Skip to Content

Biomechanics

Biomechanics is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on biomechanics research published quarterly online by MDPI.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (323)

Background: Falls are a leading cause of injury and mortality worldwide. Higher physical activity levels in young adults may increase exposure to fall-related situations. Understanding their neuromuscular adaptations is critical for balance control research and perturbation-based training. This study examined proactive and reactive adaptations in lower-limb muscle activity during repeated simulated trips among young adults. Methods: Twenty participants experienced five treadmill-induced standing-trips. Bilateral electromyography (EMG) activities of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), tibialis anterior (TA), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and biceps femoris (BF) were recorded. Muscle activity magnitude at perturbation onset (ON), EMG peak amplitude, and time-to-peak from ON were extracted and compared across trials. Results: Proactive activation at ON increased across trials in TA and RF on the recovery side (p = 0.012–0.023) and in TA, VL, and BF on the stance side (p = 0.002–0.034). Reactive peak amplitudes decreased in RF, VL, and BF on the recovery side (p < 0.001–0.014) and in RF, VL, and BF on the stance side (p < 0.001–0.016). Time-to-peak shortened in MG, RF, VL, and BF on the recovery side (p < 0.001–0.030) and in RF, VL, TA, and BF on the stance side (p < 0.001–0.050). Conclusions: Repeated simulated trips elicited proactive adaptations in muscle activity and reactive changes in time-to-peak, which may suppress the need for increased reactive muscle activations to recover balance post-perturbation over trials in young adults. The findings augment our understanding of the intercorrelation between proactive and reactive adaptations to repeated perturbations.

13 March 2026

Still images illustrate two key moments during recovery from a trip perturbation-induced forward balance loss on the ActiveStep treadmill: (a) perturbation onset (ON) and (b) recovery step touchdown (TD). Participants wore safety harnesses attached to an overhead arch for protection. The ON is defined as the moment when the belt marker’s anteroposterior position drops by three standard deviations below the baseline average, indicating the initiation of the perturbation. The TD is identified when the heel of the recovery leg first recontacts the treadmill belt. Also shown are the profiles of treadmill belt (c) velocity and (d) displacement during the standardized trip-like perturbation. The perturbation is generated by rapidly moving the belt backward over 0.6 s, reaching a peak posterior velocity of 1.2 m/s backward and a total displacement of 0.36 m. During the first 0.3 s, the belt accelerates at 4 m/s2, followed by deceleration at the same rate for the remaining 0.3 s. Each standing-perturbation trial lasts approximately 10 s, with the perturbation occurring in the middle of the trial at a random time point. Vertical lines in (c,d) indicate the timing of ON and TD.

Objectives: This study compares linear sprint force–velocity (F–v) mechanical variables between elite Under-19 (U19) academy players and senior professional players. Methods: Thirty-eight senior players (SP; mean age 24.5 ± 4.3 y) and 214 U19 academy players (YP; mean age 17.4 ± 0.5 y) from 14 first-division club academies were tested during October 2023 using a motorized resistance device (1080 Motion). The following F–v variables were assessed: maximal theoretical force (F0, N·kg−1), maximal theoretical velocity (v0, m·s−1), maximal ratio of horizontal-to-resultant force (RFmax, %), and decrease in the ratio of forces (DRF, %). Between-group comparisons were performed using the t-test, and Cohen’s d effect sizes were reported. Results: Senior players outperformed U19 players across all F–v variables. F0 exhibited a mean difference = 0.220 N·kg−1, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.056, 0.384], p = 0.0166, and d = 0.46. v0 exhibited a mean difference = 0.560 m·s−1, with a 95% CI [0.410, 0.710], p < 0.0001, and d = 1.07. RFmax exhibited a mean difference = 1.470%, with 95% CI [0.830, 2.110], p = 0.0003, and d = 0.69. DRF exhibited a mean difference = 0.260%, with a 95% CI [0.103, 0.417], p = 0.0013, and d = 0.53. Conclusions: U19 players demonstrated lower F0, lower v0, and reduced mechanical effectiveness compared with senior players. Regular monitoring of F–v profiles and individualized training interventions (force- or velocity-targeted) may be useful for training and monitoring strategies aimed at supporting physical preparation during the transition to senior soccer.

9 March 2026

Differences between senior (SP) and youth (YP) players in maximal horizontal force production (F0).

Background/Objectives: Quasi-static inverse dynamics is widely used in biomechanical analyses due to its computational simplicity; however, neglecting inertial effects may introduce joint-specific torque estimation errors during dynamic movements. The purpose of this study was to quantify torque estimation errors introduced by quasi-static assumptions during bodyweight squats performed at different movement frequencies. Methods: A planar MATLAB-based (version R2022a) musculoskeletal model incorporating standard anthropometric parameters was developed to simulate squat motions at 1.00, 0.75, 0.50, and 0.25 Hz. Joint torques calculated using quasi-static inverse dynamics were compared with fully dynamic inverse dynamics at the ankle, knee, and hip. Model agreement was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), normalized percentage error relative to peak dynamic torque, and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Quasi-static modeling produced negligible torque estimation errors at the ankle and knee across all movement frequencies, with percentage errors consistently below 0.1% and narrow confidence intervals. In contrast, the hip joint demonstrated a clear frequency-dependent underestimation of torque when inertial effects were neglected. At 1.00 Hz, the hip RMSE reached 14.4 Nm, corresponding to 14.01% of peak dynamic torque (95% CI: 13.97–14.06%). Error magnitude increased systematically with movement speed. Conclusions: The validity of quasi-static inverse dynamics strongly depends on joint location and movement frequency. While quasi-static models are appropriate for ankle and knee torque estimation during moderate-speed squats, accurate hip torque assessment during faster squats requires full dynamic modeling. These findings provide quantitative benchmarks to inform model selection in biomechanical research, rehabilitation engineering, and assistive device design.

4 March 2026

Flowchart of the simulation pipeline for quantifying inverse dynamics modeling errors. The process progresses from defining anthropometric parameters (m, l, r) for a 3-link model (Shank, Thigh, HAT) to generating sinusoidal joint trajectories 
  
    
      
        θ
      
      
        1
      
    
  
, 
  
    
      
        θ
      
      
        2
      
    
  
, and 
  
    
      
        θ
      
      
        3
      
    
  
). It details the Newton–Euler inverse dynamic simulation used to compute both dynamic and quasi-static torques, followed by RMSE calculation and 10,000-iteration bootstrap statistical analysis for error robustness.

Background/Objectives: In pole vaulting, the capacity to store elastic energy within the pole (Epole) significantly influences performance. This study investigated the characteristics of Epole storage by analyzing the box reaction force and vector angle. Methods: Eight male pole vaulters, including World Championships participants, were examined. A motion capture system (VICON) and force plates (Kistler) were used to measure the vector angle (angle between the compression force (CF) and box reaction force vectors) and horizontal velocity of the center of gravity (COG) (Vcogh). Epole was calculated as the integral of the CF (estimated from the box reaction forces), and pole bending displacement. The relationships between each variable and the peak height of COG (HP) were assessed using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficients. Results: HP correlated with Vcogh in the pole plant (PP) (r = 0.82) and Epole (r = 0.94). Vaulters with a higher HP maintained a vector angle < 2° between 20% and 80% of the pole bending phase, indicating closer directional alignment between the box reaction force vector and pole chord direction, whereas vaulters with lower HP exhibited larger vector angles (4–8°), associated with a relative reduction in the axial component of force transmitted to the pole. Conclusions: A smaller vector angle effectively enhanced the CF, thereby increasing pole bending and promoting greater accumulation of Epole. Therefore, maintaining a small vector angle may enable more effective force transmission along the pole chord, and vector angle characteristics and PP horizontal velocity may assist appropriate pole selection and training strategies to enhance elastic energy storage and performance.

4 March 2026

Definition of each analytical phase. TD: touchdown; PP: pole plant; TO: take-off; MPB: maximum pole bending; PS: pole straightening; HP: peak height of COG.

News & Conferences

Volumes

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

Inertial Sensor Assessment of Human Movement
Reprint

Inertial Sensor Assessment of Human Movement

Editors: Elissavet Rousanoglou, John Buckley, Alan Godfrey
XFacebookLinkedIn
Biomechanics - ISSN 2673-7078