-
Practice Testing Facilitates Forward Navigation but Undermines Backward Navigation During Map Learning
-
Do Applicant Reactions to Gamified Cognitive Ability Tests Differ Between High- Versus Low-Stakes Settings?
-
Gender and Accuracy in Decoding Affect Cues: A Meta-Analysis
-
Bayesian Estimation of Generalized Log-Linear Poisson Item Response Models for Fluency Scores Using brms and Stan
-
Enhancing Spatial Ability Assessment: Integrating Problem-Solving Strategies in Object Assembly Tasks Using Multimodal Joint-Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling
Journal Description
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence
is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on the study of human intelligence, published monthly online by MDPI.
- Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
- High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, SSCI (Web of Science), PubMed, PMC, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, and other databases.
- Journal Rank: JCR - Q1 (Psychology, Multidisciplinary) / CiteScore - Q1 (Education)
- Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 25.8 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 2.8 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2024).
- Recognition of Reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any MDPI journal, in appreciation of the work done.
Impact Factor:
3.4 (2024);
5-Year Impact Factor:
3.5 (2024)
Latest Articles
Intelligence and Moral Development: A Critical Historical Review and Future Directions
J. Intell. 2025, 13(7), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13070072 (registering DOI) - 22 Jun 2025
Abstract
This paper is a critical, historical review of the literature on intelligence and moral development. In this review we come to a number of conclusions. For example, we identify methodological issues in past research on intelligence in relation to moral development, from Wiggam’s
[...] Read more.
This paper is a critical, historical review of the literature on intelligence and moral development. In this review we come to a number of conclusions. For example, we identify methodological issues in past research on intelligence in relation to moral development, from Wiggam’s paper in 1941 through the first quarter of the 21st century, and we commend research done with methodological improvements we specify. Also, we conclude that Heyes’ evolutionary psychology that humans have a specifiable “starter kit” of processes that produce “cognitive gadgets,” including those used in normative thinking, should be given further attention. But, importantly, we note that these “gadgets” may be “malware” or be missing. Another conclusion is that Gert’s account of harms and benefits, of the moral rules, of how the rules are justified, and of how violations are justified, can be a fruitful component of the study of moral development. Furthermore, we argue that the work on wisdom by Sternberg, Kristjansson, and others is important to grasp for its relevance to putting morality into action. Lastly, we discuss areas for future research, especially in neuroscience, and we recommend paying attention to practices for the building of practical wisdom and morality.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Changes in Intelligence Across the Lifespan)
Open AccessArticle
Clustering Analysis of Cognitive Profiles of Clinical Groups Using the CAS: An Examination of Japanese Clinical Populations
by
Shinji Okazaki, Shiho Okuhata, Masumi Aoki and Hisao Maekawa
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060071 - 19 Jun 2025
Abstract
This study examined the distribution characteristics of the standard scores on the Japanese version of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS)’s Planning, Attention, Simultaneous Processing, and Successive Processing (PASS) scale by clustering the scores using the k-means method, focusing on clinical groups. In Study
[...] Read more.
This study examined the distribution characteristics of the standard scores on the Japanese version of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS)’s Planning, Attention, Simultaneous Processing, and Successive Processing (PASS) scale by clustering the scores using the k-means method, focusing on clinical groups. In Study 1, 140 clinical cases evaluated using the CAS at University A’s educational counseling service were analyzed. The k-means clustering method was applied based on the full-scale standard scores, PASS scale scores, score discrepancies, and subtest scaled scores. Study 2 applied the same clustering method to a clinical group of 91 cases with ADHD, ASD, or comorbid ADHD–ASD, excluding those with intellectual developmental disorders or other disorders. In Study 1, a group with lower full-scale standard scores indicating general intellectual development was identified. Study 2 identified a cluster of cases with ADHD, ASD, or comorbid ADHD–ASD that showed distinct discrepancies among the four standard scores. In addition, there were no significant differences in the diagnoses across clusters. The Japanese version of the CAS provides valid cognitive profile insights in clinical settings, which can aid in planning support interventions beyond clinical diagnosis.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurocognitive Processes: Measurement, Connections to Academic Achievement and Clinical Applications)
Open AccessArticle
Emotional Factors in the Psychological Well-Being of Future Teachers: A Structural Model
by
Raquel Gilar-Corbi, Andrea Izquierdo and Juan-Luis Castejón
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060070 - 19 Jun 2025
Abstract
Scientific research has examined relationships between various emotional factors in teachers; however, few studies have analyzed these relationships jointly. This study aimed to explore mechanisms through which emotional intelligence, resilience, stress, and burnout influence the psychological well-being of 338 trainee teachers (comprising 72.8%
[...] Read more.
Scientific research has examined relationships between various emotional factors in teachers; however, few studies have analyzed these relationships jointly. This study aimed to explore mechanisms through which emotional intelligence, resilience, stress, and burnout influence the psychological well-being of 338 trainee teachers (comprising 72.8% women) from the University of Alicante. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the direct and indirect effects among the variables included in the model. The instruments employed were the Trait Meta-Mood Scale, the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scale. The results indicated that resilience had a direct and positive effect on psychological well-being, while burnout had a direct but negative effect. In addition, emotional intelligence and stress influenced psychological well-being indirectly: emotional intelligence exerted a positive impact through resilience, whereas stress had a negative impact through burnout. The model explained a high percentage (85.3%) of variance in psychological well-being. This study provides empirical evidence on how these variables interact and highlights the importance of incorporating these abilities into teacher training programs to enhance teachers’ psychological well-being and thereby improve the quality of the educational process.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Diversity, Educational Inclusion, Emotional Intelligence, Coping, and Other Factors That Influence Psychological Health and Well-Being)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Controlling Rater Effects in Divergent Thinking Assessment: An Item Response Theory Approach to Individual Response and Snapshot Scoring
by
Gerardo Pellegrino, Janika Saretzki and Mathias Benedek
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060069 - 17 Jun 2025
Abstract
Scoring divergent thinking (DT) tasks poses significant challenges as differences between raters affect the resulting scores. Item Response Theory (IRT) offers a statistical framework to handle differences in rater severity and discrimination. We applied the IRT framework by re-analysing an open access dataset
[...] Read more.
Scoring divergent thinking (DT) tasks poses significant challenges as differences between raters affect the resulting scores. Item Response Theory (IRT) offers a statistical framework to handle differences in rater severity and discrimination. We applied the IRT framework by re-analysing an open access dataset including three scored DT tasks from 202 participants. After comparing different IRT models, we examined rater severity and discrimination parameters for individual response scoring and snapshot scoring using the best-fitting model—Graded Response Model. Secondly, we compared IRT-adjusted scores with non-adjusted average and max-scoring scores in terms of reliability and fluency confound effect. Additionally, we simulated missing data to assess the robustness of these approaches. Our results showed that IRT models can be applied to both individual response scoring and snapshot scoring. IRT-adjusted and unadjusted scores were highly correlated, indicating that, under conditions of high inter-rater agreement, rater variability in severity and discrimination does not substantially impact scores. Overall, our study confirms that IRT is a valuable statistical framework for modeling rater severity and discrimination for different DT scores, although further research is needed to clarify the conditions under which it offers the greatest practical benefit.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis of a Divergent Thinking Dataset)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessEditorial
Cognitive Ability Testing in the Workplace: Modern Approaches and Methods
by
Anne E. Kato, Yuliya M. Cheban-Gore, Charles A. Scherbaum and Harold W. Goldstein
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060068 - 11 Jun 2025
Abstract
Despite the increasing importance of cognitive abilities in today’s workplaces and growing dissatisfaction with the status quo of cognitive ability assessment, the ways that cognitive abilities are conceptualized and measured in the workplace have changed very little over the past century (Scherbaum et
[...] Read more.
Despite the increasing importance of cognitive abilities in today’s workplaces and growing dissatisfaction with the status quo of cognitive ability assessment, the ways that cognitive abilities are conceptualized and measured in the workplace have changed very little over the past century (Scherbaum et al [...]
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive Ability Testing in the Workplace: Modern Approaches and Methods)
Open AccessArticle
Intelligence and Dietary Habits: An International Study of Mensa Members
by
Anna Csák and Péter Przemyslaw Ujma
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060067 - 10 Jun 2025
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown a positive relationship between intelligence and health, with higher intelligence quotient (IQ) linked to better health outcomes, longer life expectancy, and lower rates of non-communicable diseases. Better health behaviour in the more intelligent (either due to better health knowledge
[...] Read more.
Numerous studies have shown a positive relationship between intelligence and health, with higher intelligence quotient (IQ) linked to better health outcomes, longer life expectancy, and lower rates of non-communicable diseases. Better health behaviour in the more intelligent (either due to better health knowledge or more advantageous social-financial opportunities) and system integrity theory (overlaps in the background causes of intelligence and health, such as genetic factors) are competing explanations for this link. This study aimed to examine the dietary habits of high-IQ individuals compared to a control group. An online questionnaire was completed by Mensa members (IQ ≥ 130) and control group participants from three countries, assessing various lifestyle factors, especially dietary habits. Key findings include lower smoking rates among Mensa members, special diets primarily for personal rather than medical reasons, and more frequent consumption of some national staples. There was no clear trend for healthier nutritional habits among Mensa members, suggesting that this aspect of health behavior does not account for better health in the more intelligent and supporting system integrity theory instead.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Approaches to Improving Intelligence)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
From Storytime to Success: Prospective Longitudinal Associations Between Toddler Literacy Enrichment and Long-Term Student Engagement in a Millennial Birth Cohort of Boys and Girls
by
Nairy Kazandjian, Kianoush Harandian, Stéfanie Routhier-Guilmette, Marie-Michèle Dufour, Isabelle Archambault and Linda S. Pagani
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060066 - 10 Jun 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
Cross-sectional research suggests associations between enrichment and cognitive skills in toddlerhood. There are no prospectively designed longitudinal studies that investigate the link between early home literacy activities and subsequent mechanisms that explain the putative cognitive benefits. This study tests long-term associations between toddler
[...] Read more.
Cross-sectional research suggests associations between enrichment and cognitive skills in toddlerhood. There are no prospectively designed longitudinal studies that investigate the link between early home literacy activities and subsequent mechanisms that explain the putative cognitive benefits. This study tests long-term associations between toddler literacy enrichment and later student engagement across key academic transitions, from kindergarten to the end of high school. Using the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD) population-based birth cohort data, we examined whether parent-reported experiences of shared reading, looking at picture books or illustrated stories, and pretend writing at age 2 years predict later teacher- and self-reported student engagement at ages 6, 12, and 17 years. The results from multiple regression models, stratified by sex and adjusted for pre-existing and concurrent child and family characteristics, revealed significant associations between early literacy enrichment and later engagement. For boys and girls, literacy enrichment in toddlerhood predicted increases in classroom engagement from kindergarten to the end of high school. These findings highlight the lasting influence of early literacy exposure on subsequent learning-related behaviors, both in and beyond the classroom. They underscore the importance of promoting enrichment in early childhood as a family strategy toward individual readiness to learn, a cornerstone of crystalized intelligence.
Full article

Graphical abstract
Open AccessArticle
General Ability Level Moderates Cognitive–Achievement Relations for Mathematics
by
Christopher R. Niileksela, Jacob Robbins and Daniel B. Hajovsky
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060065 - 5 Jun 2025
Cited by 1
Abstract
Spearman’s Law of Diminishing Returns (SLODR) suggests general intelligence would be a stronger predictor of academic skills at lower general ability levels, and broad cognitive abilities would be stronger predictors of academic skills at higher general ability levels. Few studies have examined how
[...] Read more.
Spearman’s Law of Diminishing Returns (SLODR) suggests general intelligence would be a stronger predictor of academic skills at lower general ability levels, and broad cognitive abilities would be stronger predictors of academic skills at higher general ability levels. Few studies have examined how cognitive–mathematics relations may vary for people with different levels of general cognitive ability. Multi-group structural equation modeling tested whether cognitive–mathematics relations differed by general ability levels for school-aged children (grades 1–5 and grades 6–12) using the Woodcock-Johnson Third Edition (n = 4470) and Fourth Edition (n = 3891) standardization samples. Results suggested that relationships between cognitive abilities and mathematics varied across general ability groups. General intelligence showed a stronger relative effect on mathematics for those with lower general ability compared to those with average or high general ability, and broad cognitive abilities showed a stronger relative effect on mathematics for those with average or high general ability compared to those with lower general ability. These findings provide a more nuanced understanding of cognitive–mathematics relations.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Studies on Cognitive Processes)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Scoring German Alternate Uses Items Applying Large Language Models
by
Janika Saretzki, Thomas Knopf, Boris Forthmann, Benjamin Goecke, Ann-Kathrin Jaggy, Mathias Benedek and Selina Weiss
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060064 - 29 May 2025
Abstract
The alternate uses task (AUT) is the most popular measure when it comes to the assessment of creative potential. Since their implementation, AUT responses have been rated by humans, which is a laborious task and requires considerable resources. Large language models (LLMs) have
[...] Read more.
The alternate uses task (AUT) is the most popular measure when it comes to the assessment of creative potential. Since their implementation, AUT responses have been rated by humans, which is a laborious task and requires considerable resources. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in automatically scoring AUT responses in English as well as in other languages, but it is not clear which method works best for German data. Therefore, we investigated the performance of different LLMs for the automated scoring of German AUT responses. We compiled German data across five research groups including ~50,000 responses for 15 different alternate uses objects from eight lab and online survey studies (including ~2300 participants) to examine generalizability across datasets and assessment conditions. Following a pre-registered analysis plan, we compared the performance of two fine-tuned, multilingual LLM-based approaches [Cross-Lingual Alternate Uses Scoring (CLAUS) and the Open Creativity Scoring with Artificial Intelligence (OCSAI)] with the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) in scoring (a) the original German AUT responses and (b) the responses translated to English. We found that the LLM-based scorings were substantially correlated with human ratings, with higher relationships for OCSAI followed by GPT-4 and CLAUS. Response translation, however, had no consistent positive effect. We discuss the generalizability of the results across different items and studies and derive recommendations and future directions.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generative AI: Reflections on Intelligence and Creativity)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Log File Times as Indicators of Structured Figural Matrix Processing
by
Dominik Weber, Marco Koch, Frank M. Spinath, Florian Krieger and Nicolas Becker
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060063 - 28 May 2025
Abstract
Previous research has shown individual differences in (a) time on task (ToT) and (b) the degree of structuredness in processing figural matrices. The goal of this article was to integrate these two lines of research by analyzing log files from a computer-based assessment
[...] Read more.
Previous research has shown individual differences in (a) time on task (ToT) and (b) the degree of structuredness in processing figural matrices. The goal of this article was to integrate these two lines of research by analyzing log files from a computer-based assessment (N = 198) to examine the role of three ToT sub-components: onset times (before engaging with the first matrix rule), interrule times (between the rules), and intrarule times (within a single rule). We tested three clues that support the assumptions that the interrule times reflect the cognitive construction of a rule-specific solution plan, while the onset times represent a global orientation reaction, and the intrarule times capture the behavioral execution of the plan: (1) based on the interrule times, we identified two clusters of participants, of which one processed the matrices in a more structured fashion; (2) only the accelerating effect of the interrule times across the test was associated with test performance, indicating higher reasoning saturation; (3) a mediated path analysis revealed that faster interrule times propagate in faster intrarule times and more structured processing of matrix rules, resulting in better performance. Confirming internal validity, the three log file times accounted for an incremental 24.30% of test performance variance beyond the traditional ToT. Confirming external validity, two clusters were also identified based on the interrule times from the first test and performance scores from a second matrix test.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence Testing and Assessment)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
An Assessment of Human–AI Interaction Capability in the Generative AI Era: The Influence of Critical Thinking
by
Feiming Li, Xinyu Yan, Hongli Su, Rong Shen and Gang Mao
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060062 - 26 May 2025
Abstract
(1) Background: In the era of generative AI (GenAI), assessing AI literacy is essential for understanding how effectively non-expert users can interact with AI. However, existing assessment tools primarily focus on users’ understanding of AI principles or rely on self-reported scales, neglecting critical
[...] Read more.
(1) Background: In the era of generative AI (GenAI), assessing AI literacy is essential for understanding how effectively non-expert users can interact with AI. However, existing assessment tools primarily focus on users’ understanding of AI principles or rely on self-reported scales, neglecting critical thinking and actual interaction capabilities. To address this gap, this study aims to design and validate evaluation indicators targeting the behavioral process of human–GenAI interactions and analyze the impact of critical thinking. (2) Methods: Grounded in information literacy and critical thinking frameworks, this study operationalized human–AI interaction capabilities into behavioral indicators and rubrics through observation, surveys, and pilot studies. Data were collected from 121 undergraduates completing two real-world tasks with GenAI, and their interaction processes were documented and evaluated. (3) Results: The indicators showed acceptable inter-rater and internal consistency reliability. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed a three-dimensional structure. Further analysis showed that interaction capabilities varied across gender, academic background, AIGC use frequency, critical thinking disposition levels, and question chain logic. (4) Conclusions: The developed evaluation indicators are reliable and valid. Further analysis reveals that a high critical thinking disposition can offset the disadvantage of lower usage frequency. This highlights the significance of critical thinking in enhancing human–GenAI interaction capabilities.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Assessment: Harnessing Technology for Testing Cognitive Ability, Thinking Skill, and Competency)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
When the Past Is Backward and the Future Is Forward: An Embodied Cognition Intervention in Preschoolers with Developmental Language Disorder
by
Carla Vergara, Mabel Urrutia and Alberto Domínguez
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060061 - 25 May 2025
Abstract
This quasi-experimental study investigates the impact of an embodied intervention on the semantics of transitive verbs in children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD), grounded in the “TIME IS SPACE” conceptual metaphor—where the future is mapped as forward and the past as backward. The
[...] Read more.
This quasi-experimental study investigates the impact of an embodied intervention on the semantics of transitive verbs in children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD), grounded in the “TIME IS SPACE” conceptual metaphor—where the future is mapped as forward and the past as backward. The intervention involved a pretest and a posttest design, using the induced plasticity technique to saturate motor areas through repetitive arm movements (either forward or backward). Then, we determined the influence of this saturation on the auditory comprehension of past- and future-tense sentences. Fifty-seven children (ages 5 years and 6 months to 6 years and 9 months) participated in the experiment. Participants were divided into four groups: two groups of children with DLD—14 Chilean students from speech therapy institutions who received the intervention and 15 who did not—and two groups of chronologically matched typically developing (TD) peers, with 14 children in each intervention condition. The hypothesis proposed that a psychoeducational intervention would enhance the comprehension of time–space conceptual metaphors in children with DLD, reflected by greater interference effects (higher RTs and lower ARs in matching vs. mismatching conditions). A 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 mixed ANOVA was used to identify significant differences in reaction times and accuracy rates. Results showed significant differences in the posttest for the DLD group with intervention versus the same group without intervention, particularly in the semantics of future tense with forward motion. Furthermore, the study found that the impact of the intervention depended on the level of narrative discourse comprehension. These findings suggest that embodied interventions leveraging metaphorical mappings of time and space can enhance verb tense comprehension, particularly in preschoolers with narrative comprehension challenges.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Studies on Cognitive Processes)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation?
by
Sultan A. Alharthi
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060060 - 24 May 2025
Abstract
Generative AI tools are increasingly being integrated into game design and development workflows, offering new possibilities for creativity, efficiency, and innovation. This paper explores the evolving role of these tools from the perspective of game designers and developers, focusing on the benefits and
[...] Read more.
Generative AI tools are increasingly being integrated into game design and development workflows, offering new possibilities for creativity, efficiency, and innovation. This paper explores the evolving role of these tools from the perspective of game designers and developers, focusing on the benefits and challenges they present in fostering creativity. Through a mixed-method study, we conducted an online survey (n = 42) with game design professionals, followed by in-depth online interviews (n = 9), to investigate how generative AI influences the creative process, decision-making, and artistic vision. Our findings reveal that while generative AI accelerates ideation, enhances prototyping, and automates repetitive tasks, it also raises concerns about originality, creative dependency, and undermine of human-authored content. Future work will aim to address these challenges by investigating strategies to balance leveraging AI’s capabilities with preserving the integrity of human creativity. This includes developing collaborative human-AI workflows that maintain human oversight, designing systems that support rather than replace creative decision-making, and establishing ethical guidelines to ensure transparency, accountability, and authorship in AI-assisted content creation. By doing so, we aim to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of generative AI’s role in creative practices and its implications for the game design and development lifecycle.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generative AI: Reflections on Intelligence and Creativity)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
by
Dora Lucia Jaramillo Gómez, Annie Julieth Álvarez Maestre, Abad Ernesto Parada Trujillo, Carlos Alfredo Pérez Fuentes, Dago Hernando Bedoya Ortiz and Ruth Katherine Sanabria Alarcón
J. Intell. 2025, 13(6), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060059 - 22 May 2025
Abstract
This study arises from the growing need to train professionals capable of confronting and analyzing the overabundance of information in an increasingly complex world, where critical thinking is seen as an indispensable skill for informed decision making and problem solving. To this end,
[...] Read more.
This study arises from the growing need to train professionals capable of confronting and analyzing the overabundance of information in an increasingly complex world, where critical thinking is seen as an indispensable skill for informed decision making and problem solving. To this end, a systematic narrative review methodology was applied to the scientific literature, compiling data from various international databases. The results reveal that physiological factors (memory, attention, nutrition and physical activity), psychological factors (cognitive biases, fear of ambiguity, and metacognition), sociocultural factors (diversity, inequality, and cultural norms), technological factors (digitalization, use of AI, and digital literacy), and educational factors (active pedagogical strategies and collaborative work) play a determining role in the development of critical thinking in higher education. The discussion emphasizes the complex interaction between these factors and underscores the need for holistic approaches that strengthen both cognitive competencies and emotional well-being. In conclusion, we recommend designing comprehensive training interventions that consider the identified factors, promoting inclusive and reflective environments, aimed at developing critical, autonomous graduates capable of facing contemporary challenges.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Formation and Evaluation of Critical and Creative Thinking for Good Personal, Academic and Professional Performance in These New Times)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Working Smarter: Work-Related Emotional Intelligence and the Family-Work Interface
by
Michael D. Robinson, Kelyn X. Chen, Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar and Roberta L. Irvin
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050058 - 21 May 2025
Abstract
Employees have both work and non-work lives, and these domains of investment can interfere with each other. The present investigation (total N = 497) sought to understand the potential role(s) of work-related emotional intelligence (W-EI) in managing these forms of conflict, with samples
[...] Read more.
Employees have both work and non-work lives, and these domains of investment can interfere with each other. The present investigation (total N = 497) sought to understand the potential role(s) of work-related emotional intelligence (W-EI) in managing these forms of conflict, with samples consisting of full-time military personnel (Study 1), postdoctoral researchers (Study 2), and employees from diverse occupations (Study 3). Higher levels of W-EI were associated with lower levels of family-to-work conflict, but not work-to-family conflict, suggesting an asymmetric form of conflict shielding. Lesser experiences of family-work conflict also provided some explanation for why employees with higher W-EI levels were less prone to counterproductive work behaviors and work-related burnout. In addition, employees with higher W-EI levels were less prone to counterproductive work behaviors even when levels of family-work conflict were relatively high. The results highlight multiple ways in which employees with high W-EI levels manage the family-work interface.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Social and Emotional Intelligence)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
AI as a Helper: Leveraging Generative AI Tools Across Common Parts of the Creative Process
by
Sudapa Chompunuch and Todd Lubart
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050057 - 20 May 2025
Abstract
This study explores Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) applications in creativity. We identify the four most common parts of the creative process: (1) Problem Identification and Framing, (2) Generating ideas, (3) Evaluating ideas, and (4) Deploying and Implementing ideas. We map Generative AI systems
[...] Read more.
