Background: Adolescence is a sensitive period for psychological, academic, and social development, and sports participation has been described as a potential protective factor for academic performance and psychological well-being. However, limited research has examined the combined influence of sports involvement, sport type, and
[...] Read more.
Background: Adolescence is a sensitive period for psychological, academic, and social development, and sports participation has been described as a potential protective factor for academic performance and psychological well-being. However, limited research has examined the combined influence of sports involvement, sport type, and family background on adolescents’ academic and psychological outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the associations between organized sport participation, sport type (football vs. judo), psychological well-being, psychosomatic symptoms, academic performance, and family socioeconomic background among adolescent boys. Methods: The sample consisted of 52 boys aged 11–14 years from a rural school, divided into football players (
n = 13), judo athletes (
n = 13), non-athletes (
n = 13), and a contextual subgroup of students with special educational needs (SEN;
n = 13), with the latter included for exploratory purposes only. Data included school-record-based academic performance and validated self-report measures of life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, psychosomatic complaints, perceived physical fitness, and socioeconomic background. Results: Athletes demonstrated significantly higher academic achievement than non-athletes in overall grade point average (
p < 0.001), mathematics (
p < 0.001), Romanian (
p < 0.001), English (
p = 0.03), and Hungarian (
p < 0.001). They also reported higher life satisfaction (
p < 0.001) but simultaneously showed slightly elevated depressive symptom scores (
p < 0.001), indicating a paradoxical pattern of concurrent psychosocial benefits and psychological strain. Parental education (
p < 0.001), parental occupational status (
p = 0.01), and fathers’ occupational position (
p = 0.02) were significantly higher among athletes’ families. Perceived physical fitness was also rated higher by athletes (
p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in body mass index, family structure, or most psychosomatic symptoms. Conclusions: Sport participation was associated with more favorable academic and psychological indicators, yet also with elevated depressive symptoms, highlighting the dual nature of organized sport during adolescence. Future research should apply longitudinal designs, include female participants, and incorporate objective indicators of training load.
Full article