You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.

Search for Articles:

Title / Keyword

Author / Affiliation / Email

Journal

Article Type

Advanced Search

Section

Special Issue

Volume

Issue

Number

Page

Logical OperatorOperator

Search Text

Search Type

Journal Description

Philosophies

Philosophies is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting re-integration of diverse forms of philosophical reflection and scientific research on fundamental issues in science, technology and culture, published bimonthly online by MDPI. The International Society for the Study of Information (IS4SI) is affiliated with Philosophies and their members receive a discount on the article processing charge.

Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, ESCI (Web of Science), PhilPapers, and other databases.
Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (History and Philosophy Of Science) / CiteScore - Q1 (Philosophy)
Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 36.3 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 10.6 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2025).
Recognition of Reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any MDPI journal, in appreciation of the work done.

Impact Factor: 0.7 (2024)

Imprint Information Journal Flyer Open Access ISSN: 2409-9287

Latest Articles

16 pages, 281 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Love That Kills: Phaedra’s Challenges to a Philosophy of Eros

by Joseph S. O’Leary

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040081 - 9 Jul 2025

Focusing on the legend of Phaedra and Hippolytus as developed in Euripides and Seneca and especially in Racine’s Phèdre and taking into account as well its further development in works by Camillo Boito, Luchino Visconti, and Yukio Mishima, I make the following arguments: [...] Read more.

Focusing on the legend of Phaedra and Hippolytus as developed in Euripides and Seneca and especially in Racine’s Phèdre and taking into account as well its further development in works by Camillo Boito, Luchino Visconti, and Yukio Mishima, I make the following arguments: (1) Contrary to many theologians and philosophers of love, a pathological form of love that issues in murder and suicide should not be regarded as unworthy of serious attention. Racine’s tragedy provides a catharsis for universal experiences of unrequited love and jealousy, a major human phenomenon. (2) Contrary to Paul Valéry, Phèdre’s love cannot be called merely animal, since the analytical insight she develops into her morbid passion carries tremendous moral force and lies at the origin of the European psychological novel, as launched by Madame de La Fayette a year later. (3) Contrary to François Mauriac, even if she is a heroine of desire or concupiscence rather than of “true love” (in contrast to the relatively innocent affections of Hippolyte and Aricie), the incredible beauty of her language resists such an easy categorization. (4) Study of concrete presentations of “love” in literature confirms that the meaning and use of this word is marked by an irreducible pluralism. Philosophical and theological analysis of love has to come to terms with this. (5) The role of a work of art, in crystallizing archetypical emotions and situations in a way that carries authority, is to provide the middle ground between the abstractions of philosophy on the one hand and the uncontrollable diversity of the empirical on the other. Even psychologies or sociologies of love, which claim to be close to the concrete data, need to be anchored in and corrected by the special concrete vision that only great literature can bring. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Philosophies of Love)

14 pages, 237 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Philosophy of Care, Feminist Care Theory and Art Care

by Mojca Puncer

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040080 - 1 Jul 2025

Drawing on the epistemological tradition of feminist care theory and care ethics, this article analyzes Boris Groys’s contribution to the philosophy of care in order to highlight the implications of care issues in the context of art, which is an important reference point [...] Read more.

Drawing on the epistemological tradition of feminist care theory and care ethics, this article analyzes Boris Groys’s contribution to the philosophy of care in order to highlight the implications of care issues in the context of art, which is an important reference point for both his and my own investigation. After an introductory overview of the problematic and conceptualization of care, I address Groys’s position. I then provide insights into feminist care ethics and the philosophy of the body, care aesthetics and care work, before turning to art care. In a concluding synthesis, I argue for a different philosophy of care in the light of a reorientation of our understanding of care work in general and in the art world in particular. Methodologically, I combine philosophical exegesis and critical theory, referring to the feminist critique of the Western philosophical tradition as expressed in Groys’s work. I remain at the discursive level of the philosophical study of care and its dialog with the broader field of feminist theory and care ethics, including in relation to care work and art care in the contemporary museum economy. Full article

15 pages, 205 KiB

Open AccessArticle

From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age

by Bram Hennekes

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040079 - 30 Jun 2025

This paper reexamines the enduring role of esoteric traditions, as articulated by Frances Yates, in shaping the intellectual landscape of the scientific revolution and their resonance in the digital age. Challenging the linear, progress-centered narratives of traditional historiographies, it explores how esoteric principles—symbolized [...] Read more.

