FinTech, Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2026) – 30 articles

Drawing on signaling theory, this study investigates the role of lead founders’ human capital signals in the success outcomes of equity crowdfunding (ECF) campaigns. While prior research emphasizes entrepreneurial teams or broadly defined founder characteristics, the role of dominant entrepreneurial actors remains underexplored. We focus on the lead founder, defined as the individual combining founder status, CEO authority, and ownership concentration, as the primary signal carrier in ECF contexts. Using a multi-platform dataset of 1067 campaigns from Republic Europe, Crowdcube, Mamacrowd, and Invesdor (2012–2024), we examine how lead founders’ education and experience shape investor decisions. Our results indicate that industry-related education is the strongest predictor of the number of investors. Furthermore, while industry experience alone can positively predict investor engagement, its role disappears once education is accounted for, suggesting that education in industry-related fields can outweigh industry experience in shaping investor perceptions. Additionally, our findings suggest that entrepreneurial experience and attendance at a top-ranked university do not contribute meaningfully to explaining investor participation. Accordingly, the study contributes to the human capital signaling literature by showing that investors evaluate the incremental informational value of human capital signals rather than assessing each signal independently, and highlights the centrality of the lead founder in decision-making under highly uncertain crowdfunding environments. Full article

Saudi Arabia’s audit market faces three governance challenges that existing frameworks may not fully address. These challenges concern a potential regulatory gap around autonomous AI accountability, a trust dimension that standard technology-adoption models may not fully capture, and limited mechanisms for independently verified ESG assurance under Vision 2030. This study adopts a conceptual design approach within the design science research tradition and proposes the CMA Agentic AI Platform as a practical response to these challenges. The platform comprises two segments. Segment 1 deploys autonomous drone swarms to verify corporate assets across four audit tasks—asset valuation, ESG compliance, anomaly detection and construction progress—using deep learning, thermal imaging and social-media cross-referencing. Segment 2 continuously monitors discretionary accruals and uses objective earnings-management data to inform auditor assignment and rotation decisions. This approach replaces subjective reputational assessments with transparent, quantifiable governance criteria. The platform is governed through the Triadic Agentic Framework, which extends classical agency theory by distributing authority across the Principal, the Human Agent and the AI Agent. The framework also operationalises Trust Expectancy as the primary adoption condition. The evidence base draws on two complementary streams: a PRISMA-guided systematic review and bibliometric analysis of thirty-nine peer-reviewed studies, and a documentary analysis of four national agentic-AI regulatory frameworks (SDAIA, MDDI/IMDA, NIST and ICO). The study contributes the concept of Algorithmic Accountability as a distinct governance domain, the Triadic Agentic Framework as an operational architecture for autonomous regulatory monitoring, and a reframing of the UTAUT trust construct for agentic-AI adoption in mature professional contexts. The platform converts theoretical governance into a regulatory architecture with direct implications for concentrated capital market regulators. Full article

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is increasingly embedded in personal finance, yet little is known about how models make recommendations using financial information and demographic cues. This study audits three frontier GAI models, GPT 5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and Claude Opus 4.7, using a conjoint experiment in which each model evaluated the same hypothetical investor profiles and selected among standardized conservative, balanced, and aggressive portfolios. Investor profiles systematically varied attributes, including risk tolerance, time horizon, goal type, income, and age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, and employment type. Ordered logistic regressions and matched-profile comparisons show that all three models base recommendations primarily on financial attributes, especially risk tolerance and time horizon. Age and marital status shift recommendations towards conservatism in all models, conversely only Claude conditions on gender and employment type. Ethnicity exerts no detectable influence on the recommendations of ChatGPT or Claude, but is a small, statistically significant predictor for Gemini, with non-White profiles receiving slightly more conservative recommendations than otherwise identical White profiles. Overall, we find that the models are not interchangeable: they differ significantly in overall risk appetite and in how they translate risk tolerance, time horizon, goal type, and age into portfolio choices, with economically meaningful differences in predicted recommendations for identical clients. These findings suggest that contemporary GAI investment advice is driven mainly by financially relevant attributes, but that demographic sensitivity may appear in model-specific and statistically nuanced ways, alongside a distinct form of platform risk arising from model-specific advisory logic. Full article

This study examines customer retention intention in neobanking environments using a theory-informed explainable machine learning framework. Existing digital banking research typically relies on linear modelling approaches to explain retention behaviour, potentially overlooking nonlinear, value-range-dependent, and interaction-based predictive patterns. Using a publicly available survey of 305 neobank users, this study compares regularized linear models, a partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM)-inspired benchmark, and XGBoost (version 3.2.0) under repeated nested cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based explainability, SHAP interaction analysis, generalized additive model (GAM) diagnostics, construct-level aggregation, and construct-sensitivity checks are used to interpret model behaviour and assess robustness. The results show that XGBoost substantially outperforms the linear benchmarks, achieving the lowest average RMSE and highest average R² across 100 out-of-sample test-fold estimates. Trust-related indicators provide the largest share of model-based predictive importance, followed by perceived security and switching costs. SHAP and GAM diagnostics suggest that trust and switching costs may contribute to retention intention in heterogeneous and nonlinear ways, while perceived security displays a more stable positive predictive pattern. Age-related nonlinearities appear weak and should be interpreted cautiously given the young sample profile. The analysis also suggests possible non-additive relationships between trust and perceived security. The study contributes to digital banking and FinTech research by showing how explainable machine learning can complement theory-driven retention models, identify potentially nonlinear predictive patterns, and preserve interpretability. The findings offer practical insight for trust-building, visible security assurance, and retention diagnostics in neobanking contexts. Full article

This study aims to examine gaps in the current AML framework related to cryptocurrency and digital assets. We focused on money laundering typologies involving the conversion of illicit funds into clean value through cryptocurrency-based purchases of vouchers, gift cards, and other non-traditional instruments. We examined the existing literature on cryptocurrency and digital assets to identify gaps in detection and classification by mapping platform features and transaction pathways using an original dataset. The work adopts the Placement Layering Integration model. It conceptualises a laundering pathway that operates outside regulated intermediaries via crypto acquisition, voucher purchases on low Know Your Customer (KYC) platforms, redemption into goods, and informal resale for cash. The analysis revealed that most platforms required minimal verification for transactions, and many supported privacy coins that can hide the flow of funds from standard detection techniques. These features create conditions for cross-border money transfers that may fall outside law enforcement oversight. Such mechanisms can lead to undeclared remittance and potential tax evasion. This study contributes to the understanding of cryptocurrency related financial crime within broader money laundering typologies. It contributes to AML frameworks by identifying a shadow payment architecture, proposing targeted reforms to extend AML coverage to voucher intermediaries, and highlights areas for future research and policy improvements. Full article

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) have transitioned from theoretical concepts to operational realities across multiple jurisdictions. While they promise improved payment efficiency and financial inclusion, public trust, privacy, and user adoption have emerged as the critical determinants of success. Users fear that CBDCs could enable government surveillance, while regulators require sufficient oversight to prevent illicit finance, which creates a fundamental tension between privacy and compliance. This paper addresses the question: how can policymakers craft a global policy framework for retail CBDCs that balances user privacy and trust with necessary regulatory oversight, in order to maximize public adoption? Employing a structured narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed empirical literature and case analysis of four major CBDC implementations, the Bahamas Sand Dollar, Nigeria’s eNaira, China’s e-CNY, and the proposed digital euro, the study develops a seven-component global policy framework organized across four architectural layers. We additionally formulate seven testable propositions linking each framework component to adoption and trust outcomes, providing a structured agenda for future quantitative research. Evidence from randomized survey experiments shows that strong privacy safeguards raise adoption willingness by up to 60, underscoring that privacy is not merely a civil liberty concern but a prerequisite for widespread CBDC success. The comparative cross-case assessment suggests that broader alignment with the proposed framework components appears conceptually consistent with more favorable trust and adoption patterns across the cases examined. Full article

Amid rising geopolitical fragmentation and growing uncertainty in global financial systems, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are increasingly viewed as a potential innovation in cross-border digital payments. This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on CBDCs, with a particular focus on their role in cross-border payment systems, while also considering broader implications for monetary power and geopolitical realignment. Using a PRISMA-based review approach, complemented by bibliometric mapping, the study synthesizes existing research across economic, technological, institutional, and geopolitical dimensions. Unlike prior studies that primarily examine technical design features or domestic monetary implications, this review develops an integrated framework that situates CBDCs within the evolving architecture of cross-border digital payment systems in a fragmented global environment. The evidence suggests that CBDCs can enhance cross-border payment efficiency by reducing transaction costs, shortening settlement times, and enabling more direct transfer mechanisms that bypass traditional correspondent banking networks. At the same time, the literature highlights several critical challenges, including interoperability constraints, regulatory divergence, privacy concerns, and cybersecurity risks. Importantly, the findings also point to the potential emergence of parallel digital currency ecosystems, which may reinforce existing financial fragmentation rather than fully resolve it. Overall, CBDCs should be understood not only as technological innovations in digital payments but also as strategic instruments with implications for monetary sovereignty and global economic influence. Their long-term impact on cross-border payment systems will depend on the development of interoperable standards, coordinated regulatory frameworks, and sustained international cooperation. By bringing together fragmented strands of research, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of how CBDCs are reshaping both digital payment infrastructures and the broader global financial order. Full article

This study maps how cognitive and behavioral concepts such as trust, emotion, and bias are represented in the literature on digital financial accounting-based decision-making and FinTech adoption (artificial intelligence, blockchain, big data analytics, and automated reporting). The study employs a bibliometric mapping analysis of 19,655 publications from SCOPUS, creating three visualizations through the VOSviewer software: Network, Overlay, and Density Visualization. This technique maps thematic clusters and identifies conceptual connections in the literature on cognitive and behavioral dimensions of FinTech adoption. Results highlight trust as a central node linking FinTech adoption with cognitive and behavioral factors. Key cognitive biases, including overconfidence, anchoring, and loss aversion, appear in the literature as recurrent concepts associated with FinTech adoption, while financial literacy is frequently discussed as a mitigating factor. The study extends behavioral financial accounting-based theory and technology acceptance models by integrating psychological and technological approaches into a unified conceptual framework, providing theoretical and practical implications for FinTech designers, regulatory authorities, and educational institutions. Full article

This study assesses how a country’s digitalization impacts sustainability indicators as measured by unmonitored environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, which serve as a proxy for the development of financial technology (FinTech). The study employs a cross-country approach using data for up to 163 countries, going beyond the firm-level focus of previous studies. The DiGiX Digitalization Index and the ICT Development Index are used to measure digital maturity, while pillar-level indicators and Sustainalytics ESG country risk scores are used to assess ESG indicators. With evidence of nonlinear, threshold-type effects at higher levels of digital maturity, the regression results suggest a strong negative correlation between digital maturity and ESG risk. Different country typologies are further identified using unsupervised cluster analysis, which reveals a continuous digital and ESG gradient in environmental, social and governance aspects. The analysis proves digital maturity serves as a systemic enabler of ESG risk management by strengthening data availability, governance capacity and policy enforcement. These findings provide policy-related guidance for coordinating digitalization strategies in line with the Sustainable Development Goals. Full article

Cryptocurrencies have become increasingly in demand in Ukraine’s wartime economy, yet little is known about how entrepreneurs perceive them in terms of trust, business use, and reputation. This study examines trust dynamics in cryptocurrencies among Ukrainian small-to-medium enterprise (SME) entrepreneurs under wartime conditions, exploring their association with business behavior, investment decisions, and reputational perceptions. The analysis is based on a survey of 561 Ukrainian entrepreneurs. The results show a statistically significant increase in trust in cryptocurrencies during the war. Higher trust is associated with more intensive operational use of cryptocurrencies and greater importance in investment portfolios. Entrepreneurs who associate cryptocurrencies with traditional liquid assets are more likely to assign them a stronger investment role. The use of cryptocurrencies affects both cryptoassets’ reputations and entrepreneurs’ business reputations. Greater engagement with cryptocurrencies is associated with a higher likelihood of viewing their use as a reputational advantage. However, overall assessments remain cautious due to regulatory uncertainty, financial risks, and potential involvement in tax evasion or speculative activities. Different perceived value propositions of cryptocurrencies are also linked to distinct behavioral strategies. Overall, the findings suggest that, in wartime Ukraine, trust in cryptocurrencies is shaped by their practical usefulness during periods of financial disruption and by their implications for entrepreneurs’ reputations. Full article

Regulatory sandboxes have evolved from specialised FinTech tools into broader mechanisms of regulatory experimentation. As artificial intelligence (AI) applications become embedded in credit decisioning, payment-fraud detection, identity verification, crypto-asset compliance, customer-facing advice and supervisory analytics, sandbox design increasingly affects how legal and institutional responsibility is allocated among regulators, participating firms, technology vendors and users. This article provides a comparative doctrinal and institutional analysis of accountability and liability in AI-related financial regulatory sandboxes. It clarifies the relevant AI modalities, distinguishes accountability (answerability and enforceability during sandbox participation) from liability (contractual, tort/product and regulatory/public law responsibility after harm), and maps framework-level safeguards across the European Union, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Norway and Hungary. The analysis does not seek to measure sandbox effectiveness empirically. Instead, it examines how publicly available legal and regulatory materials structure the allocation of duties before, during and after sandbox testing. The article shows that sandboxes generally do not operate as liability shields. Their legal significance lies in reallocating ex ante accountability duties—documentation, disclosure, monitoring, human oversight and exit planning—while preserving baseline liability rules. An Accountability and Liability Protocol is proposed to clarify roles, protect baseline consumer rights, support evidentiary traceability and connect sandbox learning to enforceable post-sandbox obligations. Full article

