Previous Article in Journal
Applications of UAV Technologies in Assessment of Transportation Infrastructure Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Portland Cement Concrete Mixes

1
Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management, 11000 University Parkway, Pensacola, FL 32514, USA
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kennesaw State University (KSU), Marietta Campus, 655 Arntson Drive, Marietta, GA 30060, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
CivilEng 2025, 6(3), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng6030033
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Revised: 17 May 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Material Engineering)

Abstract

This study is a preliminary investigation of the independent utilization of two types of fly ash (FA)–FA Type C and FA Type F-as partial replacement of fine aggregate (sand) and cement in Portland cement concrete (PCC) mixes. The main objective was to determine an optimum substitution range for each type of FA that would offer well-performing concrete in terms of workability, compressive strength, and durability. To this end, multiple concrete batches were prepared, incorporating each type of FA at four different levels: 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight of fine aggregate replacement and 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by weight for cement replacement. Then, concrete samples (100 mm diameter × 200 mm tall cylinders) were cast from each batch and were moisture-cured for 7, 14, and 28 days prior to testing. The addition of FA contributed positively to the strength development at specific replacement levels: all percentages for both FA Type C and Type F for fine aggregate replacement and up to 30% FA content for both Type C and F for cement replacement, 10% for both FA Type C and Type F provided the higher strength for aggregate replacement, and 10–20% for both types of FA provided the higher strength for cement replacement. Furthermore, these additions of FA exhibited comparable workability and durability except for FA Type F, which did not exhibit comparable workability for aggregate replacement. FA Type C can be recommended for both early and long-term strength for fine aggregate replacement, whereas FA Type C is suggested to be used for early strength and Type F provides for long-term strength for cement replacement. Type C provides better durability and Type F provides better workability for cement replacement.
Keywords: fly ash; fine aggregate; cement; strength; and Portland cement concrete fly ash; fine aggregate; cement; strength; and Portland cement concrete

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karim, M.A.; Seo, Y.; Alamayreh, I.; Suttle, S. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Portland Cement Concrete Mixes. CivilEng 2025, 6, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng6030033

AMA Style

Karim MA, Seo Y, Alamayreh I, Suttle S. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Portland Cement Concrete Mixes. CivilEng. 2025; 6(3):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng6030033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karim, M. A., Youngguk Seo, Ibrahim Alamayreh, and Stuart Suttle. 2025. "Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Portland Cement Concrete Mixes" CivilEng 6, no. 3: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng6030033

APA Style

Karim, M. A., Seo, Y., Alamayreh, I., & Suttle, S. (2025). Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate and Cement in Portland Cement Concrete Mixes. CivilEng, 6(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng6030033

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop