Traffic signal control at signalized intersections plays a key role in mitigating urban congestion, reducing vehicle emissions, and improving road safety. This study examines three signal control strategies at a four-approach isolated intersection simulated using the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) microscopic traffic
[...] Read more.
Traffic signal control at signalized intersections plays a key role in mitigating urban congestion, reducing vehicle emissions, and improving road safety. This study examines three signal control strategies at a four-approach isolated intersection simulated using the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) microscopic traffic simulator: a baseline fixed-time plan, a Webster-optimized fixed-time plan, and a queue-responsive adaptive controller implemented through the Traffic Control Interface (TraCI). The strategies were evaluated under balanced traffic demand of 600 vehicles per hour per approach over a 3600 s simulation period. Performance was assessed using eight indicators related to mobility, environmental impact, and safety, including average delay, travel time, queue length, network speed, throughput, CO
2 emissions, fuel consumption, and time-to-collision events. The results indicate that the adaptive controller produced the greatest improvements, reducing delay by 14.3%, travel time by 13.6%, CO
2 emissions by 9.3%, fuel consumption by 9.4%, and TTC conflicts by 11.2%, while increasing network speed by 47.9%. The Webster-optimized plan achieved moderate improvements, lowering delay by 4.8% and fuel consumption by 5.0% without additional infrastructure requirements. Overall, the findings suggest that both signal re-timing and queue-responsive adaptive control can enhance intersection performance, with the preferred approach depending on available infrastructure and implementation costs.
Full article