Since farmers in the inland valley region of the Niger Delta mostly rely on experience rather than empirical evidence when it comes to irrigation, flood irrigation being the most popular technique, the region’s agricultural sector needs more efficient water management. In order to
[...] Read more.
Since farmers in the inland valley region of the Niger Delta mostly rely on experience rather than empirical evidence when it comes to irrigation, flood irrigation being the most popular technique, the region’s agricultural sector needs more efficient water management. In order to better understand the intricate hydrodynamics of water flow through the soil subsurface, this study aimed to develop a soil column laboratory experimental setup for soil water infiltration. The objective was to measure the soil water content and soil matric potential at 10 cm intervals to study the soil water characteristic curve as a relationship between the two hydraulic parameters, mimicking drip soil subsurface micro-irrigation. A specially designed cylindrical vertical soil column rig was built, and an EQ3 equitensiometer of Delta-T Devices was used in the laboratory as a precision sensor to measure the soil matric potential Ψ (kPa), and the volumetric soil water content θ (%) was measured using a WET150 sensor of Delta-T Devices. The relationship between the volumetric soil water content and the soil matric potential resulted in the generation of the soil water characteristic curve. Two separate monoliths of undisturbed soil samples from Ivrogbo and Oleh in the Nigerian inland valley of the Niger Delta, as well as a uniformly packed sample of soil from Aberdeen, UK, for comparison, were used in gravity-driven flow experiments. In each case, tests were performed once on the monoliths of undisturbed soil samples. In contrast, the packed sample was subjected to an experiment before being further agitated to simulate ploughing and then subjected to an infiltration experiment, resulting in a total of four samples. The Van Genuchten model of the soil water characteristic curve was used for the verification of the experimental results. Comparing the four samples’ volumetric soil water contents and soil matric potentials at various depths revealed a significant variation in their behaviour. However, compared to the predicted curve, the range of values was narrower. Compared to n = 2 in the Van Genuchten curve, the value of n at 200 mm depth was found to be 15, with
θr of 0.046 and
θs of 0.23 for the packed soil sample, resulting in a percentage difference of 86.7%. Additionally, n = 10 for the ploughed sample resulted in an 80% difference, yet
θr = 0.03 and
θs = 0.23. For the Ivrogbo sample and the Oleh sample, the range of the matric potential was relatively too small for the comparison. The pre-experiment moisture content of the soil samples was part of the cause of this, in addition to differences in the soil types. Furthermore, the data revealed a remarkable agreement between the measured behaviour and the projected technique of the soil water characteristic curve.
Full article