This paper reexamines the enduring role of esoteric traditions, as articulated by Frances Yates, in shaping the intellectual landscape of the scientific revolution and their resonance in the digital age. Challenging the linear, progress-centered narratives of traditional historiographies, it explores how esoteric principles—symbolized by transformative motifs like the Philosopher’s Stone—provided a framework for early scientific inquiry by promoting hidden knowledge, experimentation, mathematics, and interdisciplinary synthesis. This paper argues that moments of accelerated scientific and technological development magnify the visibility of esoteric structures, demonstrating how the intellectual configurations of Renaissance learned circles persist in contemporary expert domains. In particular, artificial intelligence exemplifies the revival of esoteric modes of interpretation, as AI systems—much like their Renaissance predecessors—derive authority through the identification of unseen patterns and the extrapolation of hidden truths. By bridging Renaissance esotericism with the modern information revolution, this study highlights how such traditions are not mere relics of the past but dynamic paradigms shaping the present and future, potentially culminating in new forms of digital mysticism. This study affirms that the temporal gap during periods of rapid technological change between industrial practice and formal scientific treatises reinforces esoteric knowledge structures. Full article

21 pages, 892 KiB

Open AccessArticle

A Meta-Logical Framework for the Equivalence of Syntactic and Semantic Theories

by Maria Dimarogkona, Petros Stefaneas and Nicola Angius

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040078 - 27 Jun 2025

This paper introduces a meta-logical framework—based on the theory of institutions (a categorical version of abstract model theory)—to be used as a tool for the formalization of the two main views regarding the structure of scientific theories, namely the syntactic and the semantic [...] Read more.

This paper introduces a meta-logical framework—based on the theory of institutions (a categorical version of abstract model theory)—to be used as a tool for the formalization of the two main views regarding the structure of scientific theories, namely the syntactic and the semantic views, as they have emerged from the relevant contemporary discussion. The formalization leads to a proof of the equivalence of the two views, which supports the claim that the two approaches are not really in tension. The proof is based on the Galois connection between classes of sentences and classes of models defined over some institution. First, the history of the syntactic–semantic debate is recalled and the theory of institutions formally introduced. Secondly, the notions of syntactic and semantic theories are formalized within the institution and their equivalence proved. Finally, the novelty of the proposed framework is highlighted with respect to existing formalizations. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1578 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Lack of Other Minds as the Lack of Coherence in Human–AI Interactions

by Lin Tang

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040077 - 27 Jun 2025

As artificial intelligence (AI) undergoes rapid evolutionary advancements, two enduring queries in the philosophy of language and linguistics persist: the problem of other minds and coherence. This can be further explored by the following question: is there a fundamental difference between human-AI interactions [...] Read more.

As artificial intelligence (AI) undergoes rapid evolutionary advancements, two enduring queries in the philosophy of language and linguistics persist: the problem of other minds and coherence. This can be further explored by the following question: is there a fundamental difference between human-AI interactions and human–human interactions? More precisely, does an AI partner’s ability to understand discursive coherence sufficiently approximate that of the human mind? This study frames the problem of other minds as a problem in discourse analysis, positing that linguistic exchange inherently constitutes interactions between minds, where the act of decoding discursive coherence serves as a proxy for apprehending other minds. Guided by this perspective, this study uses four criteria of discursive coherence to examine how AI partners (with a focus on ChatGPT) achieve discursive coherence, thus reflecting whether an AI partner’s ability to understand discursive coherence suffices to simulate the human mind. Through a comparison between human–human interactions and human-AI interactions, the results indicate that while ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in constructing discursive coherence along dictional, intentional, emotional, and rational coherence lines, the structural complexity and generative creativity of its coherence lines remain significantly below the threshold observed in human–human interactions. Moreover, ChatGPT’s emotional expressiveness pales in comparison to the rich, nuanced affect inherent in human–human interactions. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 769 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Injecting Observers into Computational Complexity

by Edgar Graham Daylight

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040076 - 26 Jun 2025

We characterize computer science as an interplay between two modes of reasoning: the Aristotelian (procedural) method and the Platonic (declarative) approach. We contend that Aristotelian, step-by-step thinking dominates in computer programming, while Platonic, static reasoning plays a more prominent role in computational complexity. [...] Read more.

