Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research

This review examines existing research on virtual streamers in live streaming commerce and digital marketing, identifying key factors that shape consumer responses. Based on 41 peer-reviewed studies and following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the analysis applies the CIMCO to synthesize findings through a systematic review. Results highlight three primary mechanisms—trait-based trust, perceived social presence, and message framing—which collectively constitute an integrative model explaining how virtual streamers influence AI-enabled consumer behavior. These elements shape how consumers engage with virtual streamers across platforms and product types. However, current research is limited by geographic concentration, reliance on self-reports, and a lack of longitudinal or behavioral data, which constrains broader applicability. For retailers and platform operators, aligning avatar traits and communication styles with product categories and consumer expectations is crucial for effective digital service delivery. Transparency about whether a streamer is AI or human-operated is also important for maintaining user trust. This review proposes a triadic integration model and offers a foundation for future research on AI-driven marketing influence.

Market and government are the main bodies in solving the problem of income inequality, especially as both undergo electronic informatization. This study explores the effect of e-commerce and e-government on regional income inequality, along with its impact mechanisms and spatial characteristics. The results show a significant “sword effect” impact: e-commerce exacerbates income inequality, while e-government suppresses it. This conclusion remains valid after endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanistically, e-commerce widens the gap by promoting industrial agglomeration and worsening resource misallocation, while e-government narrows it by enhancing fiscal transparency and alleviating resource misallocation. Spatially, all three variables exhibit spatial correlation and β-convergence; e-commerce and income inequality show α-divergence, while e-government shows α-convergence. E-commerce presents a negative spatial spillover of “aggravating local inequality but suppressing adjacent regional inequality,” while e-government’s inhibitory effect is limited to local cities. Their impacts show significant heterogeneity across regional gradients and geographical locations, providing a basis for differentiated policy implications.

The unbridled pursuit of statistical rationality has precipitated a crisis of value rationality in e-commerce ecosystems, leading to algorithmic involution—a dilemma characterized by destructive hyper-competition. To reconcile this theoretical paradox and explore effective governance pathways, this paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving e-commerce platforms, government regulators, and consumers. Simulation results indicate that high-intensity government deterrence constitutes the necessary stability foundation of hard constraints, while consumer activism acts as the decisive accelerator of the soft environment contingent on high synergistic gains and low information screening costs. Furthermore, a platform’s pivot toward “algorithm for good” is not driven by altruism, but by the rational calibration between short-term extractive gains and long-term benevolent returns. Sensitivity analysis confirms that reducing the ratio of these two factors is the effective lever to speed up system convergence. Finally, effective governance requires restructuring this payoff matrix by establishing dynamic penalty mechanisms and transparent low-cost feedback channels to render ethical algorithmic behavior a dominant strategy in terms of economic rationality. This research aims to guide the e-commerce ecosystem from a zero-sum game of involution toward a sustainable equilibrium of multi-party value co-creation.