The recently proposed concept of “precursory fingerprint” is a logical consequence of the commonsense statement that seismic structures are unique and that their expected preshock behaviors, including precursory phenomena, are also unique. Our new prediction-related research strategy is conceptually based on the principles
[...] Read more.
The recently proposed concept of “precursory fingerprint” is a logical consequence of the commonsense statement that seismic structures are unique and that their expected preshock behaviors, including precursory phenomena, are also unique. Our new prediction-related research strategy is conceptually based on the principles of (1) the uniqueness of seismogenic structures, (2) interconnected and interacting geospheres, and (3) non-equivalence of Earth’s surface spots in terms of precursory signal receptivity. The precursory fingerprint of a given seismic structure is a unique assemblage of precursory signals of various natures (seismic, physical, chemical, and biological), detectable in principle by using a system of proper monitoring equipment that consists of a matrix of
n sensors placed on the ground at “sensitive” spots identified beforehand and on orbiting satellites. In principle, it is composed of a combination of signals that are emitted by the “responsive sensors”, in addition to the “non-responsive sensors”, coming from the sensor matrix, monitoring as many virtual precursory processes as possible by continuously measuring their relevant parameters. Each measured parameter has a pre-established (by experts) threshold value and an uncertainty interval, discriminating between background and anomalous values that are visualized similarly to traffic light signals (green, yellow, and red). The precursory fingerprint can thus be viewed as a particular configuration of “precursory signals” consisting of anomalous parameter values that are unique and characteristic to the targeted seismogenic structure. Presumably, it is a complex entity that consists of pattern, space, and time components. The “pattern component” is a particular arrangement of the responsive sensors on the master board of the monitoring system yielding anomalous parameter value signals, that can be re-arranged, after a series of experiments, in a spontaneously understandable new pattern. The “space component” is a map position configuration of the signal-detecting sensors, whereas the “time component” is a characteristic time sequence of the anomalous signals including the order, occurrence time before the event, transition time between yellow and red signals, etc. Artificial intelligence using pattern-recognition algorithms can be used to follow, evaluate, and validate the precursory signal assemblage and, finally, to judge, together with an expert board of human operators, its “precursory fingerprint” relevance. Signal interpretation limitations and uncertainties related to dependencies on sensor sensibility, focal depth, and magnitude can be established by completing all three phases (i.e., experimental, validation, and implementation) of the precursory fingerprint-based earthquake prediction research strategy.
Full article