We characterize computer science as an interplay between two modes of reasoning: the Aristotelian (procedural) method and the Platonic (declarative) approach. We contend that Aristotelian, step-by-step thinking dominates in computer programming, while Platonic, static reasoning plays a more prominent role in computational complexity. Various frameworks elegantly blend both Aristotelian and Platonic reasoning. A key example explored in this paper concerns nondeterministic polynomial time Turing machines. Beyond this interplay, we emphasize the growing importance of the ‘computing by observing’ paradigm, which posits that a single derivation tree—generated with a string-rewriting system—can yield multiple interpretations depending on the choice of the observer. Advocates of this paradigm formalize the Aristotelian activities of rewriting and observing within automata theory through a Platonic lens. This approach raises a fundamental question: How do these Aristotelian activities re-emerge when the paradigm is formulated in propositional logic? By addressing this issue, we develop a novel simulation method for nondeterministic Turing machines, particularly those bounded by polynomial time, improving upon the standard textbook approach. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semantics and Computation)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 246 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Faust and Job: The Dual Facets of Happiness

by Elias L. Khalil

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040075 - 26 Jun 2025

This paper advances two interrelated theses. As for the first thesis, it distinguishes well-being, on the one hand, from happiness, on the other hand. As for the second thesis, it differentiates between two important facets of happiness: what this paper calls “happiness-as-tranquility” and [...] Read more.

This paper advances two interrelated theses. As for the first thesis, it distinguishes well-being, on the one hand, from happiness, on the other hand. As for the second thesis, it differentiates between two important facets of happiness: what this paper calls “happiness-as-tranquility” and “happiness-as-aspiration”. Actually, in order to differentiate the two facets of happiness, we first need to distinguish happiness from well-being. This is the case because happiness, after all, is a by-product of reflecting upon and ruminating over well-being. Given it is the same well-being, how could it give rise to different facets of happiness? It can only do so if we stop conflating happiness with well-being. This entails taking to task the widely accepted concept of “subjective wellbeing”. Such concept is expressly designed to obfuscate the difference between well-being and happiness. As for the two facets of happiness (the second thesis), this paper relies upon the contrast of two famous works of literature: the story of Job and the story of Faust. The contrast uncovers the criticality of the temporal dimension in the acts of reflection upon and rumination over well-being. If people reflect on past accomplishments, they experience backward-looking happiness along the Job story—i.e., happiness-as-tranquility. If people reflect on desire, they experience forward-looking happiness along the Faust story—i.e., happiness-as-aspiration. While the two facets of happiness seem contradictory, they are indeed complementary if we recognize the temporal element when one reflects upon and ruminates over well-being. Full article

8 pages, 246 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Dialectic in Early Proclus and the Unity of the Soul

by Georgios Iliopoulos

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040074 - 24 Jun 2025

In Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades, we encounter a conception of dialectic that can be interpreted in terms of the philosopher’s reception of Socratic and Platonic ideas while at the same time being compatible with the relevant Aristotelian conception. We will try [...] Read more.

In Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades, we encounter a conception of dialectic that can be interpreted in terms of the philosopher’s reception of Socratic and Platonic ideas while at the same time being compatible with the relevant Aristotelian conception. We will try to show that this is the case to the extent that dialectic is ascribed a propaedeutic function, aimed both at promoting the search for truth and at practicing and developing persuasive skills that could prove beneficial in theoretical disputes. On this basis, it can become clear that dialectic is related to Proclus’ conception of the soul because it necessarily integrates specific characteristics of partial philosophical disciplines, while, on the other hand, it requires the active participation of the soul as a whole. This means concretely that through the practice of dialectic, the inner differentiation of the soul emerges as a necessary dimension of its coherent unity. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ancient and Medieval Theories of Soul)

8 pages, 169 KiB

Open AccessArticle

From Disciplinary Societies to Algorithmic Control: Rethinking Foucault’s Human Subject in the Digital Age

by Hayarpi Sahakyan, Ashot Gevorgyan and Arpine Malkjyan

Philosophies 2025, 10(4), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040073 - 24 Jun 2025

In the digital age, the mechanisms of power and control have evolved beyond Foucault’s disciplinary societies, giving rise to a new paradigm of algorithmic governance. This study critically reinterprets Foucault’s concept of the human subject in light of contemporary digital surveillance, big data [...] Read more.

In the digital age, the mechanisms of power and control have evolved beyond Foucault’s disciplinary societies, giving rise to a new paradigm of algorithmic governance. This study critically reinterprets Foucault’s concept of the human subject in light of contemporary digital surveillance, big data analytics, and algorithmic decision-making. The paper looks at how technology, biopolitics, and subject formation interact. It says that algorithmic control changes people’s choices in ways that have never been seen before through predictive modeling and real-time behavioral modulation. The study starts with a comparison of early Foucauldian frameworks and more recent theories of digital governance. It uses a method that combines philosophy, media studies, and political theory. The results show that while disciplinary societies relied on institutionalized norms and body regulation, algorithmic control works through data-driven anticipatory mechanisms, which make subjectivity less clear and more broken up. This shift raises ethical and ontological questions about autonomy, resistance, and the very notion of the self in a hyper-connected society. The study concludes that rethinking Foucault’s insights in the digital era is essential for understanding and contesting the pervasive influence of algorithmic power on human subjectivity. Full article

13 pages, 544 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Value of Art for Life: Critical Reflections on Creativity and the Art of Living Well

by Jill Marsden

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030072 - 19 Jun 2025

The contribution that arts can make to our health and wellbeing is widely acknowledged in public discourse, with the concept of ‘creative health’ having come to prominence in the UK in the last ten years. This paper asks about the kinds of values [...] Read more.

The contribution that arts can make to our health and wellbeing is widely acknowledged in public discourse, with the concept of ‘creative health’ having come to prominence in the UK in the last ten years. This paper asks about the kinds of values at play in contemporary appeals to creativity by exploring the value of art for life from a philosophical perspective. Drawing on Pierre Hadot’s influential work on the ancient philosophical practice of the ‘art of living’, it goes on to consider how aesthetic perception of the world functions as a kind of model for philosophical perception. Inflecting these ideas with Friedrich Nietzsche’s genealogical critique of values, the paper examines the role of art and philosophy in relation to luxury and need, and to fundamental conditions of life enhancement. Building on this distinctive application of Nietzsche’s genealogy, it develops the question of how to assess the value of art for life outside the current neoliberal narratives of wellbeing and the creative industries. In its focus on values rather than ideals, the paper makes an original contribution to current thinking and practice in creative health. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 209 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Reimagining Human–Nature Interactions Through the Lens of “Green Education Principles”

by Dimitri Jan Jakubowski

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030071 - 19 Jun 2025

The research explores three interconnected themes: philosophy, education, and ecology. It aims to be an interdisciplinary study that emphasizes the significance of the philosophy of environmental education and its practical implications. Initially, it addresses the contemporary hylomorphic production approach, followed by proposing educational [...] Read more.

The research explores three interconnected themes: philosophy, education, and ecology. It aims to be an interdisciplinary study that emphasizes the significance of the philosophy of environmental education and its practical implications. Initially, it addresses the contemporary hylomorphic production approach, followed by proposing educational solutions aimed at fostering a comprehensive understanding of the environment. This understanding includes recognizing humans as part of the environment, sharing equal rights to existence with all other life forms. The study advocates for a shift away from anthropocentrism, positioning humans in a non-privileged role within the ecosystem. It seeks to challenge long-standing notions where humans have historically placed themselves above other beings. The research is particularly inspired by the “Green Schools” in Bali, which embody a proactive educational philosophy aimed at reshaping how future generations perceive their role in production and environmental stewardship. These schools promote an educational framework that encourages students to reconnect with nature and develop sustainable practices from the ground up, moving away from exploitative and profit-driven paradigms. An example of this innovative approach is found in disciplines such as “eco-art,” where colors are derived from natural relationships rather than manufactured. The overarching goal is to cultivate a perspective that sees humans as integral components of nature, valuing it for its intrinsic worth rather than solely for its utility to humanity. Full article

21 pages, 438 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Confucian Educational Thought and Its Relevance to Contemporary Vietnamese Education

by Phuong Thi Nguyen, Khoa Ngoc Vo Nguyen, Huyen Thanh Thi Do and Quyet Thi Nguyen

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030070 - 17 Jun 2025

This study explores the contemporary relevance of Confucian educational thought in the context of Vietnam’s ongoing educational reform. It examines how foundational Confucian principles—particularly those related to moral cultivation, pedagogical methods, and the role of the learner—can be adapted to align with modern [...] Read more.

This study explores the contemporary relevance of Confucian educational thought in the context of Vietnam’s ongoing educational reform. It examines how foundational Confucian principles—particularly those related to moral cultivation, pedagogical methods, and the role of the learner—can be adapted to align with modern educational objectives. Employing a qualitative, comparative methodology, the research analyzes classical Confucian texts, historical records, and current Vietnamese education policy documents, alongside Humboldtian liberal ideals. The findings demonstrate that Confucian values such as benevolence (ren), ritual propriety (li), and exemplary moral conduct continue to offer meaningful frameworks for promoting ethical development and civic responsibility. Pedagogical techniques, including heuristic questioning, modeling, and situational teaching, remain relevant to modern goals like critical thinking and learner autonomy. While some critiques highlight limitations in Confucianism’s hierarchical structure or insufficient scientific orientation, this study also incorporates existing research showing that Confucian education—particularly across East Asia—has been positively associated with fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking. This paper distinguishes itself by proposing a hybrid model that critically adapts Confucian pedagogy in conjunction with Humboldtian liberalism to enhance both moral grounding and cognitive autonomy in Vietnamese education. The research concludes that a critically integrative approach can support Vietnam in building a culturally grounded, morally resilient, and globally competitive education system. Full article

(This article belongs to the Section Virtues)

12 pages, 229 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Familiar Unknown: On the Essence of a Musical Idea

by Claudio Rozzoni

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030069 - 13 Jun 2025

From a Platonistic perspective, ideas are eternal and unchanging, constituting the foundation of reality. An idea itself does not change; it is a principle, immutable in essence. This approach inherently establishes a hierarchy, valuing the world of ideas—understood as objective truth—over the sensory [...] Read more.

From a Platonistic perspective, ideas are eternal and unchanging, constituting the foundation of reality. An idea itself does not change; it is a principle, immutable in essence. This approach inherently establishes a hierarchy, valuing the world of ideas—understood as objective truth—over the sensory world—seen as deceptive and unstable. Against this backdrop, this paper examines the nature of musical ideas as they emerge from Marcel Proust’s work, exploring their potentially antiplatonistic implications and the philosophical insights they inspired in influential 20th-century thinkers. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Aesthetics of the Performing Arts in the Contemporary Landscape)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 682 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Gates of Consciousness: Buddhist Phenomenology of Cognition in the Abhidhamma

by Federico Divino

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030068 - 10 Jun 2025

This article aims to provide a comparative analysis between Husserl’s phenomenology and the Pāli Abhidhamma. To conduct this analysis, I will mainly draw on some books of the Abhidhamma and three works by Husserl. What emerges from this study are interesting convergences between [...] Read more.

