The reactions of UO
2(NO
3)
2·6H
2O or UO
2(O
2CMe)
2·2H
2O and 2,2′-{(1,2-ethanediyl)bis[nitrilo(phenyl)methylidene]}bisphenol (H
2L) in MeOH and DMF have provided access to complexes [UO
2(L)(MeOH)] (
1) and
[...] Read more.
The reactions of UO
2(NO
3)
2·6H
2O or UO
2(O
2CMe)
2·2H
2O and 2,2′-{(1,2-ethanediyl)bis[nitrilo(phenyl)methylidene]}bisphenol (H
2L) in MeOH and DMF have provided access to complexes [UO
2(L)(MeOH)] (
1) and [UO
2(L)(DMF)]·DMF (
2·DMF), respectively. The molecular structures of the complexes are similar. The central U
VI atom is surrounded by five oxygen and two nitrogen atoms in a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry; the two uranyl oxygen atoms are at the axial positions. Two phenolato oxygen and two imino nitrogen atoms from the tetradentate chelating (1.1111 using Harris notation) L
2− ligand are located at the equatorial plane, which is completed by the oxygen atom of a terminally ligated solvent (MeOH, DMF) molecule. Interestingly, the L
2− ligand adopts a chair (or stepped) conformation in
1 and a boat conformation in
2·DMF. The supramolecular features of
1 and
2·DMF are distinctly different due to the different H-bonding abilities of coordinated MeOH and DMF, and the presence of an extra-lattice solvent molecule in the latter. The solid complexes were studied by IR, Raman, electronic (UV/Vis), and emission spectroscopic techniques. Complex
1 decomposes in CHCl
3 and DMSO, whereas the molecular structure of
2 is retained in these solvents. A new polymorph of the free ligand, H
2L(
B), has also been discovered and its crystal structure is described.
Full article