Previous Issue
Volume 9, June
 
 

Appl. Syst. Innov., Volume 9, Issue 7 (July 2026) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 25323 KB  
Article
Quality 4.0 Framework for Detecting Post-Quality-Gate Rare Failures in Automotive Manufacturing Under Extreme Class Imbalance
by Muhammed Hakan Yorulmuş and Hür Bersam Sidal
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2026, 9(7), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/asi9070132 (registering DOI) - 23 Jun 2026
Abstract
Predictive quality systems are central to Industry 4.0 manufacturing, yet detecting rare defects that pass established quality gates remains an open problem. This study addresses post-quality-gate failure detection in automotive brake manufacturing, where 310 faulty units (1.20%) among 25,756 production records create a [...] Read more.
Predictive quality systems are central to Industry 4.0 manufacturing, yet detecting rare defects that pass established quality gates remains an open problem. This study addresses post-quality-gate failure detection in automotive brake manufacturing, where 310 faulty units (1.20%) among 25,756 production records create a naturally occurring extreme class imbalance of 1:82. Fault labels are derived from warranty reports and linked to multi-station production line measurements, while negative samples may include latent failures, motivating a recall-focused evaluation. We propose a Quality 4.0 machine learning framework that compares five resampling methods (ADASYN, SMOTE-Tomek, KMeans-SMOTE, CTGAN, and TVAE) plus a no-resampling baseline across 24 classifiers and stacking ensembles. In total, 504 configurations are tested on a held-out test set. The proposed SVM-RBF model trained on ADASYN-augmented data achieves recall of 0.871, specificity of 0.982, balanced accuracy of 0.926, and ROC-AUC of 0.952, producing only 93 false positives (FPR = 1.8%). Stacking ensembles provide alternative operating points maximizing the detection rate (93.5%) and a separate operating point with the highest discrimination capacity (ROC-AUC = 0.975). Feature importance analysis through Permutation Importance and SHAP identifies Force Increment as the leading feature under both attribution methods. Friedman and Wilcoxon tests confirm statistically significant differences among strategies. The framework offers a practical way to add predictive capability to existing quality control systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Industry and Intelligence Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop