Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of three methods to measure jump height during countermovement jumps performed with (CMJ
AS) and without (CMJ
NAS) arm swing: (1) an impulse–momentum method with force platforms (FP
imp), (2) a flight time method with force platforms (FP
time), and (3) an inertial measurement unit (PUSH Band 2.0; PUSH2). Methods: Eighteen physically active men performed CMJ
AS and CMJ
NAS on force platforms while wearing PUSH2 over two days. Besides jump height, we computed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the absolute and relative increases in jump height due to arm swing, compared to CMJ
NAS. Results: The reliability of intra-session, inter-session, and concurrent measures were good to excellent (intra-session ICC
2,1 = 0.957–0.979, inter-session ICC
2,1 = 0.806–0.990, concurrent ICC
3,1 = 0.940–0.973) for CMJ
AS and CMJ
NAS heights, in all three methods. The three methods showed high to very high reliability for both the absolute and relative indices of arm swing contribution (ICC
2,1 = 0.649–0.812). FP
time significantly overestimated CMJ
NAS height relative to FP
imp (
p < 0.01). The absolute index of arm swing contribution was similar in FP
imp and FP
time (
p = 0.38) but higher in PUSH2 (
p < 0.01), indicating that arm swing amplified overestimation. Conclusions: All three methods demonstrated high reliability for jump height measurements, but FP
time and PUSH2 misestimated jump height depending on jump modalities. Caution is advised when assessing the absolute and relative contribution of arm swing, because errors in CMJ
NAS and CMJ
AS height measurements can affect these values and their interpretation.
Full article