Sensors for Biomechanical and Rehabilitation Engineering

A special issue of Biomechanics (ISSN 2673-7078). This special issue belongs to the section "Injury Biomechanics and Rehabilitation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 October 2026 | Viewed by 2102

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Engineering, Edgbaston Campus, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Interests: gait analysis; musculoskeletal modelling and simulation; wearable IMU sensors; lower limb biomechanics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the realm of biomechanics, wearable technology has emerged as a transformative tool in rehabilitation, utilising sensors to continuously monitor and provide real-time feedback on a wide range of data collected from individuals. This technology facilitates the assessment of biomechanical signals using force/pressure sensors, inertial measurement units (IMUs), and electromyography (EMG) sensors. By capturing these diverse data, wearable devices enable healthcare professionals to design personalised rehabilitation protocols, track patient progress, and optimise therapeutic interventions, ultimately enhancing recovery outcomes.

This Special Issue therefore aims to put together original research and review articles on recent advances, technologies, solutions, applications, and new challenges in the field of Biomechanical and Rehabilitation Engineering.

You may choose our Joint Special Issue in Sensors.

Dr. Ziyun Ding
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomechanics is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sensors
  • biomechanical
  • rehabilitation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 13752 KB  
Article
Experimental Validation of Upper-Limb Arm Motion Measured by Wearable IMUs Using a Kinect-Based Reference System
by Marco Ceccarelli, Rosaura Anaid Suárez-Santillán and Cuauhtémoc Morales-Cruz
Biomechanics 2026, 6(2), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6020058 - 9 Jun 2026
Viewed by 224
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate and accessible assessment of upper-limb motion is essential for rehabilitation research, ergonomic evaluation, human–machine interaction, and limb exercise. This work presents a comparative evaluation of upper-limb joint angle estimation obtained from wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) using a Kinect-based practical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Accurate and accessible assessment of upper-limb motion is essential for rehabilitation research, ergonomic evaluation, human–machine interaction, and limb exercise. This work presents a comparative evaluation of upper-limb joint angle estimation obtained from wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) using a Kinect-based practical benchmark during synchronized data acquisition. Methods: The main variables analyzed were shoulder and elbow joint angles, together with IMU-derived acceleration and surface electromyography (sEMG) signals acquired as complementary physiological information during task execution. Ten healthy adult participants performed predefined upper-limb movements while data from both sensing modalities were recorded simultaneously. Joint angles were estimated independently from IMU and Kinect measurements and compared using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) equivalence analysis. Results: For upper- limb motion, IMU-derived estimates showed practical equivalence within the predefined ±10° acceptance margin with small MAE and RMSE values and significant TOST equivalence results (p < 0.001), supporting reliable proximal joint tracking under controlled conditions. Tested elbow motion exhibited large estimation error and large variability, and although the TOST analysis was significant, the equivalence interval slightly exceeded the predefined acceptance bound, indicating comparatively weak agreement between sensing modalities. The presented results should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence derived from a comparative benchmark rather than as definitive validation for unrestricted or clinical implementation. The synchronized acceleration and sEMG signals provided complementary temporal information regarding movement execution but were not treated as primary comparative outputs. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of wearable IMU-based upper-limb joint angle estimation as a proof-of-concept comparative framework rather than definitive clinical validation. The presented findings support the feasibility of the proposed IMU-based sensing approach for upper-limb joint angle estimation, particularly at the shoulder level, while also highlighting the greater complexity of elbow-related measurements. Further investigation in larger samples, more functionally diverse tasks, and broader populations is required to extend the applicability of the proposed approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Biomechanical and Rehabilitation Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4760 KB  
Article
Interjoint Range of Motion Relationships Along Myofascial Chains in Healthy Adults
by Anna Chalkia, Eleftherios Paraskevopoulos and Dimitris Mandalidis
Biomechanics 2026, 6(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6010025 - 2 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1336
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence suggests the presence of associations in joint mobility along anatomically defined myofascial continuities, indicating that joint mobility may co-vary across anatomically distant regions. This study aimed to investigate the correlations between the active range of motion (ROM) of joints [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence suggests the presence of associations in joint mobility along anatomically defined myofascial continuities, indicating that joint mobility may co-vary across anatomically distant regions. This study aimed to investigate the correlations between the active range of motion (ROM) of joints belonging to the same myofascial chain in healthy, physically active individuals. Methods: Active ROM was measured in 61 adults (21 males and 40 females) at joints contributing to four myofascial chains: the superficial front line (SFL), superficial back line (SBL), functional front line (FFL), and functional back line (FBL), using an inertial measurement unit. Partial Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), controlling for sex, were calculated to examine the relationships between joint ROM values within lines, with statistical corrections applied when necessary. Results: Significant, yet weak to moderate in most cases, partial correlation coefficients were identified among joints in the upper SFL (0.32–0.44), the lower SBL (0.42–0.44), along the FFL (0.29–0.51), and between the lower segments of the BFL (0.48–0.60). Conclusions: While some joint ROMs within myofascial chains demonstrate weak-to-strong associations, overall interdependence appears mode- and region-specific. These findings suggest that factors beyond fascial continuity, such as neuromuscular control, joint structure, and movement habits, are likely to contribute to ROM variability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Biomechanical and Rehabilitation Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop