Topic Editors

Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwest University Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter Pavilion LC 178, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Dr. Minsong Cao
Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Its Role in Radiation Therapy

Abstract submission deadline
closed (31 August 2023)
Manuscript submission deadline
31 October 2025
Viewed by
1273

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

This is the second edition of a previous edition on “Advances of MRI in Radiation Oncology”. Radiation oncology treatment planning requires CT data for dose calculation; however, CT lacks soft-tissue visualization and characterization. MR images are best suited for soft tissues, especially liver, pancreas, kidney, prostate, and brain tissues. MR images have been augmented using image fusion, but their accuracy can be questionable. Additionally, MR images do not provide the electron density information needed for dose calculation. Moving structures pose additional challenges in radiation oncology. The active trend in radiation oncology is to use MR images with the help of synthetic CT for image-guided radiation therapy. Integrated MR imaging and linear accelerator system (MRL), which provides the optimum treatment for soft tissue and moving structures, is a new frontier in radiation oncology. The focus of this Special Issue is to review current MR imaging options, as well as imaging-assisted therapies and adaptive therapies, in radiation oncology. This issue will cover MR imaging parameters/sequences in low and high magnetic fields, MR-linacs, synthetic CT, dose calculation, and motion management as well as every aspect of MR use in radiation oncology.

Prof. Dr. Indra J. Das
Dr. Minsong Cao
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • MR imaging
  • MR sequence
  • low and high magnetic-field
  • MR-linac
  • adaptive therapy
  • motion management
  • synthetic CT

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Biomedicines
biomedicines
3.9 5.2 2013 14.6 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Cancers
cancers
4.5 8.0 2009 17.4 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Current Oncology
curroncol
2.8 3.3 1994 19.8 Days CHF 2200 Submit
Diagnostics
diagnostics
3.0 4.7 2011 20.3 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Journal of Clinical Medicine
jcm
3.0 5.7 2012 16 Days CHF 2600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1984 KiB  
Systematic Review
Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Orbital and Intracranial Invasion of Sinonasal Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Umida Abdullaeva, Bernd Pape and Jussi Hirvonen
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7556; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247556 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 743
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In this study, we review the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting orbital and intracranial invasion of sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) using histopathological and surgical evidence as the reference standard. Methods: A systematic search of studies in English [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: In this study, we review the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting orbital and intracranial invasion of sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) using histopathological and surgical evidence as the reference standard. Methods: A systematic search of studies in English was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase, limited to articles published since 1990. We included studies using preoperative MRI to detect the intracranial and orbital invasion of SNMs, with histological or surgical confirmation as the reference standard, and reported patient numbers in each class as required to assess diagnostic accuracy. The outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Heterogeneity was assessed with the Higgins inconsistency test (I2). Results: Seven original articles with 546 subjects were included in the review, with six included in the meta-analysis. The pooled overall accuracy for orbital invasion was higher at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75–0.94) than that for intracranial invasion at 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.83). The meta-analytic estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were as follows for intracranial/orbital invasion: sensitivity 0.77 (0.69–0.83)/0.71 (0.40–0.90); specificity 0.79 (0.74–0.83)/0.91 (0.78–0.97); PPV 0.76 (0.64–0.85)/0.78 (0.61–0.88); and NPV 0.82 (0.72–0.89)/0.90 (0.63–0.98). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the Higgins inconsistency test (I2) for orbital invasion (84%, 83%, and 93% for sensitivity, specificity, and NPV, respectively). Conclusions: MRI yielded moderate-to-high diagnostic accuracy for intracranial and orbital invasion, despite some limitations leading to false diagnoses. Loss of the hypointense zone on postcontrast MRI was found to predict dural invasion. Infiltration of the extraconal fat beyond the periorbita was found to be an MRI feature of orbital invasion. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop