nutrients-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Perioperative Enteral and Parenteral Nutritional Therapies

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Nutrition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (6 March 2026) | Viewed by 4140

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
Interests: surgical nutrition; reoperative intestinal surgery; management of intestinal failure; critical care; trauma and prevention

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
Interests: trauma and acute care surgery; perioperative nutrition; preventive medicine

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite you to submit original research or review papers focused on the nutritional strategies for preoperative and postoperative support for patients with surgical emergencies.

Malnutrition has been noted to be an important factor in surgical outcomes since 1936, when Dudley reported adverse outcomes in malnourished patients operated on for duodenal ulcer disease. In 1991, the VA Cooperative Trial reported that preoperative parenteral nutrition decreased serious complications in severely malnourished patients. Although this has been recognized for decades, malnutrition, and specifically disease-related malnutrition, in hospitalized patients has been increasing, resulting in morbidity, and increased hospital days, readmission rates, and healthcare costs.

Patients who present with surgical emergencies and baseline malnutrition, commonly seen in our more elderly population, present an even greater challenge for rescue, and require sophisticated nutritional therapies. Despite advances in treatments for cancer, trauma, and other diseases, appropriate and well-timed nutritional support is not universally applied. This may be partially due to published controversies that relate to parenteral nutrition and its potential harm when utilized inappropriately. New data are now available that can guide us to best utilize parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. 

Nutritional management of surgical patients is optimal when overseen by surgeons with expertise in operative interventions and nutritional support, as the catabolic reaction of the procedure and the risk of complications should be considered in the perioperative nutritional plan. When taken alone, without consideration of nutritional status, the new pathways of expedited care for intestinal surgery will not be effective in reducing the cost of care in patients with severe malnutrition. 

To be most effective and least harmful, the metabolic state of the patient must be considered. Patients who are stable, yet malnourished, have a metabolic state that differs from patients catabolic from injury, sepsis, or elective surgery. Different surgical approaches and procedures create variable stress responses and should also be considered. Patients may have underlying chronic infections, malignancies, or other inflammatory states that erode their protein stores and put them into a catabolic and starved state. 

Making the correct nutritional diagnosis and assessing nutritional risk is of paramount importance and will determine the course of therapy prescribed. It is important to understand routine vascular and enteral access and the available approaches that are possible in patients with more challenging anatomy. Ongoing metabolic and nutritional monitoring is needed, as the patient’s condition will be dynamic and adjustments in the nutritional plan will be required, or there may be risk complications from therapy. For patients with more prolonged courses, micronutrients will need to be repleted and monitored. Special surgical conditions such as obesity, an open abdomen, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation need special consideration. 

This Special Issue aims to provide a road map for acute care surgeons to care for their patients with intestinal failure and to provide strategies to optimize elective surgery patients for all surgical specialties. In this Special Issue, original research articles and review papers are welcome. Research topics may include nutritional support in any of the areas below.

Suggested themes and article types for submissions:

  1. Assessment and classification of malnutrition and the metabolism of starvation;
  2. Metabolic stress response—differences between early and late stress responses;
  3. Persistent inflammatory catabolic syndrome—potential therapies;
  4. Sarcopenia and frailty—potential therapies;
  5. Preoperative nutrition support—decision making regarding enteral or parenteral;
    • How to start
    • How to monitor
    • Determination of optimization
  6. Nutritional support in critically ill trauma and surgical patients;
    • When to start
    • How to start
    • Enteral vs. parenteral—when enteral is not enough
    • Monitoring and glycemic control
    • Obesity
    • Open abdomen
    • entero-atmospheric fistulae
    • ecmo
  7. Enteral access and challenges;
  8. Vascular access and challenges;
  9. Micronutrients;
  10. Intestinal failure in patients with malignancy;
  11. Intestinal fistulae nutritional and operative management;
  12. Intestinal rehabilitation and the management of short bowel syndrome.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Patricia Marie Byers
Guest Editor

Dr. Ana Marie Reyes
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nutrition support
  • parenteral nutrition
  • intestinal failure
  • malnutrition
  • short bowel syndrome
  • enteral nutrition
  • intestinal fistulae
  • micronutrients
  • vascular access
  • enteral access

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

24 pages, 21398 KB  
Review
Enterocutaneous Fistulas: Current Management
by Amier Mohamed Rashed, April Mendoza and D. Dante Yeh
Nutrients 2026, 18(12), 1926; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121926 (registering DOI) - 14 Jun 2026
Abstract
Background: Enterocutaneous fistulas (ECFs) and enteroatmospheric fistulas (EAFs) are rare but highly morbid complications that most commonly arise after abdominal surgery. Outcomes have improved with advances in multidisciplinary care and with increasing research on how to best manage them; however, they remain associated [...] Read more.
Background: Enterocutaneous fistulas (ECFs) and enteroatmospheric fistulas (EAFs) are rare but highly morbid complications that most commonly arise after abdominal surgery. Outcomes have improved with advances in multidisciplinary care and with increasing research on how to best manage them; however, they remain associated with significant morbidity, high mortality, and prolonged hospitalization. Optimal timing of definitive repair is unknown, with many high-volume centers waiting 6–12 months, though emerging data suggest that earlier intervention may be feasible in carefully selected patients. Given their complexity and variability in management, a comprehensive review of current evidence is needed. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted with emphasis on the classification, pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary management of ECFs and EAFs. Relevant studies addressing fluid and sepsis control, nutritional optimization, wound care, pharmacologic therapies, and interventional strategies were reviewed. Results: The management of ECFs requires a staged approach focused on fluid resuscitation, sepsis control, wound management, and nutritional optimization. Spontaneous closure can occur, and is most commonly within the first two months. Nutritional optimization through enteral and/or parenteral nutrition or fistuloclysis plays a vital role in improving outcomes. Therapies such as negative pressure wound therapy, biologics, and pharmacologic agents may support spontaneous closure and fistula control. In non-healing fistulas, surgical repair remains necessary, with optimal time for surgery at least 6–12 months from fistula development. Conclusions: ECFs and EAFs remain complex surgical challenges. Outcomes have improved due to advances in nutritional support and wound management, and the emergence of minimally invasive techniques. Standardization of treatment protocols and further research into novel therapy may further enhance outcomes and limit variability in management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Enteral and Parenteral Nutritional Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1247 KB  
Review
Perioperative Immunonutrition for Elective Surgery: Review of Mechanisms, Summary of Evidence, and Future Directions
by Laura Perez Arteaga and D. Dante Yeh
Nutrients 2026, 18(10), 1603; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18101603 - 18 May 2026
Viewed by 356
Abstract
Surgical trauma triggers a complex metabolic and inflammatory response that can profoundly affect patient recovery and clinical outcomes. The magnitude of this stress response correlates with surgical complexity, patient comorbidities, and baseline nutritional status. Immunonutrition refers to the strategic use of specific nutrients, [...] Read more.
Surgical trauma triggers a complex metabolic and inflammatory response that can profoundly affect patient recovery and clinical outcomes. The magnitude of this stress response correlates with surgical complexity, patient comorbidities, and baseline nutritional status. Immunonutrition refers to the strategic use of specific nutrients, including arginine, glutamine, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and nucleotides, to modulate immune and inflammatory responses beyond their basic nutritional value. These pharmaconutrients possess distinct immunomodulatory properties that may attenuate surgical stress responses, enhance immune function, and improve clinical outcomes. While numerous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have been conducted over the past several decades, significant methodological heterogeneity, variable product compositions, inconsistent administration protocols, and divergent patient populations complicate the interpretation of findings. Recent well-designed investigator-initiated trials without industry funding have failed to demonstrate benefits, raising questions about the validity of earlier positive findings and challenging current guideline recommendations. The evidence base reveals promising signals of benefit in selected populations combined with substantial limitations. Available evidence suggests that immunonutrition may be most beneficial in severely malnourished patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery, particularly when administered perioperatively or postoperatively, though the certainty of this evidence remains moderate at best, given the methodological limitations in the existing literature. From an economic perspective, immunonutrition may represent a dominant intervention in appropriate patient populations, though cost-effectiveness estimates derive primarily from older studies with methodological limitations. However, focus on specialized immunonutrition should not distract from fundamental perioperative nutritional care, including systematic risk screening, optimization when feasible, early postoperative feeding, and achievement of adequate protein and calorie targets. Only through methodologically rigorous research addressing fundamental questions can the promise of perioperative immunonutrition be fully realized. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Enteral and Parenteral Nutritional Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 341 KB  
Review
Nutritional Support for Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: New (and Old) Frontiers in Management, a Narrative Review
by Nazanin Khajoueinejad, Christina Santiago, Kea Turner and Jose M. Pimiento
Nutrients 2025, 17(24), 3917; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243917 - 14 Dec 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3358
Abstract
Malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers can be the result of functional and/or anatomical changes in the alimentary tract, secondary to malignancy or oncologic therapies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of malnutrition in these patients is imperative in providing appropriate interventions that can [...] Read more.
Malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers can be the result of functional and/or anatomical changes in the alimentary tract, secondary to malignancy or oncologic therapies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of malnutrition in these patients is imperative in providing appropriate interventions that can not only improve quality of life for these individuals, but also improve their tolerance of oncologic treatment and progression towards remission or cure. In this narrative review, we address common nutritional deficiencies associated with GI malignancies, including pancreatic, biliary, and hepatic cancers. Furthermore, we address common issues related to these deficiencies and causes of nutrition barriers as they relate to organ malfunction or surgical alterations of anatomy. Recommendations for counseling, dietary modifications, nutritional supplements, and pharmacologic interventions are provided based on individual barriers and the vital role of multidisciplinary care is highlighted. Additionally, we highlight novel techniques, such as the role of psychosocial care, prehabilitation, digital health, and machine learning, which can improve nutritional outcomes, provide patient-directed care, and improve risk stratification for this complex and multifaceted issue that faces patients diagnosed with GI cancers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Enteral and Parenteral Nutritional Therapies)
Back to TopTop