This study explores Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) applications in creativity. We identify the four most common parts of the creative process: (1) Problem Identification and Framing, (2) Generating ideas, (3) Evaluating ideas, and (4) Deploying and Implementing ideas. We map Generative AI systems into this common part of the creative process. By positioning GenAI as a supportive “AI as a helper”, we propose a structured framework that identifies specific GenAI tools and their capabilities within each common part of the creative process. Through the analysis and demonstration of use cases, this study demonstrates how Generative AI systems facilitate problem identification, generate novel ideas, evaluate ideas, and enhance implementation. We also propose the criteria for evaluating these GenAI systems for each part of the process. Moreover, this study provides insights for researchers and practitioners who are seeking to enhance GenAI’s creative capabilities and human creativity. This study concludes with a discussion of the implications of these illustrative use cases and suggests directions for future research to further advance the use of GenAI.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generative AI: Reflections on Intelligence and Creativity)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Academic Performance and Resilience in Secondary Education Students
by
Ana María Carroza-Pacheco, Benito León-del-Barco and Carolina Bringas Molleda
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050056 - 16 May 2025
Abstract
Academic performance is a factor of concern and interest in the educational context for the improvement of the educational and economic system of any country. Determining the factors influencing it has been the subject of multiple investigations. This study focused on analysing which
[...] Read more.
Academic performance is a factor of concern and interest in the educational context for the improvement of the educational and economic system of any country. Determining the factors influencing it has been the subject of multiple investigations. This study focused on analysing which dimensions of school resilience could act as determinants of academic performance in a sample of 609 Spanish secondary education students, aged between 11 and 17 years. The School Resilience Scale (SRS) was used as a data collection instrument. The data were analysed using analysis of variance and discriminant analysis based on a canonical function model, which suggested the existence of a direct and significant relationship between academic performance and all dimensions of resilience, with somewhat larger effect sizes for the Internal Resources and Identity–Self-Esteem dimensions, which allowed us to classify students with particularly high levels of performance. The results also show that the school year was significantly associated with academic performance, with the highest percentages of students at the highest level observed in the 2nd and 3rd years.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Skills in Students)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessBrief Report
When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI
by
Vera Eymann, Thomas Lachmann and Daniela Czernochowski
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050055 - 16 May 2025
Abstract
Within the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has not only entered the field of creativity; it might even be marking a turning point for some creative domains. This raises the question of whether AI also poses a turning point for scientific creativity,
[...] Read more.
Within the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has not only entered the field of creativity; it might even be marking a turning point for some creative domains. This raises the question of whether AI also poses a turning point for scientific creativity, which comprises the ability to develop new ideas or methodological approaches in science. In this study, we use a new scientific creativity task to investigate the extent to which AI—in this case, ChatGPT-4—can generate creative ideas in a scientific context. Specifically, we compare AI-generated responses with those of graduate students in terms of their ability to generate scientific hypotheses, design experiments, and justify their ideas for a fictitious research scenario in the field of experimental psychology. We asked students to write and prompted ChatGPT to generate a brief version of a research proposal containing four separate assignments (i.e., formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment, listing the required equipment, and justifying the chosen method). Using a structured (blinded) rating, two experts from the field evaluated students’ research proposals and proposals generated by ChatGPT in terms of their scientific creativity. Our results indicate that ChatGPT received significantly higher overall scores, but even more crucially exceeded students in sub-scores measuring originality or meaningfulness of the ideas. In addition to a statistical evaluation, we qualitatively assess our data providing a more detailed report in regards to subtle differences between students’ and AI-generated responses. Lastly, we discuss challenges and provide potential future directions for the field.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generative AI: Reflections on Intelligence and Creativity)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Do Intellectually Gifted Children Have Better Planning Skills?
by
Li Cheng, Xiaohe Xie, Shiting Yang, Linjie Xiao, Xiaoyu Chen, Yun Nan, Dong Qi, Jagannath P. Das and George K. Georgiou
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050054 - 13 May 2025
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine whether intellectually gifted children had better planning skills than their chronological-age controls and what processing skills may explain these differences. A total of 35 intellectually gifted Chinese children (25 boys and 10 girls; Mage = 12.77
[...] Read more.
