You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

Epigenomes

Epigenomes is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on epigenetics and epigenomics, published quarterly online by MDPI.
The Epigenetics Society is affiliated with Epigenomes and its members receive discounts on the article processing charges.
Indexed in PubMed | Quartile Ranking JCR - Q2 (Genetics and Heredity)

All Articles (288)

  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

Background/Objectives: Histone acetylation regulates gene expression and plays a key role in cancer pathophysiology. Nanotherapeutics are known to modulate histone acetylation and influence cancer progression. This systematic scoping review examines the effects of nanotherapeutics on histone acetylation enrichment across multiple cancers. Methods: A systematic search of Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A total of 13 studies were included. Data were analyzed and visualized in R, and risk of bias was assessed with ToxRTool (OSF Registration: 10.17605/OSF.IO/E643S). Results: Nanotherapeutics were most commonly evaluated against breast (21.4%), prostate (21.4%), pancreatic (14.3%), and bladder (14.3%) cancers. Primary nanomaterials used in the synthesis of nanotherapeutics included poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (25.0%), gold (21.4%) and arsenic oxide (21.4%) nanoparticles. Studied histone acetylation marks included H3K9ac, H3K14ac, H3K27ac and H4K16ac. Treatment with nanotherapeutics increased histone H3 and H4 acetylation enrichment, particularly H3K14ac in colorectal and prostate cancers and H4K16ac in ovarian cancer. Conversely, gold-based nanotherapeutics decreased H3K9ac and H3K14ac enrichment in breast cancer. The optimal concentration for most nanotherapeutics was ≤25 µM, with PpIX-FFYSV showing the strongest anticancer effect (viability <25%). Across four preclinical studies (n = 58), treatment with the nanotherapeutics reduced tumor size to less than 50% of control in 64% of animals (95% CI: 21–92%, I2 = 63.8%). Altered histone acetylation was associated with differential expression of CDKN1A, HSPA1, SREBF2 and TGFB. Conclusions: The evidence demonstrates that nanotherapeutics can alter histone acetylation patterns by modulating EP300/CBP, GCN5 and HDAC, preventing cancer progression and invasion.

7 November 2025

PRISMA flowchart of study identification and selection.

Epigenetic Mechanisms of Plant Adaptation to Cadmium and Heavy Metal Stress

  • Eleonora Greco,
  • Emanuela Talarico and
  • Francesco Guarasci
  • + 6 authors

Heavy metal and metalloid stress, particularly from toxic elements like cadmium (Cd), poses a growing threat to plant ecosystems, crop productivity, and global food security. Elevated concentrations of these contaminants can trigger cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in plants, severely impairing growth, development, and reproduction. In recent years, epigenetic mechanisms have emerged as crucial regulators of plant responses to heavy metal stress, offering novel insights and strategies for enhancing plant resilience in contaminated environments. This review synthesises current advances in the field of plant epigenetics, focusing on key modifications such as DNA methylation, histone acetylation and remodelling, chromatin dynamics, and small RNA-mediated regulation. These processes not only influence gene expression under metal-induced stress but also hold promise for long-term adaptation through transgenerational epigenetic memory. Recent developments in high-throughput sequencing and functional genomics have accelerated the identification of epigenetic markers associated with stress tolerance, enabling the integration of these markers into breeding programs and targeted epigenome editing strategies. Special attention is given to cadmium stress responses, where specific epigenetic traits have been linked to enhanced tolerance. As plant epigenomic research progresses, its application in sustainable agriculture becomes increasingly evident offering environmentally friendly solutions to mitigate the impact of heavy metal pollution. This review provides a foundation for future research aimed at leveraging epigenetic tools to engineer crops capable of thriving under metal stress, thereby contributing to resilient agricultural systems and sustainable food production.

2 November 2025

Major natural sources of heavy metal and metalloid contamination include rock weathering and volcanic activity, while anthropogenic sources primarily stem from industrial emissions and the extensive use of pesticides. Common contaminants such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) can persist in the environment and pose significant ecological risks. Once present in the soil, metal ions (indicated in white in the close-up) can be absorbed by plant roots, translocated to aerial tissues, and detoxified through mechanisms such as phytochelatin-mediated chelation, vacuolar sequestration, and activation of antioxidant defense systems. These physiological responses are fundamental to plant tolerance and form the basis for their application in phytoremediation strategies.

Role of m6A mRNA Methylation in Plant Defense

  • Rakesh Srivastava and
  • Niraj Lodhi

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant and dynamic RNA modification in eukaryotic messenger and non-coding RNAs, playing a pivotal role in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. The coordinated actions of m6A writers, erasers, and readers influence transcript stability, immune activation, and pathogen suppression. Growing evidence indicates that m6A fine-tunes the expression of defense-related genes, modulates RNA processing events, and is frequently hijacked by pathogens and pests to promote virulence. Notably, the dual role of m6A in enhancing plant defense and facilitating pathogen adaptation highlights its significance in the host–pathogen arms race. This review emphasizes recent advances in our understanding of m6A-mediated epitranscriptomic regulation in plants, with a focus on its role in responses to biotic stresses, including fungi, bacteria, virus infections, insects, and nematode attacks. This regulatory layer offers novel opportunities for crop protection through targeted manipulation of the epitranscriptomic mechanism.

15 October 2025

(A). The primary mechanism of m6A epitranscriptomic control, which dynamically control RNA fate throughout development and stress in plants. (B). The components of m6A mRNA methylation include writers (methyltransferases), erasers (demethylases) and readers (cytoplasmic and nuclear factors).

Lysine methylation is a critical post-translational modification catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs), originally characterized in the regulation of histones. However, the breadth of non-histone targets remains largely unexplored. Here, we used a systematic peptide array-based approach to define a substrate preference motif for the SET-domain-containing KMT MLL4 (KMT2D), a member of the COMPASS complex and a known H3K4 methyltransferase. Using this motif, we identified CXXC finger protein 1 (CFP1), a core component of Setd1A/B complexes, as a putative MLL4 substrate. In vitro methyltransferase assays confirmed robust methylation of CFP1 by an MLL4-WRAD complex. Surprisingly, while initial predictions implicated K328, array-based methylation profiling revealed multiple lysine residues within CFP1’s lysine-rich basic domain as methylation targets, including K331, K335, K339, and K340. We further demonstrated that CFP1 methylation likely modulates its interaction with MLL4’s PHD cassettes and facilitates binding to Setd1A. Binding preferences of MLL4’s PHD1–3 and PHD4–6 domains varied with methylation state and site, suggesting non-histone methyl mark recognition by these cassettes. Pulldown assays confirmed that methylated, but not unmethylated, CFP1 binds Setd1A, supporting a potential methyl-switch mechanism. Together, our findings propose CFP1 as a potential non-histone substrate of MLL4 and suggest that MLL4 may regulate Setd1A/B function indirectly via CFP1 methylation. This study expands the substrate landscape of MLL4 and lays the groundwork for future investigations into non-histone methylation signaling in chromatin regulation.

15 October 2025

Identification of the MLL4 substrate recognition motif using SPOT peptide arrays. (A) A control array of histone tail peptides demonstrates that the MLL4-WRAD complex exhibits methyltransferase activity predominantly on H3K4, confirming substrate specificity. Peptides with K-to-R substitutions (bottom row) serve as negative controls. Dark spots indicate incorporation of radiolabeled [3H]-SAM, signifying methyl group transfer. (B) A permutation array of the H3 (1–9) peptide was used to assess the contribution of each residue to MLL4 recognition and H3K4 peptide methylation. Each wild-type residue was systematically replaced with all 20 amino acids, and signal intensity indicates methylation efficiency. (C) A sequence motif was generated using PeSA 2.0 software [36], summarizing the tolerated and preferred residues at each position relative to the methylated lysine (position 0).

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Epigenomes - ISSN 2075-4655