You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

Infrastructures

Infrastructures is an international, scientific, peer-reviewed open access journal on infrastructures published monthly online by MDPI.
Infrastructures is affiliated to International Society for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Transport Infrastructures (iSMARTi) and their members receive a discount on the article processing charges.
Quartile Ranking JCR - Q2 (Construction and Building Technology | Engineering, Civil | Transportation Science and Technology)

All Articles (1,420)

Accurate landslide mapping near critical infrastructure requires not only data on landslide characteristics but also clear definitions of the spatial extent of surveyed areas. While national projects like Italian Landslide Inventory (IFFI) and Italian Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, safety assessment and monitoring of existing bridges (LLG 2022) provide a list of data to collect during a field visit survey, they lack clear specifications for buffer zones, limiting data comparability and risk assessment reliability. This study refines a hierarchical framework developed by the FABRE Geo Working Group, in alignment with LLG 2022, introducing five key zones—Landslide Inventory Reference Area, Diagnostic Area, Geomorphological Significant Area, Relevant Area and the Approach Zone, plus a newly defined Geomorphological Significant Area—Close Zone. By explicitly quantifying buffer zones and their hierarchical roles, the framework ensures consistent data collection across varied terrains and reduces ambiguity in landslide risk evaluation. Applied to 95 bridges in Tuscany and Basilicata, the framework offers standardized definitions and dimensions for Diagnostic Area, Geomorphological Significant Area and Relevant Area, based on detailed field surveys. Approach Zone and Geomorphological Significant Area—Close Zone are quantified as percentages of Relevant Area and Geomorphological Significant Area, supporting efficient, reproducible inspections using both manual and UAV-assisted methods. The Geomorphological Significant Area—Close Zone distinguishes core data, which requires direct surveys, from supplementary data that can be analyzed remotely or in the office. This distinction ensures that essential hazards are observed directly, while supplementary insights are efficiently integrated, enhancing field reliability and desk-based analysis. This integrated approach enhances the accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessment and the classification of attention levels, supporting the maintenance of the national IFFI. Ultimately, the comparison of IFFI catalog data, available in the Diagnostic Area, Geomorphological Significant Area, and Relevant Area, revealed previously unrecorded landslides in Matera and confirmed the reliability of the catalog in Lucca, highlighting that inventories can be systematically integrated only by using standardized areas with field verification to improve risk and infrastructure management. The structured framework bridges gaps between national inventory standards and localized survey needs, ensuring that both previously recorded and new landslide events are systematically captured.

25 December 2025

Geographic Location of study areas. Latitude and Longitude of the center of the study area in the Lucca Province: 44.1384, 10.3551; Latitude and Longitude of the center of the study area in the Matera Province: 40.3978, 16.2749. The circles indicate the areas under investigation.

Road infrastructure is increasingly recognized as a critical asset for economic development, social cohesion, and territorial connectivity [...]

26 December 2025

This study numerically investigates pavement damage caused by explosions in buried leaking natural gas pipelines using a coupled Lagrangian–Eulerian (CLE) framework in LS-DYNA. The gas phase is described by a Jones–Wilkins–Lee-based equation of state, while soil and pavement are modeled using a pressure-dependent soil model and the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma concrete model with strain-based erosion, respectively. The approach is validated against benchmark underground explosion tests in sand and blast tests on reinforced concrete slabs, demonstrating accurate prediction of pressure histories, ejecta evolution, and crater or damage patterns. Parametric analyses are then conducted for different leaked gas masses and pipeline burial depths to quantify shock transmission, soil heave, pavement deflection, and damage evolution. The results indicate that the dynamic response of the pavement structure is most pronounced directly above the detonation point and intensifies significantly with increasing total leaked gas mass. For a total leaked gas mass of 36 kg, the maximum vertical deflection, the peak kinetic energy, and the peak pressure at the bottom interface at this location reach 148.46 mm, 14.64 kJ, and 10.82 MPa, respectively. Moreover, a deflection-based index is introduced to classify pavement response into slight (<20 mm), moderate (20–40 mm), severe (40–80 mm), and collapse (>80 mm) states, and empirical curves are derived to predict damage level from leakage mass and burial depth. Finally, the effectiveness of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthening schemes is assessed, showing that top and bottom surface reinforcement with a total CFRP thickness of 2.67 mm could reduce vertical deflection by up to 37.93% and significantly mitigates longitudinal cracking. The results provide a rational basis for safety assessment and blast resistant design of pavement structures above buried gas pipelines.

24 December 2025

In this research, a novel hybrid methodology is proposed for predicting the structural response of high concrete arch dams, combining the Discrete Element Method (DEM) with the Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) technique. A structured calibration strategy is employed during the numerical model preparation to enable the generation of a wide range of reliable output variables for training and prediction. The methodology is then applied to the El Atazar arch dam to demonstrate its capability to forecast displacement and stress responses. The study reveals that using the current air temperature as an input variable is not adequate for representing the thermal behavior of the dam body; instead, the mean air temperature over a specified period yields significantly better results. Additionally, the findings highlight the importance of the loading path and the dam’s initial state in determining its structural response. The developed model shows a strong agreement between predicted and observed data, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing the nonlinear behavior of high concrete arch dams. Compared to traditional parametric models commonly used for dam deformation analysis, the proposed framework offers greater flexibility in representing nonlinearity while requiring less training data, making it ideal for dams with limited monitoring records, such as older dams or newly operated ones.

23 December 2025

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Infrastructures - ISSN 2412-3811