Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • 19 days
    Time to First Decision

All Articles (128)

Livestock operations significantly contribute to global methane (CH4) emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. This occurs primarily through enteric fermentation (a digestive process in ruminant animals that produce methane) and manure management. This review synthesizes the current understanding of the sources of methane within livestock farming systems. It focuses on the primary drivers of these emissions, namely methane production during ruminant digestion and emissions from manure handling. The review also explores the concept of methane sinks, highlighting the processes that remove methane from the atmosphere and their role in the global methane cycle. While natural methane sinks exist, their capacity to offset methane emissions from livestock operations is limited. This review therefore discusses a range of mitigation approaches, categorized into animal and feed management, diet manipulation, rumen manipulation, and advanced technologies. Synthesizing these elements provides a clear understanding of the challenges and opportunities in addressing livestock-related methane emissions. Effective strategies should aim to reduce methane production without negatively impacting animal productivity and health. This emphasizes that addressing sustainable livestock production requires integrated approaches that simultaneously tackle climate change mitigation.

1 February 2026

Methane emission pathways in livestock operations. (i) Begins with a ruminant animal ingesting feed, which then enters the rumen where anaerobic microbial fermentation occurs producing H2 and CO2 that methanogenic archaea convert into CH4. (ii) Manure excreted by livestock collected and stored as liquid (lagoons, slurry pits) or solid (piles) decomposes leading to CH4 production.

This study evaluated the effects of ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] addition and land-use history on greenhouse gas emissions (CH4, CO2, N2O) and inorganic nitrogen dynamics (NH4+ and NO3) in Brazilian Cerrado soils. The objective was to determine how fertilization interacts with native and agricultural soils to regulate key biogeochemical processes. Soil samples from native and agricultural areas were collected in four regions (Araras, Sorocaba, Itirapina, and Brasília), representing contrasting pedoclimatic conditions and soil textures under different cropping systems. Samples were incubated under controlled conditions, with greenhouse gas fluxes analyzed by gas chromatography and inorganic nitrogen concentrations determined by colorimetric methods. Nitrogen fertilization inhibited CH4 consumption in native and agricultural soils and reversed fluxes to emissions in sandy soils. CO2 emissions increased in native soils but decreased in agricultural soils, suggesting effects of soil fertility and carbon stocks. N2O emissions increased mainly in native soils, reflecting intensified nitrification and denitrification, whereas agricultural soils responded heterogeneously. Nitrogen addition altered NH4+ and NO3 consumption, indicating enhanced oxidation and microbial assimilation. These results demonstrate that land-use history influences soil biogeochemical responses to nitrogen, underscoring the importance of site-specific fertilization in mitigating emissions and promoting sustainability in the Cerrado.

30 January 2026

Methane (CH4) fluxes in agricultural (a) and natural (b) soils from four Cerrado sites (Araras, Brasília, Itirapina, Sorocaba) in response to ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] addition. Boxplots represent mean values (box) and confidence intervals (lines), with points indicating outliers. “No” indicates the absence of nitrogen, and “yes” indicates nitrogen addition. Values are expressed in µg CH4 m−2 h−1, with scales adjusted for agricultural (a) and natural (b) soils. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by asterisks (*), while “ns” denotes no significant difference.

Biomethanization of Whey: A Narrative Review

  • Juan Sebastián Ramírez-Navas and
  • Ana María Carabalí-Banderas

Whey and its permeates constitute highly organic, low-alkalinity dairy streams whose management remains suboptimal in many processing facilities. This narrative review integrates recent evidence on the anaerobic digestion (AD) of whey, linking substrate composition and biodegradability with microbial pathways, inhibition mechanisms, biogas quality, and techno-economic and environmental feasibility in industrial settings. Data for sweet whey, acid whey, and their permeates are synthesized, with emphasis on operational windows, micronutrient requirements, and co-digestion or C/N/P/S balancing strategies that sustain resilient methanogenic communities. Options for biogas conditioning and upgrading towards combined heat and power, boiler applications, and compressed or liquefied biomethane are examined, and selection criteria are proposed based on impurity profiles, thermal integration, and methane-recovery performance. Finally, critical R&D gaps are identified, including mechanistic monitoring, bioavailable micronutrition, modular upgrading architectures, and the valorization of digestate as a recovered fertilizer. This review provides an integrated framework to guide the design and operation of technically stable, environmentally verifiable, and economically viable whey-to-biomethane schemes for the dairy industry.

27 January 2026

Schematic of biogas conditioning and upgrading from whey digestion for combined heat and power, industrial boilers, and compressed or liquefied biomethane. (The ↓ symbol next to H2S does not represent a physical flow; it indicates a change in concentration, i.e., a decrease or reduction in hydrogen sulfide content).

Food production systems associated with livestock management are significant sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Livestock excreta are one of the primary sources of GHG emissions from grazing livestock. Against this context, a field experiment was established in a UK grassland to establish the extent of soil methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), andN2O fluxes upon the deposition of (i) cattle urine (U), (ii) urine + dicyandiamide (DCD) (U + DCD), (iii) artificial urine (AU), and dung (D), and compared with a (iv) control, where neither urine nor dung was applied. Excreta applications were made at three experimental periods during the grazing season: early-, mid-, and late-season. Soil N2O emissions data have been published already by co-authors; hence, this paper summarizes the emissions of soil-borne CH4 and CO2 emissions, and explores in particular, the effects of the addition of DCD, a nitrification inhibitor used to reduce direct and indirect N2O emissions from urine patches, on these (carbon) C-GHGs. Soil moisture (p = 0.47), soil temperature (p = 0.51), and nitrate (NO3) (p = 0.049) and ammonium (NH4+) (p = 0.66) availability, and C (p = 0.54) addition were key controls of both soil CH4 and CO2 emissions. The dung treatment stimulated the production and subsequent emissions of soil CH4 and CO2, a significantly high net CH4 and CO2-based global warming potential (GWP). The findings of the current study lay a foundation for an in-depth understanding of the magnitude and dynamics of soil-borne CH4 and CO2 upon urine and dung deposition during three different seasons. This study implies that the use of DCD may have the potential to reduce carbon-based GHGs from the urine and dung of grazing animals.

19 January 2026

Monthly average rainfall, air temperature, and soil temperature at 5 cm soil surface in the experimental site during the experiment.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Methane - ISSN 2674-0389