In most African countries, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as silica fume, slag, and fly ash, are scarce, creating a need for alternative low-clinker cement that utilises locally abundant resources. Given the limited availability of SCMs, the development of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement
[...] Read more.
In most African countries, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as silica fume, slag, and fly ash, are scarce, creating a need for alternative low-clinker cement that utilises locally abundant resources. Given the limited availability of SCMs, the development of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC
3) has emerged as an attractive solution. LC
3 is a blended binder composed of ground limestone, calcined kaolinite clay, and ordinary Portland cement clinker. This research assessed the mechanical and durability properties of LC
3 binders formulated using raw materials obtained from selected deposits in Tanzania. Two samples of clay from the Pugu deposit were selected: Pugu hard clay (PH) and Pugu soft clay (PS). Limestone and gypsum were sourced from Dar es Salaam. LC
3 mixes containing 58% CEM I/42.5N were produced and used to make concrete with a water/binder ratio of 0.4. Two control mixes were made, a mix with 100% Portland cement CEM I/42.5 N and a mix with 100% Portland pozzolana CEM II/P-B 42.5 N. In addition, four concrete mixes were designed for the study: LC
3-PH, LC
3-PS, CEM I + PH (CC-PH), and CEM I + PS (CC-PS). The mechanical properties evaluated included compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength, whilst durability performance was assessed through sulfuric acid resistance, water sorptivity, and absorption. The results demonstrated the superiority of LC
3 concrete compared to CEM I and CEM II concretes. For instance, the LC
3-PS mix achieved a 90-day compressive strength of 63 ± 2.1 MPa, compared with 62 ± 1.8 MPa for CEM I. Similarly, water absorption was 1.35% and 1.1% for CEM I and LC
3 concretes, respectively. Under sulfuric acid exposure, LC
3 concrete exhibited the lowest mass loss (1.6%) and strength loss (17.9%) compared with 2.4% and 23% for CEM I and 2.1% and 21% for CEM II, respectively. The enhanced performance of LC
3 concrete was attributed to its denser and more refined microstructure, which reduced pore connectivity and improved resistance to the ingress of aggressive agents.
Full article