Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
BiomechanicsBiomechanics
  • Article
  • Open Access

11 October 2025

14 Pages

The Effect of Warm-Up on Muscle Strength and Body Temperature in Athletes with Disabilities

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Graduate Program of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil
2
Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports—GPEPS, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil
3
Graduate Program of Physiological Science, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil
4
Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa—Florestal Campus, Florestal 35690-000, Brazil
This article belongs to the Section Sports Biomechanics

Abstract

Introduction: Paralympic powerlifting (PP) is a sport in which the bench press is the sole exercise. Warm-up routines are considered essential for optimal performance. Objectives: This study aims to analyze different types of warm-up protocols—traditional warm-up (TW), post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE), and without warm-up (WW)—and their effects on dynamic strength indicators, core temperature, and skin temperature in athletes with disabilities. Methods: Fourteen nationally ranked PP athletes participated in the study. Their performance was evaluated following different warm-up protocols. Dynamic variables analyzed included Maximum Velocity (VMax), Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV), and Power output. Additionally, tympanic and skin temperatures were measured. Results: No significant differences were observed in dynamic strength indicators across the different warm-up protocols. Thermographic analysis revealed differences only in the triceps muscle between PAPE and TW (p < 0.001), TW and WW (p = 0.004), and PAPE and WW (p = 0.015). Differences were also observed between TW and WW (p = 0.026). Ten minutes post-warm-up, differences were noted between PAPE and WW (p < 0.001) and between TW and WW (p = 0.001). In the WW condition, significant differences were found between pre-warm-up and 10 min post-warm-up (p = 0.031), as well as between post-warm-up and 10 min later (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The study evaluated the potential impact of warm-ups on dynamic indicators of strength, core temperature, and skin temperature. No differences were found between the warm-up methods for strength indicators. Regarding skin temperature, only the triceps showed differences between the PAPE and Traditional methods. Regarding core temperature, after warm-up and 10 min later, the methods without warm-up showed higher temperatures than the PAPE and Traditional methods. Therefore, in practical applications, warm-up methods do not appear to interfere with strength indicators, with lower skin temperatures for the triceps in the PAPE methods.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.