- Perspective
Fishes represent an extremely diverse group of organisms, both within and among species. This diversity reflects their association with the environment and resources like habitat and food. Here, examples from diverse life histories of fishes are used to illustrate the significance of the patterns and processes involved in the ongoing dynamic relationships organisms have with their environment. This exploration relates directly to an ongoing paradigm shift in evolutionary biology, where organismal development is at the core. This paper applies knowledge of phenotypic plasticity and transgenerational plasticity in fishes in concert with biosemiotics to explain this kind of approach. It is concluded that the role of signals and cues involved in organismal interpretation and responses to changing conditions play a key role in understanding how new opportunities for development and evolution become realised through complex pathways influencing phenotypic variation within and across generations. Because of their diversity and responsiveness, especially in developmental and life history strategies, fishes are excellent subjects to study this further both theoretically and empirically.
30 May 2026




![A conceptual model exploring the interactions among ecological (ECO), evolutionary (EVO) and developmental (DEVO) processes. The key interactions and pathways within this ECO–EVO–DEVO model can be summarised as follows. In ECO–EVO, the environment influences the evolution of populations through natural selection; in EVO–ECO, evolutionary responses (i.e., phenotypic changes across generations) influence ecological processes in an ecosystem (often referred to as ECO–EVO feedbacks or niche construction); in ECO–DEVO, the environment affects the developmental processes of individual organisms (broadly encompassing any form of individual plasticity and parental effects); in DEVO–ECO, within-generation developmental responses of individuals influence the response of populations and, subsequently, ecosystems to environmental change; in EVO–DEVO, evolutionary processes across generations provide inherited signals (e.g., direct genetic and non-genetic - including epigenetic - variation) that influence phenotypic development; and in DEVO–EVO, selection acts on phenotypic variation from development. In nature, ECO–EVO–DEVO processes interact and are likely to act dynamically, that is, via reciprocal feedback responses. The figure is originally from Skúlason et al. [4]. This figure is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).](https://mdpi-res.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=470%2Cheight=317/https://mdpi-res.com/fishes/fishes-11-00329/article_deploy/html/images/fishes-11-00329-g001-550.jpg)




