Crashes involving freight and commercial vehicles impose substantial human and economic costs, yet most severity studies pool vehicle types or focus exclusively on heavy trucks, masking class-specific risk mechanisms. This study estimates separate Random Parameters Binary Logit models with heterogeneity in means and
[...] Read more.
Crashes involving freight and commercial vehicles impose substantial human and economic costs, yet most severity studies pool vehicle types or focus exclusively on heavy trucks, masking class-specific risk mechanisms. This study estimates separate Random Parameters Binary Logit models with heterogeneity in means and variances for three vehicle categories—heavy-duty multi-axle trucks (
n = 6512), two-axle trucks (
n = 2656), and light-duty pickup trucks (
n = 23,477)—using 32,645 crash records from Thailand’s national highway network (May 2022–December 2024). Pairwise transferability tests rejected parameter transferability, with four of six comparisons exceeding the 97 percent confidence level (three of these above 99 percent; χ
2 = 85.38 to 240.01), confirming that disaggregate estimation is statistically warranted. Three core findings emerge: First, although barrier medians, cut-in-front maneuvers, and sideswipe crashes affect severity in consistent directions across all vehicle types, their magnitudes differ sharply: the protective effect of barrier medians is nearly six times larger for two-axle trucks (ME = −0.160) compared to heavy-duty trucks (ME = −0.028). Second, several determinants are class-specific: dark unlit conditions elevate severity only for two-axle trucks (ME = 0.128), flush medians only for heavy-duty trucks (ME = 0.040), and raised medians only for light-duty pickups (ME = 0.042). Third, no random parameter is common to all three models. Pooled models, therefore, impose misleading homogeneity assumptions; vehicle-type-specific estimation is essential for targeted safety policy.
Full article