The present study aimed to examine whether intellectually gifted children had better planning skills than their chronological-age controls and what processing skills may explain these differences. A total of 35 intellectually gifted Chinese children (25 boys and 10 girls; Mage = 12.77 years) and 39 chronological-age controls (27 boys and 12 girls; Mage = 12.89 years) participated in this study. They were assessed on three measures of operational planning (Planned Codes, Planned Connections, and Planned Search), on a measure of action planning (Crack the Code), and on measures of processing speed, working memory, and attention. Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed first that the two groups differed in Crack the Code (accuracy and first move time) and in Planned Connections. Whereas processing speed explained the group differences in Planned Connections, none of the processing skills were able to eliminate the group differences in Crack the Code. Taken together, these findings suggest that gifted children have better action planning, which allows them to perform better than controls in tasks that require complex problem solving and evaluation of different scenarios and solutions.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Contributions to the Measurement of Intelligence)
Open AccessArticle
Effects of Peer and Teacher Support on Students’ Creative Thinking: Emotional Intelligence as a Mediator and Emotion Regulation Strategy as a Moderator
by
Yafei Shi, Qi Cheng, Yantao Wei, Yunzhen Liang and Ke Zhu
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050053 - 25 Apr 2025
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the relationships among peer and teacher support, emotional intelligence, and creative thinking. A total of 335 middle school students in grade seven were surveyed in China, including boys 187 (55.8%) and girls 148 (44.2%), aged from 11 to
[...] Read more.
This study aimed to explore the relationships among peer and teacher support, emotional intelligence, and creative thinking. A total of 335 middle school students in grade seven were surveyed in China, including boys 187 (55.8%) and girls 148 (44.2%), aged from 11 to 14 years (M = 12.5; SD = 0.5). Results of the partial least square structural equation modeling showed that emotional intelligence was a positive mediator in the processes from peer and teacher support to middle school students’ creative thinking, and emotion regulation strategies moderated these processes from emotional intelligence to creative thinking. Specifically, both peer and teacher support had an indirect effect on creative thinking through emotional intelligence. Moreover, the four dimensions of emotional intelligence bore different mediating powers. Among them, emotion regulation exhibited the greatest mediating power, and self-emotion appraisal is the least. In addition, both reappraisal and suppression positively moderated the impact of emotional intelligence on creative thinking. Moreover, reappraisal had stronger moderating power than that of suppression. Interestingly, the direct effects of both peer and teacher support on creative thinking were not observed. This study offers knowledge about the mechanisms of peer and teacher support and students’ creative thinking, and implications for practitioners were also discussed in this study.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Social and Emotional Intelligence)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Highly Accessed Articles
Latest Books
E-Mail Alert
News
Topics
Topic in
Children, Education Sciences, Healthcare, EJIHPE, J. Intell.
Diversity, Educational Inclusion, Emotional Intelligence, Coping, and Other Factors That Influence Psychological Health and Well-Being
Topic Editors: Francisco Manuel Morales Rodríguez, Juan Pedro Martínez-RamónDeadline: 31 December 2026

Conferences
Special Issues
Special Issue in
J. Intell.
Innovations in Assessment: Harnessing Technology for Testing Cognitive Ability, Thinking Skill, and Competency
Guest Editor: Jian LiDeadline: 25 June 2025
Special Issue in
J. Intell.
Analysis of a Divergent Thinking Dataset
Guest Editors: Boris Forthmann, Nils MyszkowskiDeadline: 31 July 2025
Special Issue in
J. Intell.
The Formation and Evaluation of Critical and Creative Thinking for Good Personal, Academic and Professional Performance in These New Times
Guest Editors: Carlos Saiz, Sílvia F. Rivas, Patricia Morales BuenoDeadline: 31 July 2025
Special Issue in
J. Intell.
How Culture Impacts the Process of Cognitive Assessment
Guest Editors: Lisa Suzuki, Samuel Ortiz, Vincent AlfonsoDeadline: 15 September 2025