The Logical Linguistic Legacy of Montague Grammar

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 April 2026) | Viewed by 3438

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: natural language; computer science; logic; logical grammar

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

“… But when ye come,

and all the flowers are dying,

If I am dead, as dead I well may be.

Ye'll come and find the place where I am lying,

And kneel and say an Ave there for me.”

Danny Boy,

Frederic Weatherly (1848-1929)

This Special Issue is dedicated, with gratitude and appreciation, to Richard Montague and Joachim Lambek for the elegance and beauty of their contributions to logical linguistics.

Notwithstanding the incredible achievements of statistical linguistics, in a succession of probabilistic dependencies confidence tends to 0%, whereas in a succession of logical dependencies confidence is always 100% end-to-end; this is needed in life-critical cases such as nuclear, chemical, or biological threat, security, medicine, finances, avionics, …: in fact … in fact in potentially anything.

In the context of the hegemony of statistical linguistics, the current Special Issue sends out a call for a renaissance of logical linguistics.

Richard Montague (1930-1971) was a philosopher at the University of Berkley, California, in the 1960s, who believed that it was immoral to be paid to philosophise. He amassed great wealth in real estate and met with his students while driving his expensive car about town. He died at home asphyxiated after picking up unknowns in a bar.

Richard Montague's work in logical linguistics defined a framework for compositional semantics (Montague 1970a), gave logical semantics to a significant fragment of English (Montague 1970b), and included, in particular, a treatment of quantification (Montague 1973) that had come to him while teaching natural deduction; all of this occurred at a time when the formalisation of the semantics of natural language was generally considered to be impossible.

In the preface to Chomsky (1957), Noam Chomsky makes a perfect plea for formal linguistics, but he has reneged on formal methods with disparaging remarks to the effect of “premature” or “formalisation for formalisation’s sake”.

Although Montague’s syntax was rigorous, he considered syntax to be important only as a means to semantics, and he did not trouble to formalise it.  However, in the 1950s, another mathematical linguist, Joachim Lambek (1922-2014), had proportioned the foundation of logical syntax (categorial grammar, Lambek 1958).

Lambek’s logical syntax serves to formalise the syntactic side of Montague grammar. The resulting marriage of logical syntax and logical semantics (Moortgat 1988; Morrill 1994; …) is the logical linguistic legacy of Richard Montague and Joachim Lambek.

We invite potential contributors to submit articles of up to 25 pages, including references, to this Special Issue of Philosophies, on any aspects of this logical and linguistic legacy. Contributors are requested to keep in mind that this journal integrates diverse forms of inquiry and reaches a broad audience. This includes experts on the subject matter experts and readers who are interested in the topic but may not have specialised knowledge.

In particular, an introduction to each paper should be included to present philosophical questions and problems, the solutions to which constitute the objectives of the work. Given the technical nature of the field, all potential contributors will be supplied with a text “A formal synopsis of Lambek-Montague grammar” to appear as a foreword to the Special Issue and provide a source and reference for more standard definitions, formalism, and technicalities.

Additional technicalities/formalities should be “user-friendly”, and we encourage contributors to minimise the use of additional technical terminology or undefined concepts by referring, where possible, to the context provided by this synopsis; if an explanation within the text is impractical, appropriate references to relevant literature should be provided.

References

Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

Lambek, J. (1958) `The mathematics of sentence structure’, American Mathematical Monthly, 65, 3, 154-170.

Montague, R. (1970a) `Universal grammar’, Theory, 36, 3, 373-398.

Montague, R. (1970b) `English as a formal language’ in B. Visentini et al. (eds.) Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica, Edizioni de Communita, Milan, 189-224.

Montague, R. (1973) `The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English’, in K.J.J. Hintikka et al. (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language, Synthese Library 49, Reidel, Dordrecht, 221-242.

Moortgat, M. (1988) Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus, Foris, Dordrecht.

Morrill, G. (1994) Type Logical Grammar: Categorial Logic of Signs, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.

Dr. Glyn Morrill
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • compositionality
  • focusing
  • formulas-as-types/proofs-as-programs Curry–Howard correspondence
  • intensional logic
  • lambda calculus
  • logical categorial grammar
  • logical syntax and semantics
  • parsing-as-deduction
  • proof nets
  • type logic

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 698 KB  
Article
The Logical Structure of English Quantifiers
by Edward L. Keenan
Philosophies 2026, 11(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11020026 - 26 Feb 2026
Viewed by 618
Abstract
We characterize semantically quantified subjects, type (et,t), in English and show that the Boolean closure of the generalized existential and universal quantifiers is exactly the conservative ones. We prove that all subjects are expressible as Boolean functions of Montagovian individuals and that all [...] Read more.
We characterize semantically quantified subjects, type (et,t), in English and show that the Boolean closure of the generalized existential and universal quantifiers is exactly the conservative ones. We prove that all subjects are expressible as Boolean functions of Montagovian individuals and that all mathematically extend to objects, type (eet,et). But quantified objects also include many functions that are not subject extensions, contrary to usual textbook assumptions. This is because two-place predicates (P2s) have more structure than one-place ones (P1s), so quantified objects have more to vary with/depend on. For example, we illustrate how lexical P2s in English can force their models to be infinite; P1s provably cannot. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Logical Linguistic Legacy of Montague Grammar)
27 pages, 363 KB  
Article
Richard Montague’s Turn Towards Natural Language
by Ivano Caponigro
Philosophies 2026, 11(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11020025 - 26 Feb 2026
Viewed by 868
Abstract
Richard Montague (1930–1971) is known as a founding figure of natural language semantics, i.e., the formal study of the semantics of natural languages by means of tools from mathematical logic. Less well known is that Montague maintained a strongly skeptical view on the [...] Read more.
Richard Montague (1930–1971) is known as a founding figure of natural language semantics, i.e., the formal study of the semantics of natural languages by means of tools from mathematical logic. Less well known is that Montague maintained a strongly skeptical view on the possibility of a systematic logico-philosophical analysis of natural language for most of his short life, adhering to the then-common belief that natural languages are fundamentally different from the languages of logic. Completely unknown, until now, has been how Montague underwent a 180-degree turn in the last few years of his life, in the late 1960s, and pioneered a precise formal analysis of the syntax and semantics of fragments of English in three seminal papers that established the research framework, the methodology, and the formal tools for the new field of study. I provide a precise and documented answer to when, where, and how Montague’s intellectual turn occurred and how it relates to Montague’s previous research interests and work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Logical Linguistic Legacy of Montague Grammar)
16 pages, 268 KB  
Article
A Formal Synopsis of Lambek-Montague Grammar
by Glyn Morrilll
Philosophies 2026, 11(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11010001 - 22 Dec 2025
Viewed by 698
Abstract
In the context of formal grammar we sketch a review of the smooth integration of the logical semantics of Montague with the logical syntax of Lambek: Lambek-Montague grammar. This highlights a pristine compositional architecture of categorial grammar founded on methodology of computational logic. [...] Read more.
In the context of formal grammar we sketch a review of the smooth integration of the logical semantics of Montague with the logical syntax of Lambek: Lambek-Montague grammar. This highlights a pristine compositional architecture of categorial grammar founded on methodology of computational logic. The main finding is that this approach lends itself to a further technical refinement of represention of grammar as Girard proof nets; we conclude by mentioning this prospect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Logical Linguistic Legacy of Montague Grammar)
Back to TopTop