Previous Issue
Volume 13, June
 
 

Dent. J., Volume 13, Issue 7 (July 2025) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 785 KiB  
Systematic Review
Cytotoxicity of Printed Aligners: A Systematic Review
by Mauro Lorusso, Fariba Esperouz, Gabriele Di Carlo, Michele Tepedino, Rosa Esposito, Giovanni Pappalettera, Caterina Casavola, Lucio Lo Russo and Domenico Ciavarella
Dent. J. 2025, 13(7), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13070275 (registering DOI) - 20 Jun 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The capability of printing aligners directly, eliminating the need for a dental model or thermoforming, represents a significant advancement in aligner therapy. This review aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed aligners to clarify their safety profile, given their growing clinical use. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The capability of printing aligners directly, eliminating the need for a dental model or thermoforming, represents a significant advancement in aligner therapy. This review aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed aligners to clarify their safety profile, given their growing clinical use. Methods: An electronic literature search was independently conducted by two reviewers up to February 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. After a thorough selection process, five in vitro studies were included. The quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the QUIN tool. Results: Five studies were included in the systematic review, four of which used TC-85 resin and one TA-28. Two reported no cytotoxic effects. Mild cytotoxicity was observed in one study using UV and heat post-curing, while another reported increased cytotoxicity with extended UV/nitrogen curing. However, notable heterogeneity was present among the studies in terms of the experimental protocols, the cell lines used, and the outcome measures. Conclusions: The cytotoxicity of printed aligners appears to be influenced by post-curing duration and system type, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to manufacturers’ protocols. Nevertheless, due to the limited number of studies and methodological variability, definitive conclusions cannot yet be drawn. Further clinical and standardised in vitro studies are needed to better assess the biocompatibility of 3D-printed aligners. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop