- Article
Rainfall–Surface Runoff Estimation Using SCS-CN Model and Geospatial Techniques: A Case Study of the Shatt Al-Arab Region, Iraq–Iran
- Hadi Allafta,
- Christian Opp and
- Buraq Al-Baldawi
Accurate quantification of surface runoff is required for the appropriate design of storage structures, irrigation patterns, waterways, erosion control structures, water harvesting projects, and groundwater development schemes. However, the paucity of runoff data in Iraq and Iran is a serious obstacle. The soil conservation service–curve number (SCS–CN) method is applied in conjunction with remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) to predict the surface runoff in the Shatt Al-Arab Region. In the present study, the Shatt Al-Arab Region is defined as the drainage areas and lateral sub-basins that contribute direct surface runoff to the main channel between Qurna city and the Arabian Gulf. Rainfall, land use/land cover (LULC), hydrologic soil group (HSG), and slope maps are developed in a GIS platform and processed to produce surface runoff for 35 years (1979–2013). The surface runoff ranges between 163 mm (2008) and 300 mm (1982) with an average of 233 mm yr−1. The average annual surface runoff in the study area is 33.657 km3. A scatter plot constructed to visualize the connection between annual rainfall and annual runoff reveals a significant positive relation (coefficient of determination (r2) = 0.67, probability value (p) < 0.05). The runoff potential is low in the southern parts of the study area and gradually rises towards the northern parts. Cross-validation of the modeled annual runoff with the annual runoff data shows reasonably close matches (r2 = 0.73, p < 0.001) demonstrating the procedure’s suitability.
19 February 2026




![Geological map of the northern Seulawah Agam area as well as geoelectrical and magnetotelluric observation sites. The blue rectangle marks the study area with cross sections A–A′ and B–B′. The black dashed line indicates the Seulimeum fault, a northwest–southeast dextral strike-slip fault, while thin black lines represent local faults. Geological symbols: [1] Ie Seum geothermal manifestation, [2] Ie Jue fumarole, [3] Kawah van Heutsz fumarole. The blue dashed line represents the boundary of the modeling area while the red lines represent the study area boundary, as shown in the upper-right and lower-left inset map.](https://mdpi-res.com/cdn-cgi/image/w=281,h=192/https://mdpi-res.com/earth/earth-07-00030/article_deploy/html/images/earth-07-00030-g001-550.jpg)

