- Article
Safety Evaluation of Herbicides in Maize and Soybean and Their Antioxidant Defense Responses to Thifensulfuron-Methyl and Flufenacet
- Sohail Hamza,
- Jizhi Yang and
- Liping Yu
- + 3 authors
Intercropping of maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) is a sustainable practice, but herbicide safety is critical for weed control without crop injury. This study evaluated the safety of pre-emergence (acetochlor and flufenacet) and post-emergence (2,4-D iso-octyl ester, sulfentrazone, and thifensulfuron-methyl) herbicides on seven maize and eight soybean varieties under greenhouse conditions. Greenhouse results showed that flufenacet had lower growth inhibition rates (~32% maize and ~4% soybean) compared to acetochlor (~35% maize and ~24% soybean). Among the post-emergence herbicides, thifensulfuron-methyl caused minimal inhibition (~4% maize and ~25% soybean), while 2,4-D and sulfentrazone showed higher phytotoxicity (up to 74% soybean). For thifensulfuron-methyl, soybean exhibited increased antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, CAT, APX, and POD) at the highest concentration, reaching 35–40% above control levels. In contrast, maize had higher enzyme activity (SOD, CAT, APX, and POD) at the highest herbicide dose for flufenacet. This suggests that maize’s antioxidant induction was insufficient to fully counteract flufenacet’s phytotoxicity at elevated doses. In conclusion, flufenacet demonstrated superior crop safety and weed control compared to post-emergence herbicides, making it more suitable for maize–soybean intercropping systems.
10 December 2025




