Previous Issue
Volume 21, September
 
 

J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., Volume 21, Issue 10 (October 2026) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2509 KB  
Article
Argument-Based Evaluation for AI Recommendations in E-Commerce Decision Support: A Toulmin–FCM Approach
by Li Niu and Shihui Fu
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2026, 21(10), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21100338 - 23 Sep 2026
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to generate recommendations for e-commerce decision support. Existing XAI evaluation typically focuses on explanation attributes or user outcomes such as clarity, usefulness, trust, and acceptance but provides less insight into how an explanation justifies the recommendation [...] Read more.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to generate recommendations for e-commerce decision support. Existing XAI evaluation typically focuses on explanation attributes or user outcomes such as clarity, usefulness, trust, and acceptance but provides less insight into how an explanation justifies the recommendation itself. This study develops an argument-based evaluation framework by integrating Toulmin’s model of argumentation with fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs). Toulmin’s model structures explanations through claim, ground, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal, while FCMs quantify the dependencies among these components and their combined support for a recommendation. The framework is applied to feature-based, example-based, and model-based explanations in an AI-assisted hotel-pricing scenario. The three explanation stimuli produce different argumentative profiles and Claim-support levels. A separate experiment using acceptance and trust as external outcomes shows a consistent pattern. The study contributes to XAI research by introducing argument-based evaluation, operationalizing argumentative structure quantitatively, and providing a common basis for comparing different explanation forms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 14183 KB  
Article
Human Spokesperson Versus Artificial Intelligence Avatar and Authorship Disclosure in Digital Advertising: Effects on Performance Metrics
by Edwin Arango-Espinal, Augusto Rodríguez Orejuela and Paula Andrea López-Herrera
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2026, 21(10), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21100337 - 23 Sep 2026
Abstract
Virtual influencers generated by artificial intelligence have emerged as a strategic tool in digital advertising, although evidence regarding their actual effectiveness in market campaigns remains limited to laboratory experiments based on self-report measures. This study examines the effect of advertising spokesperson type (human [...] Read more.
Virtual influencers generated by artificial intelligence have emerged as a strategic tool in digital advertising, although evidence regarding their actual effectiveness in market campaigns remains limited to laboratory experiments based on self-report measures. This study examines the effect of advertising spokesperson type (human versus AI-generated avatar) and authorship disclosure (stating or not stating the origin of the advertisement) on the performance metrics of an actual campaign on the Meta platform. Through a field experiment with a 2 × 2 factorial design (spokesperson type × authorship disclosure), stratified by gender and age group, 384 advertisements were placed with a fixed budget on Facebook, and performance metrics (reach, video plays, clicks, and messages) were modeled using generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) with a negative binomial distribution. The results reveal a trade-off: the AI avatar is associated with 25% more video plays, but with 13% less reach and 38% fewer clicks, and with no significant difference in messages. Because impressions were allocated by the platform’s delivery algorithm, these estimates are read as performance differences under standard algorithmic delivery rather than as effects of full random assignment of users to conditions. Authorship disclosure did not show a statistically significant effect on any of the evaluated metrics, nor did its interaction with spokesperson type, suggesting that stating the origin of the advertisement can be implemented without a detectable cost to performance, although for messages the evidence remains inconclusive. The originality of this study lies in providing empirical evidence based on real behavioral data from an advertising campaign, overcoming the limitations of experiments relying on self-report measures that predominate in the literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop