Background/Objectives: Traditional community oral health programs (COHPs) often remain reactive, clinic-based, and insufficiently integrated with medical, social, and aged-care systems. As a result, they may be poorly positioned to address the needs of older adults experiencing multimorbidity, mobility limitations, cognitive impairment, care dependency,
[...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Traditional community oral health programs (COHPs) often remain reactive, clinic-based, and insufficiently integrated with medical, social, and aged-care systems. As a result, they may be poorly positioned to address the needs of older adults experiencing multimorbidity, mobility limitations, cognitive impairment, care dependency, and financial or geographic barriers. This paper proposes SPACES, an implementation-oriented conceptual framework for designing, delivering, and evaluating community oral health programs for older adults.
Methods: SPACES was developed through a targeted interpretive synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, policy guidance, and implementation-oriented sources related to oral health, healthy aging, integrated care, access barriers, workforce development, and sustainable service delivery.
Results: The framework comprises six interconnected domains: Scalable Prevention and Education, Partnerships Across Sectors, Adaptive Care Coordination, Community Access Solutions, Empowered Workforce Development, and Sustainable Service Models. It is intended primarily for adults aged 60 years and older, while allowing adaptation in jurisdictions that use 65 years and older as the eligibility threshold. The framework applies across community, home care, assisted living, and long-term care settings. SPACES organizes evidence-informed components for older-adult oral health, including routine screening, caregiver-supported daily mouth care, risk-stratified prevention, referral pathways, proximity-based service delivery, geriatric workforce competencies, task sharing, sustainable financing, governance, and quality improvement.
Conclusions: SPACES is presented not as a tested intervention but as a conceptual and program-planning tool to help planners clarify responsibilities, identify equity gaps, align cross-sector resources, and select measurable implementation indicators. Future stakeholder refinement and empirical evaluation are needed through co-design, pragmatic implementation studies, and real-world assessment of feasibility, acceptability, cost, equity impact, and oral health outcomes.
Full article