Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .

CivilEng

CivilEng is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal of civil engineering, published quarterly online by MDPI.

All Articles (349)

Deep Evaluation of Structural Time Period Formulae Using Finite Element Modelling

  • Shimaa Emad,
  • Alaa Elsisi and
  • Abdallah Salama
  • + 2 authors

The accurate estimation of the fundamental period is critical for seismic design using the Equivalent Lateral Force method. This study evaluates widely used empirical period formulae from international seismic codes and previous research by comparing them with detailed finite element method (FEM) analyses. A total of 93 reinforced concrete building models were assessed. The results show that most empirical formulae, notably the American Society of Civil Engineers Standard (ASCE 7-10), the Eurocode, the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), and the Saudi Building Code (SBC 301), systematically underestimate the fundamental period in low- and mid-rise buildings often by more than 40% under cracked conditions, while discrepancies reduce under uncracked assumptions. Equations such as those proposed by the Building Standard Law of Japan (BSLJ) and Australian Standard (AS 11407.2) show comparatively closer agreements with FEM predictions, whereas formulae developed by Goel and Chopra and by Alguhane et al. have distinct differences, especially at greater heights. Statistical parameters, including the arithmetic mean difference and the standard deviation, were employed to enhance the comparison and assess the accuracy and dispersion of the estimated fundamental periods. The results indicate that empirical formulae, although beneficial in first-design stages, are likely to yield conservative results and suggest the use of advanced numerical computation or revised models and coefficients for RC high-rise and irregular buildings.

3 February 2026

Finite element models: (a–c) six-story MRF buildings; (d,e) eight-story MRFs; (f) eight-story dual system; (g,h) ten-story MRFs; (i) ten-story dual system; and (j–l) SW buildings with five, ten, and twenty stories. Shear walls and cores are highlighted in red.

Cascade dams describe an arrangement of several dam structures built along a flow path. Failure of one upstream dam in the cascade system can trigger catastrophic consequences to the downstream dams, as evidenced recently in the Edenville Dam and Sanford Dam. Previous research has mainly focused on rainfall-induced dam failures, although recent failures have demonstrated a combination of floods and earthquakes. Moreover, limited studies have analyzed the sensitivity of dam breach parameters, such as dam breach height and width in dams arranged in a cascade system for seismic events. Most hydraulic simulations that model seismic-induced dam failures assume the complete collapse of dams to analyze the downstream consequences. Hence, this study presents a novel analysis in simulating earthquake-induced failures in a cascade dam system, considering the sensitivity of dam breach parameters. In addition, dam breach parameters have been derived from the structural analysis of dams employing Finite Element Models (FEMs) to a critical Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 0.3 g. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, along with the full dynamic wave equations, are undertaken in the study to model the earthquake-induced cascade dam failures. The results further elaborate on the significance of modeling cascade dam failures in terms of the consecutive arrival of floods and total flow compared to individual dam failures. Sensitivity analysis of dam breach parameters shows that the breach height is more significant than the breach width and breach slope. However, its significance decreases as the dam breach flood flow path increases in distance. The study further confirms the novel utilization of structural analysis to derive dam breach parameters for seismic-induced dam failures of concrete arch dams and rockfill dams, which will guide the optimization of disaster mitigation strategies and the operational resilience of the dams.

2 February 2026

Dam breach parameters: average breach width (Bave), breach slope (as a ratio H:1V), and breach height (Hb) depicted from the dam breach test of the Nanjing Hydraulic Institute conducted by Zhang, et al. [20].

Annex A of EN 1992-1-1:2023—recently revised and amended in the context of the Second Generation of Eurocodes—introduces a method to adjust partial safety factors for the resistance side alongside a set of factors for different conditions and design situations, both for new and existing structures. The method proposed in Annex A is complemented by a set of stochastic models for relevant basic variables and forms a rather simple and objective format to adjust the partial safety factors from the default values offered in EN 1990:2023. Yet, over the last few years, advanced reliability-based methods aligned with modern computational tools have proved to enable rather robust and efficient structural reliability assessments. A thorough comparative analysis is imperative to understand how distinct reliability-based methods can be applied to adjust partial safety factors in the design of new structural components composed of steel-reinforced concrete. This analysis sheds light on the use of different methods to derive partial safety factors for the resolution of common engineering problems and offers inferences regarding possible implications in terms of safety and economic efficiency of design solutions.

27 January 2026

Side view of the limit state function 
  
    g
    (
    r
    ,
    e
    )
  
 = 
  
    r
    3
  
 − 
  e
 − 2 (see assumptions for the basic variables in Table 4) and Taylor approximations according to MVFOSM at the mean value and A-FORM at the design-point.

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are essential for electric vehicles, consumer electronics, and grid storage, but their rapidly increasing demand is paralleled by growing waste volumes. Current disposal methods remain costly, complex, energy-intensive, and environmentally unsustainable. This pilot study investigates a scalable, low-impact disposal method by incorporating LIB waste into concrete, evaluating both the structural and environmental effects of LIB waste on concrete performance. Several cement–mortar cube specimens were cast and tested under compression using the cement–mortar mix with varying battery waste components, such as black mass and varied metals. All mortar mixes maintained an identical water-to-cement ratio. The compressive strength of the cubes was measured at 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after casting and compared. The mix containing black mass exhibited a 35% reduction in compressive strength on day 28, whereas the mix containing varied metals showed a 55% reduction relative to the control mix without LIB waste. A case study was conducted to evaluate the combined structural and environmental performance of a concrete specimen incorporating LIB waste by estimating the embodied carbon (EC) for each mix and comparing the strength-to-net EC ratio. Selective incorporation of LIB waste into concrete provides a practical, low-carbon upcycling pathway, reducing both embodied carbon and landfill burden while enabling greener, non-structural construction materials. This sustainable approach simultaneously mitigates battery waste and lowers cement-related CO2 emissions, delivering usable concrete for non-structural and low-strength structural applications.

25 January 2026

Components of the battery waste material.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
CivilEng - ISSN 2673-4109