This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and the development of FinTech services on firms’ financial performance, with particular emphasis on the moderating role of dynamic capabilities. Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective, the study explains how organizations can effectively leverage emerging digital technologies to enhance financial outcomes. The study is applied in purpose and adopts a descriptive correlational design. Data were collected using four structured questionnaires administered to 384 respondents, including senior executives, chief financial officers, and board members of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. A convenience sampling method was employed. The conceptual model and research hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling based on the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach, implemented using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29 and Smart PLS version 4. The results indicate that both artificial intelligence and FinTech have positive and statistically significant effects on firms’ financial performance. Although dynamic capabilities do not have a direct statistically significant effect on financial performance, they play a significant moderating role in the relationship between FinTech and financial performance. A disaggregated analysis of the dimensions of dynamic capabilities shows that only sensing capability has a positive and statistically significant moderating effect on the relationship between FinTech and financial performance, whereas seizing and reconfiguring capabilities do not show statistically significant moderating effects. By emphasizing the conditional and indirect role of dynamic capabilities, this study contributes to the growing literature on FinTech and artificial intelligence in emerging markets. The findings suggest that performance advantages from FinTech and AI stem less from the technologies themselves and more from firms’ ability to identify and interpret technological opportunities promptly. The study provides valuable practical insights for managers of publicly listed Iranian firms and clarifies how digital investments translate into improved financial performance. Full article

Startup investment decisions are always accompanied by high uncertainty, limited historical data, and the need to simultaneously consider financial performance, sustainability, and innovation. With the rapid expansion of financial technologies, the use of digital decision-support tools to manage this complex environment has become increasingly important. This study presents a multi-objective optimization framework for startup portfolio selection that simultaneously maximizes expected returns, minimizes downside risk using the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measure, improves sustainability performance based on ESG indicators, and considers liquidity constraints. The main innovation of this study is the simultaneous integration of financial and non-financial criteria alongside a set of realistic structural constraints, including budget constraints, the number of options available, the concentration ceiling, and the minimum required levels for ESG, innovation, and liquidity. The results show that the proposed model is able to create a transparent balance between return, risk, sustainability, and investment horizon, and by changing the parameters related to risk and sustainability, it can target capital flows towards more innovative startups with higher ESG scores. This framework can be used as a practical tool for investors, digital investment platforms, and policymakers in responsible and data-driven capital allocation. Full article

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into financial services, its alignment with sustainability goals has given rise to a new domain: Green FinTech. This study investigates the Behavioural Intention (BI) of Greek banking customers to adopt AI chatbots in the context of sustainable digital finance. Building upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the proposed model incorporates additional constructs, i.e., Trust, Digital AI Literacy (DAIL), Environmental Concern (ENC), and Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR), to examine the behavioural intention (BI) to use AI chatbots in the context of sustainable digital finance. Unlike prior UTAUT-based research, which has mainly examined AI, FinTech, or chatbot adoption separately or in different contexts, the present study develops and empirically tests an extended green-oriented UTAUT model that integrates technological, environmental, and ethical dimensions within a single framework. In this way, the study addresses a geographical, contextual, and model-specific gap in the literature, as research on AI chatbot adoption in Green FinTech remains limited, particularly in the Greek banking context. The target population for this study consists of educated, working-age adults who have already used an AI chatbot for a banking transaction in the context of e-banking services. A structured questionnaire was administered to a sample of 209 users of AI chatbots in the banking context. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and factor analysis via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in conjunction with orthogonal rotation (VARIMAX), the results show that Green Performance Expectancy (GPE), Green Effort Expectancy (GEE), Digital AI Literacy (DAIL), and Trust significantly influence Behavioural Intention (BI). Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR) also has an indirect impact via Green Social Influence (GSI). The study extends UTAUT in the Green FinTech context by integrating sustainability- and AI chatbot usage-related constructs, showing that Green Performance Expectancy and trust are the strongest drivers of bank customers’ behavioural intention to use AI chatbots. The study therefore contributes theoretically by extending UTAUT into a green-oriented framework that captures sustainability-related and ethical drivers of AI chatbot adoption in banking, rather than examining technology-use determinants alone. More specifically, it explains AI chatbot adoption in Green FinTech through a unified framework that combines core UTAUT variables with Trust, Digital AI Literacy, Environmental Concern, and Consumer Social Responsibility in the underexplored context of Greek banking. Full article

This research presents an integrated framework for supply chain finance in which digital twin, blockchain, and multi-objective fuzzy optimization are used in synergy to improve financial decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments. In this framework, the digital twin acts as a real-time monitoring and forecasting layer, blockchain acts as a trust and transparency infrastructure, and the optimization model acts as the decision-making core. To evaluate the proposed framework, a scenario-based mathematical model was developed and analyzed using a combination of real-world and simulated data. The results showed that the proposed framework was able to reduce the total cost by 18.6% and increase the return on investment to 12.4%. Also, the use of the digital twin framework significantly reduced financial risks and delays, while the integration of blockchain improved the transparency, traceability, and reliability of transactions and reduced operational errors. Overall, the findings show that this framework has high potential for developing smart, transparent, and resilient financial systems in the supply chain context. Full article

Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in consumer-facing FinTech, but trust in AI-enabled finance depends not only on performance, but also on whether users can understand and appropriately evaluate algorithmic outputs. This review synthesizes research on AI disclosure, explainability, and related transparency cues in consumer-facing FinTech, with particular attention to whether these cues support trust calibration rather than merely increasing trust or adoption. Searches in Scopus and Web of Science identified nine formally included studies and six adjacent contextual studies. The available evidence base is concentrated in robo-advisory and adjacent AI-enabled investment advising, with only limited evidence on automated credit decisions and crowdfunding recommendation platforms. The most studied cues are explanation/explainable AI and broader advisory or platform transparency, whereas disclosure, responsibility attribution, user control, and information-quality cues remain underexamined. Across the formal corpus, transparency cues are generally associated with more positive trust-related outcomes, especially trust and adoption-oriented responses. However, only a small subset of studies addresses trust calibration through outcomes such as reliance, fairness, accountability, and contestability. Overall, the current literature supports transparency more strongly as an acceptance mechanism than as a basis for appropriately bounded trust. Full article

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly with the rise of generative AI technologies, has attracted increasing attention in financial markets. This study examines how the recent AI boom relates to changes in the interconnectedness of global financial markets. Using daily data from January 2021 to December 2025, we analyze spillover dynamics among AI-related equities, cryptocurrencies, and traditional financial assets within a time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR) framework. Our findings indicate that the emergence of generative AI is not associated with a uniform increase in financial connectedness. Instead, the overall level of connectedness declines modestly following the public release of ChatGPT by OPENAI in November 2022, while the structure of spillovers undergoes significant changes. In particular, AI-related equities initially act as net transmitters of shocks, but their relative importance diminishes over time. In contrast, broader equity markets, proxied by the S&P 500, remain the dominant source of spillovers throughout the sample period. These results are robust to alternative model specifications, including different lag lengths and forecast horizons. Overall, the findings suggest that the impact of AI on financial markets is better understood as a structural transformation of interconnectedness rather than a simple intensification of linkages. This study contributes to the literature by providing new evidence on how technological innovation reshapes financial spillover networks and highlights the importance of considering both the level and structure of connectedness in assessing systemic risk. Full article

Background: Open banking (OB) is rapidly transforming financial ecosystems by enabling controlled data sharing among multiple actors through application programming interfaces (APIs). While this transformation promises innovation and competition, it also introduces complex security challenges that extend beyond purely technical considerations. Despite growing attention in academic and professional domains, existing reviews provide limited integration of security concerns with global adoption patterns and cross regional variation. Methods: This systematic review analyses empirical and conceptual research on security in OB published between 1999 and 2025, capturing early digital banking studies that later informed the development of OB. The literature is structured into three distinct phases: foundational digital banking developments, regulatory formalisation of OB frameworks, and post-implementation expansion of OB ecosystems. A comprehensive search was conducted across major academic databases and scholarly portals, complemented by relevant regulatory and policy sources. Following duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, full-text eligibility assessment, and methodological quality appraisal, 117 studies were retained for qualitative synthesis. Results: The findings reveal recurring security challenges arising from the interaction between technological infrastructures, regulatory frameworks, and user behaviour within OB ecosystems. Technical safeguards such as APIs, strong customer authentication, and encryption are necessary but insufficient when they are misaligned with regulatory implementation and user behaviour. Behavioural factors, including trust, consent understanding, and security-related decision making, play a central role in shaping ecosystem resilience. Based on this synthesis, the study develops a tri-dimensional security framework integrating technological, regulatory, and behavioural dimensions. The bibliometric analysis of 117 studies reveals that technological security dominates the literature (58%), followed by regulatory governance (44%) and behavioural dimensions (42%). However, only 17.9% of studies integrate all three dimensions simultaneously. APIs and authentication mechanisms represent the most frequent technological terms, while PSD2 and GDPR dominate regulatory discourse. Trust and decision-making are the most recurrent behavioural constructs. The relatively low proportion of fully integrated studies confirms a structural fragmentation within OB security research, thereby empirically justifying the proposed tri-dimensional framework. Chronologically, early studies (1999–2015) predominantly focused on technical security mechanisms and regulatory compliance, whereas more recent research (2020–2025) increasingly highlights the interplay between regulatory frameworks and user behaviour, suggesting a shift towards a more holistic understanding of security within OB adoption. Conclusions: This systematic review concludes that integrating technological, regulatory, and behavioural perspectives advances a more comprehensive understanding of security in OB ecosystems. The proposed tri-dimensional security framework provides a structured foundation for future research and supports policy-relevant and practice-oriented security design. Full article