This article aims to provide a comparative analysis between Husserl’s phenomenology and the Pāli Abhidhamma. To conduct this analysis, I will mainly draw on some books of the Abhidhamma and three works by Husserl. What emerges from this study are interesting convergences between the two systems of thought, which allow us to consider, in some respects, a true Buddhist phenomenology codified in the Abhidhamma. While not perfectly coinciding with Husserl’s phenomenology, it is similar enough to allow for a comparative study and perhaps even more. The intent is also to propose the possibilities of a true Buddhist phenomenology based on its methodology, and thus, not to see differences with Husserl’s approach as a limitation, but as something that can enrich the phenomenological methodology itself. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 221 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Speaking Truth to ‘Platonism’? Some Thoughts on Alcibiades and Erôs

by Ian Leask

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030067 - 30 May 2025

This article reads Alcibiades’ speech in Plato’s Symposium in terms of the later Foucault’s examination of ‘parrhēsia’, or ‘frank spokenness’. It contends that, in part, Alcibiades’ stress on the sheer particularity and individuality of erotic attraction—in his case, attraction to Socrates himself—acts as [...] Read more.

This article reads Alcibiades’ speech in Plato’s Symposium in terms of the later Foucault’s examination of ‘parrhēsia’, or ‘frank spokenness’. It contends that, in part, Alcibiades’ stress on the sheer particularity and individuality of erotic attraction—in his case, attraction to Socrates himself—acts as a kind of rejoinder to the ‘impersonal’ aspect of erôs highlighted in the famous speech of Socrates/Diotima. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Philosophies of Love)

5 pages, 145 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Practices of Presence: Performing Arts and Philosophical Inquiry

by Alessandro Giovanni Bertinetto and Lisa Giombini

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030066 - 29 May 2025

Over the past few decades, performance theory has flourished into a dynamic interdisciplinary discourse, drawing insights from fields such as anthropology, sociology, linguistics, psychoanalysis, political theory, cultural studies, and feminism [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Aesthetics of the Performing Arts in the Contemporary Landscape)

14 pages, 293 KiB

Open AccessArticle

From the Great Void to Moral Practice: Ira Kasoff’s Systemic Reconstruction of Chang Tsai’s Ontological Ch’i in Cosmology, Human Nature, and Sagehood

by Xiangqian Che and Yunxi Ren

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030065 - 24 May 2025

This paper examines Ira E. Kasoff’s systemic interpretation of Chang Tsai’s Neo-Confucianism in his The Thought of Chang Tsai (1020–1077), focusing on Kasoff’s reconstruction of Ch’i (qi, 气) as the ontological foundation of Chang’s philosophy. Through a trichotomous translational strategy—distinguishing [...] Read more.

This paper examines Ira E. Kasoff’s systemic interpretation of Chang Tsai’s Neo-Confucianism in his The Thought of Chang Tsai (1020–1077), focusing on Kasoff’s reconstruction of Ch’i (qi, 气) as the ontological foundation of Chang’s philosophy. Through a trichotomous translational strategy—distinguishing between “Ch’i”, “ch’i”, and “qi”—Kasoff systematically integrates Chang’s cosmology, human nature, and ethics into a coherent framework. He argues that Ch’i (e.g., Great Void, taixu, 太虚) serves as the primordial substance underlying all existence, while ch’i and qi explain the generation of phenomenal forms and moral agency. Kasoff highlights how Chang’s Ch’i-centric ontology refutes Buddhist illusionism and Daoist non-being, positing yin–yang interactions as the self-generative mechanism of the cosmos. Central to Kasoff’s analysis is Chang’s dual-nature theory of heavenly nature (天地之性, as the inherent goodness of Ch’i) and physical nature (气质之性, as the individualized limitations of ch’i); Kasoff demonstrates how Chang’s emphasis on learning (xue, 学) aims to transform nature and restore heavenly nature, culminating in sagehood as the realization of cosmic harmony. Additionally, by contrasting Chang’s Ch’i-based system with Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism, Kasoff underscores its originality—a dynamic, materialist ontology that bridges metaphysics and ethics. Full article

6 pages, 171 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Introduction: Special Issue of Philosophies on Forms of Life: The Future of the Concept

by Juliet Floyd and Sandra Laugier

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030064 - 23 May 2025

Wittgenstein’s notion of “forms of life” has received recent attention in philosophy, political theory, anthropology, and the sociology and philosophy of new medias [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wittgenstein’s “Forms of Life”: Future of the Concept)

15 pages, 235 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Aristotle’s Attainable and Attributable Phronimos

by Shane D. Drefcinski

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030063 - 21 May 2025

Unlike many philosophers in the last quarter of the 20th century, many current scholars of Aristotle are less critical of the doctrine of the reciprocity of the virtues. They recognize that the reciprocity of the virtues is grounded in Aristotle’s accounts of eudaimonia [...] Read more.

Unlike many philosophers in the last quarter of the 20th century, many current scholars of Aristotle are less critical of the doctrine of the reciprocity of the virtues. They recognize that the reciprocity of the virtues is grounded in Aristotle’s accounts of eudaimonia, moral virtue, and phronēsis. However, there remains a concern that if the phronimos must have all the moral virtues in addition to phronēsis, then the phronimos is, for actual humans, unattainable. In what follows, I will argue that Aristotle’s phronimos is intended to be attainable and attributable to actual humans. In Part 2 of the paper, I will set out some preliminary points about the “methodology” Aristotle employs in his ethics, with special attention to the need to reconcile as many of the phenomena as one can and the recognition of the inescapable imprecision of ethics. In Part 3 of the paper, I will discuss passages where Aristotle insists upon the attainability of both eudaimonia and the moral virtues. In Part 4, I will explore how moral virtue and phronēsis admit of degrees and that his distinction between heroic virtue and moral virtue supports the attainability and attributability of the latter. Finally, in Part 5, I will propose a plausible reading of the reciprocity of the virtues that supports the thesis that the phronimos is attainable. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aristotelian Ethics)

15 pages, 195 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Against Ahistorical Liberalism: The Importance of Acknowledging Past Injustices

by Deniz Özbek Özyurt

Philosophies 2025, 10(3), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10030062 - 20 May 2025

Liberal political philosophy has traditionally maintained that history is irrelevant to justice, focusing instead on the present and the future. This perspective renders liberalism largely indifferent to historical injustices, as it prioritizes abstract principles of fairness over considerations of past wrongs. However, contemporary [...] Read more.

Liberal political philosophy has traditionally maintained that history is irrelevant to justice, focusing instead on the present and the future. This perspective renders liberalism largely indifferent to historical injustices, as it prioritizes abstract principles of fairness over considerations of past wrongs. However, contemporary liberal thinkers have increasingly challenged this ahistorical stance, advocating for an approach that acknowledges historical injustices and their enduring effects. This article examines this theoretical debate, emphasizing the importance of remembrance in political philosophy. Full article

More Articles...

Submit to Philosophies Review for Philosophies

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser

Highly Accessed Articles

View More...

Latest Books

More Books and Reprints...

E-Mail Alert

News

4 July 2025
MDPI’s Newly Launched Journals in June 2025

2 July 2025
MDPI INSIGHTS: The CEO's Letter #24 - 2024 Impact Factor & CiteScore, MDPI Summits France & USA, Tu Youyou Award

3 June 2025
MDPI INSIGHTS: The CEO's Letter #23 - MDPI Summits Spain & Italy, Ei Compendex, and Editorial Independence

More News & Announcements...

Topics

Propose a Topic

Conferences

Announce Your Conference

More Conferences...

Special Issues

Propose a Special Issue

Special Issue in Philosophies

Swan Songs: Philosophical Reflections on Death, Time, and Memory in Testament Films Guest Editors: Susana Viegas, Vasco Baptista Marques
Deadline: 30 July 2025

Special Issue in Philosophies

Clinical Ethics and Philosophy Guest Editors: Mario Picozzi, Fabrizio Turoldo
Deadline: 31 July 2025

Special Issue in Philosophies

Adam Smith's Philosophy and Modern Moral Economics Guest Editor: Mark Rathbone
Deadline: 10 August 2025

Special Issue in Philosophies

Philosophy of Sport and Physical Culture Guest Editor: Jason Holt
Deadline: 1 September 2025

More Special Issues

Back to TopTop