentiate immune checkpoint inhibitor activity, the expanding HCC treatment landscape compels exploration of the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This review highlights recent advances in the treatment of HCC using radiotherapy and immunotherapy in combination. Radiation can potentiate an anti-tumor response and tumor microenvironment permissive to immunotherapy. Results from randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies consistently show that combinations of radiotherapy and immunotherapy improved the treatment outcomes of unresectable or advanced HCC&amp;amp;mdash;especially HCC with macrovascular invasion. Active research to further improve treatment efficacy and reduce side effects is exemplified by more than 20 ongoing clinical trials combining external beam radiotherapy and immunotherapy to treat HCC. Ongoing research aims at prolonging survival and downstaging advanced or unresectable HCC.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Combining External Beam Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Connie Le</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Aswin G. Abraham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Keith Tankel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nawaid Usmani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kurian Joseph</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Diane Severin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatimah AlFaraj</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laura A. Dawson</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040226</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040226</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/226</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/225">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 225: Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/225</link>
	<description>Introduction: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents approximately 78% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers and is characterized by high recurrence rates and variable progression risk. While transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical therapy remains standard management, optimal treatment of high-risk and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive disease remains controversial. Radiotherapy (RT), particularly in combination with chemotherapy, has been explored as a bladder-preserving alternative. Material and Methods: We conducted a narrative review of published literature evaluating the role of definitive RT in high-risk NMIBC, with emphasis on T1 disease. Retrospective series, prospective trials, meta-analyses, and contemporary guideline recommendations were examined. For each included study, we extracted data on the extent of TURBT (maximal vs. incomplete/non-specified), use and type of concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy technique (3D-conformal, IMRT, or proton), treatment volume (bladder only vs. whole pelvis), and dose/fractionation schedule. Results: Early studies evaluating RT alone demonstrated modest complete response rates. More recent approaches incorporating maximal TURBT followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy report improved outcomes, with complete response rates of approximately 80&amp;amp;ndash;88% and 5-year overall survival comparable to surgical series. The phase II NRG/RTOG 0926 trial in recurrent high-risk T1 disease after intravesical therapy failure demonstrated an 81% complete response rate and favorable bladder preservation outcomes. Meta-analytic data suggest 5-year recurrence-free survival around 54% and overall survival near 70%, although evidence remains limited and largely non-randomized. Advances in image-guided and hypofractionated RT may further improve therapeutic outcomes while limiting toxicity. Conclusions: while definitive chemoradiotherapy is a promising option for selected patients, it remains investigational and should be considered only in those who are unfit for or decline radical cystectomy. Prospective randomized studies are needed to better define its role in contemporary management.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 225: Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/225">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040225</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lucas Resende Salgado
		Osama Zaytoun
		Ahmed Rabie
		Nicholas Murphy
		Anthony Nehlsen
		Kristin Hsieh
		Zachary Dovey
		Anum Aamir
		Kunal K. Sindhu
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents approximately 78% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers and is characterized by high recurrence rates and variable progression risk. While transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical therapy remains standard management, optimal treatment of high-risk and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive disease remains controversial. Radiotherapy (RT), particularly in combination with chemotherapy, has been explored as a bladder-preserving alternative. Material and Methods: We conducted a narrative review of published literature evaluating the role of definitive RT in high-risk NMIBC, with emphasis on T1 disease. Retrospective series, prospective trials, meta-analyses, and contemporary guideline recommendations were examined. For each included study, we extracted data on the extent of TURBT (maximal vs. incomplete/non-specified), use and type of concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy technique (3D-conformal, IMRT, or proton), treatment volume (bladder only vs. whole pelvis), and dose/fractionation schedule. Results: Early studies evaluating RT alone demonstrated modest complete response rates. More recent approaches incorporating maximal TURBT followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy report improved outcomes, with complete response rates of approximately 80&amp;amp;ndash;88% and 5-year overall survival comparable to surgical series. The phase II NRG/RTOG 0926 trial in recurrent high-risk T1 disease after intravesical therapy failure demonstrated an 81% complete response rate and favorable bladder preservation outcomes. Meta-analytic data suggest 5-year recurrence-free survival around 54% and overall survival near 70%, although evidence remains limited and largely non-randomized. Advances in image-guided and hypofractionated RT may further improve therapeutic outcomes while limiting toxicity. Conclusions: while definitive chemoradiotherapy is a promising option for selected patients, it remains investigational and should be considered only in those who are unfit for or decline radical cystectomy. Prospective randomized studies are needed to better define its role in contemporary management.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lucas Resende Salgado</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Osama Zaytoun</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmed Rabie</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicholas Murphy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anthony Nehlsen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kristin Hsieh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zachary Dovey</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anum Aamir</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kunal K. Sindhu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040225</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040225</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/225</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/224">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 224: A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized Versus Guideline-Based Well Follow-Up Strategies for Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Feasibility Outcomes</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/224</link>
	<description>Despite the paucity of high-quality data supporting its benefits, routinely scheduled, in-person post-treatment surveillance of early breast cancer (EBC) patients remains common. Evaluation of different follow-up strategies is required. We present the feasibility phase of an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two different follow-up strategies. Patients with EBC who completed the acute phase of their treatment were randomized to receive either personalized or ASCO guideline-based follow-up care alone. Feasibility endpoints, including rate of accrual, physician participation, patient acceptance of randomization arm, and patient retention 1 year after randomization, are presented. Of 279 patients approached, 261 (93.5%) were eligible and provided consent. Median rate of accrual was 34.5 patients per month, and all healthcare providers who agreed to study participation (n = 11) approached patients. Patients were randomized to receive personalized (n = 131) or guideline-based (n = 130) follow-up. No patients declined their randomization arm. For all 261 randomized patients, the 1-year participant retention rate was 92.0% (240/261). This RCT confirms both patient and healthcare-provider enthusiasm for studies comparing different strategies for post-treatment surveillance. No patients withdrew consent post-randomization due to a preference for one study arm over the other. While clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction remain to be analyzed, our reported rates of attrition can be used by others when designing similar studies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 224: A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized Versus Guideline-Based Well Follow-Up Strategies for Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Feasibility Outcomes</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/224">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040224</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless
		Emma Himmelman
		Alexander Kim
		Gregory R. Pond
		Parvaneh Fallah
		Terry Ng
		John Hilton
		Marie-France Savard
		Gail Larocque
		Kelly-Anne Baines
		Kendra Primeau
		Deanna Saunders
		Danielle Allard
		Lisa Vandermeer
		Mark Clemons
		</p>
	<p>Despite the paucity of high-quality data supporting its benefits, routinely scheduled, in-person post-treatment surveillance of early breast cancer (EBC) patients remains common. Evaluation of different follow-up strategies is required. We present the feasibility phase of an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two different follow-up strategies. Patients with EBC who completed the acute phase of their treatment were randomized to receive either personalized or ASCO guideline-based follow-up care alone. Feasibility endpoints, including rate of accrual, physician participation, patient acceptance of randomization arm, and patient retention 1 year after randomization, are presented. Of 279 patients approached, 261 (93.5%) were eligible and provided consent. Median rate of accrual was 34.5 patients per month, and all healthcare providers who agreed to study participation (n = 11) approached patients. Patients were randomized to receive personalized (n = 131) or guideline-based (n = 130) follow-up. No patients declined their randomization arm. For all 261 randomized patients, the 1-year participant retention rate was 92.0% (240/261). This RCT confirms both patient and healthcare-provider enthusiasm for studies comparing different strategies for post-treatment surveillance. No patients withdrew consent post-randomization due to a preference for one study arm over the other. While clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction remain to be analyzed, our reported rates of attrition can be used by others when designing similar studies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized Versus Guideline-Based Well Follow-Up Strategies for Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Feasibility Outcomes</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Emma Himmelman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Kim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gregory R. Pond</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Parvaneh Fallah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Terry Ng</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>John Hilton</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marie-France Savard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gail Larocque</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kelly-Anne Baines</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kendra Primeau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Deanna Saunders</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Danielle Allard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lisa Vandermeer</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mark Clemons</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040224</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040224</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/224</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/223">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 223: Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/223</link>
	<description>Sae-sim et al [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 223: Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/223">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040223</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Janhavi Venkataraman
		Kefah Mokbel
		</p>
	<p>Sae-sim et al [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reconsidering the Interpretation of &amp;amp;ldquo;Recurrence-Free Survival&amp;amp;rdquo; After Mastectomy for DCIS. Comment on Sae-sim et al. Tamoxifen Reduces Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women with DCIS Who Underwent Mastectomy. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 89</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Janhavi Venkataraman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kefah Mokbel</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040223</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Comment</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040223</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/223</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/222">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 222: Protective Effects of Plant-Based Diets Against Colorectal Carcinogenesis via Modulation of Key Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/222</link>
	<description>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and is the second largest contributor to both incidence and mortality, underscoring the urgent need for effective prevention strategies. This comprehensive review provides the most up-to-date evidence on the protective role of plant-based dietary patterns against CRC carcinogenesis, with particular emphasis on underlying cellular and molecular level mechanisms. Accumulating research demonstrates that plant-based foods, rich in dietary fibre, polyphenols, and multiple other bioactive compounds, promote gut microbial eubiosis, support immune regulation, and modulate adipose tissue homeostasis. These effects are accompanied by intestinal barrier integrity, enhanced production of short-chain fatty acids, and the induction of apoptosis in malignant cells. Moreover, plant-derived nutrients reduce the abundance of pro-inflammatory microbial taxa, decrease oxidative, nitrosative and carbonyl stress, and downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines and signalling pathways, implicated in tumourigenesis. As a result, plant-based dietary patterns have high potential to reduce CRC risk through modulating the intricate interplay between epigenetics, inflammation, immune dysregulation, metabolic and hormonal disruptions, and gut microbiota, suggesting a highly promising, cost-effective and equitable strategy for CRC prevention.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-17</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 222: Protective Effects of Plant-Based Diets Against Colorectal Carcinogenesis via Modulation of Key Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/222">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040222</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Marina Kamel
		Clarence Wong
		Eduardo Grunvald
		Andrea Galli
		Sahar Iqbal
		Arshdeep Rattol
		Tanya Jackson
		Sebastian Straube
		Ellina Lytvyak
		</p>
	<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and is the second largest contributor to both incidence and mortality, underscoring the urgent need for effective prevention strategies. This comprehensive review provides the most up-to-date evidence on the protective role of plant-based dietary patterns against CRC carcinogenesis, with particular emphasis on underlying cellular and molecular level mechanisms. Accumulating research demonstrates that plant-based foods, rich in dietary fibre, polyphenols, and multiple other bioactive compounds, promote gut microbial eubiosis, support immune regulation, and modulate adipose tissue homeostasis. These effects are accompanied by intestinal barrier integrity, enhanced production of short-chain fatty acids, and the induction of apoptosis in malignant cells. Moreover, plant-derived nutrients reduce the abundance of pro-inflammatory microbial taxa, decrease oxidative, nitrosative and carbonyl stress, and downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines and signalling pathways, implicated in tumourigenesis. As a result, plant-based dietary patterns have high potential to reduce CRC risk through modulating the intricate interplay between epigenetics, inflammation, immune dysregulation, metabolic and hormonal disruptions, and gut microbiota, suggesting a highly promising, cost-effective and equitable strategy for CRC prevention.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Protective Effects of Plant-Based Diets Against Colorectal Carcinogenesis via Modulation of Key Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Marina Kamel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Clarence Wong</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eduardo Grunvald</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrea Galli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sahar Iqbal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arshdeep Rattol</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tanya Jackson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sebastian Straube</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ellina Lytvyak</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040222</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-17</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040222</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/222</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/221">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 221: Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Imaging Modality on PSA Density: TRUS Versus MRI in Gray-Zone Prostate Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/221</link>
	<description>Background: In this study, it was aimed to compare transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in patients with gray-zone PSA levels (4&amp;amp;ndash;10 ng/mL), evaluate their diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and assess the clinical implications of reclassification across commonly used thresholds. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 202 men who underwent both TRUS and multiparametric MRI between January 2020 and June 2025. Prostate volume was measured using the ellipsoid formula for TRUS and contour-based planimetry for MRI. PSA density (PSAD) was calculated as total PSA (tPSA, ng/mL) divided by prostate volume (mL) for each modality: TRUS-PSAD and MRI-PSAD. Agreement between modalities was evaluated using Bland&amp;amp;ndash;Altman plots and correlation analyses. Reclassification at PSAD thresholds of 0.15, 0.20, and 0.30 ng/mL/mL was assessed using Cohen&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;kappa; and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Diagnostic performance for csPCa (ISUP grade group &amp;amp;ge; 2) was evaluated with ROC analysis and the DeLong test. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;kappa;. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: MRI-derived prostate volumes were significantly lower than TRUS-derived volumes (median 47.0 vs. 52.5 mL, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), resulting in higher MRI-PSAD values (median 0.14 vs. 0.12 ng/mL/mL, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Bland&amp;amp;ndash;Altman analysis demonstrated a negative bias for prostate volume (&amp;amp;minus;3.2 mL) and a positive bias for PSAD (+0.03). Strong correlations were observed between TRUS and MRI measurements (r = 0.96 for volume and r = 0.94 for PSAD). MRI-PSAD frequently reclassified patients into higher risk categories, yielding positive net reclassification improvement for cancer cases across all thresholds, while introducing some negative reclassification among non-cancer cases. ROC analysis showed comparable overall diagnostic performance between TRUS-PSAD and MRI-PSAD (AUC 0.681 vs. 0.679, p = 0.91). However, MRI-PSAD demonstrated higher sensitivity at predefined thresholds at the expense of reduced specificity, reflecting a threshold-dependent shift rather than improved discrimination. Reproducibility was higher for MRI-derived measurements (ICC = 0.94; &amp;amp;kappa; = 0.83) compared with TRUS (ICC = 0.86; &amp;amp;kappa; = 0.71). Decision curve analysis indicated that MRI-PSAD, particularly when combined with PI-RADS &amp;amp;ge; 3, provided the greatest net clinical benefit at lower threshold probabilities (5&amp;amp;ndash;15%). Conclusions: MRI-derived PSA density produces systematically higher values than TRUS-based measurements due to inherent differences in prostate volume estimation. While this results in increased sensitivity at standard thresholds, overall discrimination remains unchanged. These findings support the use of modality-specific PSAD thresholds rather than uniform cutoffs across imaging techniques. In clinical practice, MRI-PSAD may provide additional value when interpreted in conjunction with PI-RADS, primarily through improved threshold calibration rather than enhanced diagnostic accuracy.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 221: Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Imaging Modality on PSA Density: TRUS Versus MRI in Gray-Zone Prostate Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/221">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040221</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Davut Unsal Capkan
		Mehmet Solakhan
		</p>
	<p>Background: In this study, it was aimed to compare transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in patients with gray-zone PSA levels (4&amp;amp;ndash;10 ng/mL), evaluate their diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and assess the clinical implications of reclassification across commonly used thresholds. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 202 men who underwent both TRUS and multiparametric MRI between January 2020 and June 2025. Prostate volume was measured using the ellipsoid formula for TRUS and contour-based planimetry for MRI. PSA density (PSAD) was calculated as total PSA (tPSA, ng/mL) divided by prostate volume (mL) for each modality: TRUS-PSAD and MRI-PSAD. Agreement between modalities was evaluated using Bland&amp;amp;ndash;Altman plots and correlation analyses. Reclassification at PSAD thresholds of 0.15, 0.20, and 0.30 ng/mL/mL was assessed using Cohen&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;kappa; and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Diagnostic performance for csPCa (ISUP grade group &amp;amp;ge; 2) was evaluated with ROC analysis and the DeLong test. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen&amp;amp;rsquo;s &amp;amp;kappa;. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: MRI-derived prostate volumes were significantly lower than TRUS-derived volumes (median 47.0 vs. 52.5 mL, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), resulting in higher MRI-PSAD values (median 0.14 vs. 0.12 ng/mL/mL, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Bland&amp;amp;ndash;Altman analysis demonstrated a negative bias for prostate volume (&amp;amp;minus;3.2 mL) and a positive bias for PSAD (+0.03). Strong correlations were observed between TRUS and MRI measurements (r = 0.96 for volume and r = 0.94 for PSAD). MRI-PSAD frequently reclassified patients into higher risk categories, yielding positive net reclassification improvement for cancer cases across all thresholds, while introducing some negative reclassification among non-cancer cases. ROC analysis showed comparable overall diagnostic performance between TRUS-PSAD and MRI-PSAD (AUC 0.681 vs. 0.679, p = 0.91). However, MRI-PSAD demonstrated higher sensitivity at predefined thresholds at the expense of reduced specificity, reflecting a threshold-dependent shift rather than improved discrimination. Reproducibility was higher for MRI-derived measurements (ICC = 0.94; &amp;amp;kappa; = 0.83) compared with TRUS (ICC = 0.86; &amp;amp;kappa; = 0.71). Decision curve analysis indicated that MRI-PSAD, particularly when combined with PI-RADS &amp;amp;ge; 3, provided the greatest net clinical benefit at lower threshold probabilities (5&amp;amp;ndash;15%). Conclusions: MRI-derived PSA density produces systematically higher values than TRUS-based measurements due to inherent differences in prostate volume estimation. While this results in increased sensitivity at standard thresholds, overall discrimination remains unchanged. These findings support the use of modality-specific PSAD thresholds rather than uniform cutoffs across imaging techniques. In clinical practice, MRI-PSAD may provide additional value when interpreted in conjunction with PI-RADS, primarily through improved threshold calibration rather than enhanced diagnostic accuracy.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Imaging Modality on PSA Density: TRUS Versus MRI in Gray-Zone Prostate Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Davut Unsal Capkan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mehmet Solakhan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040221</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040221</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/221</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/220">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 220: Cost-Effectiveness of Radiotherapy and Its Impact on Patient Quality of Life: A Real-World Cost Utility Analysis in Greece</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/220</link>
	<description>Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the economic burden of radiotherapy (RT) from the perspectives of payers, the healthcare system, patients, and society, and to assess associated quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. The analysis examined direct medical and non-medical costs, as well as QoL, before, during, and up to six months after RT. Given the inclusion of multiple cancer types, the study reflects a heterogeneous real-world population. An exploratory comparison across RT techniques was also conducted to provide contextual economic insight. Methods: This analysis included data from 301 cancer patients undergoing RT using various techniques, including two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D), 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), at the University General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Clinical and cost data were collected retrospectively, while QoL data were collected prospectively using validated instruments at baseline, end of treatment, and six months post-treatment. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. The primary analysis compared RT with a hypothetical &amp;amp;ldquo;no RT&amp;amp;rdquo; comparator derived from published evidence, while comparisons across RT techniques were conducted as exploratory analyses. Costs and QALYs were evaluated over a 6-month time horizon; therefore, discounting was not applied. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for parameter uncertainty. Results: The cost per QALY gained with RT compared with the hypothetical &amp;amp;ldquo;no RT&amp;amp;rdquo; comparator varied substantially across techniques and cancer types. In the primary analysis, 2D radiotherapy yielded the lowest ICER (&amp;amp;euro;13,043.27/QALY), while VMAT demonstrated an ICER of &amp;amp;euro;29,945.12/QALY. In contrast, IMRT was associated with a substantially higher ICER (&amp;amp;euro;135,529.51/QALY), suggesting limited cost-effectiveness under commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, whereas 3D-CRT was found to be dominant. Subgroup analyses revealed marked heterogeneity, with ICERs ranging from &amp;amp;euro;3234.45 to &amp;amp;euro;30,232.50 per QALY gained across cancer types. In certain subgroups, RT was either cost-saving or dominant, particularly in breast cancer (cost-saving with similar QALYs) and in skin cancer and sarcoma (dominant strategies). Sensitivity analyses highlighted considerable uncertainty, especially for 2D radiotherapy, primarily driven by small sample sizes and variability in QALY estimates. Conclusions: This study provides short-term, real-world evidence on the cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life outcomes of radiotherapy in a Greek healthcare setting. While simpler techniques such as 2D radiotherapy may appear economically favorable, their limited effectiveness and substantial uncertainty may reduce their overall value. In contrast, advanced techniques&amp;amp;mdash;particularly VMAT&amp;amp;mdash;demonstrate a more consistent balance between cost and clinical outcomes, supporting their role within value-based, patient-centered oncology care. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to population heterogeneity, small subgroup sizes, the short (6-month) time horizon, and the use of a hypothetical comparator. Further research with longer follow-up and disease-specific analyses is warranted.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 220: Cost-Effectiveness of Radiotherapy and Its Impact on Patient Quality of Life: A Real-World Cost Utility Analysis in Greece</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/220">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040220</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Elissavet Vardaki
		Maria Tolia
		Christos Michalakelis
		Athanassios Vozikis
		</p>
	<p>Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the economic burden of radiotherapy (RT) from the perspectives of payers, the healthcare system, patients, and society, and to assess associated quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. The analysis examined direct medical and non-medical costs, as well as QoL, before, during, and up to six months after RT. Given the inclusion of multiple cancer types, the study reflects a heterogeneous real-world population. An exploratory comparison across RT techniques was also conducted to provide contextual economic insight. Methods: This analysis included data from 301 cancer patients undergoing RT using various techniques, including two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D), 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), at the University General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Clinical and cost data were collected retrospectively, while QoL data were collected prospectively using validated instruments at baseline, end of treatment, and six months post-treatment. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. The primary analysis compared RT with a hypothetical &amp;amp;ldquo;no RT&amp;amp;rdquo; comparator derived from published evidence, while comparisons across RT techniques were conducted as exploratory analyses. Costs and QALYs were evaluated over a 6-month time horizon; therefore, discounting was not applied. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for parameter uncertainty. Results: The cost per QALY gained with RT compared with the hypothetical &amp;amp;ldquo;no RT&amp;amp;rdquo; comparator varied substantially across techniques and cancer types. In the primary analysis, 2D radiotherapy yielded the lowest ICER (&amp;amp;euro;13,043.27/QALY), while VMAT demonstrated an ICER of &amp;amp;euro;29,945.12/QALY. In contrast, IMRT was associated with a substantially higher ICER (&amp;amp;euro;135,529.51/QALY), suggesting limited cost-effectiveness under commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, whereas 3D-CRT was found to be dominant. Subgroup analyses revealed marked heterogeneity, with ICERs ranging from &amp;amp;euro;3234.45 to &amp;amp;euro;30,232.50 per QALY gained across cancer types. In certain subgroups, RT was either cost-saving or dominant, particularly in breast cancer (cost-saving with similar QALYs) and in skin cancer and sarcoma (dominant strategies). Sensitivity analyses highlighted considerable uncertainty, especially for 2D radiotherapy, primarily driven by small sample sizes and variability in QALY estimates. Conclusions: This study provides short-term, real-world evidence on the cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life outcomes of radiotherapy in a Greek healthcare setting. While simpler techniques such as 2D radiotherapy may appear economically favorable, their limited effectiveness and substantial uncertainty may reduce their overall value. In contrast, advanced techniques&amp;amp;mdash;particularly VMAT&amp;amp;mdash;demonstrate a more consistent balance between cost and clinical outcomes, supporting their role within value-based, patient-centered oncology care. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to population heterogeneity, small subgroup sizes, the short (6-month) time horizon, and the use of a hypothetical comparator. Further research with longer follow-up and disease-specific analyses is warranted.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Cost-Effectiveness of Radiotherapy and Its Impact on Patient Quality of Life: A Real-World Cost Utility Analysis in Greece</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Elissavet Vardaki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria Tolia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christos Michalakelis</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Athanassios Vozikis</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040220</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040220</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/220</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/219">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 219: Unusual Case of Neuromeningeal Late Relapse of POLE Mutated Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Case Report and Systematic Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/219</link>
	<description>Background: POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas are associated with exceptionally favorable outcomes, forming the basis for treatment de-escalation in early-stage disease. Nevertheless, rare adverse clinical courses have been reported. This study describes an unusual case of late metastatic recurrence in a POLE-mutated tumor and provides a review of similar cases in the literature. Methods: We present a detailed clinical, radiological, pathological, and molecular description of a patient who developed metastatic recurrence 16 years after initial surgery. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify reports of recurrence, progression, or cancer-related death in POLE-mutated endometrial carcinoma, with extraction of recurrence patterns, genomic features, treatment, and outcomes. Results: The patient experienced sequential pulmonary, cerebral, and leptomeningeal metastases despite harboring a canonical POLE hotspot mutation, proficient mismatch repair status, wild-type TP53, no additional known driver mutation beyond PTEN alterations. The literature review identified a small number of similarly adverse cases. Reported recurrences were heterogeneous, though distant and occasionally central nervous system involvement were noted. Conclusions: While POLE-mutated tumors overall retain an excellent prognosis, rare cases may follow an atypical and aggressive course. Improved molecular annotation and integrated risk-stratification models are needed to better identify this minority of higher-risk patients.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 219: Unusual Case of Neuromeningeal Late Relapse of POLE Mutated Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Case Report and Systematic Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/219">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040219</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Emma Donati
		Michel Fabbro
		Noémie Drappier
		Alexis Marguerit
		Cristina Leaha
		Stéphanie Nougaret
		Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
		Stanislas Quesada
		</p>
	<p>Background: POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas are associated with exceptionally favorable outcomes, forming the basis for treatment de-escalation in early-stage disease. Nevertheless, rare adverse clinical courses have been reported. This study describes an unusual case of late metastatic recurrence in a POLE-mutated tumor and provides a review of similar cases in the literature. Methods: We present a detailed clinical, radiological, pathological, and molecular description of a patient who developed metastatic recurrence 16 years after initial surgery. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify reports of recurrence, progression, or cancer-related death in POLE-mutated endometrial carcinoma, with extraction of recurrence patterns, genomic features, treatment, and outcomes. Results: The patient experienced sequential pulmonary, cerebral, and leptomeningeal metastases despite harboring a canonical POLE hotspot mutation, proficient mismatch repair status, wild-type TP53, no additional known driver mutation beyond PTEN alterations. The literature review identified a small number of similarly adverse cases. Reported recurrences were heterogeneous, though distant and occasionally central nervous system involvement were noted. Conclusions: While POLE-mutated tumors overall retain an excellent prognosis, rare cases may follow an atypical and aggressive course. Improved molecular annotation and integrated risk-stratification models are needed to better identify this minority of higher-risk patients.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Unusual Case of Neuromeningeal Late Relapse of POLE Mutated Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Case Report and Systematic Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Emma Donati</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Michel Fabbro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noémie Drappier</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alexis Marguerit</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Cristina Leaha</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stéphanie Nougaret</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stanislas Quesada</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040219</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040219</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/219</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/218">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 218: Economic Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Socioeconomic Stratification Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/218</link>
	<description>Economic inequities in healthcare access persist globally, yet the impact of income on palliative care (PC) utilization in Middle Eastern contexts remains empirically understudied. This cross-sectional study of 200 cancer patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, employed a socioeconomic stratification analysis to examine income-stratified differences in PC awareness and access. Using chi-square and linear-by-linear association tests, results revealed pronounced income gradients; awareness increased from 41.9% in the low-income group to 71.9% in the high-income group (p = 0.001), demonstrating a significant dose&amp;amp;ndash;response trend. Access disparities were even more striking, with only 35.5% of low-income patients utilizing services compared to 76.1% of high-income patients (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), representing a 40.6 percentage-point gap. After multivariable adjustment, after controlling for age, gender, education, and geographic living region, the results of logistic regression analysis showed that cancer patients with high income were more than three times as likely to access PC services compared with lower-income cancer patients (OR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.83&amp;amp;ndash;6.02; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Geographic stratification further indicated that income disparities were significantly amplified in peripheral regions compared to the Central region (p = 0.072 for interaction), where service scarcity exacerbates economic barriers. These findings underscore that economic barriers operate through awareness gaps and structural obstacles like transportation and opportunity costs. Addressing these inequities requires multifaceted strategies, including financial support and geographic service expansion, to ensure equitable PC distribution under the Vision 2030 framework.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 218: Economic Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Socioeconomic Stratification Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/218">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040218</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Thurayya Eid
		Norah M. Alyahya
		Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah
		Bader M. Almutairy
		Faihan F. Alshaibany
		Waleed M. Alshehri
		</p>
	<p>Economic inequities in healthcare access persist globally, yet the impact of income on palliative care (PC) utilization in Middle Eastern contexts remains empirically understudied. This cross-sectional study of 200 cancer patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, employed a socioeconomic stratification analysis to examine income-stratified differences in PC awareness and access. Using chi-square and linear-by-linear association tests, results revealed pronounced income gradients; awareness increased from 41.9% in the low-income group to 71.9% in the high-income group (p = 0.001), demonstrating a significant dose&amp;amp;ndash;response trend. Access disparities were even more striking, with only 35.5% of low-income patients utilizing services compared to 76.1% of high-income patients (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), representing a 40.6 percentage-point gap. After multivariable adjustment, after controlling for age, gender, education, and geographic living region, the results of logistic regression analysis showed that cancer patients with high income were more than three times as likely to access PC services compared with lower-income cancer patients (OR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.83&amp;amp;ndash;6.02; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). Geographic stratification further indicated that income disparities were significantly amplified in peripheral regions compared to the Central region (p = 0.072 for interaction), where service scarcity exacerbates economic barriers. These findings underscore that economic barriers operate through awareness gaps and structural obstacles like transportation and opportunity costs. Addressing these inequities requires multifaceted strategies, including financial support and geographic service expansion, to ensure equitable PC distribution under the Vision 2030 framework.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Economic Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Socioeconomic Stratification Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Thurayya Eid</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Norah M. Alyahya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdulaziz M. Alodhailah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bader M. Almutairy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Faihan F. Alshaibany</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Waleed M. Alshehri</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040218</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040218</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/218</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/217">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 217: Ablation-First Balloon-Assisted Acetabuloplasty for Painful Acetabular Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Mechanical Rationale</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/217</link>
	<description>Purpose: To evaluate the safety, technical feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a strict two-step protocol&amp;amp;mdash;CT/fluoroscopic-guided thermal ablation followed by Balloon-Assisted Acetabuloplasty (BAA)&amp;amp;mdash;for the treatment of painful acetabular metastases, utilized as an immediate mechanical stabilization bridge prior to radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 16 consecutive patients treated for severe mechanical pain (VAS &amp;amp;ge; 6) and impaired mobility due to osteolytic acetabular metastases. The physiological rationale mandated a strict procedural sequence: (1) preliminary thermal devitalization using radiofrequency or microwave ablation to reduce tumor pressure and vascularity, followed subsequently by (2) balloon-assisted cavity compaction and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement injection. Clinical outcomes included VAS for pain and the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) assessed before treatment and up to 6 months post-procedure. Results: Technical success was 100% with a mean procedural time of 58 &amp;amp;plusmn; 14 min. No major complications occurred. At a mean follow-up of 8.2 months, all 16 patients were alive. The procedure yielded dramatic acute pain relief: mean baseline VAS dropped from 7.4 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.8 to 2.3 &amp;amp;plusmn; 1.0 at 1 week, and to 0.9 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.9 at 1 month (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), remaining stable at 6 months. Functional mobility was rapidly restored, with mean FMS improving from 2.9 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.7 pre-procedure to 1.1 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.3 at 1 month (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), allowing independent ambulation in 87.5% of patients. Conclusion: The strict &amp;amp;ldquo;ablation-first&amp;amp;rdquo; BAA strategy is safe and highly effective. It abolishes load-bearing pain and restores biomechanical stability immediately, allowing previously immobilized patients to rapidly regain independent ambulation and seamlessly transition to necessary consolidative radiotherapy.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 217: Ablation-First Balloon-Assisted Acetabuloplasty for Painful Acetabular Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Mechanical Rationale</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/217">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040217</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Claudio Pusceddu
		Eliodoro Faiella
		Pierluigi Maria Rinaldi
		Jesús Ares-Vidal
		José Maria Maiques Llacér
		Igor Radalov
		Albert Solano López
		Salvatore Marsico
		</p>
	<p>Purpose: To evaluate the safety, technical feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a strict two-step protocol&amp;amp;mdash;CT/fluoroscopic-guided thermal ablation followed by Balloon-Assisted Acetabuloplasty (BAA)&amp;amp;mdash;for the treatment of painful acetabular metastases, utilized as an immediate mechanical stabilization bridge prior to radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 16 consecutive patients treated for severe mechanical pain (VAS &amp;amp;ge; 6) and impaired mobility due to osteolytic acetabular metastases. The physiological rationale mandated a strict procedural sequence: (1) preliminary thermal devitalization using radiofrequency or microwave ablation to reduce tumor pressure and vascularity, followed subsequently by (2) balloon-assisted cavity compaction and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement injection. Clinical outcomes included VAS for pain and the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) assessed before treatment and up to 6 months post-procedure. Results: Technical success was 100% with a mean procedural time of 58 &amp;amp;plusmn; 14 min. No major complications occurred. At a mean follow-up of 8.2 months, all 16 patients were alive. The procedure yielded dramatic acute pain relief: mean baseline VAS dropped from 7.4 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.8 to 2.3 &amp;amp;plusmn; 1.0 at 1 week, and to 0.9 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.9 at 1 month (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), remaining stable at 6 months. Functional mobility was rapidly restored, with mean FMS improving from 2.9 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.7 pre-procedure to 1.1 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.3 at 1 month (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), allowing independent ambulation in 87.5% of patients. Conclusion: The strict &amp;amp;ldquo;ablation-first&amp;amp;rdquo; BAA strategy is safe and highly effective. It abolishes load-bearing pain and restores biomechanical stability immediately, allowing previously immobilized patients to rapidly regain independent ambulation and seamlessly transition to necessary consolidative radiotherapy.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Ablation-First Balloon-Assisted Acetabuloplasty for Painful Acetabular Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Mechanical Rationale</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Claudio Pusceddu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eliodoro Faiella</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pierluigi Maria Rinaldi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jesús Ares-Vidal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>José Maria Maiques Llacér</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Igor Radalov</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Albert Solano López</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Salvatore Marsico</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040217</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040217</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/217</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/216">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 216: Molecular Profiling and Survival Outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Turkey</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/216</link>
	<description>Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables molecular characterization and may identify clinically actionable alterations; however, real-world multicenter data linking genomic subgroups to survival outcomes remain limited. We aimed to characterize the molecular landscape of NGS-tested PDAC in a Turkish multicenter cohort and evaluate the association of key molecular alterations, including KRAS status and KRAS variant subgroups, with survival outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients with pathologically diagnosed PDAC between 2017 and 2025 who underwent tumor-based NGS in routine clinical practice. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of metastasis, defined as the date of diagnosis for de novo metastatic disease and the date of first documented distant recurrence for recurrent cases. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the initiation of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic disease to progression or death. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for OS and PFS using clinically relevant covariates selected a priori. Results: A total of 98 patients underwent molecular profiling, and survival analyses were performed in 92 patients with available OS/PFS data. KRAS mutations were detected in 83.7% (82/98) of patients, with predominant variants G12D (47.6%), G12V (30.5%), and G12R (12.2%). TP53 mutations were present in 59.2% (58/98) of tumors, and all tumors were microsatellite stable. Tumor mutational burden data were available for 72 patients; the median TMB was 3.83 mutations/Mb, and 15.3% of evaluable tumors had a TMB &amp;amp;ge; 10 mutations/Mb. Excluding KRAS, clinically actionable alterations were identified in 4.1% of patients, whereas an additional 32.7% harbored potentially actionable or investigational alterations. Median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.7&amp;amp;ndash;16.3), and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.3&amp;amp;ndash;7.7). In unadjusted analyses, OS and PFS did not differ significantly according to KRAS mutation status (OS, p = 0.967; PFS, p = 0.652), TP53 mutation status (OS, p = 0.404; PFS, p = 0.510), or KRAS variant subgroup (OS, p = 0.332; PFS, p = 0.194). In multivariable Cox analyses, KRAS mutation status was not independently associated with OS (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.56&amp;amp;ndash;2.28; p = 0.727) or PFS (aHR 1.09, 95% CI 0.59&amp;amp;ndash;2.01; p = 0.780), whereas ECOG performance status remained the strongest adverse clinical factor. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world PDAC cohort, the molecular landscape was dominated by KRAS and TP53 alterations, whereas clinically actionable non-KRAS alterations were identified in only a minority of patients. After adjustment for major clinical covariates, KRAS mutation status was not independently associated with OS or PFS. Molecular profiling may still be useful for identifying uncommon potentially targetable alterations; however, larger clinically annotated multicenter studies are needed to better define its prognostic and treatment-directing value in routine practice.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 216: Molecular Profiling and Survival Outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Turkey</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/216">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040216</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Selami Bayram
		Bahadır Köylü
		Maral Martin Mıldanoğlu
		Mustafa Serkan Alemdar
		Tahir Yerlikaya
		Fatih Selçukbiricik
		Ahmet Bilici
		Ali Murat Tatli
		Mustafa Ozdogan
		</p>
	<p>Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables molecular characterization and may identify clinically actionable alterations; however, real-world multicenter data linking genomic subgroups to survival outcomes remain limited. We aimed to characterize the molecular landscape of NGS-tested PDAC in a Turkish multicenter cohort and evaluate the association of key molecular alterations, including KRAS status and KRAS variant subgroups, with survival outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients with pathologically diagnosed PDAC between 2017 and 2025 who underwent tumor-based NGS in routine clinical practice. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of metastasis, defined as the date of diagnosis for de novo metastatic disease and the date of first documented distant recurrence for recurrent cases. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the initiation of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic disease to progression or death. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for OS and PFS using clinically relevant covariates selected a priori. Results: A total of 98 patients underwent molecular profiling, and survival analyses were performed in 92 patients with available OS/PFS data. KRAS mutations were detected in 83.7% (82/98) of patients, with predominant variants G12D (47.6%), G12V (30.5%), and G12R (12.2%). TP53 mutations were present in 59.2% (58/98) of tumors, and all tumors were microsatellite stable. Tumor mutational burden data were available for 72 patients; the median TMB was 3.83 mutations/Mb, and 15.3% of evaluable tumors had a TMB &amp;amp;ge; 10 mutations/Mb. Excluding KRAS, clinically actionable alterations were identified in 4.1% of patients, whereas an additional 32.7% harbored potentially actionable or investigational alterations. Median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.7&amp;amp;ndash;16.3), and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.3&amp;amp;ndash;7.7). In unadjusted analyses, OS and PFS did not differ significantly according to KRAS mutation status (OS, p = 0.967; PFS, p = 0.652), TP53 mutation status (OS, p = 0.404; PFS, p = 0.510), or KRAS variant subgroup (OS, p = 0.332; PFS, p = 0.194). In multivariable Cox analyses, KRAS mutation status was not independently associated with OS (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.56&amp;amp;ndash;2.28; p = 0.727) or PFS (aHR 1.09, 95% CI 0.59&amp;amp;ndash;2.01; p = 0.780), whereas ECOG performance status remained the strongest adverse clinical factor. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world PDAC cohort, the molecular landscape was dominated by KRAS and TP53 alterations, whereas clinically actionable non-KRAS alterations were identified in only a minority of patients. After adjustment for major clinical covariates, KRAS mutation status was not independently associated with OS or PFS. Molecular profiling may still be useful for identifying uncommon potentially targetable alterations; however, larger clinically annotated multicenter studies are needed to better define its prognostic and treatment-directing value in routine practice.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Molecular Profiling and Survival Outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Turkey</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Selami Bayram</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bahadır Köylü</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maral Martin Mıldanoğlu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mustafa Serkan Alemdar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tahir Yerlikaya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fatih Selçukbiricik</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmet Bilici</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ali Murat Tatli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mustafa Ozdogan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040216</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040216</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/216</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/215">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 215: First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Vietnam</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/215</link>
	<description>Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world clinical practice in Vietnam. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in Vietnam between January 2018 and August 2024. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. Results: A total of 73 patients were included, with a median age of 69 years (range, 47&amp;amp;ndash;92). Most patients had good performance status (ECOG PS 0&amp;amp;ndash;1, 75.3%) and high PD-L1 expression (TPS &amp;amp;ge; 50%, 86.3%). The overall response rate was 60.3%, and the disease control rate was 79.5%. Median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 6.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.8), and median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI, 20.8&amp;amp;ndash;30.0). Multivariate analysis identified never-smoking status (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.16&amp;amp;ndash;8.50; p = 0.024), squamous histology (HR 4.09, 95% CI 1.18&amp;amp;ndash;14.17; p = 0.026), and low PD-L1 expression (TPS 1&amp;amp;ndash;49%) (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.14&amp;amp;ndash;11.78; p = 0.029) as independent predictors of inferior overall survival. Immune-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, hepatitis, nephritis, fever, skin reactions, and myositis, were mostly mild and manageable, with grade 3 toxicity occurring in only 4.2% of patients. Better survival was observed in patients with high PD-L1 expression and non-squamous histology. However, the association with non-squamous histology should be interpreted with caution due to the very small number of squamous cases. Conclusions: First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated favorable effectiveness and acceptable safety in patients with advanced NSCLC in real-world clinical practice in Vietnam. Clinical outcomes were particularly favorable in patients with high PD-L1 expression, non-squamous histology, and a history of smoking. Nevertheless, the survival benefit associated with non-squamous histology should be interpreted cautiously, given the limited number of patients with squamous histology. These findings support the use of pembrolizumab monotherapy in selected patient populations within resource-limited settings.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 215: First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Vietnam</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/215">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040215</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Thi Huong Pham
		Cam Phuong Pham
		Thi Thu Huong Nguyen
		Khanh Toan Nguyen
		</p>
	<p>Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world clinical practice in Vietnam. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in Vietnam between January 2018 and August 2024. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. Results: A total of 73 patients were included, with a median age of 69 years (range, 47&amp;amp;ndash;92). Most patients had good performance status (ECOG PS 0&amp;amp;ndash;1, 75.3%) and high PD-L1 expression (TPS &amp;amp;ge; 50%, 86.3%). The overall response rate was 60.3%, and the disease control rate was 79.5%. Median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 6.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.8), and median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI, 20.8&amp;amp;ndash;30.0). Multivariate analysis identified never-smoking status (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.16&amp;amp;ndash;8.50; p = 0.024), squamous histology (HR 4.09, 95% CI 1.18&amp;amp;ndash;14.17; p = 0.026), and low PD-L1 expression (TPS 1&amp;amp;ndash;49%) (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.14&amp;amp;ndash;11.78; p = 0.029) as independent predictors of inferior overall survival. Immune-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, hepatitis, nephritis, fever, skin reactions, and myositis, were mostly mild and manageable, with grade 3 toxicity occurring in only 4.2% of patients. Better survival was observed in patients with high PD-L1 expression and non-squamous histology. However, the association with non-squamous histology should be interpreted with caution due to the very small number of squamous cases. Conclusions: First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated favorable effectiveness and acceptable safety in patients with advanced NSCLC in real-world clinical practice in Vietnam. Clinical outcomes were particularly favorable in patients with high PD-L1 expression, non-squamous histology, and a history of smoking. Nevertheless, the survival benefit associated with non-squamous histology should be interpreted cautiously, given the limited number of patients with squamous histology. These findings support the use of pembrolizumab monotherapy in selected patient populations within resource-limited settings.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Vietnam</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Thi Huong Pham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Cam Phuong Pham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thi Thu Huong Nguyen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Khanh Toan Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040215</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040215</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/215</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/214">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 214: Acquired Resistance to Afatinib Mediated by EGFR T790M in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Harboring EGFR-KDD: A Case Report and Literature Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/214</link>
	<description>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-kinase domain duplication (KDD) represents an atypical mutation distinct from classical EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although first- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity in EGFR-KDD, the mechanisms of acquired resistance in this setting remain poorly characterized. Herein, we present a LUAD patient with EGFR-KDD who achieved a sustained initial response to afatinib lasting 67 months before developing acquired resistance. Re-biopsy with next-generation sequencing (NGS) uncovered EGFR T790M, accompanied by EGFR amplification and EGFR M766T. The patient was switched to firmonertinib, with subsequent tumor regression. We reviewed published EGFR-KDD cases that had both acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and corresponding repeat biopsy findings. Five of the eleven cases harbored EGFR T790M, yielding a prevalence of 45%, which is similar to that seen in classical EGFR mutations. This case suggests that EGFR T790M mediates acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-KDD, mirroring the resistance pattern observed in classical EGFR mutations.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-14</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 214: Acquired Resistance to Afatinib Mediated by EGFR T790M in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Harboring EGFR-KDD: A Case Report and Literature Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/214">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040214</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Qian Liu
		Lu Lv
		Guanchao Pang
		Pingli Wang
		</p>
	<p>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-kinase domain duplication (KDD) represents an atypical mutation distinct from classical EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although first- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity in EGFR-KDD, the mechanisms of acquired resistance in this setting remain poorly characterized. Herein, we present a LUAD patient with EGFR-KDD who achieved a sustained initial response to afatinib lasting 67 months before developing acquired resistance. Re-biopsy with next-generation sequencing (NGS) uncovered EGFR T790M, accompanied by EGFR amplification and EGFR M766T. The patient was switched to firmonertinib, with subsequent tumor regression. We reviewed published EGFR-KDD cases that had both acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and corresponding repeat biopsy findings. Five of the eleven cases harbored EGFR T790M, yielding a prevalence of 45%, which is similar to that seen in classical EGFR mutations. This case suggests that EGFR T790M mediates acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-KDD, mirroring the resistance pattern observed in classical EGFR mutations.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Acquired Resistance to Afatinib Mediated by EGFR T790M in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Harboring EGFR-KDD: A Case Report and Literature Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Qian Liu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lu Lv</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Guanchao Pang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pingli Wang</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040214</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-14</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040214</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/214</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/213">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 213: Improving Quality of End-of-Life Care Through the K-HOPE Consultative Palliative Care Model: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/213</link>
	<description>As population aging accelerates, the demand for high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care continues to rise. However, a substantial proportion of patients with terminal cancer still experience death in acute-care hospitals without adequate palliative care. Consultative palliative care (CPC) represents a feasible model for delivering palliative care without requiring dedicated inpatient units, yet evidence evaluating its clinical impact remains limited. In this study, we developed a structured hospital-based CPC model tailored to the Korean healthcare system, the Korea Holistic Optimized Palliative care for End-of-life (K-HOPE) model, and prospectively evaluated its clinical impact. K-HOPE was delivered by an interdisciplinary CPC team in a tertiary hospital. Unmet needs were assessed using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), and longitudinal changes were analyzed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Among patients who died during hospitalization, quality of death was evaluated using the Good Death Scale (GDS). A total of 84 patients with terminal cancer received K-HOPE. The total IPOS score significantly decreased over time (&amp;amp;beta; = &amp;amp;minus;10.4, 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;12.8 to &amp;amp;minus;8.0; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), indicating reduced overall burden and unmet needs. Significant improvements were observed in psychological distress (p = 0.010) and communication and information needs (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), whereas changes in physical symptoms and practical concerns were not statistically significant. Among 22 patients who died during hospitalization, 59.1% achieved a good quality of death (GDS &amp;amp;ge; 12). Longer duration of CPC involvement was significantly associated with higher quality of death and remained an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. These findings suggest that the K-HOPE CPC model improves communication and overall EOL care experiences among hospitalized patients with terminal cancer, indicating that meaningful improvements in EOL care can occur even during short periods of CPC involvement. Structured CPC integrated into routine oncology practice represents a feasible strategy for improving EOL care in tertiary hospitals, and a standardized CPC framework may enhance the consistency and reproducibility of care delivery within the Korean healthcare system.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 213: Improving Quality of End-of-Life Care Through the K-HOPE Consultative Palliative Care Model: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/213">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040213</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yoo Jeong Lee
		In Cheol Hwang
		Eun Jeong Lee
		Soon-Young Hwang
		Youn Seon Choi
		</p>
	<p>As population aging accelerates, the demand for high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care continues to rise. However, a substantial proportion of patients with terminal cancer still experience death in acute-care hospitals without adequate palliative care. Consultative palliative care (CPC) represents a feasible model for delivering palliative care without requiring dedicated inpatient units, yet evidence evaluating its clinical impact remains limited. In this study, we developed a structured hospital-based CPC model tailored to the Korean healthcare system, the Korea Holistic Optimized Palliative care for End-of-life (K-HOPE) model, and prospectively evaluated its clinical impact. K-HOPE was delivered by an interdisciplinary CPC team in a tertiary hospital. Unmet needs were assessed using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), and longitudinal changes were analyzed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Among patients who died during hospitalization, quality of death was evaluated using the Good Death Scale (GDS). A total of 84 patients with terminal cancer received K-HOPE. The total IPOS score significantly decreased over time (&amp;amp;beta; = &amp;amp;minus;10.4, 95% CI &amp;amp;minus;12.8 to &amp;amp;minus;8.0; p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), indicating reduced overall burden and unmet needs. Significant improvements were observed in psychological distress (p = 0.010) and communication and information needs (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), whereas changes in physical symptoms and practical concerns were not statistically significant. Among 22 patients who died during hospitalization, 59.1% achieved a good quality of death (GDS &amp;amp;ge; 12). Longer duration of CPC involvement was significantly associated with higher quality of death and remained an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. These findings suggest that the K-HOPE CPC model improves communication and overall EOL care experiences among hospitalized patients with terminal cancer, indicating that meaningful improvements in EOL care can occur even during short periods of CPC involvement. Structured CPC integrated into routine oncology practice represents a feasible strategy for improving EOL care in tertiary hospitals, and a standardized CPC framework may enhance the consistency and reproducibility of care delivery within the Korean healthcare system.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Improving Quality of End-of-Life Care Through the K-HOPE Consultative Palliative Care Model: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yoo Jeong Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>In Cheol Hwang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eun Jeong Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Soon-Young Hwang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Youn Seon Choi</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040213</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040213</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/213</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/212">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 212: Axillary Reverse Mapping Improves Quality of Life by Significantly Reducing Clinically Relevant Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Older Women with Breast Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/212</link>
	<description>Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most debilitating long-term morbidities after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), severely impairing quality of life through reduced mobility, independence, and chronic burden, especially in older women. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) aims to preserve upper extremity lymphatics while maintaining oncologic safety. Evidence in older adult populations with long-term follow-up remains limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 138 female patients (median age 72.5 years) undergoing ALND for invasive breast cancer between January 2018 and January 2024. Patients were divided into ARM (n = 72) and non-ARM (n = 66) groups. BCRL was graded 0&amp;amp;ndash;3 according to adapted International Society of Lymphology (ISL) criteria (2013 consensus document). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months using blinded circumference measurements and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Mean follow-up was 46.5 &amp;amp;plusmn; 8.8 months. Clinically relevant BCRL (Grades 2&amp;amp;ndash;3) was dramatically lower in the ARM group (18.1% vs. 60.6%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001), while subclinical changes (Grade 1) were similar (31.9% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.55). Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier analysis showed significantly better clinically relevant lymphedema-free survival with ARM (log-rank p = 0.00019), with curve separation after 30&amp;amp;ndash;40 months&amp;amp;mdash;indicating a sustained long-term benefit for quality of life in this frail population. Recurrence rates were comparable (8.3% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.776). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed ARM as an independent protective factor (adjusted HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11&amp;amp;ndash;0.44, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: In older women with breast cancer, ARM significantly reduces clinically relevant lymphedema&amp;amp;mdash;a major determinant of long-term quality of life&amp;amp;mdash;without compromising oncologic safety. These findings support the routine consideration of ARM during ALND to preserve upper-extremity function, mobility, and independence in this vulnerable population, thereby balancing aggressive oncologic treatment with enhanced long-term quality of life and reduced treatment-related morbidity.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 212: Axillary Reverse Mapping Improves Quality of Life by Significantly Reducing Clinically Relevant Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Older Women with Breast Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/212">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040212</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Merve Tokocin
		Turan Pehlivan
		Atilla Celik
		</p>
	<p>Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most debilitating long-term morbidities after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), severely impairing quality of life through reduced mobility, independence, and chronic burden, especially in older women. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) aims to preserve upper extremity lymphatics while maintaining oncologic safety. Evidence in older adult populations with long-term follow-up remains limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 138 female patients (median age 72.5 years) undergoing ALND for invasive breast cancer between January 2018 and January 2024. Patients were divided into ARM (n = 72) and non-ARM (n = 66) groups. BCRL was graded 0&amp;amp;ndash;3 according to adapted International Society of Lymphology (ISL) criteria (2013 consensus document). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months using blinded circumference measurements and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Mean follow-up was 46.5 &amp;amp;plusmn; 8.8 months. Clinically relevant BCRL (Grades 2&amp;amp;ndash;3) was dramatically lower in the ARM group (18.1% vs. 60.6%, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001), while subclinical changes (Grade 1) were similar (31.9% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.55). Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier analysis showed significantly better clinically relevant lymphedema-free survival with ARM (log-rank p = 0.00019), with curve separation after 30&amp;amp;ndash;40 months&amp;amp;mdash;indicating a sustained long-term benefit for quality of life in this frail population. Recurrence rates were comparable (8.3% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.776). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed ARM as an independent protective factor (adjusted HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11&amp;amp;ndash;0.44, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: In older women with breast cancer, ARM significantly reduces clinically relevant lymphedema&amp;amp;mdash;a major determinant of long-term quality of life&amp;amp;mdash;without compromising oncologic safety. These findings support the routine consideration of ARM during ALND to preserve upper-extremity function, mobility, and independence in this vulnerable population, thereby balancing aggressive oncologic treatment with enhanced long-term quality of life and reduced treatment-related morbidity.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Axillary Reverse Mapping Improves Quality of Life by Significantly Reducing Clinically Relevant Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Older Women with Breast Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Merve Tokocin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Turan Pehlivan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Atilla Celik</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040212</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040212</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/212</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/211">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 211: Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Delivery of Cancer Care to Teenagers and Young Adults in England and Wales: BRIGHTLIGHT_2021</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/211</link>
	<description>Background: Healthcare policy in the United Kingdom recognizes that teenagers and young adults (TYAs: 16&amp;amp;ndash;24 years at diagnosis) require specialist care. In England, Principal Treatment Centers (PTCs) exist, delivering enhanced care exclusively within the PTC or as &amp;amp;lsquo;joint care&amp;amp;rsquo; with designated hospitals (DHs). Central to this is the TYA multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an outreach model coordinating care between hospitals. We previously reported similar outcomes regardless of care location. Aims: To compare TYA experiences of care with healthcare professionals&amp;amp;rsquo; perspectives of the service they deliver. Methods: Mixed methods across England and Wales were used. The TYA-MDT identified TYAs who then received a postal invite to a cross-sectional survey capturing experiences of places of care, treatment, healthcare professional support (HCP), mental health, sexuality/fertility, clinical trials and care coordination. Comparisons were made based on exposure to care in a specialist TYA environment within 6 months of diagnosis: all-TYA-PTC (all care in the TYA-PTC, n = 70, 28%), no-TYA-PTC (no care in the TYA-PTC (n = 87, 35%): care delivered in a children/adult unit only), and joint care (care in a TYA-PTC and in a children&amp;amp;rsquo;s/adult unit, n = 91, 36%). HCP perspectives were captured by rapid ethnography. Results: A total of 250/1056 (24%) TYAs participated. Overall, 200 (80%) rated their teams as excellent/good for helping them prepare for treatment. No evidence of significant differences existed between categories of care for proportions receiving support from key TYA-related professionals: TYA cancer nurse specialists (all-TYA-PTC n = 58, 91%; joint care n = 71, 88%; no-TYA-PTC n = 64, 82%) and social workers (all-TYA-PTC n = 30, 55%; joint care n = 36, 48%; no-TYA-PTC n = 28, 38%). A trend of diminishing support from youth support co-coordinators existed (all-TYA-PTC 63%; joint care 49%; no-TYA-PTC 40%, p = 0.069). This may explain why few differences in patient experiences existed across categories of care. Forty-nine HCPs participated. They were more critical in their interpretation of care, highlighting inequity in resources and challenges in some pathways and coordination. Conclusions: Similar access to age-appropriate support across care settings is likely to reflect recruitment methods. When TYAs are known to the MDT, age-appropriate care can be mobilized beyond TYA units, which could explain the equitable outcomes observed across different care locations in young people who responded to the survey. Nevertheless, gaps persist in communication and coordination, particularly within joint care models, and in the involvement of allied health professionals such as dieticians and physiotherapists, whose input is essential for rehabilitation and return to normal life. Strengthening these areas will require continued investment in workforce capacity and digital infrastructure to support genuinely coordinated, developmentally appropriate TYA cancer care.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 211: Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Delivery of Cancer Care to Teenagers and Young Adults in England and Wales: BRIGHTLIGHT_2021</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/211">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040211</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Rachel M. Taylor
		Elysse Bautista-Gonzalez
		Julie A. Barber
		Jamie Cargill
		Rozalia Dobrogowska
		Richard G. Feltbower
		Laura Haddad
		Nicolas Hall
		Maria Lawal
		Martin G. McCabe
		Sophie Moniz
		Louise Soanes
		Dan P. Stark
		Bethany Wickramasinghe
		Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
		Lorna A. Fern
		</p>
	<p>Background: Healthcare policy in the United Kingdom recognizes that teenagers and young adults (TYAs: 16&amp;amp;ndash;24 years at diagnosis) require specialist care. In England, Principal Treatment Centers (PTCs) exist, delivering enhanced care exclusively within the PTC or as &amp;amp;lsquo;joint care&amp;amp;rsquo; with designated hospitals (DHs). Central to this is the TYA multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an outreach model coordinating care between hospitals. We previously reported similar outcomes regardless of care location. Aims: To compare TYA experiences of care with healthcare professionals&amp;amp;rsquo; perspectives of the service they deliver. Methods: Mixed methods across England and Wales were used. The TYA-MDT identified TYAs who then received a postal invite to a cross-sectional survey capturing experiences of places of care, treatment, healthcare professional support (HCP), mental health, sexuality/fertility, clinical trials and care coordination. Comparisons were made based on exposure to care in a specialist TYA environment within 6 months of diagnosis: all-TYA-PTC (all care in the TYA-PTC, n = 70, 28%), no-TYA-PTC (no care in the TYA-PTC (n = 87, 35%): care delivered in a children/adult unit only), and joint care (care in a TYA-PTC and in a children&amp;amp;rsquo;s/adult unit, n = 91, 36%). HCP perspectives were captured by rapid ethnography. Results: A total of 250/1056 (24%) TYAs participated. Overall, 200 (80%) rated their teams as excellent/good for helping them prepare for treatment. No evidence of significant differences existed between categories of care for proportions receiving support from key TYA-related professionals: TYA cancer nurse specialists (all-TYA-PTC n = 58, 91%; joint care n = 71, 88%; no-TYA-PTC n = 64, 82%) and social workers (all-TYA-PTC n = 30, 55%; joint care n = 36, 48%; no-TYA-PTC n = 28, 38%). A trend of diminishing support from youth support co-coordinators existed (all-TYA-PTC 63%; joint care 49%; no-TYA-PTC 40%, p = 0.069). This may explain why few differences in patient experiences existed across categories of care. Forty-nine HCPs participated. They were more critical in their interpretation of care, highlighting inequity in resources and challenges in some pathways and coordination. Conclusions: Similar access to age-appropriate support across care settings is likely to reflect recruitment methods. When TYAs are known to the MDT, age-appropriate care can be mobilized beyond TYA units, which could explain the equitable outcomes observed across different care locations in young people who responded to the survey. Nevertheless, gaps persist in communication and coordination, particularly within joint care models, and in the involvement of allied health professionals such as dieticians and physiotherapists, whose input is essential for rehabilitation and return to normal life. Strengthening these areas will require continued investment in workforce capacity and digital infrastructure to support genuinely coordinated, developmentally appropriate TYA cancer care.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Delivery of Cancer Care to Teenagers and Young Adults in England and Wales: BRIGHTLIGHT_2021</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Rachel M. Taylor</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Elysse Bautista-Gonzalez</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julie A. Barber</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jamie Cargill</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rozalia Dobrogowska</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Richard G. Feltbower</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Laura Haddad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Hall</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria Lawal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Martin G. McCabe</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sophie Moniz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Louise Soanes</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dan P. Stark</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bethany Wickramasinghe</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Cecilia Vindrola-Padros</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lorna A. Fern</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040211</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>211</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040211</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/211</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/210">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 210: Co-Occurrence of Nuclear-Catenin and H3K27me3 Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/210</link>
	<description>Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by alterations in oncogenic signaling pathways and epigenetic mechanisms involved in gene regulation. Aberrant activation of the Wnt/&amp;amp;beta;-catenin pathway represents a central molecular event in colorectal tumorigenesis, while histone-associated epigenetic modifications may contribute to tumor progression and variability. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Wnt pathway activation and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in colorectal cancer and to examine their associations with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. A retrospective observational study was performed on 83 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases using immunohistochemical evaluation of nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin and H3K27me3 expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples, together with molecular analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability status. Nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin expression was observed in 39.8% of cases, while H3K27me3 exhibited negative, mosaic, or diffuse nuclear staining patterns. Nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin expression was significantly associated with patient sex and age, whereas H3K27me3 expression patterns were significantly associated with tumor location, histological grade, disease stage, and metastatic status. These results indicate that Wnt pathway activation and H3K27me3-associated epigenetic alterations frequently coexist in colorectal cancer and support the value of integrated molecular and epigenetic assessment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 210: Co-Occurrence of Nuclear-Catenin and H3K27me3 Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/210">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040210</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ramona Abrudan
		Luca Abrudan
		Andreea Cămărășan
		Ovidiu Camarasan
		Corina Florica Ioniță
		Luca Vilceanu
		Ovidiu Laurean Pop
		</p>
	<p>Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by alterations in oncogenic signaling pathways and epigenetic mechanisms involved in gene regulation. Aberrant activation of the Wnt/&amp;amp;beta;-catenin pathway represents a central molecular event in colorectal tumorigenesis, while histone-associated epigenetic modifications may contribute to tumor progression and variability. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Wnt pathway activation and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in colorectal cancer and to examine their associations with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. A retrospective observational study was performed on 83 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases using immunohistochemical evaluation of nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin and H3K27me3 expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples, together with molecular analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability status. Nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin expression was observed in 39.8% of cases, while H3K27me3 exhibited negative, mosaic, or diffuse nuclear staining patterns. Nuclear &amp;amp;beta;-catenin expression was significantly associated with patient sex and age, whereas H3K27me3 expression patterns were significantly associated with tumor location, histological grade, disease stage, and metastatic status. These results indicate that Wnt pathway activation and H3K27me3-associated epigenetic alterations frequently coexist in colorectal cancer and support the value of integrated molecular and epigenetic assessment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Co-Occurrence of Nuclear-Catenin and H3K27me3 Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ramona Abrudan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luca Abrudan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andreea Cămărășan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ovidiu Camarasan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Corina Florica Ioniță</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luca Vilceanu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ovidiu Laurean Pop</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040210</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040210</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/210</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/209">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 209: Linking Inflammation to Reduced Food Intake in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/209</link>
	<description>Background: Undernutrition and cachexia are common in advanced cancer and often linked to systemic inflammation. While inflammation is associated with poorer prognosis, accelerated weight loss, and reduced treatment tolerance, its direct impact on food intake remains insufficiently investigated. Aim: To examine the association between systemic inflammation and energy and protein intake over time in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: A total of 170 patients from the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study were included. Nutritional status was assessed using PG-SGA SF. Dietary intake was recorded using repeated 24 h recalls. Systemic inflammation was defined as CRP &amp;amp;gt; 10 mg/L. Mixed linear models were applied to evaluate the association between inflammation energy and protein intake over time. Results: Systemic inflammation (CRP &amp;amp;gt;10 mg/L) was present in 87 (51%) patients and associated with significantly lower energy (&amp;amp;minus;3.6 kcal/kg, p = 0.04) and lower protein intake (&amp;amp;minus;0.25 g/kg, p = 0.003). Patients with inflammation were more often undernourished and had shorter survival. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation is likely associated with clinically relevant reductions in energy and protein intake in advanced cancer. CRP may help identify patients for whom standard nutritional support is insufficient.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 209: Linking Inflammation to Reduced Food Intake in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/209">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040209</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Asta Bye
		Trude Rakel Balstad
		Ida Ervik Raaness
		Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
		Ragnhild Habberstad
		Pål Klepstad
		Erik Torbjørn Løhre
		Olav Faisal Dajani
		Stein Kaasa
		Nina Aass
		Ola Magne Vagnildhaug
		</p>
	<p>Background: Undernutrition and cachexia are common in advanced cancer and often linked to systemic inflammation. While inflammation is associated with poorer prognosis, accelerated weight loss, and reduced treatment tolerance, its direct impact on food intake remains insufficiently investigated. Aim: To examine the association between systemic inflammation and energy and protein intake over time in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: A total of 170 patients from the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study were included. Nutritional status was assessed using PG-SGA SF. Dietary intake was recorded using repeated 24 h recalls. Systemic inflammation was defined as CRP &amp;amp;gt; 10 mg/L. Mixed linear models were applied to evaluate the association between inflammation energy and protein intake over time. Results: Systemic inflammation (CRP &amp;amp;gt;10 mg/L) was present in 87 (51%) patients and associated with significantly lower energy (&amp;amp;minus;3.6 kcal/kg, p = 0.04) and lower protein intake (&amp;amp;minus;0.25 g/kg, p = 0.003). Patients with inflammation were more often undernourished and had shorter survival. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation is likely associated with clinically relevant reductions in energy and protein intake in advanced cancer. CRP may help identify patients for whom standard nutritional support is insufficient.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Linking Inflammation to Reduced Food Intake in Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Asta Bye</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Trude Rakel Balstad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ida Ervik Raaness</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ragnhild Habberstad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pål Klepstad</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Erik Torbjørn Løhre</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Olav Faisal Dajani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stein Kaasa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nina Aass</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ola Magne Vagnildhaug</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040209</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040209</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/209</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/208">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 208: Minimizing Lymphatic Morbidity: Incidence of Lower Extremity Lymphedema After vNOTES-Assisted Sentinel Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/208</link>
	<description>Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has emerged as a less invasive alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy and is increasingly incorporated into surgical staging algorithms. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) provides transvaginal access to the retroperitoneum and may facilitate SLN mapping while potentially reducing postoperative morbidity, including lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and retroperitoneal SLN mapping and to report early postoperative lymphedema outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 113 patients who underwent vNOTES-assisted hysterectomy with BSO and SLN mapping using methylene blue dye at a tertiary referral center between January 2022 and January 2023. Lymphedema was evaluated using the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, supported by clinical examination. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to summarize clinical characteristics and symptom profiles. Results: The mean patient age was 55.0 &amp;amp;plusmn; 10.5 years and the mean BMI was 30.94 &amp;amp;plusmn; 2.54 kg/m2. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was the most common histological subtype (75.5%), and most tumors were grade 1 (57.1%). SLN mapping was successful in 102 of 113 patients (overall detection rate 90.3%), with bilateral detection in 79.6% and unilateral detection in 10.6% of cases. Limb swelling was reported in 4.1% of patients, while only one patient (1.0%) met the criteria for self-reported mild lymphedema. No clinical signs of inguinal lymphedema were detected. Conclusions: vNOTES hysterectomy combined with retroperitoneal SLN mapping was associated with a low incidence of postoperative lower extremity lymphedema in this single-arm cohort. These findings suggest that vNOTES-assisted SLN mapping may represent a feasible minimally invasive approach for nodal assessment in selected patients with endometrial cancer. Prospective comparative studies are required to confirm these findings and to evaluate long-term oncologic and lymphatic outcomes.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 208: Minimizing Lymphatic Morbidity: Incidence of Lower Extremity Lymphedema After vNOTES-Assisted Sentinel Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/208">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040208</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Duygu Kurtulus
		Kevser Arkan
		Ali Deniz Erkmen
		Gul Cavusoglu Colak
		Sedat Akgol
		Behzat Can
		</p>
	<p>Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has emerged as a less invasive alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy and is increasingly incorporated into surgical staging algorithms. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) provides transvaginal access to the retroperitoneum and may facilitate SLN mapping while potentially reducing postoperative morbidity, including lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and retroperitoneal SLN mapping and to report early postoperative lymphedema outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 113 patients who underwent vNOTES-assisted hysterectomy with BSO and SLN mapping using methylene blue dye at a tertiary referral center between January 2022 and January 2023. Lymphedema was evaluated using the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, supported by clinical examination. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to summarize clinical characteristics and symptom profiles. Results: The mean patient age was 55.0 &amp;amp;plusmn; 10.5 years and the mean BMI was 30.94 &amp;amp;plusmn; 2.54 kg/m2. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was the most common histological subtype (75.5%), and most tumors were grade 1 (57.1%). SLN mapping was successful in 102 of 113 patients (overall detection rate 90.3%), with bilateral detection in 79.6% and unilateral detection in 10.6% of cases. Limb swelling was reported in 4.1% of patients, while only one patient (1.0%) met the criteria for self-reported mild lymphedema. No clinical signs of inguinal lymphedema were detected. Conclusions: vNOTES hysterectomy combined with retroperitoneal SLN mapping was associated with a low incidence of postoperative lower extremity lymphedema in this single-arm cohort. These findings suggest that vNOTES-assisted SLN mapping may represent a feasible minimally invasive approach for nodal assessment in selected patients with endometrial cancer. Prospective comparative studies are required to confirm these findings and to evaluate long-term oncologic and lymphatic outcomes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Minimizing Lymphatic Morbidity: Incidence of Lower Extremity Lymphedema After vNOTES-Assisted Sentinel Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Duygu Kurtulus</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kevser Arkan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ali Deniz Erkmen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gul Cavusoglu Colak</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sedat Akgol</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Behzat Can</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040208</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040208</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/208</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/207">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 207: Impact of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program on Perioperative Outcomes in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/207</link>
	<description>Background: Major hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeries cause significant physical stress. In this study, we evaluated how a 4-week multimodal prehabilitation program affects perioperative outcomes across different types of HPB procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 359 patients undergoing HPB surgery (162 historical controls and 197 in the prehabilitation group). To accurately assess the clinical benefits of various procedures, patients were stratified into specific surgical groups: major and minor hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and left pancreatectomy (LP). Results: The prehabilitation program significantly improved preoperative nutrition, demonstrated by increased serum albumin levels on the day of surgery (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), and the clinical benefits were most pronounced in pancreatic surgeries. Patients undergoing PD in the prehabilitation group had a significantly shorter median hospital stay (8 versus 13 days, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). LP patients also experienced shorter hospital stays (5 versus 9 days, p = 0.001) and reduced blood loss (p = 0.002). For minor hepatectomies, the intervention significantly lowered the need for blood transfusions (8.3% versus 18.9%, p = 0.033). The length of stay and complication rates for major hepatectomies remained comparable between groups. Importantly, major morbidities and 90-day mortality were low and similar across all cohorts. Conclusions: Multimodal prehabilitation successfully optimizes preoperative nutrition and accelerates hospital discharge, especially after highly stressful pancreatic surgeries. Because benefits vary by surgical magnitude, prehabilitation pathways should be tailored to prioritize high-risk patients facing complex operations.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 207: Impact of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program on Perioperative Outcomes in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/207">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040207</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Pipit Burasakarn
		Nattaporn Maneepairoj
		Vachiraluck Chalokool
		Anuparp Thienhiran
		Sermsak Hongjinda
		Pusit Fuengfoo
		</p>
	<p>Background: Major hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeries cause significant physical stress. In this study, we evaluated how a 4-week multimodal prehabilitation program affects perioperative outcomes across different types of HPB procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 359 patients undergoing HPB surgery (162 historical controls and 197 in the prehabilitation group). To accurately assess the clinical benefits of various procedures, patients were stratified into specific surgical groups: major and minor hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and left pancreatectomy (LP). Results: The prehabilitation program significantly improved preoperative nutrition, demonstrated by increased serum albumin levels on the day of surgery (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001), and the clinical benefits were most pronounced in pancreatic surgeries. Patients undergoing PD in the prehabilitation group had a significantly shorter median hospital stay (8 versus 13 days, p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). LP patients also experienced shorter hospital stays (5 versus 9 days, p = 0.001) and reduced blood loss (p = 0.002). For minor hepatectomies, the intervention significantly lowered the need for blood transfusions (8.3% versus 18.9%, p = 0.033). The length of stay and complication rates for major hepatectomies remained comparable between groups. Importantly, major morbidities and 90-day mortality were low and similar across all cohorts. Conclusions: Multimodal prehabilitation successfully optimizes preoperative nutrition and accelerates hospital discharge, especially after highly stressful pancreatic surgeries. Because benefits vary by surgical magnitude, prehabilitation pathways should be tailored to prioritize high-risk patients facing complex operations.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Impact of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program on Perioperative Outcomes in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Pipit Burasakarn</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nattaporn Maneepairoj</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vachiraluck Chalokool</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anuparp Thienhiran</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sermsak Hongjinda</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pusit Fuengfoo</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040207</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040207</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/207</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/206">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 206: Controlled Ovarian Stimulation After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Borderline Ovarian Tumors: An Exploratory Cohort Study on Recurrence and Reproductive Outcomes</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/206</link>
	<description>Borderline ovarian tumors often affect women of reproductive age for whom fertility preservation may be a major concern. While fertility-sparing surgery is widely accepted, the safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation after surgery remains uncertain due to potential recurrence risk. This retrospective single-center cohort study explored the association between controlled ovarian stimulation following fertility-sparing surgery and both recurrence risk and reproductive outcomes. Patients treated between January 2011 and June 2024 were included. Baseline characteristics, surgical details, and reproductive outcomes were compared using non-parametric and exact tests. Progression-free survival was assessed with Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models, modeling stimulation as a time-dependent covariate, and using a 10-month landmark analysis to account for immortal time bias. Of 45 included patients, 19 underwent ovarian stimulation after surgery, with a median interval of 9.9 months to stimulation. Median follow-up was 34.4 months. Recurrence occurred in 21.1% of stimulated patients versus 38.5% of non-stimulated patients (p = 0.338). After adjustment for time-dependent exposure, ovarian stimulation was not associated with increased recurrence risk (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.22&amp;amp;ndash;4.09; p = 0.944). Eleven patients (24.4%) achieved at least one pregnancy, 81.8% of which were spontaneous. Controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation after fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors did not show an increased recurrence risk, although larger studies are needed.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 206: Controlled Ovarian Stimulation After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Borderline Ovarian Tumors: An Exploratory Cohort Study on Recurrence and Reproductive Outcomes</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/206">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040206</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Sofia Thiella
		Giacomo Corrado
		Paola Villa
		Inge Peters
		Diana Giannarelli
		Rossella Letizia Mancusi
		Tina Pasciuto
		Lucrezia Massaro
		Maria Luisa Di Pietro
		Maria Lucia Specchia
		Anna Fagotti
		</p>
	<p>Borderline ovarian tumors often affect women of reproductive age for whom fertility preservation may be a major concern. While fertility-sparing surgery is widely accepted, the safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation after surgery remains uncertain due to potential recurrence risk. This retrospective single-center cohort study explored the association between controlled ovarian stimulation following fertility-sparing surgery and both recurrence risk and reproductive outcomes. Patients treated between January 2011 and June 2024 were included. Baseline characteristics, surgical details, and reproductive outcomes were compared using non-parametric and exact tests. Progression-free survival was assessed with Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models, modeling stimulation as a time-dependent covariate, and using a 10-month landmark analysis to account for immortal time bias. Of 45 included patients, 19 underwent ovarian stimulation after surgery, with a median interval of 9.9 months to stimulation. Median follow-up was 34.4 months. Recurrence occurred in 21.1% of stimulated patients versus 38.5% of non-stimulated patients (p = 0.338). After adjustment for time-dependent exposure, ovarian stimulation was not associated with increased recurrence risk (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.22&amp;amp;ndash;4.09; p = 0.944). Eleven patients (24.4%) achieved at least one pregnancy, 81.8% of which were spontaneous. Controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation after fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors did not show an increased recurrence risk, although larger studies are needed.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Controlled Ovarian Stimulation After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Borderline Ovarian Tumors: An Exploratory Cohort Study on Recurrence and Reproductive Outcomes</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Sofia Thiella</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giacomo Corrado</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Paola Villa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Inge Peters</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Diana Giannarelli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rossella Letizia Mancusi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tina Pasciuto</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lucrezia Massaro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria Luisa Di Pietro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maria Lucia Specchia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anna Fagotti</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040206</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040206</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/206</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/205">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 205: Instability in Pentanucleotide Markers in a Subset of Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Cancer</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/205</link>
	<description>Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is frequently used to screen patients for the early detection of Lynch syndrome, the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome. MSI testing compares microsatellite repeat lengths in tumor DNA with those in matched normal tissue from the same patient. Therefore, precise sample identification is critical for obtaining reliable test results. The Penta-C and Penta-D pentanucleotide markers are widely used for sample identification in MSI testing. We investigated instability, defined as allelic mismatches or shifts, discordant fragment sizes, or the appearance of alleles in tumor DNA that were absent in the corresponding normal DNA, in the Penta-C and Penta-D loci across 2609 paired colorectal tumor and matched normal tissue or blood DNA samples. The allele sizes of both markers did not match in 0.3% of microsatellite-stable (MSS) and 12.3% of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001, difference in proportions, 12.0% (95% CI, 8.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.1%)). Non-matching allele sizes in 12.3% of the MSI-H tumors suggest that other repeat markers may also be unstable and not suitable for sample identification in these tumors.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 205: Instability in Pentanucleotide Markers in a Subset of Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Cancer</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/205">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040205</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ahmet Yilmaz
		Wendy L. Frankel
		Benjamin J. Swanson
		Kristin Miller
		Jason Bacher
		Christopher Bigley
		Lori Nelsen
		Matthew F. Kalady
		Joshua F. Coleman
		Rachel Pearlman
		Heather Hampel
		</p>
	<p>Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is frequently used to screen patients for the early detection of Lynch syndrome, the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome. MSI testing compares microsatellite repeat lengths in tumor DNA with those in matched normal tissue from the same patient. Therefore, precise sample identification is critical for obtaining reliable test results. The Penta-C and Penta-D pentanucleotide markers are widely used for sample identification in MSI testing. We investigated instability, defined as allelic mismatches or shifts, discordant fragment sizes, or the appearance of alleles in tumor DNA that were absent in the corresponding normal DNA, in the Penta-C and Penta-D loci across 2609 paired colorectal tumor and matched normal tissue or blood DNA samples. The allele sizes of both markers did not match in 0.3% of microsatellite-stable (MSS) and 12.3% of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001, difference in proportions, 12.0% (95% CI, 8.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.1%)). Non-matching allele sizes in 12.3% of the MSI-H tumors suggest that other repeat markers may also be unstable and not suitable for sample identification in these tumors.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Instability in Pentanucleotide Markers in a Subset of Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Cancer</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ahmet Yilmaz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wendy L. Frankel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Benjamin J. Swanson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kristin Miller</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jason Bacher</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Bigley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lori Nelsen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Matthew F. Kalady</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joshua F. Coleman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rachel Pearlman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Heather Hampel</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040205</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040205</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/205</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/204">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 204: Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Thigh Presenting as a Hemorrhagic Mass: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/204</link>
	<description>Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma with a marked propensity for early regional lymph node metastasis. Although MCC most often arises on sun-exposed head and neck skin in older adults, tumors of the lower extremity are uncommon and may be mistaken for benign hemorrhagic lesions. Case presentation: A 54-year-old woman developed a rapidly enlarging, hemorrhagic mass in the left suprapatellar thigh. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an extracompartmental subcutaneous soft-tissue mass without quadriceps muscle invasion. Wide local excision including the quadriceps fascia was performed. Histopathologic examination showed a dermal/subcutaneous small blue round cell neoplasm with brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated diffuse cytoplasmic synaptophysin positivity, paranuclear dot-like CK20 reactivity, chromogranin A positivity, and negative MCPyV staining; TTF-1, S100, melan-A, HMB-45, and hematolymphoid markers were negative. Staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography identified ipsilateral inguinal nodal involvement. Therapeutic inguinal lymph node dissection revealed metastatic MCC in one of four lymph nodes without extranodal extension. The final stage was pT3 pN1b cM0 (AJCC 8th edition), corresponding to stage IIIB disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy (57 Gy in 20 fractions) was delivered to the primary bed and ipsilateral inguinal basin. The patient remains disease-free at 5-year follow-up. Conclusions: Lower-extremity MCC can mimic hemorrhagic or post-traumatic lesions, contributing to diagnostic delay. Persistent or rapidly enlarging &amp;amp;ldquo;hematoma-like&amp;amp;rdquo; lesions warrant early biopsy, and timely pathologic nodal staging is essential. Multimodal management can achieve durable control even in node-positive disease</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 204: Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Thigh Presenting as a Hemorrhagic Mass: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/204">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040204</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hüseyin Emre Tepedelenlioğlu
		Özlem Orhan
		Şefik Murat Arıkan
		Güldal Esendağlı
		</p>
	<p>Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma with a marked propensity for early regional lymph node metastasis. Although MCC most often arises on sun-exposed head and neck skin in older adults, tumors of the lower extremity are uncommon and may be mistaken for benign hemorrhagic lesions. Case presentation: A 54-year-old woman developed a rapidly enlarging, hemorrhagic mass in the left suprapatellar thigh. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an extracompartmental subcutaneous soft-tissue mass without quadriceps muscle invasion. Wide local excision including the quadriceps fascia was performed. Histopathologic examination showed a dermal/subcutaneous small blue round cell neoplasm with brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated diffuse cytoplasmic synaptophysin positivity, paranuclear dot-like CK20 reactivity, chromogranin A positivity, and negative MCPyV staining; TTF-1, S100, melan-A, HMB-45, and hematolymphoid markers were negative. Staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography identified ipsilateral inguinal nodal involvement. Therapeutic inguinal lymph node dissection revealed metastatic MCC in one of four lymph nodes without extranodal extension. The final stage was pT3 pN1b cM0 (AJCC 8th edition), corresponding to stage IIIB disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy (57 Gy in 20 fractions) was delivered to the primary bed and ipsilateral inguinal basin. The patient remains disease-free at 5-year follow-up. Conclusions: Lower-extremity MCC can mimic hemorrhagic or post-traumatic lesions, contributing to diagnostic delay. Persistent or rapidly enlarging &amp;amp;ldquo;hematoma-like&amp;amp;rdquo; lesions warrant early biopsy, and timely pathologic nodal staging is essential. Multimodal management can achieve durable control even in node-positive disease</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Thigh Presenting as a Hemorrhagic Mass: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hüseyin Emre Tepedelenlioğlu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Özlem Orhan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Şefik Murat Arıkan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Güldal Esendağlı</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040204</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>204</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040204</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/204</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/203">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 203: The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/203</link>
	<description>Background: Patients with breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a diverse population including high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Staging investigations are routinely performed, but the clinical utility is unclear. Methods: Using a provincial cancer registry, we identified breast cancer patients referred for NAC between 2020 and 2022. Patients with staging investigations were stratified into EBC (anatomic clinical stage I&amp;amp;ndash;II) and LABC (stage III). Rates of metastatic (M1) disease and associated factors were assessed. Results: Among 529 EBC patients, 515 (97.4%) underwent staging. The M1 disease rate was 5.4%. The M1 rate for cT1-2N0 was 1.1%, and for cT1-2N1 it was 7.9%. In multivariable analysis, cT1N1 (OR 5.31; 95% CI 1.05&amp;amp;ndash;27.0; p = 0.044) and cT2N1 (OR 4.59; 95% CI 1.02&amp;amp;ndash;20.67; p = 0.047) were associated with M1 disease in EBC. All 320 LABC patients underwent staging. The M1 disease rate was 22.8%, significantly higher than in EBC (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). A higher cT/N stage correlated with M1 disease in LABC, although most subgroups demonstrated rates of &amp;amp;ge;10%. Conclusions: These findings support a risk-adapted approach to pre-treatment staging in patients planned for NAC, omitting staging in asymptomatic cT1&amp;amp;ndash;2N0 disease, considering it for node-positive EBC, and performing it routinely in LABC.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 203: The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/203">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040203</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kadhim Taqi
		Camelia Ursu
		Susan Isherwood
		Rabia Raheel
		Julia Downey
		Jeffrey Q. Cao
		Sasha Lupichuk
		Omar Khan
		Nancy Nixon
		May Lynn Quan
		Alison Laws
		</p>
	<p>Background: Patients with breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a diverse population including high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Staging investigations are routinely performed, but the clinical utility is unclear. Methods: Using a provincial cancer registry, we identified breast cancer patients referred for NAC between 2020 and 2022. Patients with staging investigations were stratified into EBC (anatomic clinical stage I&amp;amp;ndash;II) and LABC (stage III). Rates of metastatic (M1) disease and associated factors were assessed. Results: Among 529 EBC patients, 515 (97.4%) underwent staging. The M1 disease rate was 5.4%. The M1 rate for cT1-2N0 was 1.1%, and for cT1-2N1 it was 7.9%. In multivariable analysis, cT1N1 (OR 5.31; 95% CI 1.05&amp;amp;ndash;27.0; p = 0.044) and cT2N1 (OR 4.59; 95% CI 1.02&amp;amp;ndash;20.67; p = 0.047) were associated with M1 disease in EBC. All 320 LABC patients underwent staging. The M1 disease rate was 22.8%, significantly higher than in EBC (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). A higher cT/N stage correlated with M1 disease in LABC, although most subgroups demonstrated rates of &amp;amp;ge;10%. Conclusions: These findings support a risk-adapted approach to pre-treatment staging in patients planned for NAC, omitting staging in asymptomatic cT1&amp;amp;ndash;2N0 disease, considering it for node-positive EBC, and performing it routinely in LABC.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kadhim Taqi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Camelia Ursu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Susan Isherwood</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rabia Raheel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julia Downey</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeffrey Q. Cao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sasha Lupichuk</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar Khan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nancy Nixon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>May Lynn Quan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alison Laws</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040203</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040203</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/203</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/202">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 202: Resuscitation in Oncology: Limits, Ethics, Practice, and Humanity</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/202</link>
	<description>Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the most consequential decisions in clinical medicine&amp;amp;mdash;a pivotal moment between life and death where science, ethics, and humanity intersect. Although advances in systems of care, technology, and training have refined technique and logistics, outcomes do not consistently result in meaningful, neurologically intact survival. In oncology&amp;amp;mdash;where disease trajectories are heterogeneous, treatment burdens substantial, and organ reserve often limited&amp;amp;mdash;these tensions are especially pronounced. Methods and approaches: This manuscript examines resuscitation as a medical, ethical, and human process, with explicit focus on patients with cancer. We review contemporary strategies for early recognition of deterioration (MEWS, NEWS, MET activation), team preparedness through Immediate Life Support (ILS), and structured decision-making at the boundaries of resuscitation. We also address communication with patients and families, the legal framework of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, and the distinctions among treatment forgoing, palliative sedation, and euthanasia, emphasising oncology-specific considerations such as metastatic burden, treatment intent (curative vs. palliative), performance status, and organ reserve. Results and discussion: The overall effectiveness of resuscitation remains modest (approximately 5&amp;amp;ndash;20% survival), highlighting the importance of prevention and early intervention. In cancer care, the limits of resuscitation are both clinical and ethical, requiring proportionality between the likely benefit and the risks of prolonging suffering, careful attention to prognosis and expected neurological outcomes, and rigorous alignment with goals of care. Early and ongoing involvement of palliative services, along with robust long-term care pathways, provides humane, value-concordant alternatives for patients with advanced disease. Psychotherapists and chaplains play integral roles in supporting families and clinical staff. Structured post-event debriefing and system-level safeguards are essential to mitigate burnout and moral distress within oncology teams. Initiating or discontinuing resuscitation in oncology requires expertise, empathy, and moral clarity. Dignity-preserving care depends on aligning interventions with patient values and realistic clinical endpoints. Acceptance of the natural course of dying represents an important component of responsible and patient-centred medical care.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 202: Resuscitation in Oncology: Limits, Ethics, Practice, and Humanity</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/202">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040202</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Lea Andjelković
		Milan Krnojelac
		Iztok Potočnik
		</p>
	<p>Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the most consequential decisions in clinical medicine&amp;amp;mdash;a pivotal moment between life and death where science, ethics, and humanity intersect. Although advances in systems of care, technology, and training have refined technique and logistics, outcomes do not consistently result in meaningful, neurologically intact survival. In oncology&amp;amp;mdash;where disease trajectories are heterogeneous, treatment burdens substantial, and organ reserve often limited&amp;amp;mdash;these tensions are especially pronounced. Methods and approaches: This manuscript examines resuscitation as a medical, ethical, and human process, with explicit focus on patients with cancer. We review contemporary strategies for early recognition of deterioration (MEWS, NEWS, MET activation), team preparedness through Immediate Life Support (ILS), and structured decision-making at the boundaries of resuscitation. We also address communication with patients and families, the legal framework of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, and the distinctions among treatment forgoing, palliative sedation, and euthanasia, emphasising oncology-specific considerations such as metastatic burden, treatment intent (curative vs. palliative), performance status, and organ reserve. Results and discussion: The overall effectiveness of resuscitation remains modest (approximately 5&amp;amp;ndash;20% survival), highlighting the importance of prevention and early intervention. In cancer care, the limits of resuscitation are both clinical and ethical, requiring proportionality between the likely benefit and the risks of prolonging suffering, careful attention to prognosis and expected neurological outcomes, and rigorous alignment with goals of care. Early and ongoing involvement of palliative services, along with robust long-term care pathways, provides humane, value-concordant alternatives for patients with advanced disease. Psychotherapists and chaplains play integral roles in supporting families and clinical staff. Structured post-event debriefing and system-level safeguards are essential to mitigate burnout and moral distress within oncology teams. Initiating or discontinuing resuscitation in oncology requires expertise, empathy, and moral clarity. Dignity-preserving care depends on aligning interventions with patient values and realistic clinical endpoints. Acceptance of the natural course of dying represents an important component of responsible and patient-centred medical care.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Resuscitation in Oncology: Limits, Ethics, Practice, and Humanity</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Lea Andjelković</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Milan Krnojelac</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iztok Potočnik</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040202</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040202</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/202</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/199">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 199: The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/199</link>
	<description>Given ongoing uncertainty about the benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, this systematic review updates the evidence to inform guideline recommendations for adults aged &amp;amp;ge; 18 years in primary care. We searched multiple bibliographic databases from inception to 30 May 2022, with an update on 24 July 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies evaluating PSA-based screening with or without adjunctive technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies were selected in duplicate, with data extraction and quality assessment verified by a second reviewer; risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using study design-specific tools and GRADE. Four RCTs and one cohort study (17 articles) were included: ERSPC, PLCO and CAP compared PSA screening with no screening, while STHLM3-MRI evaluated a risk-based test combined with MRI targeted biopsy. Meta-analysis showed 0.96 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 1000 individuals invited to screen, corresponding to a 12% relative reduction over 9.5&amp;amp;ndash;22 years (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81&amp;amp;ndash;0.95). One trial estimated 2.3% to 10.3% overdiagnosis over 10&amp;amp;ndash;14 years. Overall certainty of evidence was low or very low. PSA screening may offer a small mortality benefit, but uncertainty and variable harms limit confidence, underscoring the need for high-quality evidence, particularly for MRI and risk-based screening strategies.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 199: The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/199">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040199</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Alexandria Bennett
		Niyati Vyas
		Nicole Shaver
		Faris Almoli
		Taddele Kibret
		Andrew Loblaw
		Lisa Del Giudice
		Xiaomei Yao
		Becky Skidmore
		Melissa Brouwers
		Julian Little
		David Moher
		</p>
	<p>Given ongoing uncertainty about the benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, this systematic review updates the evidence to inform guideline recommendations for adults aged &amp;amp;ge; 18 years in primary care. We searched multiple bibliographic databases from inception to 30 May 2022, with an update on 24 July 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies evaluating PSA-based screening with or without adjunctive technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies were selected in duplicate, with data extraction and quality assessment verified by a second reviewer; risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using study design-specific tools and GRADE. Four RCTs and one cohort study (17 articles) were included: ERSPC, PLCO and CAP compared PSA screening with no screening, while STHLM3-MRI evaluated a risk-based test combined with MRI targeted biopsy. Meta-analysis showed 0.96 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 1000 individuals invited to screen, corresponding to a 12% relative reduction over 9.5&amp;amp;ndash;22 years (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81&amp;amp;ndash;0.95). One trial estimated 2.3% to 10.3% overdiagnosis over 10&amp;amp;ndash;14 years. Overall certainty of evidence was low or very low. PSA screening may offer a small mortality benefit, but uncertainty and variable harms limit confidence, underscoring the need for high-quality evidence, particularly for MRI and risk-based screening strategies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Alexandria Bennett</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Niyati Vyas</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicole Shaver</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Faris Almoli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Taddele Kibret</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Loblaw</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lisa Del Giudice</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiaomei Yao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Becky Skidmore</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Melissa Brouwers</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julian Little</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David Moher</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040199</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040199</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/199</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/200">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 200: Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Settings (2025 Update)</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/200</link>
	<description>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is an aggressive subtype associated with a poor prognosis when not optimally treated. Over the past year, major advances&amp;amp;mdash;including results from DESTINY-Breast05, DESTINY-Breast09, DESTINY-Breast11, PATINA, and long-term APHINITY follow-up&amp;amp;mdash;have changed the treatment landscape regarding the place in therapy of antibody&amp;amp;ndash;drug conjugates and the optimal sequencing of systemic therapies. These developments prompted the need for updated evidence-informed consensus recommendations to support consistent, high-quality care across Canada. Research Excellence, Active Leadership Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance (REAL Alliance), comprising clinical-academic oncologists from across Canada and Breast Cancer Canada, updated its 2024 HER2+ recommendations through a modified Delphi process with up to three rounds of anonymous voting. Consensus was defined a priori as &amp;amp;ge;75% agreement. This 2025 update incorporates new data in early-stage, metastatic, and central nervous system-involved disease, including revisions to neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment pathways and expanded guidance on the clinical use of antibody&amp;amp;ndash;drug conjugates.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 200: Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Settings (2025 Update)</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/200">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040200</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Aalok Kumar
		Katarzyna J. Jerzak
		Karen A. Gelmon
		Jean-François Boileau
		Nathaniel Bouganim
		Christine Brezden-Masley
		Jeffrey Q. Cao
		David W. Cescon
		Stephen Chia
		Scott Edwards
		Anil Abraham Joy
		Kara Laing
		Nathalie LeVasseur
		Sandeep Sehdev
		Christine Simmons
		Marc Webster
		Mita Manna
		on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada
		</p>
	<p>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is an aggressive subtype associated with a poor prognosis when not optimally treated. Over the past year, major advances&amp;amp;mdash;including results from DESTINY-Breast05, DESTINY-Breast09, DESTINY-Breast11, PATINA, and long-term APHINITY follow-up&amp;amp;mdash;have changed the treatment landscape regarding the place in therapy of antibody&amp;amp;ndash;drug conjugates and the optimal sequencing of systemic therapies. These developments prompted the need for updated evidence-informed consensus recommendations to support consistent, high-quality care across Canada. Research Excellence, Active Leadership Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance (REAL Alliance), comprising clinical-academic oncologists from across Canada and Breast Cancer Canada, updated its 2024 HER2+ recommendations through a modified Delphi process with up to three rounds of anonymous voting. Consensus was defined a priori as &amp;amp;ge;75% agreement. This 2025 update incorporates new data in early-stage, metastatic, and central nervous system-involved disease, including revisions to neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment pathways and expanded guidance on the clinical use of antibody&amp;amp;ndash;drug conjugates.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer in Both the Early and Metastatic Settings (2025 Update)</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Aalok Kumar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Katarzyna J. Jerzak</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Karen A. Gelmon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jean-François Boileau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nathaniel Bouganim</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christine Brezden-Masley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeffrey Q. Cao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David W. Cescon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Chia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Scott Edwards</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anil Abraham Joy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kara Laing</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nathalie LeVasseur</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sandeep Sehdev</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christine Simmons</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marc Webster</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mita Manna</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada on behalf of Patient Advocacy, Breast Cancer Canada</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040200</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Guidelines</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040200</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/200</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/201">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 201: Metabolomic Insights into Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/201</link>
	<description>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to pose a major global health challenge, with over 600,000 new cases diagnosed annually and persistently poor survival outcomes despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Growing evidence implicates metabolic reprogramming, including enhanced glycolysis, glutaminolysis, lipid synthesis, and one-carbon/redox flux as a central driver of HNC initiation, progression, and therapy resistance. In contrast, metabolic crosstalk within the hypoxic, acidic tumor microenvironment (TME) further shapes immune evasion and stromal support. Recent innovations in mass spectrometry platforms (LC-MS, GC-MS, NMR) have attracted attention in clinical therapeutics, and spatial metabolomics imaging techniques now enable high-resolution in situ mapping of metabolites, revealing intratumoral heterogeneity and offering new insights into tumor-immune&amp;amp;ndash;stromal interactions and potential biomarkers for precision oncology. In this review, we integrate critical methodological considerations from sample collection and data-analysis workflows to analytical pitfalls with a balanced, pathway-focused analysis of HNSCC dysmetabolism, examine tumor immune stromal metabolic interactions, and highlight translational opportunities through emerging biomarkers, targeted inhibitors, and cutting-edge approaches such as single-cell and AI-driven metabolomics to chart a roadmap toward precision oncology for HNSCC.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 201: Metabolomic Insights into Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/201">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040201</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Srikanth Ponneganti
		Kousalya Lavudi
		Maharshi Thalla
		Gayatri Narkhede
		Reva Dwivedi
		Rekha Kokkanti
		Prashant Pandey
		</p>
	<p>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to pose a major global health challenge, with over 600,000 new cases diagnosed annually and persistently poor survival outcomes despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Growing evidence implicates metabolic reprogramming, including enhanced glycolysis, glutaminolysis, lipid synthesis, and one-carbon/redox flux as a central driver of HNC initiation, progression, and therapy resistance. In contrast, metabolic crosstalk within the hypoxic, acidic tumor microenvironment (TME) further shapes immune evasion and stromal support. Recent innovations in mass spectrometry platforms (LC-MS, GC-MS, NMR) have attracted attention in clinical therapeutics, and spatial metabolomics imaging techniques now enable high-resolution in situ mapping of metabolites, revealing intratumoral heterogeneity and offering new insights into tumor-immune&amp;amp;ndash;stromal interactions and potential biomarkers for precision oncology. In this review, we integrate critical methodological considerations from sample collection and data-analysis workflows to analytical pitfalls with a balanced, pathway-focused analysis of HNSCC dysmetabolism, examine tumor immune stromal metabolic interactions, and highlight translational opportunities through emerging biomarkers, targeted inhibitors, and cutting-edge approaches such as single-cell and AI-driven metabolomics to chart a roadmap toward precision oncology for HNSCC.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Metabolomic Insights into Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Srikanth Ponneganti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kousalya Lavudi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maharshi Thalla</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gayatri Narkhede</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Reva Dwivedi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rekha Kokkanti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Prashant Pandey</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040201</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040201</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/201</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/197">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 197: Wilms Tumor with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/197</link>
	<description>Background: An inferior vena cava thrombus (IVCT) occurs in approximately 4&amp;amp;ndash;10% of Wilms tumor (WT) cases. The presence of an IVCT complicates surgical management and potentially affects patient outcomes. We reviewed all patients with a WT with and without an IVCT treated at our center, comparing their characteristics and outcome. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients with a WT treated between November 2014 and July 2023. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of an IVCT. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected. Group comparisons for categorical data were carried out using Chi-square tests, Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier curves, and differences between groups were assessed with the log-rank test. Results: Among 110 children with a unilateral WT, 17 (15.4%) had an IVCT at presentation. Their median age at diagnosis was 4.2 years. Females predominated (65%) and 11 (65%) had distant metastasis. Thrombus levels were infra-hepatic (52.9%), retro-hepatic (23.6%), supra-hepatic (5.9%), and intra-cardiac (17.6%). Thrombus resolution following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was achieved in 41.2% of patients, most frequently in infra-hepatic thrombi. Local control followed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy that included doxorubicin. Favorable histology was observed in 70% of patients with an IVCT. Compared with patients without an IVCT, children with an IVCT tend to present at an older age, have hematuria, a larger tumor, positive lymph node (LN) involvement, and metastatic disease (p value, 0.019, 0.008, 0.01, 0.014, and 0.002, respectively). On univariable analysis, older age, the presence of metastatic disease, IVCT, LN involvement, and diffuse anaplasia were associated with inferior EFS and OS. Five-year EFS and OS were significantly lower in patients with IVCT compared to those without (51% &amp;amp;plusmn; 12.5% vs. 74.5% &amp;amp;plusmn; 4.6%, p = 0.021 and 53.8% &amp;amp;plusmn; 15.4% vs. 82% &amp;amp;plusmn; 4.9%, p = 0.012, respectively). Conclusions: We observed a higher proportion of IVCT than previously reported. Consistent with prior studies, an IVCT was associated with more aggressive disease features. Although survival was worse in patients with an IVCT, the mere presence of a thrombus as an independent prognostic factor requires evaluation in larger patient cohorts.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 197: Wilms Tumor with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/197">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040197</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Rahaf Al-Hasan
		Rula Al-Qawabah
		Khalil Ghandour
		Ahmad Kh. Ibrahimi
		Nasim Sarhan
		Iyad Sultan
		Hadeel Halalsheh
		</p>
	<p>Background: An inferior vena cava thrombus (IVCT) occurs in approximately 4&amp;amp;ndash;10% of Wilms tumor (WT) cases. The presence of an IVCT complicates surgical management and potentially affects patient outcomes. We reviewed all patients with a WT with and without an IVCT treated at our center, comparing their characteristics and outcome. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients with a WT treated between November 2014 and July 2023. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of an IVCT. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected. Group comparisons for categorical data were carried out using Chi-square tests, Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan&amp;amp;ndash;Meier curves, and differences between groups were assessed with the log-rank test. Results: Among 110 children with a unilateral WT, 17 (15.4%) had an IVCT at presentation. Their median age at diagnosis was 4.2 years. Females predominated (65%) and 11 (65%) had distant metastasis. Thrombus levels were infra-hepatic (52.9%), retro-hepatic (23.6%), supra-hepatic (5.9%), and intra-cardiac (17.6%). Thrombus resolution following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was achieved in 41.2% of patients, most frequently in infra-hepatic thrombi. Local control followed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy that included doxorubicin. Favorable histology was observed in 70% of patients with an IVCT. Compared with patients without an IVCT, children with an IVCT tend to present at an older age, have hematuria, a larger tumor, positive lymph node (LN) involvement, and metastatic disease (p value, 0.019, 0.008, 0.01, 0.014, and 0.002, respectively). On univariable analysis, older age, the presence of metastatic disease, IVCT, LN involvement, and diffuse anaplasia were associated with inferior EFS and OS. Five-year EFS and OS were significantly lower in patients with IVCT compared to those without (51% &amp;amp;plusmn; 12.5% vs. 74.5% &amp;amp;plusmn; 4.6%, p = 0.021 and 53.8% &amp;amp;plusmn; 15.4% vs. 82% &amp;amp;plusmn; 4.9%, p = 0.012, respectively). Conclusions: We observed a higher proportion of IVCT than previously reported. Consistent with prior studies, an IVCT was associated with more aggressive disease features. Although survival was worse in patients with an IVCT, the mere presence of a thrombus as an independent prognostic factor requires evaluation in larger patient cohorts.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Wilms Tumor with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Rahaf Al-Hasan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rula Al-Qawabah</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Khalil Ghandour</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmad Kh. Ibrahimi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nasim Sarhan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Iyad Sultan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hadeel Halalsheh</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040197</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040197</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/197</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/198">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 198: Preclinical Rationale, Clinical Efficacy, and Safety of the Selective AKT Kinase Inhibitor Capivasertib in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Carcinoma: A Practical Narrative Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/198</link>
	<description>Most patients with advanced/metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer receive first-line therapy with cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy. Almost universally, these patients eventually progress due to the emergence of resistant cancer clones. Targeting the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN pathway is a way of overcoming resistance. Recently, the oral, selective AKT kinase inhibitor capivasertib has been approved for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive/human HER2-growth factor receptor-2 advanced BC with alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN, in combination with fulvestrant after progression on endocrine therapy. We performed a narrative review to recapitulate the available evidence about capivasertib in the management of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, focusing on studies that address preclinical rationale, pharmacology, and clinically relevant problems.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 198: Preclinical Rationale, Clinical Efficacy, and Safety of the Selective AKT Kinase Inhibitor Capivasertib in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Carcinoma: A Practical Narrative Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/198">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040198</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Maria Rosaria Valerio
		Daniela Sambataro
		Federica Martorana
		Martina Greco
		Chiara Mesi
		Vittorio Gebbia
		Paolo Vigneri
		Giuseppa Scandurra
		</p>
	<p>Most patients with advanced/metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer receive first-line therapy with cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy. Almost universally, these patients eventually progress due to the emergence of resistant cancer clones. Targeting the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN pathway is a way of overcoming resistance. Recently, the oral, selective AKT kinase inhibitor capivasertib has been approved for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive/human HER2-growth factor receptor-2 advanced BC with alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN, in combination with fulvestrant after progression on endocrine therapy. We performed a narrative review to recapitulate the available evidence about capivasertib in the management of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, focusing on studies that address preclinical rationale, pharmacology, and clinically relevant problems.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Preclinical Rationale, Clinical Efficacy, and Safety of the Selective AKT Kinase Inhibitor Capivasertib in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Carcinoma: A Practical Narrative Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Maria Rosaria Valerio</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Daniela Sambataro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Federica Martorana</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Martina Greco</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chiara Mesi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Vittorio Gebbia</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Paolo Vigneri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giuseppa Scandurra</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040198</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040198</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/198</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/196">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 196: Lattice Radiation Therapy Plays a Synergistic Role in the Radical Treatment of Bulky Cervical Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/196</link>
	<description>Background: An increasing number of reports showed patients with bulky tumors after lattice radiation therapy (LRT) treatment achieved good local control. However, in these reports, LRT was previously used primarily for palliation. We reported a case that LRT plays a synergistic role in the radical treatment of locally advanced bulky cervical cancer (LABCC) combined with INTERLACE study protocol. Methods: The patient was a 54-year-old female with LABCC and treated with LRT combined with the INTERLACE study protocol. She received three fractions of 3 Gy each to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and three fractions of 9 Gy each to the lattice therapy volume (LTV), on an emergent basis, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Subsequently, according to the INTERLACE study protocol, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were carried out and the standard follow-up examinations were conducted. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: The patient initially received LRT, which reduced the tumor burden and controlled bleeding. After this was combined with the INTERLACE study protocol, the complete clinical response (cCR) was achieved and they maintained this status for 13 months after the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), with only manageable grade IV hematological toxicity observed after the completion of CCRT. During this period, only manageable grade IV hematological toxicity (platelet count 16 &amp;amp;times; 109/L, white blood cell count 0.33 &amp;amp;times; 109/L) was observed. Conclusions: In this case, LRT combined with INTERLACE study protocol appears to be a safe and effective for the treatment of LABCC which improved the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s quality of life without uncontrolled treatment-related toxicity.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-31</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 196: Lattice Radiation Therapy Plays a Synergistic Role in the Radical Treatment of Bulky Cervical Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/196">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040196</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Feifei Wang
		Qianru Zhan
		Zhitao Dai
		Huijuan Zhang
		Miao Peng
		Zhijian Chen
		Jing Jin
		Xiugui Sheng
		</p>
	<p>Background: An increasing number of reports showed patients with bulky tumors after lattice radiation therapy (LRT) treatment achieved good local control. However, in these reports, LRT was previously used primarily for palliation. We reported a case that LRT plays a synergistic role in the radical treatment of locally advanced bulky cervical cancer (LABCC) combined with INTERLACE study protocol. Methods: The patient was a 54-year-old female with LABCC and treated with LRT combined with the INTERLACE study protocol. She received three fractions of 3 Gy each to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and three fractions of 9 Gy each to the lattice therapy volume (LTV), on an emergent basis, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Subsequently, according to the INTERLACE study protocol, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were carried out and the standard follow-up examinations were conducted. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: The patient initially received LRT, which reduced the tumor burden and controlled bleeding. After this was combined with the INTERLACE study protocol, the complete clinical response (cCR) was achieved and they maintained this status for 13 months after the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), with only manageable grade IV hematological toxicity observed after the completion of CCRT. During this period, only manageable grade IV hematological toxicity (platelet count 16 &amp;amp;times; 109/L, white blood cell count 0.33 &amp;amp;times; 109/L) was observed. Conclusions: In this case, LRT combined with INTERLACE study protocol appears to be a safe and effective for the treatment of LABCC which improved the patient&amp;amp;rsquo;s quality of life without uncontrolled treatment-related toxicity.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Lattice Radiation Therapy Plays a Synergistic Role in the Radical Treatment of Bulky Cervical Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Feifei Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Qianru Zhan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhitao Dai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Huijuan Zhang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Miao Peng</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhijian Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jing Jin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Xiugui Sheng</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040196</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040196</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/196</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/195">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 195: Tumor-Agnostic Landscape with HER2 Amplification in Japan: Real-World Prevalence and Implications for Targeting HER2</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/195</link>
	<description>Limited data exist on the prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2/HER2) amplification in patients with all types of solid tumors. This retrospective, observational study (UMIN ID: UMIN000057382) analyzed the prevalence of HER2 amplification across all solid tumors using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database in Japan. We analyzed 89,374 eligible patients with solid tumors: HER2 amplification was detected in 5119 patients (5.7%). The highest rates of HER2 amplification were observed in patients with tumors of the esophagus/stomach (12.9%), followed by tumors of the bladder/urinary tract (10.6%), breast (9.5%), biliary tract (8.4%), and uterus (8.4%). Among the five assay platforms, FoundationOne CDx accounted for 69.7% of all CGP tests and had an HER2 amplification detection rate of 7.4%, compared to the other four platforms (range: 1.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.4% of all CGP tests [detection rates: 1.5&amp;amp;ndash;2.3%]). Substantial differences were observed in the mutation frequencies of multiple genes between HER2 amplified and HER2 non-amplified tumors. The results highlight that HER2 amplification extends beyond conventional tumor types and enables the identification, via CGP testing, of non-traditional tumor subsets (cancers other than breast and gastric cancer), including rare cancers, that could be candidates for HER2-targeting therapy such as trastuzumab deruxtecan in Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 195: Tumor-Agnostic Landscape with HER2 Amplification in Japan: Real-World Prevalence and Implications for Targeting HER2</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/195">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040195</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yutaka Hatanaka
		Jun Sasano
		Osamu Takizawa
		</p>
	<p>Limited data exist on the prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2/HER2) amplification in patients with all types of solid tumors. This retrospective, observational study (UMIN ID: UMIN000057382) analyzed the prevalence of HER2 amplification across all solid tumors using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database in Japan. We analyzed 89,374 eligible patients with solid tumors: HER2 amplification was detected in 5119 patients (5.7%). The highest rates of HER2 amplification were observed in patients with tumors of the esophagus/stomach (12.9%), followed by tumors of the bladder/urinary tract (10.6%), breast (9.5%), biliary tract (8.4%), and uterus (8.4%). Among the five assay platforms, FoundationOne CDx accounted for 69.7% of all CGP tests and had an HER2 amplification detection rate of 7.4%, compared to the other four platforms (range: 1.9&amp;amp;ndash;15.4% of all CGP tests [detection rates: 1.5&amp;amp;ndash;2.3%]). Substantial differences were observed in the mutation frequencies of multiple genes between HER2 amplified and HER2 non-amplified tumors. The results highlight that HER2 amplification extends beyond conventional tumor types and enables the identification, via CGP testing, of non-traditional tumor subsets (cancers other than breast and gastric cancer), including rare cancers, that could be candidates for HER2-targeting therapy such as trastuzumab deruxtecan in Japan.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Tumor-Agnostic Landscape with HER2 Amplification in Japan: Real-World Prevalence and Implications for Targeting HER2</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yutaka Hatanaka</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jun Sasano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Osamu Takizawa</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040195</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040195</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/195</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/194">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 194: Ferroptosis-Based Nanotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/194</link>
	<description>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant forms of brain cancer, posing challenges to modern oncology. Current treatments, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy (e.g., Temozolomide or TMZ), often fail due to the inevitable development of drug resistance. TMZ resistance remains a major therapeutic challenge for the reasons that it is the first-line treatment. Recent studies indicate a rising GBM tumour burden and a trend towards earlier age of onset. It highlights the urgent need for evidence-based policymaking and intensified research to address this most difficult-to-treat malignancy in clinical settings. Ferroptosis, a newly recognized type of controlled cell death induced by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a potential approach to overcome apoptosis resistance and restore drug sensitivity in GBM. This mechanism is modulated by key molecules that can be specifically targeted to either enhance oxidative stress or inhibit antioxidant defences, ultimately leading to tumour cell death. This review conducts a meta-analysis of preclinical evidence to better understand the potential of activating ferroptosis as a key target for developing nanoparticles to resensitize TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Current evidence indicates that combining ferroptosis induction with strategically engineered nanocarrier systems can serve as a novel and effective therapeutic approach to overcome TMZ resistance and advance precision-based GBM treatment.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 194: Ferroptosis-Based Nanotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/194">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040194</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Yashaswi Sharma
		Arpana Parihar
		Neha Arya
		Jagat Kanwar
		Murali Munisamy
		Megha Katare-Pandey
		Ashwani Tandon
		Mahadev Rao
		Saikat Das
		Adesh Shrivastava
		Rashmi Chowdhary
		Amit Agrawal
		Rupinder Kaur Kanwar
		</p>
	<p>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant forms of brain cancer, posing challenges to modern oncology. Current treatments, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy (e.g., Temozolomide or TMZ), often fail due to the inevitable development of drug resistance. TMZ resistance remains a major therapeutic challenge for the reasons that it is the first-line treatment. Recent studies indicate a rising GBM tumour burden and a trend towards earlier age of onset. It highlights the urgent need for evidence-based policymaking and intensified research to address this most difficult-to-treat malignancy in clinical settings. Ferroptosis, a newly recognized type of controlled cell death induced by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a potential approach to overcome apoptosis resistance and restore drug sensitivity in GBM. This mechanism is modulated by key molecules that can be specifically targeted to either enhance oxidative stress or inhibit antioxidant defences, ultimately leading to tumour cell death. This review conducts a meta-analysis of preclinical evidence to better understand the potential of activating ferroptosis as a key target for developing nanoparticles to resensitize TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Current evidence indicates that combining ferroptosis induction with strategically engineered nanocarrier systems can serve as a novel and effective therapeutic approach to overcome TMZ resistance and advance precision-based GBM treatment.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Ferroptosis-Based Nanotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Yashaswi Sharma</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Arpana Parihar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Neha Arya</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jagat Kanwar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Murali Munisamy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Megha Katare-Pandey</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ashwani Tandon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mahadev Rao</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Saikat Das</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adesh Shrivastava</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rashmi Chowdhary</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Amit Agrawal</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rupinder Kaur Kanwar</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040194</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>194</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040194</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/194</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/193">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 193: A Scoping Review of Exercise Oncology in the Primary Brain Tumor Patient&amp;ndash;Caregiver Dyad</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/193</link>
	<description>Background: Primary malignant brain tumors (PBT) impose substantial burdens on patients and caregivers. Caregivers are essential in the delivery of outpatient care for patients with PBT but experience high levels of fatigue, distress, and health decline. Although exercise is known to improve outcomes in cancer patients, interventions tailored specifically to the PBT patient&amp;amp;ndash;caregiver dyad remain limited. Dyadic intervention, as well as exercise oncology, are emerging areas of active research in neuro-oncology. This scoping review incorporates both principles to evaluate the existing literature on exercise interventions on primary brain tumor patient&amp;amp;ndash;caregiver dyads. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Rehabilitation &amp;amp;amp; Sports Medicine (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central (Ovid) in December 2025 for studies involving exercise interventions that included adult PBT patients and caregivers. Results: Of the 1126 records screened, eight studies were included: four yoga-based interventions (three feasibility trials and one ongoing multicenter RCT), one pilot ski-based intervention, and three aerobic and resistance training-based interventions (two qualitative and one ongoing trial). The interventions were safe and feasible, with high adherence and retention. The preliminary reported benefits included improvements in fatigue, sleep, quality of life, and caregiver distress for the dyads. Videoconference delivery was effective, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The eight included studies comprised 5&amp;amp;ndash;67 dyads, with four being single-arm feasibility studies. Conclusions: Current literature on dyadic exercise intervention in neuro-oncology consists primarily of small-scale feasibility and pilot studies. Initial findings have demonstrated that such interventions are safe. However, preliminary efficacy remains limited due to the risk of bias and lack of statistical power. Larger randomized clinical trials with objective endpoints are needed to define efficacy and guide evidence-based protocols.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 193: A Scoping Review of Exercise Oncology in the Primary Brain Tumor Patient&amp;ndash;Caregiver Dyad</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/193">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040193</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Anh Huan Vo
		Maximilian Libmann
		David Carson
		Kimberly Wang
		Sushant Puri
		Nicholas Butowski
		Kerri Winters-Stone
		</p>
	<p>Background: Primary malignant brain tumors (PBT) impose substantial burdens on patients and caregivers. Caregivers are essential in the delivery of outpatient care for patients with PBT but experience high levels of fatigue, distress, and health decline. Although exercise is known to improve outcomes in cancer patients, interventions tailored specifically to the PBT patient&amp;amp;ndash;caregiver dyad remain limited. Dyadic intervention, as well as exercise oncology, are emerging areas of active research in neuro-oncology. This scoping review incorporates both principles to evaluate the existing literature on exercise interventions on primary brain tumor patient&amp;amp;ndash;caregiver dyads. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Rehabilitation &amp;amp;amp; Sports Medicine (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central (Ovid) in December 2025 for studies involving exercise interventions that included adult PBT patients and caregivers. Results: Of the 1126 records screened, eight studies were included: four yoga-based interventions (three feasibility trials and one ongoing multicenter RCT), one pilot ski-based intervention, and three aerobic and resistance training-based interventions (two qualitative and one ongoing trial). The interventions were safe and feasible, with high adherence and retention. The preliminary reported benefits included improvements in fatigue, sleep, quality of life, and caregiver distress for the dyads. Videoconference delivery was effective, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The eight included studies comprised 5&amp;amp;ndash;67 dyads, with four being single-arm feasibility studies. Conclusions: Current literature on dyadic exercise intervention in neuro-oncology consists primarily of small-scale feasibility and pilot studies. Initial findings have demonstrated that such interventions are safe. However, preliminary efficacy remains limited due to the risk of bias and lack of statistical power. Larger randomized clinical trials with objective endpoints are needed to define efficacy and guide evidence-based protocols.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Scoping Review of Exercise Oncology in the Primary Brain Tumor Patient&amp;amp;ndash;Caregiver Dyad</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Anh Huan Vo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maximilian Libmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David Carson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kimberly Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sushant Puri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicholas Butowski</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kerri Winters-Stone</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040193</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040193</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/193</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/192">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 192: Percutaneous Image-Guided Non-Target Renal Biopsy in Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/192</link>
	<description>Objective: To assess the safety and diagnostic outcomes of image-guided, non-target renal biopsies performed in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent percutaneous, image-guided, non-target renal biopsy between January 2017 and December 2020 in our institution. We recorded demographics, clinical, procedural, and pathologic details. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between various variables and diagnostic yield or development of adverse events. Results: A total of 318 biopsies were performed in 318 patients (178 male, 140 female) with a median BMI of 28.4 kg/m2. Median systolic and diastolic BP at the time of biopsy were 133 mmHg and 74 mmHg, respectively. Tissue was obtained using 18-gauge needles (99%). Adverse events were documented in 57 cases (18%), with 12 cases (3.8%) classified as grade 2 or higher per SIR classification. Diagnosis was achieved in 310 biopsies (97%). The median number of the glomeruli identified by light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy was 25, 8, and 3, respectively, and a higher number of identified glomeruli was associated with diagnostic yield in univariate analysis, although not in multivariable analysis. Diastolic BP higher than 80 mmHg and CT imaging guidance were associated with the development of adverse events in univariate analysis, and CT use remained so in the final multivariable analysis (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). No other variables, including pre-biopsy anticancer or immunotherapy medications, were associated with increased risk of adverse events. Conclusions: Percutaneous, image-guided, non-target renal biopsy in cancer patients using an 18-gauge needle has a high diagnostic yield and safety profile.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 192: Percutaneous Image-Guided Non-Target Renal Biopsy in Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/192">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040192</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mohamed E. Abdelsalam
		Milan N. Patel
		Ryan D. Murray
		Shahroz Khalid Aziz
		Haley Shields
		Pamela Chien
		Steven Yevich
		Zeyad A. Metwalli
		Zhongya Wang
		Jamie S. Lin
		Steven Y. Huang
		David Irwin
		Thomas Lu
		Stephen R. Lee
		Ala Abudayyeh
		Peiman Habibollahi
		Bruno C. Odisio
		Kamran Ahrar
		Sanjay Gupta
		</p>
	<p>Objective: To assess the safety and diagnostic outcomes of image-guided, non-target renal biopsies performed in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent percutaneous, image-guided, non-target renal biopsy between January 2017 and December 2020 in our institution. We recorded demographics, clinical, procedural, and pathologic details. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between various variables and diagnostic yield or development of adverse events. Results: A total of 318 biopsies were performed in 318 patients (178 male, 140 female) with a median BMI of 28.4 kg/m2. Median systolic and diastolic BP at the time of biopsy were 133 mmHg and 74 mmHg, respectively. Tissue was obtained using 18-gauge needles (99%). Adverse events were documented in 57 cases (18%), with 12 cases (3.8%) classified as grade 2 or higher per SIR classification. Diagnosis was achieved in 310 biopsies (97%). The median number of the glomeruli identified by light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy was 25, 8, and 3, respectively, and a higher number of identified glomeruli was associated with diagnostic yield in univariate analysis, although not in multivariable analysis. Diastolic BP higher than 80 mmHg and CT imaging guidance were associated with the development of adverse events in univariate analysis, and CT use remained so in the final multivariable analysis (p &amp;amp;lt; 0.001). No other variables, including pre-biopsy anticancer or immunotherapy medications, were associated with increased risk of adverse events. Conclusions: Percutaneous, image-guided, non-target renal biopsy in cancer patients using an 18-gauge needle has a high diagnostic yield and safety profile.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Percutaneous Image-Guided Non-Target Renal Biopsy in Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mohamed E. Abdelsalam</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Milan N. Patel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ryan D. Murray</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shahroz Khalid Aziz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Haley Shields</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pamela Chien</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Steven Yevich</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zeyad A. Metwalli</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zhongya Wang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jamie S. Lin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Steven Y. Huang</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David Irwin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Thomas Lu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephen R. Lee</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ala Abudayyeh</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Peiman Habibollahi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Bruno C. Odisio</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kamran Ahrar</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Sanjay Gupta</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>192</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040192</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/192</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/190">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 190: Robotic Partial Cystectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Positive Urachal Adenocarcinoma in a 34-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/190</link>
	<description>Urachal carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which standardized management remains limited, particularly in patients with locally advanced and node-positive disease. We report the case of a 34-year-old woman with urachal adenocarcinoma involving the bladder dome and radiographically suspicious pelvic lymph nodes who underwent robot-assisted partial cystectomy with urachal resection and extended bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Because there was no clinical, radiologic, or intraoperative evidence of umbilical involvement, the umbilicus was preserved after preoperative counseling and intraoperative confirmation of a negative proximal margin. Final pathology demonstrated a 4.5 cm enteric-type urachal adenocarcinoma, pT3a pN2 (2/17), with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and negative surgical margins. Immunohistochemistry and DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing showed microsatellite stability, mismatch-repair proficiency, low tumor mutational burden, and no actionable genomic alteration. Given the absence of an established adjuvant standard, the multidisciplinary tumor board selected adjuvant FOLFOX as a non-standard postoperative strategy based on the overall clinicopathologic context. The patient remained continent, experienced no postoperative complications or treatment-limiting toxicity, and showed normalization of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. This case provides a carefully contextualized example of transparent surgical reasoning and restrained multidisciplinary management in a rare malignancy with limited prospective evidence.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 190: Robotic Partial Cystectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Positive Urachal Adenocarcinoma in a 34-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/190">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040190</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Stefanie Herrmann
		Christian Gilfrich
		Stephan Siepmann
		Julio Ruben Rodas Garzaro
		Fabian Eder
		Stephan Schleder
		Philipp Aubele
		Felix Keil
		Matthias May
		Anton Kravchuk
		</p>
	<p>Urachal carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which standardized management remains limited, particularly in patients with locally advanced and node-positive disease. We report the case of a 34-year-old woman with urachal adenocarcinoma involving the bladder dome and radiographically suspicious pelvic lymph nodes who underwent robot-assisted partial cystectomy with urachal resection and extended bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Because there was no clinical, radiologic, or intraoperative evidence of umbilical involvement, the umbilicus was preserved after preoperative counseling and intraoperative confirmation of a negative proximal margin. Final pathology demonstrated a 4.5 cm enteric-type urachal adenocarcinoma, pT3a pN2 (2/17), with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and negative surgical margins. Immunohistochemistry and DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing showed microsatellite stability, mismatch-repair proficiency, low tumor mutational burden, and no actionable genomic alteration. Given the absence of an established adjuvant standard, the multidisciplinary tumor board selected adjuvant FOLFOX as a non-standard postoperative strategy based on the overall clinicopathologic context. The patient remained continent, experienced no postoperative complications or treatment-limiting toxicity, and showed normalization of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. This case provides a carefully contextualized example of transparent surgical reasoning and restrained multidisciplinary management in a rare malignancy with limited prospective evidence.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Robotic Partial Cystectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Positive Urachal Adenocarcinoma in a 34-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Stefanie Herrmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christian Gilfrich</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephan Siepmann</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Julio Ruben Rodas Garzaro</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Fabian Eder</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephan Schleder</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Philipp Aubele</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Felix Keil</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Matthias May</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Anton Kravchuk</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040190</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>190</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040190</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/190</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/191">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 191: Life Years Gained and Healthcare Dollars Saved: National Economic Evidence Supporting Comprehensive Genomic Profiling as Standard of Care for Canadian Cancer Patients</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/191</link>
	<description>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is a meaningful advancement in the field of oncology, enabling critical clinical decision-making regarding precision treatments that have biological rationale. In June 2025, the Colorectal Cancer Resource &amp;amp;amp; Action Network (CCRAN) hosted their annual pan-tumour Biomarkers Conference, a virtual meeting of clinicians, scientists, and patients, to discuss recent progress in overcoming barriers to CGP access for patients in Canada with metastatic cancer. The meeting&amp;amp;rsquo;s cornerstone was the presentation of the first national costs and benefits analysis of universal CGP for five metastatic tumour types; findings demonstrated this diagnostic&amp;amp;rsquo;s potential, with the model estimating a gain of 3440 life years while generating $87M&amp;amp;ndash;134M of potential healthcare system savings, over a six-year time horizon. Additionally, conference sessions focused on the clinical value of CGP, strategies to leverage the economic analysis results and learn from international experiences, as well as mechanisms to prepare the Canadian healthcare system for future adoption. The conference led to calls to action for a national strategy to reduce disparities in equitable access to CGP, funding allocation for CGP as a standard of care for all patients with metastatic cancer, and pathways to enhance current infrastructure to expedite CGP across the country.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 191: Life Years Gained and Healthcare Dollars Saved: National Economic Evidence Supporting Comprehensive Genomic Profiling as Standard of Care for Canadian Cancer Patients</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/191">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040191</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Stephanie Snow
		Shantanu Banerji
		Yvonne Bombard
		Don Husereau
		Jason Karamchandani
		Eddy Nason
		Pamela S. Ohashi
		Gijs van Rooijen
		Gilad Vainer
		Cassandra Macaulay
		Filomena Servidio-Italiano
		</p>
	<p>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is a meaningful advancement in the field of oncology, enabling critical clinical decision-making regarding precision treatments that have biological rationale. In June 2025, the Colorectal Cancer Resource &amp;amp;amp; Action Network (CCRAN) hosted their annual pan-tumour Biomarkers Conference, a virtual meeting of clinicians, scientists, and patients, to discuss recent progress in overcoming barriers to CGP access for patients in Canada with metastatic cancer. The meeting&amp;amp;rsquo;s cornerstone was the presentation of the first national costs and benefits analysis of universal CGP for five metastatic tumour types; findings demonstrated this diagnostic&amp;amp;rsquo;s potential, with the model estimating a gain of 3440 life years while generating $87M&amp;amp;ndash;134M of potential healthcare system savings, over a six-year time horizon. Additionally, conference sessions focused on the clinical value of CGP, strategies to leverage the economic analysis results and learn from international experiences, as well as mechanisms to prepare the Canadian healthcare system for future adoption. The conference led to calls to action for a national strategy to reduce disparities in equitable access to CGP, funding allocation for CGP as a standard of care for all patients with metastatic cancer, and pathways to enhance current infrastructure to expedite CGP across the country.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Life Years Gained and Healthcare Dollars Saved: National Economic Evidence Supporting Comprehensive Genomic Profiling as Standard of Care for Canadian Cancer Patients</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Stephanie Snow</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shantanu Banerji</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yvonne Bombard</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Don Husereau</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jason Karamchandani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eddy Nason</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Pamela S. Ohashi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gijs van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gilad Vainer</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Cassandra Macaulay</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Filomena Servidio-Italiano</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040191</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Conference Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040191</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/191</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/189">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 189: Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Toward Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Among the General Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/189</link>
	<description>Background: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, while rare, making up less than 2% of adult cancers with an incidence below 5 per 100,000 annually, present a significant challenge due to their varied and often obscure pathology. Additionally, the absence of global sarcoma awareness contributes to delayed interventions, necessitating more-aggressive treatments and increasing mortality risks. Conversely, cancers such as breast and colon have seen improved outcomes through effective screening and early-management strategies. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, out of the total number of participants approached, using a preset questionnaire, by trained medical students to participate in this study, 626 met the inclusion criteria. The questionnaire started with an informed consent process followed by a set of questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle. Subsequently, the questionnaire delved into their understanding and awareness of bone and soft tissue sarcomas, focusing on risk factors, recognizable signs and symptoms, and tendencies regarding health-seeking behavior. Results: In this study with 626 participants, demographic insights showed a young cohort, with 43.5% between 21 and 30 years, and a male predominance of 60.1%. Risk factor awareness was moderate; genetics and smoking were recognized as primary risks for sarcomas. Participants showed limited awareness of sarcoma signs, symptoms, and management, with a substantial percentage unsure about the most at-risk age group, gender differences in risk, and recognizability of symptoms. Barriers to seeking medical care included a passive attitude towards healthcare, fear, and accessibility issues. Most participants had limited knowledge of sarcomas, with 58% unaware of risk factors and 72.3% of signs and symptoms. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the necessity for targeted interventions to bridge the knowledge gap and promote early detection practices, which could significantly impact the prognosis of sarcoma patients.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 189: Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Toward Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Among the General Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/189">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040189</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Motaz Alaqeel
		Omar A. Aldosari
		Abdulrahman Alaseem
		Waleed Albishi
		Mohammed N. Alhuqbani
		Zyad A. Aldosari
		Badr Alshehri
		Naif Alsaber
		Nawaf M. Alwagdani
		Ibrahim S. Alshaygy
		</p>
	<p>Background: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, while rare, making up less than 2% of adult cancers with an incidence below 5 per 100,000 annually, present a significant challenge due to their varied and often obscure pathology. Additionally, the absence of global sarcoma awareness contributes to delayed interventions, necessitating more-aggressive treatments and increasing mortality risks. Conversely, cancers such as breast and colon have seen improved outcomes through effective screening and early-management strategies. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, out of the total number of participants approached, using a preset questionnaire, by trained medical students to participate in this study, 626 met the inclusion criteria. The questionnaire started with an informed consent process followed by a set of questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle. Subsequently, the questionnaire delved into their understanding and awareness of bone and soft tissue sarcomas, focusing on risk factors, recognizable signs and symptoms, and tendencies regarding health-seeking behavior. Results: In this study with 626 participants, demographic insights showed a young cohort, with 43.5% between 21 and 30 years, and a male predominance of 60.1%. Risk factor awareness was moderate; genetics and smoking were recognized as primary risks for sarcomas. Participants showed limited awareness of sarcoma signs, symptoms, and management, with a substantial percentage unsure about the most at-risk age group, gender differences in risk, and recognizability of symptoms. Barriers to seeking medical care included a passive attitude towards healthcare, fear, and accessibility issues. Most participants had limited knowledge of sarcomas, with 58% unaware of risk factors and 72.3% of signs and symptoms. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the necessity for targeted interventions to bridge the knowledge gap and promote early detection practices, which could significantly impact the prognosis of sarcoma patients.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Toward Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Among the General Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Motaz Alaqeel</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Omar A. Aldosari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Abdulrahman Alaseem</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Waleed Albishi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mohammed N. Alhuqbani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Zyad A. Aldosari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Badr Alshehri</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Naif Alsaber</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nawaf M. Alwagdani</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ibrahim S. Alshaygy</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040189</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040189</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/189</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/188">

	<title>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 188: Regression of a Non-Irradiated Lung Adenocarcinoma During Glioblastoma-Directed Chemoradiotherapy: A Case Report</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/188</link>
	<description>Treatment-associated regression of tumors outside the irradiated field has occasionally been reported, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, particularly in the context of central nervous system (CNS)&amp;amp;ndash;directed therapy. Glioblastoma (GBM) is commonly treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide, both of which may influence tumor biology and the systemic environment. We report a patient with synchronous primary GBM and early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who underwent craniotomy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for GBM. During GBM-directed chemoradiotherapy, the untreated pulmonary lesion demonstrated progressive regression without any lung-specific therapy, temporally coinciding with CNS-targeted treatment. Although comprehensive immunophenotyping was not feasible, longitudinal changes in the proportion of peripheral blood lymphocytes were observed during therapy. These findings represent a clinical observation characterized by a temporal association between CNS-directed treatment and regression of a distant, non-irradiated tumor. However, the underlying mechanism remains uncertain, and a contribution from systemic temozolomide exposure cannot be excluded. While treatment-related systemic effects may be considered, no specific causal mechanism can be established based on this single case. This case highlights an unusual clinical observation that may warrant further investigation. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between CNS-directed therapies and systemic tumor behavior.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Current Oncology, Vol. 33, Pages 188: Regression of a Non-Irradiated Lung Adenocarcinoma During Glioblastoma-Directed Chemoradiotherapy: A Case Report</b></p>
	<p>Current Oncology <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/188">doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040188</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Mizuki Iwanaga
		Yosuke Dotsu
		Takeshi Hiu
		Nozomi Ueki
		Yudai Hirano
		Takatomo Tokito
		Toru Morikawa
		Seiya Kaneko
		Noritaka Honda
		Kazumasa Akagi
		Hiromi Tomono
		Midori Matsuo
		Hirokazu Taniguchi
		Shinnosuke Takemoto
		Shinji Okano
		Hiroshi Mukae
		</p>
	<p>Treatment-associated regression of tumors outside the irradiated field has occasionally been reported, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, particularly in the context of central nervous system (CNS)&amp;amp;ndash;directed therapy. Glioblastoma (GBM) is commonly treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide, both of which may influence tumor biology and the systemic environment. We report a patient with synchronous primary GBM and early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who underwent craniotomy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for GBM. During GBM-directed chemoradiotherapy, the untreated pulmonary lesion demonstrated progressive regression without any lung-specific therapy, temporally coinciding with CNS-targeted treatment. Although comprehensive immunophenotyping was not feasible, longitudinal changes in the proportion of peripheral blood lymphocytes were observed during therapy. These findings represent a clinical observation characterized by a temporal association between CNS-directed treatment and regression of a distant, non-irradiated tumor. However, the underlying mechanism remains uncertain, and a contribution from systemic temozolomide exposure cannot be excluded. While treatment-related systemic effects may be considered, no specific causal mechanism can be established based on this single case. This case highlights an unusual clinical observation that may warrant further investigation. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between CNS-directed therapies and systemic tumor behavior.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Regression of a Non-Irradiated Lung Adenocarcinoma During Glioblastoma-Directed Chemoradiotherapy: A Case Report</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Mizuki Iwanaga</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yosuke Dotsu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Takeshi Hiu</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nozomi Ueki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yudai Hirano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Takatomo Tokito</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Toru Morikawa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Seiya Kaneko</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Noritaka Honda</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kazumasa Akagi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hiromi Tomono</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Midori Matsuo</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hirokazu Taniguchi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shinnosuke Takemoto</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Shinji Okano</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Hiroshi Mukae</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/curroncol33040188</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Current Oncology</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Current Oncology</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>188</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/curroncol33040188</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/4/188</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
    
<cc:License rdf:about="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
