sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Strategies in Light of the New European Bauhaus for Resilience and Decreasing the Impact of Natural Hazards on Urban Areas

A Special Issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050) belonging to the section "Hazards and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 November 2026 | Viewed by 2626

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Urban and Landscape Design, “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, 010014 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: disaster management; 20th century architecture; historic gardens
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The early 20th century was marked by a rapid increase in the employment of new technologies in order to respond to the challenges of the time, which included affordable housing between the wars. There were several architectural currents which spanned two or maybe even only one decade, among which one of the most remembered today is the Bauhaus. These technologies were, however, not tested sufficiently and norms for more developed but less seismic countries such as Germany or France were applied in seismic countries such as Greece or Romania, rendering the buildings vulnerable. This Special Issue calls for papers on how to deal with these pre-code buildings. Generally, pre-code buildings are regarded more as those from the postwar period, which are more numerous than experimental interwar buildings, since Modernism spread then as the International Style. Also, historic reinforced concrete buildings are not always considered old enough to be subject to being listed. Contributions from the history of construction in this sense, with a view to the sustainability of the material today, when building with concrete should be decreased, are welcome. This means that the existing built substance should be refurbished instead of being demolished, with the aim of decreasing the carbon footprint. In this sense, the initiative launched in the current European framework programme after the 100th anniversary of the Bauhaus movement might be a solution. The New European Bauhaus calls for beautiful, sustainable, inclusive solutions. Beautiful in this sense means that aesthetic qualities must be conserved when completing a retrofit intervention for natural hazards. At the beginning of this millenium, for example, research projects in engineering treated buildings with architectural value as common buildings. This is no longer the case in European programmes, with consideration given to social sciences and the humanities. Sustainable, in this sense, means resilient to natural hazards and includes also nature-based solutions. Today, climate change-related hazards are as threatening as earthquakes and the role of structural solutions as well as non-structural solutions for floods and wildfires, in particular, are not as researched as those for earthquakes. Papers on these topics are welcome. Inclusive, in this regard, means not only participation through, for example, living labs, in order to elaborate the solutions above (as they are non-structural management retrofit solutions through a change in function) but also consideration of the contribution of local cultures that renders different retrofit solutions for a diverse Modernism, meaning that within the global current learning from the vernacular might lead to regional differences.

Dr. Maria Bostenaru Dan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • 20th century architecture
  • nature-based solutions
  • inclusivity
  • retrofit
  • participation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

23 pages, 1072 KB  
Article
Recommended Methodological Steps for Applying New European Bauhaus Principles in Urban Regeneration: Insights from NONA Project Pilot Sites
by Nataša Danilović Hristić, Nataša Čolić Marković, Sanja Simonović Alfirević, Borjan Brankov and Blaž Barborič
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4837; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104837 - 12 May 2026
Viewed by 667
Abstract
This paper draws on primary research conducted within the international project New Governance for New Spaces—NONA, implemented under the Interreg Danube Region Programme with EU co-funding. The principles of the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative are fully aligned with the research framework and [...] Read more.
This paper draws on primary research conducted within the international project New Governance for New Spaces—NONA, implemented under the Interreg Danube Region Programme with EU co-funding. The principles of the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative are fully aligned with the research framework and outcomes. The study aimed to test the applicability of the NEB model in urban regeneration at four selected pilot sites in four mid-sized cities in Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia) with a strong focus on participatory governance and co-creation involving stakeholders, local authorities, and citizens. It also examined appropriate financing and management models to support sustainable improvement and future development of these spaces. A central outcome of the research was the development of a comprehensive methodological framework outlining key steps and potential implementation scenarios, designed as a roadmap for medium-sized European cities. The methodology combined field research, surveys, the establishment of a Local Action Group (LAG), and the implementation of “soft interventions,” including creative competitions, site-based festivals, workshops, expert walks, and panel discussions and forums. These activities informed a set of beneficial practice recommendations, defined through clear requirements and expected outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

23 pages, 1941 KB  
Systematic Review
Green Roofs as Carbon Sequestration Tools in Urban Environments
by Virgil Dacian Lalescu, Alina-Maria Țenche-Constantinecu, Adina Horablaga, Cosmin Alin Popescu, Marius Moșoarcă, Gigliola D’Angelo and Mihai Fofiu
Sustainability 2026, 18(15), 8000; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18158000 - 6 Aug 2026
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Green roofs have emerged as a critical nature-based solution for urban climate mitigation, offering potential for carbon sequestration alongside thermal regulation and stormwater management. This literature review synthesizes recent research (2020–2025) on green roof carbon dynamics, with emphasis on temperate climate zones and [...] Read more.
Green roofs have emerged as a critical nature-based solution for urban climate mitigation, offering potential for carbon sequestration alongside thermal regulation and stormwater management. This literature review synthesizes recent research (2020–2025) on green roof carbon dynamics, with emphasis on temperate climate zones and methodological approaches relevant to environmental impact assessment. We systematically analyzed 47 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 through comprehensive database searches, focusing on substrate composition effects, vegetation type performance, seasonal variation patterns, and Life Cycle Assessment methodologies. Key findings from extensive systems in maritime and temperate–arid climates reveal that substrate organic carbon typically dominates total carbon storage, significantly exceeding plant biomass contributions. Extensive green roofs demonstrate a wide range of annual carbon fluxes—from initial net emissions of +20.2 g C m−2 yr−1 during establishment phases to substantial net sequestration rates reaching up to −1762 g CO2 m−2 yr−1 in mature systems—depending strongly on substrate age, vegetation type, and local climate conditions. Native grass and forb mixtures consistently outperform Sedum monocultures in long-term carbon storage through enhanced root biomass and substrate organic matter accumulation. Substrate depth, composition, and moisture retention capacity emerge as primary controls on carbon balance, with recycled waste materials showing promise for enhanced storage. Life cycle assessment studies indicate that indirect carbon savings from reduced building energy consumption frequently exceed direct biological sequestration by one to two orders of magnitude. However, significant methodological heterogeneity, limited long-term monitoring datasets, and geographic gaps—particularly for Central and Eastern European temperate zones—constrain robust comparative analysis and transferability of findings. This review identifies critical research priorities, including standardized carbon accounting frameworks, dynamic life cycle assessments incorporating temporal sequestration trajectories, multi-decadal monitoring programs, and region-specific validation studies for temperate continental climates similar to Romania’s Cfb/Dfb zones. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop