Adolescents

Across the globe, adolescents often grow up surrounded by cultural silence, taboo, or discomfort regarding conversations about sexuality, relationships, and power. The absence of timely, comprehensive, and honest conversations about sexuality, power dynamics, and sexual pleasure during adolescence can significantly impact young people’s mental health and well-being. This commentary paper examines the detrimental effects of the “unspoken curriculum” surrounding sexuality, characterized by silence, misinformation, and avoidance, on the psychological development of young individuals. It examines how the lack of open dialogue contributes to anxiety, shame, distorted perceptions of sexuality, and vulnerability to exploitation. Furthermore, this article underscores the critical need for parents, educators, and society at large to engage in transparent conversations that encompass not only the biological aspects of sexuality but also the essential elements of power, consent, sexual pleasure, healthy relationships, and emotional literacy. By drawing on global research, this paper reveals both common challenges and unique regional barriers, advocating for culturally responsive yet universally rights-based solutions. By fostering open communication and providing accurate, age-appropriate information, we can empower young people to navigate their sexual development with confidence, respect, and a positive sense of self, thereby safeguarding their mental health and fostering healthier societal attitudes towards sexuality.

Introduction: School belonging is a key component of adolescent well-being, associated with academic success, mental health, and social inclusion. This study explores the levels of school belonging among Portuguese students and examines the psychosocial factors associated with this perception. Methods: Data from 3083 students (5th to 12th grade) obtained through the 2024 National Study by the Observatory of Psychological Health and Well-Being were analysed. Socio-emotional skills, well-being indicators, psychological symptoms, and school engagement variables were assessed using validated instruments. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and linear regression. Results: Overall, boys and younger students reported higher levels of school belonging. Sociability, resilience, confidence, school engagement, and and components of Positive Youth Development (PYD)—a strengths-based framework focusing on the internal and external assets that foster healthy youth development—such as competence and connection, were positively associated with school belonging. Conversely, depressive symptoms and experiences of bullying negatively predicted this outcome. Conclusions: This study’s findings highlight the need to reinforce inclusive educational practices, foster positive youth development, and promote protective relational dynamics within the school context.

Background: Adolescence is marked by heightened reward sensitivity and incomplete maturation of cognitive control, creating conditions that favor engagement in risky behaviors. Traditional self-report methods often overlook the fast, automatic processes—such as attentional biases, approach–avoidance tendencies, and associative schemas—that shape adolescent decision-making in real time. Aims: This Perspective aims to synthesize recent (2018–2025) advances in the study of implicit measures relevant to adolescent risk behaviors, evaluate their predictive value beyond explicit measures, and identify translational pathways for prevention and early intervention. Methods: A narrative synthesis was conducted, integrating evidence from eye-tracking, drift-diffusion modeling, approach–avoidance tasks, single-category implicit association tests, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and passive digital phenotyping. Emphasis was placed on multi-method phenotyping pipelines and on studies validating these tools in adolescent populations. Results: Implicit indices demonstrated incremental predictive validity for risky behaviors such as substance use, hazardous driving, and problematic digital engagement, outperforming self-reports in detecting context-dependent and state-specific risk patterns. Integrative protocols combining laboratory-based measures with EMA and passive sensing captured the influence of peer presence, affective state, and opportunity structures on decision-making. Mobile-based interventions, including approach bias modification and attention bias training, proved feasible, scalable, and sensitive to change in implicit outcomes. Acoustic biomarkers further enhanced low-burden state monitoring. Conclusions: Implicit measures provide a mechanistic, intervention-sensitive complement to explicit screening, enabling targeted, context-aware prevention strategies in adolescents. Future priorities include multi-site validations, school-based implementation trials, and the use of implicit parameter change as a primary endpoint in prevention research.