In complementary electrochromic devices (ECDs), nickel oxide (NiO) is generally used as a counter electrode material for enhancing the coloration efficiency. However, an NiO film as a counter electrode in ECDs is susceptible to degradation upon prolonged electrochemical cycling, which leads to an
[...] Read more.
In complementary electrochromic devices (ECDs), nickel oxide (NiO) is generally used as a counter electrode material for enhancing the coloration efficiency. However, an NiO film as a counter electrode in ECDs is susceptible to degradation upon prolonged electrochemical cycling, which leads to an insufficient device lifetime. In this study, a type of counter electrode iridium oxide (IrO
2) layer was fabricated using vacuum cathodic arc plasma (CAP). We focused on the comparison of IrO
2 and NiO deposited on a 5 × 5 cm
2 indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate with various Ar/O
2 gas-flow ratios (1/2, 1/2.5, and 1/3) in series. The optical performance of IrO
2-ECD (glass/ITO/WO
3/liquid electrolyte/IrO
2/ITO/glass) was determined by optical transmittance modulation; ∆T = 50% (from T
bleaching (75%) to T
coloring (25%)) at 633 nm was higher than that of NiO-ECD (ITO/NiO/liquid electrolyte/WO
3/ITO) (∆T = 32%). Apart from this, the ECD device demonstrated a fast coloring time of 4.8 s, a bleaching time of 1.5 s, and good cycling durability, which remained at 50% transmittance modulation even after 1000 cycles. The fast time was associated with the IrO
2 electrode and provided higher diffusion coefficients and a filamentary shape as an interface that facilitated the transfer of the Li ions into/out of the interface electrodes and the electrolyte. In our result of IrO
2-ECD analyses, the higher optical transmittance modulation was useful for promoting electrochromic application to a cycle durability test as an alternative to NiO-ECD.
Full article