Cryptocurrency adoption remains difficult to explain when treated as a single decision or static outcome. Addressing this limitation, the present study develops a qualitative, process-oriented account of cryptocurrency adoption among users in Central and Eastern Europe, with particular attention to how engagement emerges, changes, and stabilizes over time. Semi-structured individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 cryptocurrency users, and the material was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within an interpretivist framework. The findings show that adoption unfolds as a multi-phase process embedded in users’ biographies, financial practices, and socio-technical environments. Across accounts, cryptocurrencies were described not only as speculative assets but also as tools of financial autonomy, learning, and optionality under conditions of institutional uncertainty and constrained access to conventional financial pathways, making the CEE context particularly revealing for a process-oriented understanding of adoption. The analysis identified six interrelated themes: adoption as a project of financial autonomy; the “conscious investor” identity; the market as a school of cost and irreversibility; platforms and communities as adoption infrastructures; the relational politics of visibility; and practice stabilization. Together, these themes show that factors already highlighted in prior adoption research—such as trust, risk, autonomy, and knowledge—do not function as stable predictors, but change their meaning across different phases of engagement. The study contributes to FinTech adoption research by proposing a processual model that reconceptualizes cryptocurrency adoption as a phased, experience-dependent pattern of participation rather than a static outcome of parallel determinants. In doing so, it extends existing variable-centered frameworks toward a more dynamic and interpretive understanding of financial technology use. Full article

This paper develops a tractable theoretical framework to study how network participation shapes the boom–bust dynamics of non-fungible token (NFT) prices. We model NFT pricing under network effects and heterogeneous consumers, and show that prices and participation are jointly determined in equilibrium. The model implies a critical participation threshold that separates expansion from contraction regimes: above this threshold, positive feedback between participation and valuation generates self-reinforcing growth, while below it, weakening network benefits lead to contraction. We provide empirical evidence using data from the aggregate NFT market and prominent collections including Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) and CryptoPunks. Reduced-form regressions show a positive association between prices and network participation, with stronger effects at the collection level than in the aggregate market. Threshold estimation further provides evidence consistent with regime-dependent dynamics, with clearer tipping behaviour in well-defined NFT communities than in the aggregate market. These findings suggest that NFT valuation is closely tied to network structure and participation dynamics. More broadly, this paper contributes a unified framework that links participation, price formation, and threshold behaviour in NFT markets. Full article

Despite growing recognition of blockchain technology’s potential to enhance traceability, verifiability, and integrity in financial reporting, empirical evidence from regulated banking environments in developing economies remains scarce. This study investigates whether blockchain adoption is positively associated with transparency and accounting disclosure in digital financial reports among Jordanian listed banks. A structured questionnaire was distributed to managers, financial managers, and accountants across 15 banks listed on the Amman Stock Exchange, yielding 312 valid responses. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with 5000 bootstrap subsamples was employed for data analysis. The results show that blockchain adoption is positively and significantly associated with transparency (β = 0.361, p < 0.001) and accounting disclosure (β = 0.437, p < 0.001), explaining 13.0% and 19.1% of the variance, respectively. These findings suggest that blockchain-enabled systems are perceived by banking professionals as contributing to greater reporting credibility. By providing empirical evidence from a developing economy banking sector, this study indicates that blockchain adoption may serve as a governance-supporting mechanism associated with improved perceived transparency and disclosure quality. Full article

