Previous Issue
Volume 7, May
 
 

AgriEngineering, Volume 7, Issue 6 (June 2025) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 6258 KiB  
Article
Experimental and Numerical Study on Dynamic Porosity of the Flow Layer During the Paddy Grain Convective Drying Process
by Bin Li, Chuandong Liu, Zebao Li, Yuelang Liu, Haoping Zhang, Xuefeng Zhang, Cheng Lv and Zhiheng Zeng
AgriEngineering 2025, 7(6), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7060164 - 22 May 2025
Abstract
Porosity is the key factor affecting a medium’s tortuosity, effective evaporation area coefficient, and ventilation resistance, and further affects the drying efficiency, energy consumption, and drying uniformity in the drying process. To reveal the dynamic variation characteristics of porosity in paddy flow layer, [...] Read more.
Porosity is the key factor affecting a medium’s tortuosity, effective evaporation area coefficient, and ventilation resistance, and further affects the drying efficiency, energy consumption, and drying uniformity in the drying process. To reveal the dynamic variation characteristics of porosity in paddy flow layer, an air convection drying apparatus was established and a mathematical porosity model was established based on response surface methodology. The reliability of the model was verified through EDEM–Fluent coupled digital simulation and experiments. The research results show that under different paddy flow rates vd(0.01 m/s, 0.03 m/s, 0.05 m/s), different moisture contents Mc (14% w.b., 23% w.b., 32% w.b.), different wind speeds vw (0.4 m/s, 0.6 m/s, 0.8 m/s), and different layer thicknesses L (100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm), the porosity values obtained by the porosity measurement device range from 39.562% to 46.006%. The relative errors between the actual values (εr), the simulation values (εs), and the predicted values (εp) are all within ±1%. Moreover, the obtained mathematical porosity model has high reliability (R2 = 0.968). The Conclusions provide an analysis method for dynamic change characteristic parameters and basic data for the dynamic change of porosity to reduce drying energy consumption, improve the drying power coefficient, and enhance drying quality. Full article
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop