Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Cells Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Early Career Editorial Board
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal BrowserNeed Help?
Announcements
1 April 2026
Cells | Explore Papers and Special Issues on Autophagy
We are delighted to share a collection of papers on autophagy published in our journal Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409). These articles cover a range of critical topics, including the development, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and other disorders.
In addition, we would like to highlight several Special Issues related to this topic that are currently open for submission.
1. “Effect of the Ketone Body, D-β-Hydroxybutyrate, on Sirtuin2-Mediated Regulation of Mitochondrial Quality Control and the Autophagy–Lysosomal Pathway”
by Juan Carlos Gómora-García, Teresa Montiel, Melanie Hüttenrauch, Ashley Salcido-Gómez, Lizbeth García-Velázquez, Yazmin Ramiro-Cortés, Juan Carlos Gomora, Susana Castro-Obregón and Lourdes Massieu
Cells 2023, 12(3), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030486
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/3/486
2. “The Role of Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 Complex in “Switching” between Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Glioma Cells upon LY294002 and Sorafenib Treatment”
by Adrian Zając, Aleksandra Maciejczyk, Joanna Sumorek-Wiadro, Kamil Filipek, Kamil Deryło, Ewa Langner, Jarosław Pawelec, Magdalena Wasiak, Mateusz Ścibiorski, Wojciech Rzeski et al
Cells 2023, 12(23), 2670; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12232670
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/23/2670
3. “Inhibition of Autophagy by Berbamine Hydrochloride Mitigates Tumor Immune Escape by Elevating MHC-I in Melanoma Cells”
by Jinhuan Xian, Leilei Gao, Zhenyang Ren, Yanjun Jiang, Junjun Pan, Zheng Ying, Zhenyuan Guo, Qingsong Du, Xu Zhao, He Jin et al.
Cells 2024, 13(18), 1537; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13181537
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/18/1537
4. “Discovery of Evolutionary Loss of the Ubiquitin-like Autophagy-Related ATG12 System in a Lineage of Apicomplexa”
by Xiaoxia X. Lin, Yun D. Bai, Sichang T. Wang, Akira Nozawa, Tatsuya Sawasaki, Tatsunori Masatani, Kenji Hikosaka, Masahito Asada and Hirokazu Sakamoto
Cells 2025, 14(2), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020121
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/2/121
5. “Dopamine Receptor D3 Induces Transient, mTORC1-Dependent Autophagy That Becomes Persistent, AMPK-Mediated, and Neuroprotective in Experimental Models of Huntington’s Disease”
by Diego Luis-Ravelo, Felipe Fumagallo-Reading, Alejandro Febles-Casquero, Jonathan Lopez-Fernandez, Daniel J. Marcellino and Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez
Cells 2025, 14(9), 652; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090652
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/9/652
6. “Autophagy and Breast Cancer: Connected in Growth, Progression, and Therapy”
by Qitong Wu, and Dipali Sharma.
Cells 2023, 12(8), 1156. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12081156
Available Online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/8/1156
7. “Autophagosome Biogenesis”
by Yan Zhen and Harald Stenmark
Cells 2023, 12(4), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040668
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/4/668
8. “Neuronal Autophagy: Regulations and Implications in Health and Disease”
by Caroline Liénard, Alexandre Pintart and Pascale Bomont
Cells 2024, 13(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13010103
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/1/103
9. “Autophagy in Crohn’s Disease: Converging on Dysfunctional Innate Immunity”
by Kibrom M. Alula and Arianne L. Theiss
Cells 2023, 12(13), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131779
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/13/1779
10. “Role of Macroautophagy in Mammalian Male Reproductive Physiology”
by Doaa Kirat, Ahmed Mohamed Alahwany, Ahmed Hamed Arisha, Adel Abdelkhalek and Taku Miyasho
Cells 2023, 12(9), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12091322
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/12/9/1322
11. “Molecular Mechanisms of Autophagy Decline during Aging”
by Shaun H. Y. Lim, Malene Hansen and Caroline Kumsta
Cells 2024, 13(16), 1364; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13161364
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/16/1364
12. “Autophagy in Tissue Repair and Regeneration”
by Daniel Moreno-Blas, Teresa Adell and Cristina González-Estévez
Cells 2025, 14(4), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14040282
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/4/282
13. “Mechanistic Insights into Autophagy-Dependent Cell Death (ADCD): A Novel Avenue for Cancer Therapy”
by Md Ataur Rahman, Maroua Jalouli, Mohammed Al-Zharani, Ehsanul Hoque Apu and Abdel Halim Harrath
Cells 2025, 14(14), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14141072
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/14/1072
14. “Autophagy and Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms and Impact Beyond the Brain”
by Zaw Myo Hein, Thirupathirao Vishnumukkala, Barani Karikalan, Aisyah Alkatiri, Farida Hussan, Saravanan Jagadeesan, Mohd Amir Kamaruzzaman, Muhammad Danial Che Ramli, Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir and Prarthana Kalerammana Gopalakrishna
Cells 2025, 14(12), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14120911
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/12/911
15. “Iron Metabolism and Muscle Aging: Where Ferritinophagy Meets Mitochondrial Quality Control”
by Rosa Di Lorenzo, Emanuele Marzetti, Helio José Coelho-Junior, Riccardo Calvani, Vito Pesce, Francesco Landi, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh and Anna Picca
Cells 2025, 14(9), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090672
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/9/672
Relevant Special Issues:
“Autophagy in Neurological Disorders”
Guest Editors: Dr. Natalia Jimenez-Moreno and Prof. Dr. Ciro Isidoro
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2026

“Molecular Mechanisms of Autophagy, Apoptosis and Senescence and Therapeutic Advances in Cancer Progression”
Guest Editors: Dr. Katerina Gioti and Prof. Dr. Apostolos Beloukas
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2026

“Autophagy in Stress Responses: From Molecular Mechanisms to Disease Relevance”
Guest Editors: Dr. Katrina F. Cooper and Dr. Kleiton Silva
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 May 2026

31 March 2026
MDPI INSIGHTS: The CEO’s Letter #33 - 2025 Annual Report, Preprints.org, IWD, Recapping Viruses 2026 & Romania Salon
Welcome to the MDPI Insights: The CEO's Letter.
In these monthly letters, I will showcase two key aspects of our work at MDPI: our commitment to empowering researchers and our determination to facilitating open scientific exchange.
Opening Thoughts

Scaling Open Access with Integrity: MDPI Annual Report 2025
I am pleased to share the release of MDPI’s 2025 Annual Report, reflecting our continued progress as one of the world’s leading open access publishers. The report highlights not only our growth, but also the continued evolution of our publishing model and our commitment to quality, transparency, and collaboration.
You can explore the full report here: https://mdpi-res.com/data/mdpi_annual_report_2025_0401.pdf?1775045421
Or visit the interactive page: https://www.mdpi.com/annual-report-2025/
A Year of Growth and Responsibility
2025 was a year of significant growth for MDPI. We received over 669,000 manuscript submissions, the highest in our history, while maintaining a rejection rate above 60%, reinforcing our commitment to both scale and quality.
We published 261,576 peer-reviewed open access articles across a portfolio of 500 journals, supported by a global community of more than 68,000 Editorial Board Members and 209,000 reviewers.
Scaling with Integrity
Growth alone is not the objective; how we grow matters.
Our 2025 Annual Report, Scaling Open Access with Integrity, reflects our continued focus on building the systems and processes that support reliable and trustworthy publishing. As submission volumes increase globally, so too does the importance of robust editorial workflows, research integrity frameworks, and the infrastructure required to support them.
In 2025, we continued to invest in:
- Research integrity and quality assurance processes
- Editorial support and reviewer engagement
- Transparency across the publishing workflow
These efforts ensure that scale does not come at the expense of rigor, but rather reinforces it.
Validation Through Indexing and Visibility
As MDPI continues to grow, validation of quality remains essential.
In 2025, the number of MDPI journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection increased from 298 to 329, while Scopus coverage reached 355 journals, including 45 new acceptances. Coverage in major biomedical databases (PMC/Medline/PubMed) expanded to 95 journals, and indexing in Ei Compendex increased significantly.
These milestones reflect the strength of our editorial processes and the trust placed in our journals by independent indexing bodies.
Importantly:
- 96% of all MDPI articles are indexed in Web of Science databases
- More than 1.75 million articles are indexed, with an average of 13 citations per article
Recognition through Journal Citation Reports also continues to grow:
- 298 journals received Impact Factors
- 65% ranked in the top half of their categories
- 61 journals achieved top-quartile positions
These developments demonstrate that growth and quality are advancing together, supported by strong editorial oversight and consistent performance across our journal portfolio.
Strengthening Partnerships and Community
Open access is a collaborative endeavor.
In 2025, we expanded our institutional partnerships to more than 1,000 IOAP agreements, helping simplify publishing for researchers and institutions worldwide.
We also hosted 60 in-person conferences and virtual events, bringing together more than 28,000 participants to exchange ideas, share research, and strengthen connections across the global scientific community.
At the heart of everything we do is this community of authors, editors, reviewers, and partners who make open science possible.
Looking Ahead
Open access continues to move toward becoming the standard model for sharing research globally. With that growth comes increased responsibility.
Our focus moving forward is to continue building a publishing ecosystem that is:
- Collaborative, to serve the research community
- Rigorous, to ensure quality
- Transparent, to support trust
- Scalable, to meet global demand
We believe that open access, when combined with strong editorial standards and integrity, is the most effective way to accelerate scientific progress.
Thank you to all the scholarly community who collaborated with us and our MDPI staff for your continued dedication and contributions in making 2025 a successful year.
Impactful Research

Celebrating Ten Years of Preprints.org: Accelerating Open Research
In 2026, MDPI’s preprints server Preprints.org marked its 10th anniversary as a platform dedicated to accelerating the dissemination of research. Since its launch, Preprints.org has grown into a global platform that hosts more than 120,000 preprints contributed by hundreds of thousands of researchers worldwide, generating tens of millions of views and downloads and demonstrating the value of sharing research openly and rapidly.
At MDPI, we are proud to celebrate ten years of Preprints.org supporting the mission of open science. Over the past decade, we have seen how early sharing of research can accelerate collaboration and help ideas move more quickly from discovery to impact.
The Evolution of Preprints
While Preprints.org launched in 2016, the idea behind it has deeper roots. The concept of rapid research dissemination has existed for decades, with early preprint servers showing how open sharing can accelerate scientific progress.
Over the past decade, preprints have become an increasingly important part of scholarly communication. Researchers across disciplines are looking at faster ways to share their discoveries, exchange ideas, and receive feedback from the global scientific community.
Preprints in a Growing Research Ecosystem
The global preprint landscape has expanded significantly over the past decade, with multiple platforms serving different research communities. The figure below (sourced from James Butcher newsletter), based on data from Dimensions (Digital Science), shows the growth of preprint outputs across several major platforms over time.

Among these platforms, arXiv (the pioneering preprint server) has experienced great growth in recent years. At the same time, other platforms have continued to expand their reach across disciplines, capturing increasing global interest in early research sharing.
Preprints.org contributes to this evolving ecosystem by providing a multidisciplinary platform that works in synergy with academic journals, helping researchers bridge the gap between rapid dissemination and the formal publication process.
Celebrating the First Decade
To commemorate this milestone, Preprints.org launched a 10th Anniversary celebration hub highlighting the impact of preprints and the researchers who contribute to them.

One of the central initiatives is the Popular Preprints of the Decade Award, recognizing influential preprints published between 2016 and 2026 across multiple research fields. Through community voting, the award will recognize research that has generated high engagement and visibility within the global research community.
Looking Ahead: The Next Decade of Preprints
As research communication continues to evolve, preprints will continue to play an important role in enabling faster collaboration, improving transparency, and expanding access to knowledge. The next decade may bring further integration between preprint platforms and journals, new tools for discovery and evaluation, and greater global participation in open science.
At MDPI, we remain committed to supporting researchers through platforms that encourage the open exchange of ideas. The success of Preprints.org over the past ten years reflects the engagement and trust of the global research community – authors, readers, reviewers, and collaborators who believe in the value of sharing knowledge openly.
Congratulations to everyone involved in the development and growth of Preprints.org over the past decade!
Inside MDPI

Beyond International Women’s Day: Supporting Women in Research
International Women’s Day (IWD) offers an opportunity to recognize the achievements of women around the world and reflect on how we can continue building a more inclusive future. In research and academia, this conversation carries particular importance, as scientific progress depends on diverse perspectives, and supporting women in science is essential to strengthening the global research ecosystem.
For MDPI, IWD is an opportunity to celebrate the achievements of women in research and highlight the initiatives, conversations, and collaborations that help support researchers across disciplines and career stages.
Highlighting Women in Science Across MDPI
This year, MDPI marked International Women’s Day with a global campaign highlighting research, awards, and perspectives that support women in science. Throughout the week, our teams shared content across MDPI’s social media channels sharing the work of women researchers and encouraging engagement across the academic community.

As part of this initiative, MDPI published several blog articles exploring important themes related to gender equity in research. One article, Give Support, Gain Progress: Retaining Women in Science, discusses the importance of mentorship, institutional support, and inclusive research environments in helping women build sustainable scientific careers.
Another featured article, Bridging the Gap in Women’s Health Research, highlights the ongoing need to address disparities in health research and ensure that women’s health receives the scientific attention and investment it deserves.
These topics capture the notion that supporting women in science benefits not only individual researchers but the entire scientific community. When researchers from diverse backgrounds can contribute their perspectives and ideas, the scope and impact of scientific discovery expand.
Creating Spaces for Dialogue
Beyond online content, MDPI is also supporting conversations about women in research through community engagement.

On 10 March, MDPI UK hosted the “Women in Research” event, bringing together researchers and professionals to share experiences and discuss the opportunities and challenges women face throughout their scientific careers. Events like these are an opportunity for open dialogue, mentorship, and networking to create more inclusive research communities.
Looking Beyond a Single Day
While IWD is an important moment of recognition, progress requires ongoing effort.
Supporting women in research involves many forms of engagement: from mentorship and collaboration to creating inclusive environments in which diverse voices are heard and valued. Publishers, institutions, and researchers all play a role in building this ecosystem.
At MDPI, we remain committed to supporting the global research community and to promoting open access publishing as a foundation for accessible and inclusive knowledge-sharing.
As we reflect on IWD this year, we recognize the many women who contribute to research as authors, reviewers, editors, mentors, and educators; we also recognize the impact they continue to have on the advancement of science. The influence of women in research extends far beyond a single day of recognition, reminding us that supporting them is a commitment that continues throughout the year.
Coming Together for Science

Highlights from Viruses 2026 – New Horizons in Virology (11–13 March)
Through 11–13 March, we successfully delivered the Viruses 2026 – New Horizons in Virology MDPI conference in Barcelona, bringing together an international community of researchers, editors, and partners dedicated to advancing the field of virology.
Conference Highlights
Viruses 2026 in numbers:
- 198 total registrations, with 171 attendees on site
- 233 submissions, with 122 accepted
- 42 short talks, 9 flash talks, and 80 posters
- 13 invited speakers and 1 keynote speaker

The strong level of participation and quality of submissions once again demonstrate the relevance of the Viruses community.
A standout moment was the keynote lecture by Dr. Ho, which also attracted an NBC documentary film crew, highlighting the broader impact of the research being presented.
Scientific Programme
The conference programme covered areas across modern virology, including viral replication, pathogenesis, immunology, and public health. Sessions explored topics on antiviral therapeutics and vaccines, innate immunity, virus–host interactions, and the structure and mechanisms of virus replication.
Together, these discussions highlighted both the fundamental biology of viruses and the translational challenges of addressing emerging infectious diseases, reflecting the breadth and continued importance of virology research in a global context. The programme also included a sponsored workshop on research data management in virology, further emphasizing the importance of data practices in advancing the field.
Thank You
Feedback from participants has been very positive, and I would like to thank the Conference team for the organization and delivery of this year’s event.

Thank you to our Viruses journal team and all colleagues involved behind the scenes in supporting the delivery of the event. As noted by Dr. Eric Freed (EiC of Viruses), the success of this edition gives us strong momentum as we look ahead to the next conference in 2028, with opportunities to further expand participation and engagement.
Closing Thoughts

Recap from MDPI Romania Salon in Cluj-Napoca (24 March)
On 24 March, we had the opportunity to meet with members of the Romanian research community in Cluj-Napoca at our MDPI Romania Salon. The event was a space for presentations, open discussion, and the exchange of perspectives on publishing and the research landscape in Romania.

We welcomed 39 participants, including 27 researchers from institutions across Romania, representing cities such as Cluj-Napoca, Timișoara, and Reșița. Among them were Editorial Board Members, Associate Editors, and Guest Editors, all of whom play an important role in collaborating with MDPI and shaping the quality and direction of academic publishing.
|
|
|
|
A Shared Commitment to Research Excellence
These events reflect MDPI’s commitment to connecting with and supporting researchers by means of transparency, dialogue, and collaboration. During the day, MDPI colleagues shared a series of presentations covering different parts of our publishing ecosystem:
- MDPI’s presence in Romania – Anamaria Vartolomei (Journal Relationship Specialist (JRS), Section Managing Editor (ME))
- MDPI’s performance, growth, and impact in Romania – Stefan Tochev (CEO)
- Academic services, initiatives, and projects supporting researchers – Ioana Preda (JRS, Section ME)
- Best practices and standards in publication ethics – Lavinia Rogojina (Research Integrity Manager)
- Panel session on ethics, AI, and peer review – Lavinia Rogojina, Ioana Preda, Doris Larisa Albu (JRS, Section ME), Cristina Georgiana Spelmezan (JRS, Section ME)
- Closing remarks – Lavinia Dumitrela Cozma (Operations Manager, Section ME)

Feedback from participants was very positive, particularly regarding the quality of discussions, the relevance of the topics, and the opportunity to engage directly with MDPI colleagues. What stood out most was the openness of the discussion. These events are important not only for the purposes of presenting what we do, but also as an opportunity to listen, understand concerns, and continue to build alignment with the research community.
Romania and the Growth of Open Access Publishing
The Romanian research landscape continues to show growth in open access (OA) publishing.
In 2025:
- 72% of all publications in Romania were published as OA
- Of these, 74% were Gold Open Access
Over the past five years, Romania has produced more than 109,000 publications, with approximately 71% available openly, highlighting a sustained shift toward accessibility and knowledge-sharing.
Within this landscape, MDPI continues to play a significant role:

- MDPI is the leading OA publisher in Romania, contributing 42% of all OA publications in 2025
- More than 37,000 articles have been published with MDPI by Romanian institutions since 1996
- This figure includes over 7,500 publications in 2025 alone
- More than 400 Editorial Board Members from Romania collaborate with MDPI across disciplines
These trends show the growth of OA and the strength of collaboration between MDPI and the Romanian research community.
Looking Ahead
As academic publishing continues to evolve, maintaining open and transparent communication with researchers is essential. Events such as our Salons and Summits provide great opportunities to exchange perspectives and to build trust and collaboration.
Thank you to all participants who joined us in Cluj, and to our teams in Romania for delivering a successful event. A special thank-you to Alina-Florina Agafitei (Marketing Specialist) for her care and attention to detail in delivering the Salon.
Chief Executive Officer
MDPI AG
25 March 2026
Acknowledging the Contributions of Our Reviewers in 2025
As a pioneer in open access publishing, MDPI maintains rigorous publication standards. This mission relies on the dedication and expertise of our reviewers, who invest their time and knowledge to ensure the quality and integrity of the research we publish.
In 2025, over 209,000 reviewers contributed to the peer-review process at MDPI, providing more than 1.3 million review reports for our journals. To express our gratitude, MDPI’s Reviewer Recognition Program highlights reviewers across over 400 journals, featuring those who have assessed at least one manuscript and agreed to be acknowledged.
In addition, MDPI has identified its Top 1000 Reviewers of 2024 to recognize those whose expertise, dedication, and thoughtful evaluations were particularly outstanding.
Many journals have also established Outstanding Reviewer Awards to honor our reviewers’ commitment to publication excellence. Together with the Exceptional Reviewer List, we showcase the importance of reviewers’ work and their time and dedication.
These initiatives serve to express our deepest appreciation and gratitude towards the whole reviewer community. In recognition of their contributions, we also welcome new researchers to join this community. If you would like to contribute to open access publishing, learn more about the reviewers’ benefits and sign up to join us.
24 March 2026
Cells | Top 15 Viewed Articles in 2025
Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on cell biology, molecular biology, and biophysics, published semimonthly online by MDPI.
All the articles published in our journal are in an open access format, granting our readers free and unlimited access to the full text. We welcome you to read the most viewed articles published in 2025, listed below.
- “Impact of a High-Fat Diet on the Gut Microbiome: A Comprehensive Study of Microbial and Metabolite Shifts During Obesity”
by Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Ahmed Rakib, Mousumi Mandal and Udai P. Singh
Cells 2025, 14(6), 463; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14060463
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/6/463 - “The Combination of Neurotropic Vitamins B1, B6, and B12 Enhances Neural Cell Maturation and Connectivity Superior to Single B Vitamins”
by Oscar Cuyubamba, Camila Pereira Braga, Dionne Swift, John T. Stickney and Christian Viel
Cells 2025, 14(7), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14070477
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/7/477 - “Mebendazole Exerts Anticancer Activity in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines via Novel Girdin-Mediated AKT/IKKα/β/NF-κB Signaling Axis”
by Rahul Gupta, Dipanjan Roy, Arijit Ghosh, Yasmin Begum, Dipanjan Ghosh and Snehasikta Swarnakar
Cells 2025, 14(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020113
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/2/113 - “Inhibition of the Prostaglandin-degrading Enzyme 15-PGDH Ameliorates Mash-associated Apoptosis and Fibrosis in Mice”
by Utibe-Abasi S. Udoh, Mathew Steven Schade, Jacqueline A. Sanabria, Pradeep Kumar Rajan, Rodrigo Aguilar, Micheal Andryka, Alexei Gorka, Sandrine V. Pierre and Juan Sanabria
Cells 2025, 14(13), 987; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14130987
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/13/987 - “Taurine Prevents Impairments in Skin Barrier Function and Dermal Collagen Synthesis Triggered by Sleep Deprivation-Induced Estrogen Circadian Rhythm Disruption”
by Qi Shao, Zhaoyang Wang, Yifang Li, Xun Tang, Ziyi Li, Huan Xia, Qihong Wu, Ruxue Chang, Chunna Wu, Tao Meng et al.
Cells 2025, 14(10), 727; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100727
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/10/727 - “One Month of Brief Weekly Magnetic Field Therapy Enhances the Anticancer Potential of Female Human Sera: Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study”
by Jan Nikolas Iversen, Yee Kit Tai, Jasmine Lye Yee Yap, Rafhanah Banu Binte Abdul Razar, Viresh Krishnan Sukumar, Kwan Yu Wu, Melissa Gaik-Ming Ooi, Marek Kukumberg, Sabrina Adam, Abdul Jalil Rufaihah et al.
Cells 2025, 14(5), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14050331
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/5/331 - “Male-Dominant Spinal Microglia Contribute to Neuropathic Pain by Producing CC-Chemokine Ligand 4 Following Peripheral Nerve Injury”
by Fumihiro Saika, Tetsuya Sato, Takeru Nakabayashi, Yohji Fukazawa, Shinjiro Hino, Kentaro Suzuki and Norikazu Kiguchi
Cells 2025, 14(7), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14070484
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/7/484 - “810-nm Photobiomodulation Evokes Glutamate Release in Normal and Rotenone-Dysfunctional Cortical Nerve Terminals by Modulating Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism”
by Silvia Ravera, Elisa Farsetti, Guido Maura, Manuela Marcoli, Matteo Bozzo, Chiara Cervetto and Andrea Amaroli
Cells 2025, 14(2), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020067
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/2/67 - “Genetic and Molecular Characterization of H9c2 Rat Myoblast Cell Line”
by Thomas Liehr, Stefanie Kankel, Katharina S. Hardt, Eva M. Buhl, Heidi Noels, Diandra T. Keller, Sarah K. Schröder-Lange and Ralf Weiskirchen
Cells 2025, 14(7), 502; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14070502
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/7/502 - “Epimedium-Derived Exosome-Loaded GelMA Hydrogel Enhances MC3T3-E1 Osteogenesis via PI3K/Akt Pathway”
by Weijian Hu, Xin Xie and Jiabin Xu
Cells 2025, 14(15), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14151214
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/15/1214 - “Effects of Microplastic Accumulation on Neuronal Death After Global Cerebral Ischemia”
by Dong Yeon Kim, Min Kyu Park, Hyun Wook Yang, Seo Young Woo, Hyun Ho Jung, Dae-Soon Son, Bo Young Choi and Sang Won Suh
Cells 2025, 14(4), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14040241
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/4/241 - “In Vitro Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Patients with Crohn’s Disease”
by Bruno Lima Rodrigues, Lívia Bitencourt Pascoal, Lívia Moreira Genaro, Leonardo Saint Clair Assad Warrak, Beatriz Alves Guerra Rodrigues, Andressa Coope, Michel Gardere Camargo, Priscilla de Sene Portel Oliveira, Maria de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono, Lício Augusto Velloso et al.
Cells 2025, 14(4), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14040270
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/4/270 - “Traumatic Brain Injury Promotes Neurogenesis and Oligodendrogenesis in Subcortical Brain Regions of Mice”
by Olga Astakhova, Anna Ivanova, Ilia Komoltsev, Natalia Gulyaeva, Grigori Enikolopov and Alexander Lazutkin
Cells 2025, 14(2), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020092
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/2/92 - “Advanced Paternal Age and Sperm Proteome Dynamics: A Possible Explanation for Age-Associated Male Fertility Decline”
by Joana Santiago, Joana V. Silva, Manuel A. S. Santos and Margarida Fardilha
Cells 2025, 14(11), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110813
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/11/813 - “Development of SNAP-Tag Based Nanobodies as Secondary Antibody Mimics for Indirect Immunofluorescence Assays”
by Wenjie Sheng, Chaoyu Zhang, T. M. Mohiuddin, Marwah Al-Rawe, Roland Schmitz, Marcus Niebert, Lutz Konrad, Steffen Wagner, Felix Zeppernick, Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein et al.
Cells 2025, 14(10), 691; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100691
Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/10/691
16 March 2026
Cells | Selected Papers on Checkpoint Inhibition Published in 2024–2025
We are pleased to highlight eight interesting papers on immune checkpoint inhibitors published in Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409) in 2024 and 2025. These papers provide important insights into immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering immunomodulation, signaling pathways, immunotherapy, and both classical and novel targets. We welcome you to explore these contributions, which reflect recent advances and emerging directions in checkpoint inhibition.
1. “Cancer Vulnerabilities Through Targeting the ATR/Chk1 and ATM/Chk2 Axes in the Context of DNA Damage”
by Anell Fernandez, Maider Artola, Sergio Leon, Nerea Otegui, Aroa Jimeno, Diego Serrano and Alfonso Calvo
Cells 2025, 14(10), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100748
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/10/748
2. “B7H3 in Gastrointestinal Tumors: Role in Immune Modulation and Cancer Progression: A Review of the Literature”
by Sylwia Mielcarska, Anna Kot, Agnieszka Kula, Miriam Dawidowicz, Piotr Sobków, Daria Kłaczka, Dariusz Waniczek and Elżbieta Świętochowska
Cells 2025, 14(7), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14070530
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/7/530
3. “Exploiting Cancer Dormancy Signaling Mechanisms in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Through Spheroid and Organoid Analysis”
by Emily J. Tomas, Yudith Ramos Valdes, Jennifer Davis, Bart Kolendowski, Adrian Buensuceso, Gabriel E. DiMattia and Trevor G. Shepherd
Cells 2025, 14(2), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020133
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/2/133
4. “B-Cell Lymphomas Secrete Novel Inhibitory Molecules That Disrupt HLA Class II-Mediated CD4+ T-Cell Recognition”
by Jason M. God, Shereen Amria, Christine A. Cameron, Lixia Zhang, Jennifer R. Bethard and Azizul Haque
Cells 2025, 14(15), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14151220
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/15/1220
5. “Transcriptomic Analyses of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Spheroids Reveal Distinct Proliferative Phenotypes and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities”
by Bart Kolendowski, Sylvia Cheng, Yudith Ramos Valdes, Trevor G. Shepherd and Gabriel E. DiMattia
Cells 2025, 14(11), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110785
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/11/785
6. “Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase in Mitochondrial Ferroptosis and Cancer Therapy”
by Jaewang Lee and Jong-Lyel Roh
Cells 2025, 14(23), 1889; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231889
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/23/1889
7. “Chronic High-Salt Diet Activates Tumor-Initiating Stem Cells Leading to Breast Cancer Proliferation”
by Lisa Tucker, Umer Ali, Roy Zent, Deborah A. Lannigan, Jeffrey C. Rathmell and Venkataswarup Tiriveedhi
Cells 2024, 13(11), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13110912
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/11/912
by Muna Aljieli, Clément Rivière, Louis Lantier, Nathalie Moiré, Zineb Lakhrif, Anne-France Boussemart, Thomas Cnudde, Laurie Lajoie, Nicolas Aubrey, Elhadi M. Ahmed et al.
Cells 2024, 13(11), 975; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13110975
Full text available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/11/975
12 March 2026
Interview with Dr. Wei-Wei Lim—Cells Exceptional Reviewer 2025
We are pleased to share an interview with Dr. Wei-Wei Lim, who has been recognized as a Cells Exceptional Reviewer 2025.
In this interview, Dr. Lim reflects on her experience collaborating with Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409) and MDPI, discusses the benefits of open access publishing, and shares her perspective on the peer review process. She also offers valuable insights into what reviewers look for in high-quality manuscripts and provides advice for early career researchers interested in becoming reviewers.
We warmly invite you to read the full interview and learn more about Dr. Lim’s perspectives on peer review and scientific publishing.
1. Can you briefly describe your academic background and research interests?
I have a PhD and consider myself a translational rather than a basic scientist. My main research focus is on cardiovascular diseases involving inflammation, cytokines, and cell biology. I also work on cardiac dysrhythmias, cardiomyopathies, and vascular biology, mostly by using preclinical cellular and animal models. I’m a current senior research fellow at the National Heart Centre Singapore and a research assistant professor at Duke-NUS Medical School.
2. In your opinion, what is the biggest advantage of open access publishing?
I think the biggest advantage of open access publishing is accessibility. It benefits both authors and readers by removing paywalls, making it easier to access research, data, and updates on current studies. It also speeds up the process from submission to publication, allowing others in the field to engage sooner and help accelerate scientific progress.
3. You first collaborated with our journal in 2022. How would you describe your experience with Cells and MDPI so far?
My first experience with the journal was in 2022, as a co-author. Overall, I’ve found the process across MDPI journals to be consistent; the peer review pathways are quite similar. One clear advantage is the much faster turnaround time compared to traditional journals.
4. What do you look for in a high-quality manuscript?
I pay close attention to figure quality, making sure units are correct and that the data aligns with established knowledge. I also look out for issues in data analysis or figure composition, like signs of improper copying and pasting. A strong abstract is also important: it should be concise and clearly summarize the research, as that’s often the section readers use to decide whether to read on. Most importantly, I assess whether the conclusions are actually supported by the data. If they’re not, that raises concerns. Overall, I believe the data and visuals should tell the story as clearly as possible.
5. How do you balance constructive criticism with encouragement in your reviews?
I try to remain unbiased in all my reviews. If I have concerns about the data, I support my feedback with references to relevant papers, so authors can see where I’m coming from. I always aim to be polite; criticism can be tough to receive, and my goal is to help improve the work, not just to point out flaws. I think that mindset is important for both reviewers and authors.
6. What do you think authors most commonly overlook during manuscript preparation?
One of the most common issues I see is authors not paying enough attention to their data, especially the underlying data. There’s a growing trend toward including more source material as supplementary files, which is good. But in early drafts, I often find incomplete data, such as mismatched sample sizes or error bars that don’t correspond with the graphs. These problems usually come from not thoroughly checking datasets before submission.
7. What advice would you give to early career researchers who are new to reviewing?
I strongly encourage early career researchers to get involved in peer review. It helps them understand what reviewers look for, which in turn improves their own writing and submissions. Because reviewing can be quite complex, I think mentorship from an experienced reviewer is really valuable. Jumping straight into reviewing after a PhD can be a big leap. But overall, I believe the peer review process is a great learning experience for those starting out.
8. How do you think peer review might evolve in the future, especially in open access publishing?
Looking ahead, I think peer review, particularly in the open access model, will involve more steps before acceptance. I also see artificial intelligence playing a larger role, especially in identifying AI-generated content like images and managing copyright. Transparency will likely be emphasized more, with raw data being made available through open repositories. In my field, I also expect to see more focus on including both sexes in animal models, to ensure the findings are applicable more broadly.
12 March 2026
Interview with Prof. Dr. Johannes Boltze—Cells Exceptional Reviewer 2025
We are pleased to share an interview with Prof. Dr. Johannes Boltze, who has been recognized as a Cells Exceptional Reviewer 2025.
In this interview, Prof. Boltze reflects on his experience collaborating with Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409) and MDPI, discusses the importance of transparency in scientific publishing, and shares his perspective on the peer review process. He also offers valuable insights into what makes a high-quality manuscript and provides advice for early-career researchers interested in becoming reviewers.
We warmly invite you to read the full interview and learn more about Prof. Boltze’s perspectives on peer review and scientific publishing.
1. Can you briefly describe your academic background and research interests?
I was originally trained as a physician, but I also hold a degree in neurobiology, along with doctoral degrees in both fields. My core research interests focus on cerebrovascular diseases, especially stroke and vascular dementia, with a particular emphasis on cerebral small vessel disease. I also have a background in the stem cell field.
2. In your opinion, what is the biggest advantage of open access publishing?
The greatest benefit of open access (OA) publishing is the unrestricted availability of published knowledge. While I recognize that it comes with considerable costs, I believe it's well worth it. Another major advantage is the transparency it offers.
3. You first collaborated with our journal in 2019. How would you describe your experience with Cells and MDPI so far?
My experience with Cells and MDPI has been very positive overall. The timelines can sometimes be a bit tight, but in most cases, it’s manageable. Communication has been efficient, and responses typically come within 48 hours. The peer review process is smooth and pleasant.
4. What do you look for in a high-quality manuscript?
For me, a strong manuscript includes both internal and external validity in original research, appropriate use of statistical methods, and models that closely reflect the condition being studied. I also look for detailed descriptions of experimental procedures to ensure reproducibility. Transparency is essential, particularly in data presentation. I prefer seeing individual data points rather than just bar charts. I also value when authors include raw data, such as full, uncropped Western blot images alongside the cropped ones. It’s an important step in confirming data integrity and ruling out any manipulation.
5. How do you balance constructive criticism with encouragement in your reviews?
I avoid rejecting a paper outright unless there's clear manipulation or exaggerated claims not supported by the data. I find that approach unhelpful. Instead, I aim to give thorough and constructive feedback, especially if the manuscript needs substantial improvement. That way, authors can genuinely enhance their work. I also try to be patient with language issues; poor language doesn't mean poor science, and language editing is available before publication. My reviews tend to be long and time-consuming, but I believe that detailed responses are essential, not just because I appreciate them as an author myself, but also because I see it as part of my duty as a reviewer.
6. What do you think authors most commonly overlook when preparing manuscripts?
There are a few recurring issues I’ve noticed. One is the misuse of statistical tests or error indicators, for instance, using the standard error of the mean instead of the standard deviation. Another is applying parametric tests without first checking for normal data distribution, which can increase the chance of false positives. These mistakes are so common that they’re often seen even in high-impact journals. Another common oversight is not including individual data points. While many minor errors can be caught and fixed during the review process, these particular issues often go unnoticed.
7. What advice would you give to early-career researchers new to peer reviewing?
I strongly encourage young researchers to participate in peer review. Once they start publishing their own work, they’ll understand the value of thoughtful feedback. It's important to approach each manuscript with a neutral and objective mindset, neither overly enthusiastic nor overly critical. Treating the review process as a learning opportunity is key, both for scientific insight and professional growth. Providing detailed feedback is crucial because it’s the only way authors can really benefit.
8. How do you think peer review might evolve in the future, especially in the context of open access publishing?
I think double-blind review processes should become more common in the future. Hiding authors’ identities from reviewers can help reduce bias and lead to a more objective evaluation. However, once a paper is accepted, revealing the reviewers’ identities could be a good step for added transparency. I believe this would encourage more constructive feedback. I'm also intrigued by the idea of post-publication review, possibly hosted online, where readers could leave comments and critiques after publication. That kind of model would motivate authors to uphold higher standards and could improve the overall quality of research, especially in cases where a paper may have initially undergone limited scrutiny.
9 March 2026
Cells | New Affiliation Agreement with the International Cell Death Society (ICDS)
We are pleased to announce that the International Cell Death Society (ICDS) and our journal Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409) have signed an affiliation agreement.
The International Cell Death Society (ICDS) promulgates research and clinical information on the broad topic of cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy, necrosis, necroptosis, and other variants. ICDS brings together researchers from varying backgrounds and countries to foster international cooperation and collaborations based on new and different ideas.
ICDS started as a club in 1995, based on the intellectual and personal compatibility of a group of researchers from very different backgrounds working in the New York metropolitan area.
The meetings that ICDS organises are their most important annual events. They serve as the most visible example of the society’s efforts to promote interaction and collaboration between scientists working in various subspecialty fields of apoptosis.
There is no comparable US-based society that formally recognises the need for such a rapidly growing area. For more information about ICDS, please visit their website at https://celldeath-apoptosis.org/.
As part of this affiliation, ICDS members will receive a discount on regular submissions to Cells. We look forward to a productive and inspiring collaboration!
4 March 2026
MDPI’s 2025 Best Paper Awards—Award-Winning Papers Announced
MDPI is honored to announce the recipients of the 2025 Best Paper Awards, celebrating exceptional research for its scientific merit and broad impact. After a rigorous evaluation process conducted by Academic Editors, this year’s awards showcase papers that stand out for their innovation, relevance, and high-quality presentation.
Out of a highly competitive pool, 396 winning papers have been recognized for their exceptional contributions. We congratulate these authors for pushing the boundaries of their respective disciplines.
At MDPI, we are dedicated to broadening the reach of innovative science. To learn more about the award-winning papers and explore research projects in your field of study, please visit the following links:
- Biology and Life Sciences;
- Business and Economics;
- Chemistry and Materials Sciences;
- Computer Sciences and Mathematics;
- Engineering;
- Environmental and Earth Sciences;
- Medicine and Pharmacology;
- Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities;
- Physical Sciences;
- Public Health and Healthcare.
About MDPI Awards:
To reward the global research community and enhance academic dialogue, MDPI journals regularly host award programs across diverse scientific disciplines. These awards, serving as a source of inspiration and recognition, help raise the influence of talented individuals who have been credited with outstanding achievements and whose work drives the advancement of their fields.
Explore the Best Paper Awards open for participation, please click here.
4 March 2026
Cells | Issue Cover Articles in the Second Half of 2025
The articles below have been selected as the Cover Articles for Issues 13–24 of Volume 14 by the Editorial Office of Cells (ISSN: 2073-4409). These articles come from multiple fields within the scope of cell biology, and we hope they can provide insights and references for scholars in related fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|














