Editor’s Choice Articles

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2514 KB  
Article
Prognostic Value of Preoperative Neutrophil Percentage to Albumin Ratio in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Qianle Cheng, Dengke Jia and Yawu Zhang
Gastroenterol. Insights 2026, 17(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent17020029 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 999
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of the peripheral blood neutrophil percentage and serum albumin ratio (NPAR) for overall survival after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma, and to construct a nomogram prediction model. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including [...] Read more.
Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of the peripheral blood neutrophil percentage and serum albumin ratio (NPAR) for overall survival after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma, and to construct a nomogram prediction model. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including patients who underwent radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from 2013 to 2023. The optimal cut-off value of the NPAR was determined by a ROC curve. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used for grouping. Cox regression was used to analyze prognostic factors and construct a nomogram. Results: A total of 207 patients were included in this study. ROC curve analysis was conducted using preoperative NPAR values, and the results showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72, the optimal cut-off value of the NPAR was 14.83, and the high NPAR (≥14.83) group had better overall survival and disease-free survival. Multivariable analysis showed that an NPAR ≥ 14.83, tumor diameter > 5 cm, multiple tumors, and low tumor differentiation were independent risk factors for overall survival. The C-index of the nomogram for overall survival (OS) was 0.77, indicating a moderate but clinically acceptable discriminative ability for predicting overall survival. Conclusions: Preoperative NPAR is an effective prognostic marker, and the established nomogram can accurately predict the overall survival of patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Liver)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1135 KB  
Review
Clostridioides difficile: Modern Approaches in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention, Emerging Perspectives and Health Economics
by Nikoletta T. Karavasili, Konstantinos H. Katsanos, Ioanna Nefeli Mastorogianni, Maria Veatriki Christodoulou, Georgios Manomenidis, Dimitrios Kosmidis, Anastasios Tzenalis, Albani Eleni, Stavroula Tsiara and Dimitrios K. Christodoulou
Gastroenterol. Insights 2026, 17(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent17020025 - 13 Apr 2026
Viewed by 2534
Abstract
Introduction: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and healthcare-associated infections, with rising global incidence and severity due to the emergence of hypervirulent strains. Methods: This review synthesizes recent literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic [...] Read more.
Introduction: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and healthcare-associated infections, with rising global incidence and severity due to the emergence of hypervirulent strains. Methods: This review synthesizes recent literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies related to C. difficile infection (CDI). Sources were selected from peer-reviewed journals, clinical guidelines, and emerging research between 2020 and 2025. Results: Advances in molecular diagnostics have improved the accuracy and speed of CDI detection. New therapeutic options such as fidaxomicin offer narrower-spectrum antibiotic activity with reduced recurrence rates. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a highly effective option for recurrent CDI. Preventive efforts, including antibiotic stewardship programs and early-phase vaccine trials, show potential in reducing infection rates. Discussion: The management of CDI is evolving rapidly with the integration of precision diagnostics, targeted therapies, and microbiome-based interventions. Preventive strategies are critical, particularly in healthcare settings where C. difficile persists in the environment. Continued research and coordinated public health efforts are essential to reduce disease burden, improve outcomes, and limit transmission. Conclusions: Clostridioides difficile infections remain a major healthcare challenge with rising incidence and recurrent cases. Fidaxomicin has become the preferred first-line therapy. Microbiota-based therapies (like FMT, Rebyota, and Vowst) and Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein (LBP) are highly effective for recurrent CDI prevention. Diagnostic strategies have improved with multi-step testing, enhancing accuracy and reducing overtreatment. Future focus lies in vaccines, targeted antimicrobials, and stricter prevention through antibiotic stewardship and hygiene. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 257 KB  
Article
Assessing Intestinal Inflammation: A Comparison of Immunochromatographic Tests and ELISA for Fecal Calprotectin Detection
by Hassan Ali, Milena Peruhova, Antoaneta Mihova, Georgi V. Vasilev and Tsvetelina Velikova
Gastroenterol. Insights 2026, 17(2), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent17020021 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1789
Abstract
Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a well-established, non-invasive biomarker of intestinal inflammation and is widely used to differentiate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from functional gastrointestinal disorders. Although enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) remain the reference method, rapid immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) offer important operational [...] Read more.
Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a well-established, non-invasive biomarker of intestinal inflammation and is widely used to differentiate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from functional gastrointestinal disorders. Although enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) remain the reference method, rapid immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) offer important operational advantages for point-of-care (POC) diagnostics. However, variability in analytical performance among available ICTs remains a concern. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CerTest Calprotectin one-step card (CerTest Biotec S.L., Zaragoza, Spain) in comparison with the Actim® Calprotectin lateral flow assay and the reference Calprest® ELISA (Eurospital Diagnostics, Italy). Methods: A total of 128 fresh stool samples from patients clinically suspected of IBD were analyzed in parallel using all three assays. For the reference ELISA (Calprest®), a cutoff value of >40 µg/g was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For discrepant results between assays, a cutoff of 200 ng/mL (equivalent to 200 µg hCp/g stool) was employed for ELISA Calprest® to resolve inconsistencies. The results of the lateral flow assays (CerTest® Calprotectin ICT and Actim® Calprotectin) were interpreted using their respective manufacturer-recommended thresholds. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using ELISA as the reference standard. Agreement between methods was assessed using Cohen’s κ coefficient. Results: Using ELISA, 47 of 128 samples (36.7%) exceeded the 40 µg/g cutoff. Compared with the Actim® assay, the CerTest card demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.0% (95% CI: 75.7–95.5), a specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 95.4–100), and a strong agreement (κ = 0.90). When compared with ELISA, the CerTest assay showed a sensitivity of 87.2% (95% CI: 74.3–95.2), a specificity of 96.3% (95% CI: 89.6–99.2), a PPV of 93.2%, an NPV of 93.2%, and a strong agreement (κ = 0.85). Conclusions: The CerTest Calprotectin one-step card provides a rapid and reliable detection of fecal calprotectin, demonstrating a high sensitivity and specificity that are comparable to both other lateral flow assays and the ELISA reference method. These findings support the use of rapid immunochromatographic testing as a valuable tool for preliminary screening and clinical decision-making in patients suspected of IBD, while acknowledging that histology remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunological Aspects of Gastrointestinal Diseases)
Back to TopTop