Recent advances in large language models, tool-using agents, and financial machine learning are shifting financial automation from isolated prediction tasks to integrated decision systems that can perceive information, reason over objectives, and generate or execute actions. The paper develops an integrative framework for analysing agentic finance: financial market environments in which autonomous or semi-autonomous AI systems participate in information processing, decision support, monitoring, and execution workflows. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, the paper proposes a four-layer architecture of financial AI agents covering data perception, reasoning engines, strategy generation, and execution with control. Second, it introduces the Agentic Financial Market Model (AFMM), a stylised agent-based representation linking agent design parameters such as autonomy depth, heterogeneity, execution coupling, infrastructure concentration, and supervisory observability to market-level outcomes including efficiency, liquidity resilience, volatility, and systemic risk. Third, it presents an illustrative empirical application based on event studies of AI-agent capability disclosures and heterogeneous market repricing. It argues that the systemic implications of AI in finance depend less on model intelligence alone than on how agent architectures are distributed, coupled, and governed across institutions. The empirical application is intentionally exploratory: it does not validate the full AFMM but shows how one observable expectations channel can be studied using public data. In the near term, the most plausible equilibrium is bounded autonomy, in which AI agents operate as supervised co-pilots, monitoring systems, and constrained execution modules embedded within human decision processes. Full article

This paper examines the factors associated with valuation patterns in FinTech and RegTech mergers and acquisitions (M&A) using a global sample of 3739 completed transactions sourced from S&P Global Market Intelligence from 2008 to 2025. We develop and empirically validate an integrated theoretical framework combining digital platform theory, open innovation theory, and control-based theories of the firm. We test our five hypotheses using semi-log regression models with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors. We document five main findings. First, full acquisitions are associated with valuation premiums nearly three times larger than traditional M&A control premiums in baseline specifications, which remain economically large (~188%) after correcting for sample selection. Second, cross-border transactions are associated with significantly higher valuations. Third, infrastructure-oriented FinTech and RegTech segments are valued more highly than consumer-facing segments. Fourth, transaction values increase systematically over time, consistent with declining uncertainty as the sector matures. Fifth, deal structure explains more variation in transaction values than temporal or geographic factors, reversing conventional valuation patterns observed in financial-sector M&A. We further document that tighter financing conditions significantly depress valuations, though the underlying structural drivers of the FinTech premium remain robust to these macroeconomic shifts. Our findings contribute to the banking and finance literature by demonstrating that M&A in FinTech and RegTech exhibit a distinct valuation regime shaped by digital platforms and innovation-driven control mechanisms. Full article

This empirical study examines how FinTech innovation is adopted, scaled, and sustained in a small and highly regulated market, such as Latvia. The triangulated analytical framework is applied in this study, integrating Rogers’ Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), De Meyer’s Innovation Ecosystem framework, and Value Chain Theory. This framework analyses the relationship between innovation characteristics, ecosystem relationships, and restructuring in the value chain. The data was collected from FinTech leaders, conventional financial institutions (banks), regulators, and associations, and was analysed thematically. Based on interviews with stakeholders, the relative advantage of Latvian FinTech lies in its flexibility, speed, and trialability; however, barriers to adoption result in complex regulation, an uneven distribution of technology in infrastructure, and differences in institutional readiness. The authors found strong collaboration among the ecosystem’s players but limited proactive regulatory engagement. This research provides a replicable model for cross-border or cross-sector analysis to assess the progress of innovation in regulatory and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) integration. Full article

The digital transformation of entrepreneurial finance has progressed beyond basic FinTech adoption toward the deeper digitalization of financial processes and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). Yet, firms, particularly non-financial SMEs, vary substantially in their ability to convert these technologies into superior entrepreneurial, market, and financial outcomes. This study develops and tests a capability-based model explaining how FinTech-enabled financial process digitalization (FPD) and AI use shape entrepreneurship by influencing entrepreneurial performance outcomes. In line with current developments in digital finance, AI use is conceptualized as an embedded and complementary feature of FinTech-enabled financial process digitalization rather than an independent technological category. Drawing on the resource-based view and behavioral finance, we propose digital financial capability (DFC) as a central mechanism through which FinTech-enabled digitalized finance creates value, while credit fear is conceptualized as a behavioral constraint that limits entrepreneurial outcomes. We further posit customer satisfaction as a market-facing outcome linking financial capabilities to firm performance. Using survey data from 318 non-financial SMEs operating in Greece and applying Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the findings show that FPD and AI use significantly enhance DFC, which in turn increases customer satisfaction and entrepreneurial performance. In addition, financial process digitalization reduces credit fear, thereby mitigating its negative impact on entrepreneurial performance. By shifting the focus from technology adoption toward AI-supported capability development within digitally enabled financial processes and behavioral mechanisms, this study advances FinTech and entrepreneurship research and offers actionable insights for managers and policymakers seeking to leverage digital finance for sustainable entrepreneurial value creation. Full article

Saudi Arabia experienced rapid convergence in women’s financial inclusion between 2014 and 2024, a period marked by the 2018–2019 reforms expanding women’s economic rights and the accelerated deployment of digital payment infrastructure. Using four waves of Global Findex microdata (2014, 2017, 2021, and 2024), this study estimates probability-weighted logit models with average marginal effects and decomposes gender gaps using nonlinear Kitagawa and Blinder–Oaxaca methods. Reform-era dynamics are examined by tracing changes in the gender gap across survey waves. The findings indicate that aggregate gender gaps in account ownership and digital payment usage narrowed substantially by 2024, with conditional gaps among employed adults no longer statistically significant, while sizable disparities persist among individuals outside the workforce. Decomposition results highlight increased female labor force participation as a key correlate of convergence, consistent with labor market integration playing a central role in women’s financial inclusion during the reform era. Full article

We examine a simple duration-rotation strategy applied to six U.S. Treasury ETFs spanning the full maturity spectrum, using data from 2007 to 2025. At each semi-annual rebalancing date, ETFs are ranked by prior-period return and divided into three equal groups—Winners, Median, and Losers. Contrary to conventional momentum logic, the middle group consistently outperforms. The Median strategy grows USD 100 to USD 199.90 by end-2025, a CAGR of 3.79% against 2.17% for the passive benchmark, with a higher Sharpe ratio (0.606 vs. 0.494) and a shallower maximum drawdown ($-11.6\%$ vs. $-14.4\%$). Newey–West HAC and Lo (2002) tests confirm statistical significance ($p=0.031$ and $p=0.014$), and an expanding-window walk-forward procedure yields $p=0.0005$ across 27 out-of-sample evaluations from 2012 to 2025. The result is robust to calendar alignment, evaluation endpoint, lookback window, and execution timing, and survives transaction costs by a wide margin. The strategy requires no interest rate forecasts, no proprietary data, and is implementable with standard ETF brokerage access. Full article

This paper examines the market maturation hypothesis in cryptocurrency markets through a three-stage analysis of the evolution of tail risk in Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). Using daily closing prices from January 2015 to February 2026 for BTC (n = 4058) and November 2017 to February 2026 for ETH (n = 3015), we employ 365-day rolling windows—reflecting the continuous 24/7 operation of cryptocurrency markets—to trace the temporal dynamics of Value-at-Risk (VaR), Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), and Maximum Drawdown (MDD). The empirical strategy combines (i) Newey–West trend tests on rolling risk metrics, (ii) regime-conditional analysis across market states (Bull, Bear, or Neutral) and volatility regimes (high/low uncertainty), and (iii) exceedance correlation analysis to capture asymmetric BTC–ETH tail dependence. The results are consistent with the market maturation hypothesis: all ten trend coefficients across both assets are statistically significant (p < 0.001), with linear time trends explaining up to 46.8% (BTC VaR₁%) and 67.5% (ETH VaR₁%) of variation in rolling tail risk. Sub-period comparisons confirm economically meaningful declines—BTC VaR₁% fell by 22.0% and ETH VaR₁% by 26.6% between the early and late subsamples. However, maturation is markedly asymmetric across uncertainty regimes: tail-risk reductions concentrate in low-uncertainty periods, whereas BTC MDD in high-uncertainty regimes shows no significant improvement (+1.0%, p = 0.176). Excess correlation analysis reveals a persistent and widening downside asymmetry (ρ⁻ = 0.847 vs. ρ⁺ = 0.246 at the 90th percentile), with late-period upper-tail correlation turning negative (ρ⁺ = −0.175 at the 95th percentile), implying that portfolio diversification within the cryptocurrency asset class remains illusory during market stress. These findings carry direct implications for institutional risk management, stress-testing frameworks, and prudential regulation of digital assets. Full article

This paper explores the relationship between risk-taking attitudes, different dimensions of trust, and the adoption of financial technology (FinTech) in an emerging Central European economy. Based on survey data collected via LimeSurvey (October to December 2025) in Hungary, multivariate linear regression models were estimated to explore the relationship between FinTech usage, individual risk-taking propensity, and four dimensions of trust, while controlling for socioeconomic variables. The results indicate that higher institutional trust in independent financial actors facilitates FinTech adoption. However, higher institutional trust in domestic financial and governmental actors has an inhibiting effect. When trust dimensions are added to the model, the positive association with general risk-taking propensity becomes statistically marginal, indicating that trust-related factors account for a substantial share of the observed variation. Further tests regarding the possible direction of this causation confirm that FinTech use is also linked to increased trust in independent financial actors. This study adds to the FinTech literature by demonstrating that usage is related not only to generalized trust and individual risk propensity but also to differentiated institutional trust attitudes. The findings highlight that institutional background is an important determinant of digital financial behavior in emerging economies. Full article