Previous Article in Journal
The Development in Heidegger’s Thinking of Truth: From the 1930 Drafts of on the Essence of Truth to the Published 1943/49 Version
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79

1
FNWI (Faculty of Science), Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Philosophies 2025, 10(6), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10060133
Submission received: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 3 December 2025 / Published: 11 December 2025

Missing Citation

In the original publication [1], the following reference: Ref. [1] “Zajko, R. Technocratic mysticism: The new priesthood of AI developers. Sociol. Rev. 2023, 71, 15–32” was incorrect. It has been replaced with the correct reference: “Zajko, M. Conservative AI and Social Inequality: Conceptualizing Alternatives to Bias Through Social Theory. AI Soc. 2021, 36, 1047–1056”. The citation has now been inserted in Section 3.1 and should read: Furthermore, the concept of “technocratic mysticism” can be connected to Zajko’s discussion on social inequality in AI, which highlights the hierarchical structures embedded within AI research and development [20].
In the original publication [1], the following reference: Ref. [5] “Iszler, S. Automating expertise: AI’s role in scientific research and knowledge production. Sci. Public Policy 2024, 51, 243–259” was incorrect. It has been replaced with the correct reference: “Musslick, S.; Bartlett, L.K.; Chandramouli, S.H.; Dubova, M.; Gobet, F.; Griffiths, T.L.; Hullman, J.; King, R.D.; Kutz, J.N.; Lucas, C.G.; et al. Automating the Practice of Science: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2401238121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401238121”.
In the original publication [1], the following reference: Ref. [21] “Delventhal, M. AI and economic decision-making: A case study in financial forecasting. J. Econ. Perspect. 2024, 38, 102–118” was incorrect. It has been replaced with the following: “Parkes, D.C.; Wellman, M.P. Economic Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence. Science 2015, 349, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8403”.
In the original publication [1], the following reference: Ref. [33] “Soranzo, A. The cognitive mechanisms of mystical experiences: Bridging esotericism and modern neuroscience. J. Conscious. Stud. 2023, 30, 89–105” was incorrect. It has been replaced with the following: “van Elk, M.; Aleman, A. Brain Mechanisms in Religion and Spirituality: An Integrative Predictive Processing Framework. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 73, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031”.
In the original publication [1], the Ref. [2] ‘Don’t Fear AI: Used Well, It Can Empower Us All.’ was attributed to Clifford M. The correct name of the author of this article is Reid Hoffman (Hoffman R.).

Text Correction

There was an error in the original publication [1]. The sentence incorrectly read as follows:
“Soranzo’s research on mystical experiences suggests that esoteric encounters—whether religious, symbolic, or technologically induced—share cognitive characteristics that enhance their perceived significance [33].”
A correction has been made to Section 4.4, Paragraph 3.
The corrected version reads as follows:
“Research on mystical experiences indicates that esoteric encounters—whether religious, symbolic, or technologically induced—share cognitive characteristics that contribute to their felt significance, aligning with recent neuroscientific models of brain mechanisms underlying spirituality and mystical phenomena [33].”
There was an error in the original publication [1]. The sentence incorrectly cited one citation. To remove the citation, a correction has been made to Section 1, Paragraph 1.
The corrected paragraph reads as follows:
“The influence of esoteric traditions on the scientific revolution has long been overlooked due to the dominance of Whig historiography, which privileges linear narratives of progress and rationality.”
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

References

With this correction, the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hennekes, B. Correction: Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79. Philosophies 2025, 10, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10060133

AMA Style

Hennekes B. Correction: Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79. Philosophies. 2025; 10(6):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10060133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hennekes, Bram. 2025. "Correction: Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79" Philosophies 10, no. 6: 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10060133

APA Style

Hennekes, B. (2025). Correction: Hennekes, B. From the Philosopher’s Stone to AI: Epistemologies of the Renaissance and the Digital Age. Philosophies 2025, 10, 79. Philosophies, 10(6), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10060133

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop