You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .

Biomechanics

Biomechanics is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on biomechanics research published quarterly online by MDPI.

Quartile Ranking JCR - Q3 (Sport Sciences)

All Articles (303)

Background/Objectives: Considering that the kinematics of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) is concomitant with head movements and that temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are frequently associated with neck pain in clinics but seldom or never investigated, the aim of this study was to develop a reliable in vivo measurement protocol of the simultaneous amplitudes of the mandible and of the skull. The development of such a protocol is part of a project to build an accurate kinematic assessment tool for clinicians in the orofacial field who treat patients suffering from TMD. Methods: Mouth opening, laterotrusion and protrusion movements for three different positions of the head (neutral, slouched and military) on 12 asymptomatic voluntary subjects (5 men and 7 women, mean 33.6 yo +/− 11.1) were recorded using 20 markers palpated and taped and 14 optoelectronic cameras. The acquisition frequency was set at 150 hertz. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability of marker palpation in mm was calculated using standard deviation (SD), mean difference (MD) and standard error (SE). Amplitudes of movement according to axes defined by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) are given for the mandible and skull segments. The propagation of error on the amplitudes was calculated with the root mean square propagation error (RMSPE) in degrees. Repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman tests were used to assess the influence of the position of the head on the amplitudes of the jaw. Power analysis of the sample size was estimated with Cohen’s f3 size effect test. Steady-state plots (SSPs) and normalized motion graphs between the skull and the mandible motion were performed to study the coordination of their maximum amplitude over time. Results: The protocol demonstrated good intra-examiner reliability (1.5 < MD < 5.8; 2.6 < SD < 7.8; 2.0 < SE < 3.8), good inter-examiner reproducibility (0.2 < MD < 4.0; 3.5 < SD < 4.6; 2.0 < SE < 2.5) and small error propagation (0.0 < RMSPE intra < 2.8; 0.0 < RMSPE inter < 1.0). The amplitudes of the jaw and head found during the three types of movements correspond to the values reported in the literature. Head positions did not appear to significantly influence the amplitudes of jaw movements, which could be explained by the power estimation of our sample (Type II error β = 0.692). The participation of head movements in those of the jaw, for all motions and in all positions, was demonstrated and discussed in detail. Conclusions: The accuracy, test–retest reliability, and intra-individual variability of the TMJ kinematic analysis, including head movements, was ensured. The small sample size and the absence of standardized head positions for the subjects limit the scope of the intra- and inter-group analysis results. Given the natural biological and complex coordination of jaw–head movement, the authors consider its evaluation useful in clinical intervention and would like to further develop the present protocol. The next step should be to test the feasibility of its clinical application with a larger group of asymptomatic subjects compared to patients suffering from TMD.

10 January 2026

(a) Dental arch print in alginate; (b) personalized dental splint on the plaster model (the splint is transparent and covers the entire dental arch to ensure stability); (c) personalized dental splint with the jaw cluster fixed on it.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to examine the post-activation performance enhancement effects of bilateral horizontal drop jumps (BHDJs) on 30 m sprint and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, as well as in sprint mechanical and kinematics characteristics. Methods: Fourteen young sprinters (nine boys and five girls) completed both an experimental condition (EC) and a control condition (CC). The EC consisted of five BHDJs performed at each participant’s individually determined optimal drop height, whereas in the CC, no exercise has been performed. Results: The findings revealed no significant (p > 0.05) interactions for CMJ and time to 30 m. Significant increases in 5 m split times were observed across all segments in the CC, as well as in the initial 5 m segment in the EC. Regarding sprint mechanics, a significant interaction was found in the effectiveness of horizontal force application (−2.42% in CC vs. −0.33% in EC). Step frequency demonstrated significant interaction in the 5–10 m segment (−1.79% in CC vs. 1.20% in EC) and decreased significantly in the 15–20 m segment in the CC (−2.03% in CC vs. −1.85% in EC). Conclusions: In conclusion, performance parameters reduced under the CC, whereas the BHDJ intervention stabilized these parameters or exhibited smaller performance variations than in the CC.

9 January 2026

(a) 30 m PAPE protocol; (b) CMJ PAPE protocol. BHDJ = bilateral horizontal drop jump; CMJ = countermovement jump.

Exploration of Achilles Tendon Loading Symmetry in Female Recreational Runners

  • Thomas W. Kernozek,
  • C. Nathan Vannatta and
  • Kaelyn C. Wagner
  • + 3 authors

Background/Objectives: Running is associated with increased Achilles Tendon (AT) loading and cross-sectional area (CSA). Achilles tendinopathy is a common unilateral injury. Differences in AT loading variables between dominant and non-dominant lower extremities while running have not been characterized. This study examined the AT loading variables between dominant and non-dominant lower extremities in healthy recreational runners. Methods: Twenty-four females ran at 3.3 m/s (11.88 km/hr) on an instrumented treadmill. Achilles Tendon CSA (AT-CSA) was measured from ultrasound images. Kinematic and kinetic data were used as input into a musculoskeletal model. Paired t-tests examined inter-limb differences in peak vertical ground reaction force, Achilles Tendon-related loading variables (AT force, AT-CSA, AT stress), total gastrocnemius force, soleus force, foot strike angle, and stance time. Results: No differences were shown between dominant and non-dominant lower extremities in stance time, vertical ground reaction force, gastrocnemius and soleus force, AT force, AT-CSA, or AT stress. Foot strike angle was different between limbs (p = 0.015); however, the absolute difference was about 2°. Conclusions: These data indicated that AT loading was similar between dominant and non-dominant lower extremities in healthy female recreational runners. While some asymmetry can be expected during a bilateral task such as running, runners displayed differences in AT force and stress less than 18%. These data may assist clinicians in the assessment and management of runners recovering from AT tendinopathy.

9 January 2026

(A) Retroreflective markers placed on participants running on an instrumented treadmill, (B) kinematic marker tracking and link segment model used, and (C) musculoskeletal modeling based on kinematic and kinetic data.

Mechatronic Device for Accurate Characterization of Knee Flexion Based on Pivot Point

  • Fernando Valencia,
  • Brizeida Gámez and
  • David Ojeda
  • + 1 author

Objective: The purpose of this study is to develop a mechatronic device capable of characterizing the kinematics of the knee joint, based on the acquisition and analysis of data focused on the knee joint point. Methods: A mechatronic device was designed using dimensional data from a participant’s lower limb (1.59 m, 57 kg), obtained through 3D scanning. The device, based on a proportional mechanism aligned with anatomical reference points, allows the evolution of the knee joint pivot point (PPKJ) to be recorded. Ten healthy subjects (aged 22–26 years, height 1.50–1.63 m, body mass 48–59 kg) were selected for testing. The device was placed on each knee to record joint trajectories during squats. The trajectories were classified into two groups: extension to flexion and flexion to extension. For each group, the average trajectory was calculated. Results: Forty PPKJ trajectories were obtained, divided into two sets: extension to flexion with a range of 8° to 51.3° and flexion to extension with a range of 6.7° to 56.83°, which allowed the mean trajectory and cubic polynomial regression to be calculated as the best approximation for characterizing the trajectory of the instantaneous center of rotation of the knee joint. Conclusions: The developed mechatronic device offers an accessible and non-invasive solution for recording the trajectory of the knee joint pivot point in individuals with characteristics like those in the study. This alternative approach could improve the representation of knee kinematics in the design of customized prostheses, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation devices for lower limbs.

7 January 2026

Pivot point of the tibiofemoral joint determination [41].

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Biomechanics - ISSN 2673-7078